Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Fashion and Popular Print in Early Modern England Depicting Dress in Black Letter Ballads First Edition Backhouse Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Fashion and Popular Print in Early Modern England Depicting Dress in Black Letter Ballads First Edition Backhouse Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-ashgate-research-companion-
to-popular-culture-in-early-modern-england-andrew-hadfield/
https://textbookfull.com/product/dressed-in-dreams-a-black-girl-
s-love-letter-to-the-power-of-fashion-first-edition-ford/
https://textbookfull.com/product/fashion-in-european-art-dress-
and-identity-politics-and-the-body-1775-1925-first-edition-young/
https://textbookfull.com/product/angels-in-early-medieval-
england-first-edition-sowerby/
Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional
Thought Daniel Lee
https://textbookfull.com/product/popular-sovereignty-in-early-
modern-constitutional-thought-daniel-lee/
https://textbookfull.com/product/witchcraft-witch-hunting-and-
politics-in-early-modern-england-1st-edition-elmer/
https://textbookfull.com/product/elizabeth-i-in-writing-language-
power-and-representation-in-early-modern-england-donatella-
montini/
https://textbookfull.com/product/conversion-narratives-in-early-
modern-england-tales-of-turning-abigail-shinn/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-practice-of-citizenship-
black-politics-and-print-culture-in-the-early-united-states-
derrick-r-spires/
i
‘Clare Backhouse’s Fashion and Popular Print in Early Modern England transforms the
way we think about fashion and popular culture in the sixteenth and sev-
enteenth centuries. Single-sheet ballads, illustrated with woodcuts, offered
ordinary English men and women unmatched access to the output of the
new printing presses. A cheap price and accessible content ensured them
a wide audience. The words of the ballads remain familiar today as a key
source for English folk song, but Clare Backhouse shows that, for those who
bought, read and sung them, their illustrations were equally important. In an
era when the modern fashion system was emerging, the ballads’ woodcuts
disseminated clothing fashions to ordinary people. They did so by drawing
on the rapidly changing conventions of courtly portrait painting, in the pro-
cess transmitting fashion in art as well as fashion in dress. This is a pathbreak-
ing book. It bridges the gaps between high art and everyday life and between
image and text, while obliging us to rethink the origins of popular fashion.’
– John Styles, University of Hertfordshire and
Victoria and Albert Museum
Fashion and
Popular Print in
Early Modern
England
Depicting Dress in Black-Letter Ballads
Clare Backhouse
iv
Published in 2017 by
I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd
London • New York
www.ibtauris.com
The right of Clare Backhouse to be identified as the author of this work has
been asserted by the author in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any
part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission
of the publisher.
Every attempt has been made to gain permission for the use of the images in
this book. Any omissions will be rectified in future editions.
A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library
A full CIP record is available from the Library of Congress
CONTENTS
List of Illustrations vi
Citations and Abbreviations x
Introduction 1
1 Commodities of Print and Dress 9
2 Ballad Comment on Dress 43
3 Ballad Pictures: Conventions of Clothes and the Body 84
4 Classical Ideals and Satirical Deviations, Part I: Masculinity,
Fashion and the Defence of the Nation 126
5 Classical Ideals and Satirical Deviations, Part II: Female Bodies,
Feminine Fashions and Economic Benefits 158
Epilogue 191
Notes 203
Select Bibliography 226
Acknowledgements 245
Index of Ballad Titles 248
Index 250
vi
ILLUSTRATIONS
2.6 Merry Tom of All Trades, 1658–64, Wood E 25(47). The Bodleian
Library, University of Oxford. 63
2.7 L[awrence] P[rice], Round Boyes Indeed, 1632, PB 1.442–3. By
permission of the Pepys Library, Magdalene College, Cambridge. 65
2.8 The Coblers New Prophesie, 1678–80, PB 4.230. By permission of
the Pepys Library, Magdalene College, Cambridge. 67
2.9 The War-Like Taylor, 1681–4, PB 4.282. By permission of the
Pepys Library, Magdalene College, Cambridge. 69
2.10 A Warning and Good Counsel to the Weavers, 1688, PB 4.356. By
permission of the Pepys Library, Magdalene College, Cambridge. 74
2.11 The Weavers Request, 1685–8, PB 4.355. By permission of the
Pepys Library, Magdalene College, Cambridge. 76
3.1a First page of the Book of Esdras from Miles Coverdale’s
translation of the Bible, Marburg?, 1535. © The British
Library Board. 90
3.1b The second part of The Historie of the Prophet Ionas, c.1620, PB
1.28–9. By permission of the Pepys Library, Magdalene
College, Cambridge. 91
3.2a Michael Drayton, Poly-Olbion, ed. John Selden 1612; 1622, p. 4.
