Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Masen Morgan Eng401 Final
Masen Morgan Eng401 Final
Masen Morgan Eng401 Final
MasenMorgan
JimByrne
ENG401-MetamodernismandtheTwenty-FirstCenturyNovel
December11,2023
MetamodernisminMyth:TheSilenceoftheGirls,SemioticstheOralTradition,Misogynyand
HomericRetellings
Whatvaluedoancientstoriesholdintoday’sworld?Intheever-evolvingfieldof
storytelling,theinventionofwritingbytheSumeriansnearlysixmillenniaagosetanew
standardfortellingstories.Throughouthistory,fromtheSumeriancuneiformdebtreceiptsto
Athenianplaysandmodernnovels,writinghasconsistentlycarriedprofoundsignificancefor
bothauthorsandaudiences.Overthemillennia,theevolutionofwritingstyleshasgivenriseto
literarymovementsanddiversestylesinliterature.Metamodernismisamodernliteraryand
artisticmovementthatoftencombineselementsofbothpostmodernismandmodernism.Itseeks
tobridgethegapbetweenmodernistsincerityandpostmodernistirony.Combiningthiswith
ancientGreekmythscanresultinnarrativesthatblendtheancientandthecontemporary.Inthis
paper,Iwillexplorethemanifestationofmetamodernistthoughtwithincontemporaryretellings
ofHomericmyths,withafocusonthenovelTheSilenceoftheGirlsbyPatBarker.By
examiningtheintersectionoftheoraltradition,grandnarratives,andtheinherentchallenges
posedbymisogynisticnarratives,weunveilhowmetamodernistelementsareemployedto
navigatethecomplexitiesofretellingancientstoriesinamoderncontext.Throughananalysisof
thenovel'snarrativestructure,linguisticchoices,andengagementwithoraltraditions,thispaper
seekstouncoverthewaysinwhichmetamodernismservesasalensforreinterpretingand
Morgan2
challengingtraditionalmyths,addressingissuesofsilence,agency,andgenderdynamicswithin
thecontextofHomericretellings.
Theinventionofwritingmarkedaprofoundshiftinthewaystorieswereconveyed,
transformingtheartofstorytellingfromanoraltraditiontoaliterateone.PuraNietoHernandez,
aprofessorofclassicsatBrownUniversity,definesoralandliteratetobeopposites,sayingthat
“‘Oral’istheconceptionthatunderliesadiscourse,andopposeitnottowrittenbutto‘literate’”
(Hernandez30).Inthepreliterateera,narrativesweretransmittedorally,relyingonthecollective
memoryandskillfulorationofstorytellers.Withthecreationofwriting,storiescouldbe
inscribedondurablemediumslikeclaytablets,papyrus,orparchment,enablingtheir
preservationanddisseminationacrosstimeandspace.Beforethis,asisthecasewithGreek
mythologyasawhole,storieshadtheabilitytochangeandshiftastheyweretold,likean
ancientgameoftelephone.Theinventionofwritingthusnotonlyalteredthemodeof
storytellingbutalsoexpandedaccesstonarratives,shapingtheculturallandscapeandliterature
wehavetoday.
Hernandezalsoreflectsonthedifferentculturalconnotationsbetweenoralandliterate
texts.Sheexplainshow“Wetendtoconsidertextsthatareoraltotheirconceptionascrudeor
primitive…or,inanothercontext,as‘archaic’simplybecauseweuseourownsenseand
conceptionofwritingasanorm”(Hernandez30).Thepermanenceofwrittenrecords
encouragedcarefulconsiderationoflanguageandcultivatedasenseoforderandsophistication
incommunication.Incontrast,oraltexts,beingsubjecttothefluidityofspokenlanguageand
reliantonthememoryandimprovisationofstorytellers,wereoftenviewedasmoreproneto
embellishments,inaccuracies,andalackofdecorum.Thetransitionfromoraltoliterate
traditionscarriedwithitanimplicitbiasthatequatedthewrittenwordwithahigherlevelof
Morgan3
intellectualandculturalrefinement,whileoraltraditionswereunfairlystereotypedasmore
primitiveoruncivilized.
Thisrelatestometamodernism,asmetamodernisttextstendtobreaktraditionalnarrative
forms.Asasuccessortopostmodernism,thereisanoscillationbetweensincerityandirony,
unliketheabsolutetruthnarrativeofpostmodernismandthechaosthatismodernism.The
SilenceoftheGirlsfitsthistrendofmetamodernism’sbreakinformthroughthemixtureofa
first-personperspectivethatswitchesbetweenthepastandpresentofBriseis’slifewithadded
tidbitsofherinternaldialogueinitalics.Inonesceneinparticular,weseethisuseofitalicsto
showaprayerBriseismakesforhercaptorstosuffer:
“Asthepriest’sgreatprayerforvengeancemountedtotheskies,Ifoundmyselfpraying
withhim.