The Bodleian Library, University of Oxford. 92
3.2b The second part of Robert Johnson, The Good Shepheards Sorrow
for the Death Ef [sic] His Beloued Sonne, 1612, PB 1.352–3. By
permission of the Pepys Library, Magdalene College, Cambridge. 93
3.3a Frontispiece to Haec Vir, or the Womanish Man, 1620. © The British
Library Board. 96
3.3b The first part of A Most Delicate, Pleasant, Amorous, New Song, 1625,
PB 1.254–5. By permission of the Pepys Library, Magdalene
College, Cambridge. 97
3.4 Sir Walter Rauleigh His Lamentation, 1618, PB 1.110–11. By
permission of the Pepys Library, Magdalene College,
Cambridge. 99
3.5 Any Thing for a Quiet Life, c.1620, PB 1.378–9. By permission of
the Pepys Library, Magdalene College, Cambridge. 100
3.6 A Batchelers Resolution, 1629, PB 1.232–3r. By permission of the
Pepys Library, Magdalene College, Cambridge. 101
3.7 The Young-Womans Complaint, c.1655–60, Wood E 25(37). The
Bodleian Library, University of Oxford. 102
3.8 The Famous Flower of Serving-Men, 1664, Douce 1(83b). The
Bodleian Library, University of Oxford. 103
viii
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ix
CITATIONS AND
ABBREVIATIONS
It is customary for ballads to be cited like books; this study, however, also
treats them as primary art-and dress-historical sources. Named ballads are
therefore specified in each chapter’s Endnotes by collection and shelfmark.
Approximate publication dates are given according to the English Ballads and
Broadsides Archive, the holding institution’s catalogue, or the English Short Title
Catalogue. To differentiate clearly between Samuel Pepys’s diary and print col-
lections, Pepys’s ballads are cited ‘PB’ before the selfmark. Some ballads exist
in two parts, with consecutive shelfmarks, for example ‘PB 1.76–7’. An index
of titles for surviving ballads cited can be found within the main Index,
while the principal ballad collections consulted are listed in the Bibliography.
ABBREVIATIONS
INTRODUCTION
Fig. 0.1 The Country Lass, 1690?, PB 3.290. By permission of the Pepys Library, Magdalene
College, Cambridge.
This sheet of paper, about eight by twelve inches in size, was printed in
London around 1690 (fig. 0.1).1 Set to the tune of ‘My Maid Mary’, its rhym-
ing stanzas relate how Jenny, a country girl, strives to elevate herself socially
from poor spinner to well-dressed woman. Neatly encapsulated by two
woodcuts, the legend of Jenny’s finery reached its beholders as song, text
and image in seventeenth-century England.
Sheets like this were printed mainly in London throughout the seven-
teenth century, before being distributed and sold throughout the country
2
Introduction 3
you may see by [ballads], how the Wind sits. As take a Straw, and throw it
up into the Air; you shall see by that, which way the Wind is; which you
shall not do, by casting up a Stone. More solid things do not shew the
Complexion of the Times, so well as Ballads and Libells.
Preserving ballads alongside his ‘more solid’ books and fine prints, Pepys sought
to capture the ephemeral fashions and preoccupations that he and Selden had
4
seen pass in their lifetimes. He even divided his collection into themed categor-
ies, such as ‘Devotion & Morality’, ‘History True & Fabulous’, ‘Tragedy –vizt
Murdrs. Execut.s Jugdmts of God &c.’, ‘State & Times’ and ‘Love Pleasant’.
A book of this length could not hope to do justice to the full variety of
seventeenth-century ballad texts and images; however, pursuing Selden’s
and Pepys’s approaches, it aims to elucidate some of the key changes in ‘the
Complexion of the Times’ which ballads portray, especially with regard to
that other ephemeral and Protean commodity: dress. It examines certain
developments in the attitudes to dress and fashion consumption repre-
sented in ballads over the course of the century –from the lapse of sump-
tuary ‘fashion laws’ in 1604 to the lapse of the Licensing Act restrictions
on print in 1695 –and analyses these developments in light of other visual
and textual evidence of the period, such as books, printed images, peti-
tions, white-letter ballads and paintings.
On the whole, the media listed above tended to be commissioned by
patrons, or undertaken by named authors, or to be more expensive than
black-letter ballads. These are the kinds of sources that typically inform
histories of seventeenth-century dress. Compared with such media, black-
letter ballads appear hard to pin down. They were produced outside the
traditional arts patronage system, destined for speedy sale on the open
market, and they rarely state their authors or dates. However, ballads almost
always list the name of their publisher. For example, The Souldiers Prayers of
1690 was (it declares) ‘printed for James Bissel at the Bible and Harp in
West-Smithfield near the hospital gate’.9 Recent scholarship uses the biog-
raphy of publishers and their professional peregrinations to identify rough
dates, or date ranges, for ballad sheets.10 For this reason, although ballad
dating is best approached tentatively, broad chronological developments in
ballad representations can still make a fruitful starting-point for analysis.
Ballads’ wide social reach, and typical designation as material evidence of
‘popular’ culture, may seem to promise new information for a history of dress
‘from below’. However, there are two reasons we shall not aim for that here.The
first is that ballads do not offer information purely about the lower social orders.
They are just as concerned with nobles and monarchs as they are with beggars
and labourers. The second reason is the difficulty of making any firm correla-
tion between ballad woodcuts and surviving seventeenth-century clothing. The
study of surviving seventeenth-century garments already faces the challenges of
rare survival and provenance, but even the objects that fortunately do remain
cannot be linked in a simple manner to what we see in ballads.
5
Introduction 5
Introduction 7
1
COMMODITIES OF
PRINT AND DRESS
During the seventeenth century, this ‘logic’ of clothing –its raw materi-
als, its production processes and its cultural space –was also shared with
broadside ballad sheets. That is to say, broadside ballads and dress were fun-
damentally connected on many levels. To some extent, early modern schol-
ars have already recognised a connection at the point of sale. For example,
certain geographical areas of London, such as St Paul’s churchyard, were
centres for selling both printed and clothing commodities.2 More impor-
tantly, as Margaret Spufford has shown, print and dress were typically sold
by the same itinerant salesmen, who were described at the time as pedlars,
chapmen or hawkers. These highly mobile vendors –called pedlars here3 –
carried printed paper and clothing from the centre of cities to the farthest
corners of the country.4
However, the links between print and dress in seventeenth- century
England are much deeper and more complex than has been recognised hith-
erto. Taking a cultural history approach, we will attend to the circulation of
ideas surrounding print and dress both before and after they entered the
pedlar’s pack, focusing on ‘use and practice’ in order to ‘gain entry into the
10
By the time that ballads and clothing items found themselves as objects in
the same pedlar’s pack, they had already shared a long series of other con-
nections that would have been commonplace to seventeenth-century con-
sumers. To open up these associations, we first examine ballads and clothing
as commodities within the wider context of textile and paper production. An
overview of textile manufacture introduces the principal raw materials of the
period –wool, silk, cotton, hemp and linen –elucidating their production
processes and their relative cultural value on the textile commodity market.
This gives background to the meanings that ballads assigned to these materi-
als as clothing, which will be discussed in later chapters. A brief survey of
English paper-making in the period demonstrates not only how the paper
and print trades relied upon recycled clothing, but also how the the clothing
trades relied upon paper as an element of both of inner garment construc-
tion and surface textile design. Together, this variety of physical intercon-
nections will reveal how clothing and print were objects tied together in
multiple ways, as they moved in and out of the commodity phases of their
existence. We therefore now turn to examine the typical textile contents of
a pedlar’s pack, how they were made, and what they might have meant for
the pedlar’s customers.
Wool
Of all the textiles a pedlar carried, wool was seen as the quintessentially
English type.7 Sheep farming and wool processing had brought great
11
prosperity to England, and wool was associated with the very essence of
English identity. This is portrayed in the ballad The Shepheard and the King, where
the social gap between the title’s two protagonists is closed by their shared
appreciation for wool and sheep.8 In practice, several kinds of woollen textile
were named after specific English towns or counties, such as ‘Tauntons’ or
‘Short Suffolks’, so that the welfare of England’s people and land was both
imaginatively as well as practically tied to wool production.9
From the Middle Ages, raw English wool dominated the country’s export
economy; after the 1550s, woven wool cloth was exported as well. Depending
on its yarn and weave, this ranged from very light, fine ‘New Drapery stuffs’ to
cheap, ‘kersey’ cloth, made of uneven, worst-quality thick yarn. Heavy, dense
‘broadcloth’ was considered the best and most characteristic of England’s
woollen textiles.10 Overall, however, wool’s national symbolism was con-
nected to its importance as a source of employment. Its numerous stages
of production required many workers, including shepherds, wool brokers,
clothiers, spinners, weavers, fullers, rowers and, finally, shearmen.11
Although the association between wool and English national pride
continued through the seventeenth century, its peak of success in the mid-
1500s was long past. European-wrought silks brought strong competition
in the early 1600s, while the over-reaching aims of the Cockayne Project of
1614–17 tried (and failed) to force Dutch markets to buy dyed and finished,
instead of unfinished, wool.12 Yet, despite its trade and production problems,
wool remained a textile which aroused recurring nostalgic lamentations of
lost national pride, particularly whenever it faced new market difficulties:13 it
was materially and culturally important for the country’s identity.
Silk
Silk was more expensive than other textiles, because it had to be imported raw
from China and defied all efforts to produce it in England. In 1680, a pedlar
called Richard Ridding had his wares valued. His red woollen tape was val-
ued at a halfpenny per yard, but his silken ribbons were costlier, at twopence
each.14 The ballad The Virgins Constancy imagined a ‘Faithful Marriner’ returning
home to deck his sweetheart with valuable gifts from abroad, saying:
Woven silk was uniquely colourful, lustrous, light and strong, and its high
value throughout the seventeenth century supported the perception of silk
fabrics as significant love-gifts. Even low quality, leftover scraps were spun
into threads for sewing and knitting, or perhaps for ribbons like those sold
by Richard Riddings.
Taken as filaments directly from silkworm cocoons, silk fibres were
twisted or ‘thrown’ into threads: strong ‘organzine’ for warp, or weaker
‘tram’ threads for weft.16 Until the mid-sixteenth century, independent silk-
women were largely in control of importing and working silk goods into
ribbons and small luxury wares. An influx of Huguenot refugees to England
in the late sixteenth century helped establish broadloom silk weaving as a
male-only industry, which expanded considerably after a second wave of
Huguenot immigration in the 1680s.17 Women lost their independent foot-
hold in silk working, but a divide remained between ribbon-weaving or
‘narrow-wares’, and broadloom weaving of wider silk textiles.18 As we will
see in later chapters, while immigrants aroused anger and suspicion from
native silkworkers, their new production techniques allowed England to
compete with Continental silks.19
Although silk textiles were associated with high fashion, weaving them
was a long process and complex brocade designs could further slow the pace.