Lordofmice,hearme!
Lordofthesilverbow,hearme!
Lordwhosearrowsstrikefromafar,hearme!
Until,finally,theforbiddenwordseruptingfrommymouthlikebloodorbile:
Godofplague,hearme!”(Barker63)
ThismomentisaturningpointforBriseis,andlikewise,theformandstructureofthenovel
changetoemphasizeitsimportance.Briseis,agirlwhohadbeenstolenfromherhomeandhad
everythingshehadtakenfromher,wasinthismomentgoingtofightagainsthercaptorsin
whateverwayshecould,inthiscasebyinvokingthevengeanceofthegodofplaguetocursethe
Greekheroeswhohadturnedherlifeupsidedown.
AnimportantaspectofHomer’sIliadistheuseofparanarrativestopaintafullpictureof
theeventsofthefinalyearoftheTrojanWar.Hernandezreferencesparanarratives,using
Morgan4
Alden’sdefinitionthatdescribesthemas"secondarynarrativesrelatedbythepoet'scharacters
andalsotheinterludesrelatedinthevoiceofthepoethimselfwhichdonotadvancetheprogress
ofthemainnarrative"(Hernandez47).Thereadermust“extractsomeinformationaboutthe
charactersfromotherspeakersinthetext,fromthesituationsinwhichtheyareplaced,andalso
fromtheepithetsandpatronymicsthatoftenaccompanytheirnames”(Hernandez32-33).In
orderforareadertofullyunderstandthecontentsofTheIliad,theyarerequiredtobeatleast
somewhatfamiliarwiththerestoftheTrojanCycle,thedozensofstoriesandplaysthatare
associatedwithitthattellthestoriesofAgamemnonandClytemnestra,MenelausandHelen,
AchillesandPatroclus,manyotherheroesandfools,aswellasthegodswhothemselveshavea
mainroleinthenarrative.Hernandezsays“Thereisnowayoftelling...whetherHomerrefers
heretocommonstoriesorparticularpoems.Thenumberofthesereferences,however,does
showhisconcerntoplacehisownworkinacontextofotherepicsandtogiveitasenseof
reachingouttotherestofthelegendaryworld”(Hernandez35).Metamodernismoftenuses
overarching,all-encompassingstoriesorideologiestoattempttomakesenseoftheworld,
knownbytheterm‘grandnarratives.’Inthiscase,theTrojanCycleservesasanoverallgrand
narrativethatTheIliadfitsinto,servingasthefinalyearoftheten-yearconflictbetweenthe
GreeksandTrojans.Theparanarrativesnecessaryforthefullunderstandingofthesegrand
narrativesserveassecondarynarrativesthataddlayerstothestory,mainlythroughthe
characterizationofthemainplayersofthewar,mainlythegodsandheroes.Thisseriesof
paranarrativesandgrandnarrativesiscontinuedthroughtothepresent,throughmodern
retellingsoftheTrojanCycleandHomer’sstories,suchasTheSilenceoftheGirls.Throughthis
text,PatBarkerreinterpretsthestoryofHomer,furtherplacingimportanceonthesenarratives,
andcontinuingtostringthewebconnectionsevenmoreintricately.
Morgan5
ModernretellingsofancientGreekstoriesoftenserveasaplatformforreexaminingand
interpretingmisogynyembeddedintheoriginalnarratives.Contemporaryauthors,suchasPat
Barker,engagewithclassicalmythstochallengeandsubverttraditionalgenderdynamics.