Master weavers employed outworkers to make individual pieces of broad silk
for an agreed piece-rate; the design for one piece could take up to six weeks to
plan and set up for weaving, which even then progressed at a maximum rate
of only one yard a day. Silk’s unmatched expense and kudos might suggest that
it was a reliable luxury commodity (particularly compared to the troubles of
the wool cloth industry); but in fact, it too could be subject to sudden changes
in fortune. In addition to the vicissitudes of fashion, silk weavers faced the
constant threat of deaths at Court, because the sobriety of national mourning
precluded the wearing of colourful silk altogether. For a weaver in the midst of
constructing a new piece of silk, this fashion hiatus might last until the design
he was weaving had ceased to be popular.20
Cotton
Like silk, raw and finished cotton were imports. However, unlike silk, the
relatively gradual increases in consumption of pure cotton goods in seven-
teenth-century England may explain why few seventeenth-century ballads
mention them. Presumably cotton had not built up enough of an individual
‘character’ in consumers’ minds to merit specific discussion.21 Unlike silk,
13
cotton goods were associated with imperial expansion: they first appeared
on English shores as cargo of the East India Company. Cotton had been
woven in Europe since the fourteenth century, usually mixed with linen
into a twill ‘fustian’;22 but until Crompton’s spinning mule appeared in
the 1770s it was impossible to produce in England a strong, even warp
thread for pure cotton cloth.23 Pure cotton cloth consumption is there-
fore often associated with the eighteenth century, though in fact such fab-
rics were imported to England from at least the mid-sixteenth century,
for both furnishing and dress.24
Woven in India, pure cotton textiles were known as ‘calicoes’, a refer-
ence to ‘Calicut’, or Kozhikode, then one of India’s main trading ports
with Europe. There were many practical reasons for their success: unlike
worsted and wool, cotton held its colour and washed easily.25 Cottons
could thus replace the lighter wools of the ‘New Draperies’, and com-
pete with the washability and weight of linens; by 1695, cottons were
already in common use for shirts and shifts.26 To promote demand for
cotton across different levels of society, the East India Company created
different varieties and quality grades of cotton.27 They were assisted in this
project by Catherine of Braganza’s marriage dowry to Charles II in 1662,
which included the Indian port of Bombay.28 In addition to its widespread
social appeal, cotton’s bright colours and lively designs competed with
silk’s, but were cheaper. Imports of both cottons and silks increased during
the century, but remained controversial.29 There were several protectionist
attempts in the Commons to create a renewed dependence upon English
wool, with varying success,30 but the craze for calicoes merely increased
over the eighteenth century.31
Linen
Notwithstanding the increasing importance of silk and cotton, seventeenth-
century pedlars’ inventories are dominated by linen.32 As Beverly Lemire
observes, linen consistently remained a staple good, used ‘from birth to
death, from swaddling bands to shifts, shirts to shrouds’.33 Although local-
ised and small-scale production obscures its history, linen has been described
as ‘the most essential raw material for local textile use’.34 Furthermore –and
unlike all other clothing textiles –linen was the essential ingredient for pro-
ducing white paper.
Linen is made from the inner bark, or ‘bast’ fibre, of the flax plant. In the
seventeenth century, its hardy strength provided raw material not just for
14
clothes, but also for rope, sailcloth, canvas, sacking and carpeting. Sometimes
the term ‘linen’ was used loosely, to refer to cloth made from either flax or
hemp.35 Flax and hemp plants required a great deal of labour to grow and linen
required several stages of processing. The plant fibres had to be combed, rotted
in water, beaten with knives, hammered, untangled, twisted, wound, spun,
scoured, woven and finally bleached, before they produced linen.36 Owing to
this complex production, almost all types of linen were intrinsically valuable.
Surviving shirts and shifts, as well as textual accounts, reveal how linen was
cut out –in neat squares and rectangles –to avoid wasting the tiniest amount
of material.37 Pawning clothes and other valuable objects was commonplace in
the period, and even used linen had financial value in the pawnshop.38
Linen’s cultural significance differed from other textiles, being neither
symbolic of the nation (like wool), nor exotic (like silk or cotton). Lemire
observes the paradox that, although linen was economically very impor-
tant, it was not perceived to promote national prestige.39 In part, this may
be because linen products were more heterogeneous than other fabrics.
Being highly absorbent and hardwearing, it was used for undergarments
and domestic sheeting; a surviving coarse linen doublet from this period
suggests it was also material for outer clothing.40 Tough linen interlinings
supported finer and more expensive textiles: for example, a jerkin from the
period reveals a sturdy linen ground beneath a decayed silk velvet exterior
(fig. 1.1). Furthermore, linen could range all the way from hardy sailcloth to
intricate lace, which was an important aspect of fashionable display through-
out the seventeenth century.41 Heavy-duty canvases, towels, tents and tar-
paulins were thus formed, paradoxically, from the same plant as the most
delicate, transparent head veils and finest domestic damasks.42
Linen also had a gendered significance. Clothes of silk and wool were cut and
sewn by a male tailor, but the workforce dedicated to making and decorating
linen clothing (whether professional or amateur), was almost entirely female.
In the ballad The Dorset-shire Damosel, Nancy the ‘damosel’ offers herself in mar-
riage to a miller, with the promise of ‘three Ells of good Linnen /For to make
you a Shirt, of my Mother’s own Spinning’.43 Even wealthy and titled women
sewed linen shirts for their family, as Brilliana, Lady Harley did in 1642.44 Linen
materials were thus malleable, multivalent, capable of extremely diverse trans-
formations, and appealing to a very broad range of people and occupations.
Paper
Once clothing textiles had been used beyond repair, they became fodder for
paper-making. Brown paper for packaging could be made from almost any
15
Fig. 1.1 Detail of a crimson velvet jerkin, showing collar and centre front, c.1628–32. © Museum
of London; author’s photograph.
fabric, while paper for printing and writing was made out of used white
linen, in a process that changed little between 1500 and 1800.45 The diarist
and writer John Evelyn described his visit to a paper mill in Byfleet in his
journal for 24 August 1678:
First they cull the raggs (which are linnen for white paper, Wollen for
browne) then they stamp them in troughs to a papp, with pestles or
hammers like [a]powder cloose as a Weavers reede: upon this take up
the papp, the superfluous water draining from it thro the wyres: This
they dextrously turning shake out like a thin pan-cake on a smoth board,
between two pieces of flannell: Then presse it, betweene a great presse,
the [flannel] sucking out the moisture, then taking it out ply & dry it on
strings, as they dry linnen in the Laundry, then dip it in allume water,
lastly polish, & make it up in quires: &c: note that the[y] put some gumm
in the water, in which they macerate the raggs into a papp: note that the
marks we find in the sheetes is formed in the wyres.46
16
for the rag-collector. Yet such fragments could eventually ‘assume a new
whiteness’ in paper, so that ‘A Beau may peruse his Cravat after it is worn
out, with greater Pleasure and Advantage than ever he did in a Glass.’56 We
can vividly imagine Addison’s ‘Beau’, unwittingly reading his own recycled
necklinen. This highlights how linen’s cultural flexibility was perceived at
the time, not just as a malleable textile, but also as a highly mobile product
that could enter and re-enter the commodity stage in different forms, and
with a different status each time.
Rag-
collecting was important street trade right up until the mid-
nineteenth century, when wood pulp was introduced for paper produc-
tion.57 This ease of recycling meant that paper and linen shared similar
qualities even in their ‘afterlives’. Most seventeenth-century linens that
survive today have been preserved for their finely worked embroidery.
Likewise, paper’s longevity was contingent upon what was printed upon
it, either as literary content or an assigned monetary value: the first paper
money dates from 1695.58 In this sense, linen and paper were both ‘foun-
dational’ materials. Outer clothes or embroideries were placed upon the
basic covering of the linen shift, just as symbolic letters were laid upon the
blank white paper.
Another key link between clothing and paper in the period was that
paper could also play a part in making textiles and dress. In the first place,
printed designs on paper were an important medium for disseminating
textile designs, whether as emblems, lace patterns or engravings of bibli-
cal texts.59 Such patterns were often lost as people would tear out designs
from pattern books and distribute them to needlewomen and lace makers
to produce the desired pattern.60 The term ‘passementerie’ or ‘passments’ for
lace trimmings comes from the method of making ‘parchment’ needle lace,
which was built up, stitch by stitch, on threads tacked to a design drawn on
a parchment, or paper pattern.61
There was a neat circularity to the way linen could re-enter the realm of
personal adornment after being recycled into paper form. While linen tex-
tiles could form supple yet supportive interlinings for silk garments, once
they had been reformed into paper or card, they could be layered to rein-
force sections of clothing with an even firmer effect. The ‘Poore Scholar’
mentioned above humorously describes this as a cheap method of clothing
repair:
These words were repeated again and again with little variation.
The woman who lay for some time as she had fallen was then
supposed to be able to see things in the world of Ilogo, and was
brought to after half an hour’s insensibility; she looked very much
prostrated. She averred that she had seen Ilogo, that he had told her
Quengueza was not bewitched.
Chaillu heard one day by accident that a man had been
apprehended on a charge of causing the death of one of the chief
men of the village, and went to Dayoko, the king, and asked about it.
He said yes, the man was to be killed; that he was a notorious
wizard, and had done much harm.
Chaillu begged to see this terrible being, and was taken to a
rough hut, within which sat an old, old man, with wool white as snow,
wrinkled face, bowed form, and shrunken limbs. His hands were tied
behind him, and his feet were placed in a rude kind of stocks. This
was the great wizard. Several lazy negroes stood guard over him,
and from time to time insulted him with opprobrious epithets and
blows, to which the poor old wretch submitted in silence. He was
evidently in his dotage.
When asked if he had no friends, no relatives, no son or daughter
or wife to take care of him, he said sadly, “No one.”
Now here was the secret of this persecution. They were tired of
taking care of the helpless old man, who had lived too long, and a
charge of witchcraft by the greegree man was a convenient pretext
for putting him out of the way.
The Wizard in the Stocks.
Chaillu went, however, to Dayoko, and argued the case with him,
and tried to explain the absurdity of charging a harmless old man
with supernatural powers; told him that God did not permit witches to
exist, and dually made an offer to buy the old wretch, offering to give
some pounds of tobacco, one or two coats, and some looking-
glasses for him, goods which would have bought an able-bodied
slave.