Throughtheirretellings,theseauthorsoffernuancedperspectives,givingagencyandvoiceto
silencedfemalecharacters,thusfosteringacriticaldialogueonthehistoricalandcultural
implicationsofmisogynywithinthecontextofancientGreekmythology.Forexample,inthe
originalIliadwrittenbyHomer,Briseisspeaksonlyonce,whenshemournstheuntimelydeath
ofPatroclus(Homer19.282-300).Ingreatcontrast,BarkerdeeplydevelopsBriseisasnotonlya
prizeforAchillestowinandlose,butafully-fledgedhumanbeingwiththoughts,fears,and
emotions.ThefirstonehundredpagesofTheSilenceoftheGirls,alsoknownas‘PartOne,’
takesplaceentirelybeforethestartofTheIliadasHomerwroteit.Thesepagesdepictthelifeof
BriseisbeforeLyrnessus,herhomecity,issacked,herfamilyiskilled,andthewomenare
enslavedtobeconcubinesfortheGreekheroeswhocommittedthoseatrocities.Barkershows
Briseisasshefirstexperiencesthehorrorsofhernewexistence,aswellasthepersonBriseis
becomesasshebecomesdesensitizedtotheseatrocities,andwhenherlifeisonceagain
uprootedwhensheisreclaimedbyAgamemnon.Homer,however,beginshisnarrativefarlater
thanthis,afterBriseisistakenbyAgamemnonandAchillesswearsnottofightinthewardueto
thisslight.ThefirstwordsofHomer’sIliadare“Wrath,goddess,singofAchillesPēleus’sson’s
calamitouswrath,whichhittheAchaianswithcountlessills—”(Homer1.1-2).Inthisactalone,
itiscleartoseethatBarkeriscenteringhernovelnotonlyonthecontentsofTheIliadfromthe
perspectiveofBriseis,thewomanatthecenteroftheconflict,butbyrehumanizingBriseisand
herexperiencesasavictimofwarandmen.
Morgan6
MelissaMarturano,whohasexperienceasbothaprofessorofclassicsandasahigh
schoolteacherofclassicalcivilization,explicitlyteachesancienthistoryandmythologythrough
afeministlens.ThroughtheexampleofPolyphemusandGalatea,sheintroducesherstudentsto
theideaoftoxicmasculinityinclassicalliterature,relatingPolyphemustothetypical“niceguy”
archetypefrommoderntimes(Marturano147).ThissentimentisechoedinDeborahRoss’
article“Homer’sOdyssey:‘TheIliad’sWife’(ca.700B.C.E.),”whichfocusesonhowwomen
wereusedonlyasthespoilsofwarinsteadofashumanswithinherentvalue:“Thelifeofa
Greekepicherocouldbesaidtoconsistofgoingouttogettreasure,throughconquestorgift,
andcomingbackhometoaddittohispile.TheIliadisastoryofgoingout;theOdyssey,of
comingback”(Ross218).TheSilenceoftheGirlsexemplifiesthesethemesofsearchingfora
feministlensinastoryfilledwithmaleviolence.Ratherthanshyingawayfromthe
dehumanizationofBriseisandtheotherTrojanwomen,Barkerdirectlycentersitinher
narrative:“Ilaythere,hatinghim,thoughofcoursehewasn’tdoinganythinghedidn’thavea
perfectrighttodo.Ifhisprizeofhonourhadbeenthearmourofagreatlordhewouldn’thave
restedtillhe’dtrieditout:liftedtheshield,pickedupthesword,assesseditslengthandweight,
slasheditafewtimesthroughtheair.That’swhathedidtome.Hetriedmeout”(Barker31).
Barkerconnectsfightingtothemaleego,andtheinsistenceonacquiringtheshiniest,prettiest
newtoy.Inherrefusaltosweepthisvictimizationandbrutalization,Barker’sinterpretationof
TheIliadisabletohitevenclosertohometheculturalnormsofancientGreeknationalism,war
prizes,andhonor.Thestrongestwarriorsgetthebestprizes,themostcraftilymadeweapons,and
themostbeautifulconcubines.ThisevenfurtherexplainstheconflictofTheIliad:why
Agamemnon’sreclamationofBriseis,histheftofAchilles’warprize,wasatruespitintheface
ofnotonlyAchillesbutallwarriorsofGreece.InTheSilenceoftheGirls,Achillesattemptsto
Morgan7
assertthehonorhehasearnedinbattle,claimingthatthathasearnedhimownershipover
Briseis:“Ifoughtforthatgirl,”hesaid.“She’smyprize,awardedbythearmyinrecognitionof
myservices.Youhavenorighttotakeher.Butit’salwaysthesame;Ibearthebruntofthe
fightingandyougetthelion’sshareofeverythingwetake.AllIeverget’sascrap,a
trifle…whileyousitthereonyourfatarse‘guardingtheships.’(Barker89).Inthisway,Barker
isabletomasterfullyweavemodernfeministthoughtwiththecultureofGreecefromantiquity,
reinterpretingitformodernaudiences.