Dayoko replied that for his part he would be glad to save him, but
that the people must decide; that they were much excited against
him, but that he would, to please Chaillu, try to save his life.
During the night following our travellers heard singing all over the
town all night, and a great uproar. Evidently they were preparing
themselves for the murder. Even these savages cannot kill in cold
blood, but work themselves into a frenzy of excitement first, and then
rush off to do the bloody deed.
Early in the morning the people gathered together with the fetish
man, the rascal who was at the bottom of the murder, in their midst.
His bloodshot eyes glared in savage excitement as he went round
from man to man getting the votes to decide whether the old man
should die.
In his hands he held a bundle of herbs, with which he sprinkled
three times those to whom he spoke. Meantime a man was stationed
on the top of a high tree, whence he shouted from time to time in a
loud voice, “Jocoo! Jocoo!” at the same time shaking the tree
strongly.
Jocoo is devil among the Mbousha, and the business of this man
was to keep away the evil spirit, and to give notice to the fetish-man
of his approach.
At last the sad vote was taken. It was declared that the old man
was a most malignant wizard, that he had already killed a number of
people, that he was minded to kill many more, and that he must die.
No one would tell Chaillu how he was to be killed, and they proposed
to defer the execution till his departure. The whole scene had
considerably agitated Chaillu, and he was willing to be spared the
end. Tired and sick at heart, Chaillu lay down on his bed about noon
to rest and compose his spirits a little. After a while he saw a man
pass his window, almost like a flash, and after him a horde of silent
but infuriated men. They ran towards the river. Then in a little while
was heard a couple of sharp piercing cries, as of a man in great
agony, and then all was still as death. Chaillu got up, guessing the
rascals had killed the poor old man, and turning his steps toward the
river, was met by the crowd returning, every man armed with axe,
knife, cutlass, or spear, and these weapons and their own hands and
arms and bodies all sprinkled with the blood of their victim. In their
frenzy they had tied the poor wizard to a log near the river bank, and
then deliberately hacked him into many pieces. They finished by
splitting open his skull and scattering the brains in the water. Then
they returned; and to see their behaviour, it would have seemed as
though the country had just been delivered from a great curse.
By night the men, whose faces for two days had filled Chaillu with
loathing and horror, so bloodthirsty and malignant were they, were
again as mild as lambs, and as cheerful as though they had never
heard of a witch tragedy.
The following is a fair sample of “witch-test,” as practised in this
region. A Gaboon black trader in the employment of a white
supercargo, died suddenly. His family thinking that the death had
resulted from witchcraft, two of his sisters were authorised to go to
his grave and bring his head away in order that they might test the
fact. This testing is effected in the following manner: An iron pot with
fresh water is placed on the floor; at one side of it is the head of the
dead man, at the other side is seated a fetish doctor. The latter
functionary then puts in his mouth a piece of herb, supposed to
impart divining powers, chews it, and forms a magic circle by spitting
round the pot, the head, and himself. The face of the murderer, after
a few incantations, is supposed to be reflected on the water
contained in the pot. The fetish man then states he sees the
murderer, and orders the head to be again put back to its proper
grave, some days being then given to him for deliberation. In the
mean time he may fix on a man who is rich enough to pay him a
sufficient bribe to be excused of the charge, and if so he confesses
that the fetish has failed.
In the central regions of Eastern Africa all that is sacerdotal is
embodied in individuals called Mganga or Mfumbo. They swarm
throughout the land; are of both sexes: the women, however,
generally confine themselves to the medical part of the profession.
The profession is hereditary; the eldest or the cleverest son begins
his education at an early age, and succeeds to his father’s functions.
There is little mystery, says Burton, in the craft, and the magicians of
Unyamwezi have not refused to initiate some of the Arabs. The
power of the Mganga is great; he is treated as a sultan, whose word
is law, and as a giver of life and death. He is addressed by a kingly
title, and is permitted to wear the chieftain’s badge, made of the base
of a conical shell. He is also known by a number of small greasy and
blackened gourds filled with physic and magic hanging round his
waist, and by a little more of the usual grime, sanctity and dirt being
closely connected in Africa. These men are sent for from village to
village, and receive as spiritual fees sheep and goats, cattle and
provisions. Their persons, however, are not sacred, and for criminal
acts they are punished like other malefactors. The greatest danger to
them is an excess of fame. A celebrated magician rarely, if ever, dies
a natural death; too much is expected from him, and a severe
disappointment leads to consequences more violent than usual.
The African phrase for a man possessed is ana’p’hepo, he has a
devil. The Mganga is expected to heal the patient by expelling the
possession. Like the evil spirit in the days of Saul, the unwelcome
visitant must be charmed away by sweet music; the drums cause
excitement, the violent exercise expels the ghost. The principal
remedies are drumming, dancing, and drinking till the auspicious
moment arrives. The ghost is then enticed from the body of the
possessed into some inanimate article which he will condescend to
inhabit. This, technically called a Keti or stool, may be a certain kind
of bead, two or more bits of wood bound together by a strip of
snake’s skin, a lion’s or a leopard’s claw, and other similar articles
worn round the head, the arm, the wrist, or the ankle. Paper is still
considered great medicine by the Wasukuma and other tribes, who
will barter valuable goods for a little bit: the great desideratum of the
charm in fact appears to be its rarity, or the difficulty of obtaining it.