Barker,throughoutthenovel,juxtaposestheideasofbeautyandcrueltytoexpressher
thoughtsonthemisogynyofancientGreeceandTheIliad,infusingtheancientstorywith
modernfeministthought.Thenovel,itself,beginswiththisideabyincludinganepigraph
quotingPhilipRoth:
“YouknowhowEuropeanliteraturebegins?”he’dask,aftertakingtherollatthefirst
classmeeting.“Withaquarrel.AllofEuropeanliteraturespringsfromafight.”Andthen
hepickeduphiscopyofTheIliadandreadtotheclasstheopeninglines.“‘Divine
Muse,singoftheruinouswrathofAchilles…Beginwheretheyfirstquarrelled,
Agamemnon,theKingofmen,andgreatAchilles.’Andwhataretheyquarrellingabout,
thesetwoviolent,mightysouls?It’sasbasicasabarroombrawl.Theyarequarrelling
overawoman.Agirl,really.Agirlstolenfromherfather.Agirlabductedinawar.”
—TheHumanStain,PhilipRoth(BarkerEpigraph).
ThemostpopularlinefromTheIliadisthefirst,asmentionedabove,thatevokesthewrathof
Achilles.Thefirstthingtheaudiencehearsfromthiscycleisviolenceandrage,therageofa
manscorned.Barker,however,choosestofocusonthefemaleperspectiveofthisstory,choosing
tocentertheexperiencesofwomenwhohavepreviouslybeenpushedtothesideorfully
Morgan8
excludedfromthenarrative.Thisactionisadirectmoveagainsttheprevalenceoftoxic
masculinityandmisogynyinthefieldofclassicswhichtendstodeifytheviolenceofmenunder
theguiseofheroism.SimilartoTheIliad,BarkeropensTheSilenceoftheGirlswithareference
toAchilles,choosingtoemphasizehisimpactonthepeoplehekilledandvictimizedratherthan
avaguedescriptionofhisviolence:“GreatAchilles.BrilliantAchilles,shiningAchilles,godlike
Achilles…Howtheepithetspileup.Wenevercalledhimanyofthosethings;wecalledhim‘the
butcher.’”(Barker3).BarkercontinuesthisdepictionofAchilles’brutalitywhenhebreaches
LyrnessusandbeginstheslaughterofBriseis’family,
“Isawmybrotherlyingonthegroundwrigglinglikeastuckpig.Andatthatmoment
Achilles,asifhehadallthetimeintheworld,turnedhisheadandglancedupatthe
tower….Then,withakindoffastidiousprecision…heputhisfootonmybrother’sneck
andpulledthespearout.Bloodspurtedfromthewound,mybrotherstruggledforafull
minutetogoonbreathing,andthenlaystill.Isawmyfather’ssworddropfromhis
looseninggrip.
Achilleshadalreadymovedon,tothenextman,andthenext.Hekilledsixtymenthat
day”(Barker19).
‘GodlikeAchilles’hadtheabilitytoslaughtersixtymen,includingyoungboysattemptingto
savetheirfamilies,andrevelinruthlessness.ToraiseMarturano’sargument,isthisruthlessness
whatthemodern-daywouldrefertoas‘toxicmasculinity?’AncientGreekcultureglorified
aggression,dominance,andphysicalprowessinbattle.Theidealizedimageofthewarrior,
epitomizedbyfigureslikeAchilles,promotedahyper-masculineethosthatvalorizedviolenceas
ameansofassertingdominanceandprowess.However,Barker’stextplacesviolenceastheroot
oftheissue.Itislessapushagainsttoxicmasculinityandmoreagainstviolentmasculinity.By
Morgan9
modernstandards,thiscontributedtothenormalizationoftoxicmasculinity,fosteringan
environmentwhereaggression,power,andcontrolwereprioritizedoveremotionalexpression
andempathy,perpetuatingharmfulstereotypesthathaveenduredovertime.
ThisrepresentationofAchillesastheepitomeofancientGreekmasculinityismeantto
juxtaposehisoverwhelmingbeauty.InonesceneofTheSilenceoftheGirls,Barkerdepicts
Achillesplayingthelyrebeforebed,playingsongsof“deathlessglory,heroesdyingonthe
battlefield,or(ratherlessoften)returninghomeintriumph”(Barker56). Barkercontinuesthis
scene,showingBriseis’responseashisvictim,“Atthattime,hewasprobablythemostbeautiful
manalive,ashewascertainlythemostviolent,butthat’stheproblem.Howdoyouseparatea
tiger’sbeautyfromitsferocity?Oracheetah’selegancefromthespeedofitsattack?Achilles
waslikethat—thebeautyandtheterrorweretwosidesofasinglecoin”(Barker56).Ifbeauty
andviolencearemeanttocoincide,asthe‘twosides’ofacoin,itmakessensethatBriseissays
“‘Iwatchedhim’Iverynearlyadded‘likeahawk,’...Butitwasnothinglikethat.Achilleswas
thehawk.Iwashisslavetodowhathelikedwith;Iwascompletelyinhispower.Ifhe’dwoken
uponemorninganddecidedtobeatmetodeath,nobodywouldhaveintervened.Oh,Iwatched
himallright,Iwatchedhimlikeamouse”(Barker39).Thisdichotomyencouragesa
reevaluationoftraditionalnarrativesthatglorifysuchviolentqualities,offeringametamodern
perspectivethatinvitescriticalreflectiononthecomplexitiesofheroismandtheintertwining
natureofbeautyandbrutalityinthecontextofancientGreekmythology.
Theothermalefigureseenin‘PartOne’ofTheSilenceoftheGirlsisPatroclus,
Achilles’brother-in-armsandtrustedfriend.PatroclusisvisiblylessbeautifulthanAchilles,
havingaseverelybrokennose,butheisimmediatelymuchwarmerandkindertoBriseisthan
Achilles,whoviolentlysexuallyassaultsherupontheirfirstnighttogether(Barker,24).Laterin
Morgan10
thenovel,thiskindnessisexplainedwhenPatroclus’historyisrevealed:hehadkilledoneofhis
friendswhenhewasachildandwassenttoliveinAchilles’householdasaservantand
companiontotheyoungboy,explainingtoBriseisthatheknows“whatit’sliketolose
everythingandbehandedtoAchillesasatoy”(Barker71).Hisrepeatedkindnessandempathy
towardsBriseisleadstosomesortoffriendshipandsharedunderstandingbetweenthem.In
Homer’sIliad,itisonlyatPatroclus’deaththatBriseisspeaks,lamentingthelossofherdear
friend,referringtohimas“Patroklos,...themanmostdeartomyheart”(Homer19.283).
Patroclus,withhisbrokennoseandahistorymarredbytragedy,emergesasabeaconofkindness
inthenovel,challengingconventionalnotionsofbeautyandshowcasingthetransformative
powerofcompassioninforgingmeaningfulconnections.
TheexplorationofmetamodernismwithincontemporaryretellingsofHomericmyths,
particularlyinTheSilenceoftheGirlsbyPatBarker,servesasalensthroughwhichtocritically
engagewiththecomplexissuesofsemiotics,theoraltradition,misogyny,andthereimaginingof
ancientnarratives.ThemetamodernistelementsemployedbyBarker,suchasthebreakingof
traditionalnarrativeform,emphasizethedynamictensionbetweensincerityandirony,allowing
foranuancedreinterpretationofclassicalmyths.Metamodernistworksdeconstructtraditional
narratives,justasancientGreekmythsweredeconstructedandreinterpretedbydifferentauthors
andthinkersthroughouthistory.Additionally,theexistenceofTheIliadasanexampleofthe
historicaltransitionfromoraltoliteratetraditionshighlightsthebiasassociatedwiththe
perceivedcivilityofwrittentextscomparedtotheperceivedbarbarismoforaltraditions.The
studyfurtherconnectsthesehistoricalshiftstometamodernistliterature'sinclinationtochallenge
andreshapegrandnarratives,particularlythoseembeddedinancientGreekstories.Barker's
nuancedportrayalofBriseisandtheexplorationoftoxicmasculinitycontributetoafeminist
Morgan11
reevaluationofclassicalliterature,urgingreaderstoreflectontheenduringimpactofancient
storiesintoday'sworldandpromptingacriticalexaminationofculturalnormssurrounding
genderandviolence.Ultimately,themetamodernistlensoffersapowerfultoolfornavigatingthe
complexitiesofretellingancientstoriesinamoderncontext,invitingreaderstoreconsiderthe
narrativesthatshapeourunderstandingofthepastandpresent.
Morgan12
WorksCited
Barker,Pat.TheSilenceoftheGirls.PenguinBooks,2018.
Hernández,PuraNieto.“ReadingHomerinthe21stCentury.”CollegeLiterature,vol.34,no.2,
2007,pp.29–54.JSTOR,http://www.jstor.org/stable/25115420.
Homer.TheIliad:ANewTranslationbyPeterGreen,UniversityofCaliforniaPress,2015.
ProQuestEbookCentral,
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/wheatonma-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1882108.
Marturano,Melissa.“Ovid,FeministPedagogy,ToxicManhood,andtheSecondarySchool
Classroom.”TheClassicalOutlook,vol.95,no.4,2020,pp.147–51.JSTOR,
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26983714.
Ross,Deborah.“‘Homer’sOdyssey:“TheIliad’sWife”(ca.700B.C.E.).’”inWomenin
Literature:AGuidetoGenderIssues,Fisher,Jerilyn,etal.GreenwoodPress,Westport,
CT,2003,pp.218–220.