Hence also the habit of driving nails into and hanging rags upon
trees. The vegetable itself is not worshipped, as some Europeans,
who call it the devil’s tree, have supposed; it is merely the place for
the laying of ghosts, where by appending the keti most acceptable to
the spirit, he will be bound over to keep the peace with man. Several
accidents in the town of Zanzibar have confirmed even the higher
orders in their lurking superstition. Mr. Peters, an English merchant,
annoyed by the slaves, who came in numbers to hammer nails and
to hang iron hoops and rags upon a devil’s tree in his court-yard,
ordered it to be cut down, to the horror of all the black beholders.
Within six months five persons died in that house—Mr. Peters, his
two clerks, his cooper, and his ship’s carpenter. Salim bin Raschid, a
half caste merchant, well known at Zanzibar, avers, and his
companions bear witness to his words, that on one occasion, when
travelling northwards from Unyamzembe, the possession occurred to
himself. During the night two female slaves, his companions, of
whom one was a child, fell without apparent cause into the fits which
denote the approach of a spirit. Simultaneously the master became
as one intoxicated; a dark mass—material, not spiritual—entered the
tent, threw it down, and presently vanished, and Salim bin Raschid
was found in a state of stupor, from which he did not recover till the
morning. The same merchant circumstantially related, and called
witnesses to prove, that a small slave boy, who was produced on the
occasion, had been frequently carried off by possession, even when
confined in a windowless room, with a heavy door carefully bolted
and padlocked. Next morning the victim was not found although the
chamber remained closed. A few days afterwards he was met in the
jungle, wandering absently, like an idiot, and with speech too
incoherent to explain what had happened to him. The Arabs of Iman
who subscribe readily to transformation, deride these tales; those of
African blood, believe them. The transformation belief, still so
common in many countries, and anciently an almost universal
superstition, is, curious to say, unknown amongst these East African
tribes.
The Mganga, Mr. Burton further informs us, is also a soothsayer.
He foretels the success, or failure of commercial undertakings, of
wars, and of kidnapping; he foresees famine and pestilence, and he
suggests the means of averting calamities. He fixes also before the
commencement of any serious affair fortunate conjunctions, without
which, a good issue cannot be expected. He directs, expedites, or
delays the march of a caravan; and in his quality of augur, he
considers the flight of birds, and the cries of beasts like his prototype
of the same class, in ancient Europe, and in modern Asia.
The principal instrument of the Mganga’s craft is one of the dirty
little buyou, or gourds, which he wears in a bunch round his waist,
and the following is the usual programme when the oracle is to be
consulted. The magician brings his implements in a bag of matting;
his demeanour is serious as the occasion, he is carefully greased,
and his head is adorned with the diminutive antelope horns, fastened
by a thong of leather above the forehead. He sits like a sultan, upon
a dwarf stool in front of the querist, and begins by exhorting the
highest possible offertory. No pay no predict. The Mganga has many
implements of his craft. Some prophesy by the motion of berries
swimming in a cup full of water, which is placed upon a low stool,
surrounded by four tails of the zebra, or the buffalo, lashed to stakes
planted upright in the ground. The Kasanda is a system of folding
triangles, not unlike those upon which plaything soldiers are
mounted. Held in the right hand, it is thrown out, and the direction of
the end points to the safe and auspicious route; this is probably the
rudest appliance of prestidigitation. The shero is a bit of wood, about
the size of a man’s hand, and not unlike a pair of bellows, with a
dwarf handle, a projection like a muzzle, and in a circular centre a
little hollow. This is filled with water, and a grain, or fragment of wood
placed to float, gives an evil omen if it tends towards the sides, and
favourable if it veers towards the handle or the nozzle. The Mganga
generally carries about with him, to announce his approach, a kind of
rattle. This is a hollow gourd of pine-apple, pierced with various
holes prettily carved, and half filled with maize grains, and pebbles;
the handle is a stick passed through its length, and secured by
cross-pins.
The Mganga has many minor duties. In elephant hunts he must
throw the first spear, and endure the blame if the beast escapes. He
marks ivory with spots disposed in lines and other figures, and thus
enables it to reach the coast, without let or hindrance. He loads the
kirangoze, or guide, with charms to defend him from the malice
which is ever directed at a leading man, and sedulously forbids him
to allow precedence even to the Mtongi, the commander and
proprietor of the caravan. He aids his tribe by magical arts, in wars
by catching a bee, reciting over it certain incantations, and loosing it
in the direction of the foe, when the insect will instantly summon an
army of its fellows and disperse a host however numerous. This
belief well illustrates the easy passage of the natural into the
supernatural. The land being full of swarms, and man’s body being
wholly exposed, many a caravan has been dispersed like chaff
before the wind by a bevy of swarming bees. Similarly in South
Africa the magician kicks an ant-hill, and starts wasps which put the
enemy to flight.
Here is an account of a queer dance witnessed in this land of
Mgangas and Mfumbos and fetishes, furnished by the celebrated
explorer Bakie:—“A little before noon Captain Vidal took leave of
King Passol, in order to prosecute his observations. I remained, but
shortly afterwards prepared to leave also. Passol, however, as soon
as he perceived my intention, jumped up, and in a good-humoured
way detaining me by the arm, exclaimed, ‘No go, no go yet; ‘top a
little; bye-bye you look im fetish dance; me mak you too much laugh!’
It appeared that the old man had heard me some time before, on
listening to the distant tattoo of a native drum, express a
determination to the young midshipman who was with me to go
presently to see the dance, with which I had little doubt that it was
accompanied. The noise of the drum, almost drowned by the
singing, whooping, and clamour of a multitude of the natives, was
soon heard approaching. When close to us the procession stopped,
and the dancers, all of whom were men, ranged themselves in
parallel lines from the front of an adjoining house, and commenced
their exhibition. They were specially dressed for the purpose, having
suspended from their hips a complete kilt formed of threads of grass-
cloth, manufactured by the natives of the interior, and likewise an
appendage of the same kind to one or both arms, just above the
elbow. Some had their faces and others their breasts marked with
white balls, given to them by the fetish as a cure or safeguard
against some disease which they either had or dreaded. The
dancing, although not elegant, was free from that wriggling and
contortion of body so common on the east coast. It consisted
principally in alternately advancing and drawing back the feet and
arms, together with a corresponding inclination of the body, and, at
stated times, the simultaneous clapping of hands, and a loud sharp
ejaculation of ‘Heigh!’ Although I have remarked that it was not
elegant, yet it was pleasing, from the regularity with which it was
accompanied. There were two men who did not dance in the line
among the rest, but shuffled around, and at times threaded the
needle among them: one was termed the master fetish, and the
other appeared to be his attendant; neither wore the fancy dress, but
they were both encircled by the usual wrapper round the loins. The
former had on a French glazed hat, held in great request by the
natives, and the other, chewing some root of a red colour, carried a
small ornamented stick, surmounted at the end like a brush with a
bunch of long and handsome feathers. At times one of these men
would stop opposite a particular individual among the dancers, and
entice him by gestures to leave the line and accompany him in his
evolutions, which finally always ended where they began, the
pressed man returning to his former place. For some time I had
observed the master fetish dancing opposite to the house, and with
many gesticulations apparently addressing it in a half threatening
half beseeching tone. Old Passol, who was standing close by me,
suddenly exclaimed, ‘Now you laugh too much; fetish he come!’
“Sure enough, forthwith rushed from the house among the
dancers a most extraordinary figure. It was a man mounted on stilts
at least six feet above the ground, of which from practice he had
acquired so great a command that he certainly was as nimble in his
evolutions as the most active among the dancers. He was
sometimes so quick that one stilt could hardly be seen to touch the
earth before it was relieved by the other. Even when standing still he
often balanced himself so well as not to move either stilt for the
space of two or three minutes. He wore a white mask with a large
red ball on each cheek, the same on his chin, and his eyebrows and
the lower part of his nose were painted with the same colour. Over
his forehead was a sort of vizor of a yellow colour, having across it a
line of small brass bells; it was armed in front by long alligator’s
teeth, and terminated in a confused display of feathers, blades of
grass, and the stiff hairs of elephants and other large animals. From
the top of his head the skin of a monkey hung pendant behind,
having affixed to its tail a wire and a single elephant’s hair with a
large sheep’s bell attached to the end. The skin was of a beautiful
light green, with the head and neck of a rich vermilion. From his
shoulders a fathom of blue dungaree with a striped white border
hung down behind; and his body and legs and arms were completely
enshrouded in a number of folds of the native grass-cloth, through
which he grasped in each hand a quantity of alligator’s teeth, lizard’s
skins, fowl’s bones, feathers, and stiff hairs, reminding me strongly of
the well-known attributes of Obi, the dread of the slave-owners of
Jamaica.
“The fetish never spoke. When standing still he held his arms
erect, and shook and nodded his head with a quick repetition; but
when advancing he extended them to their full length before him. In
the former case he appeared as if pointing to heaven, and
demanding its vengeance on the dancers and the numerous
bystanders around; and in the latter as one who, finding his
exhortations of no avail, was resolved to exterminate, in the might of
his gigantic stature and superior strength, the refractory set. The
master fetish was his constant attendant, always following, doubling,
and facing him, with exhortations uttered at one minute in the most
beseeching tone, accompanied hat in hand by obsequious bows,
and in the next threatening gestures, and violent, passionate
exclamations. The attendant on the master fetish was likewise
constantly at hand, with his stick applied to his mouth, and in one or
two instances when the masquerader approached, he crouched
close under him, and squirted the red juice of the root he was
chewing into his face. For upwards of an hour I watched the dance,
yet the fetish appeared untired; and I afterwards heard that the same
ceremony was performed every day, and sometimes lasted three or
four hours. I at first thought that it was merely got up for our
amusement, but was soon undeceived; and when, under the first
impression, I inquired of a bystander what man it was who performed
the character, he answered, with a mixture of pique at the question
and astonishment of my ignorance, ‘He no man; no man do same as
him; he be de diable! he be de debil!’ Still I was a little sceptic as to
their really holding this belief themselves, though they insisted on the
fact as they represented it to me; and therefore, after I had received
the same answer from all, I used to add in a careless way to try their
sincerity, ‘In what house does he dwell?’ ‘What! fetish! I tell you he
de debil; he no catch house; he lib (live) in dat wood,’ pointing to a