Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Smartphones Vs Smart People
Smartphones Vs Smart People
Smartphones Vs Smart People
Smart people are intelligent people, they are quite clever and
they have an answer to almost every question and what are
smartphones? Smartphones are electronic devices that have
made our lives a lot easier. Smartphone with internet facility
is like heaven on earth, it is great asset to many people as it
connects us to the rest of the world. Smartphone is like a mini
computer.Only smart people can use the smartphones
efficiently and effectively. Nowadays nobody carries a map
whenever they go to a new place, they just open the maps on
their phones. Earlier we used to go to taxi stand to book a taxi
but now we can just book a can by few clicks on the phone.
Hundreds and thousands of books are available on the
internet, we can just download and read them.What actually
matters the most is how we utilize these features for our own
benefits which you can do only if you are smart. For instance,
say that you are not smart and have zero knowledge about
these electronic devices then how will you use them properly.
Being smart is more than just being intelligent.One who is
self-aware, mentally fit and confident is smart. Smart people
can complete a task with reduced efforts in less time.We are a
lot engrossed in the virtual world of smart devices and this
can ruin our real-life relationships. Hence, we should be smart
about our usage and dependency on these gadgets.Perhaps I
would like to conclude by saying that there is no perfect
comparison between smartphone and smart people as both of
them are useful and important in their own places.
Searching answers on google
We live in a world that is fundamentally run by the internet. We use it every
day, multiple times in a variety of ways. We use it to keep up to date with
the latest news, to watch movies and shows, to listen to music, do research
for our latest assignment and even to simply search the latest topic our
mind is wandering off to.These were the basic
uses of the Google Search application. Google search hunts for texts that are
uploaded somewhere on the internet and other graphical contents such as
images or data contained in databases. Google search was created by two
people namely Larry Page and Sergey Brin.
Initially. Till now Google accustomed Google Voice Search by which users
can interact with the search by voicing over it instead of engaging into a
tiring writing style. More the possibility of the search term more is the
indication of the trends in economic, social and health perspective. While it
was impossible to come up with answers to questions without consulting a
book or scribbling down own thoughts in the past, search engines such as
Google are the preferred go-to places in the era of smartphones. Like no
other generation, today’s teenagers and students appreciate the
convenience of knowledge at their fingertips asking Google to provide
information on any kind of question.Google is undoubtedly today’s most
famous and interesting business in the globe. It’s the mission, according to
its corporate website, is to “organize the data of the world and make it
widely available and helpful”.I do think google is a great tool but it is
making us lazy, not stupid. The internet has many advantages, we now have
infinite information at our fingertips at any time of the day. People now can
share their ideas with others all around the world and gain a different
perspective. Anybody with internet access is able to have any question they
have answered by experts in that field immediately.As time progresses,
more and more advances in technology are coming about. These advances
are readily placing information at the hands of the consumer. People are
relying on the internet and technological advances for things that used to be
only completed manually. As a result many people argue that these
advances are adhering to society’s desire to be lazy but, researchers are
finding the exact opposite. Our minds are literally changing and the way we
think about information is becoming simpler.
Open book examinations
Open book exam is an assessment procedure formulated in such a way
that enables learners to pertain to textbooks, class notes, or any other
ratified equipment while replying to problems. It can also mean that
learners are provided with the question paper before writing the exam.
It inclines to ask students to analyze, synthesize, compare or evaluate
information. They test whether you comprehend the central aspect of
the course and how it works. It requires you to comprehend the
material properly and be prepared to pertain or analyze information
and content rather than just remember it. These exams provide
learners with a second learning opportunity to absorb and
comprehend the course equipment. While browsing through the
textbook for excuses, students will get more knowledge on the subject
and can be ready for prospective analyses and professional
improvement in a decent means. Exams with open books emphasize
“advanced level learning.” It signifies that students aren’t anxious
about memorization. The expectation of an open book exam is to
behold how well the learners grasp a subject. Fairly than just
recollecting news, they’ll be expected to compose, compare, analyze,
evaluate, or combine it. In a conclusion, even with several reference
books for their availability, open-book exams are normally more
absurd than other forms of examinations. Learners must entirely
prepare for open book tests because they can be harder than other
sectors of assessments. Learners should be ready for an open book
exam in the equivalent direction they would for any other
assessment.It can help decrease examination dishonesty and copying
because learners have sufficient study substance to evaluate their
responses.If pupils are not taught well to give open-book exams, they may
just duplicate what is in the textbook. And it will not fulfill the intention for
which the exams are held.
Advantages Disadvantages
Learners can passingly examine Learners take the exam lightly and
the notes and books. become overconfident.
Recession is said to be a period of negative growth. In this situation, there is an overall decline in the
economic levels of the economy. Recession is confirmed to happen when there is a fall in the Gross
Domestic Product (Real GDP) of the economy.
Recession is characterised by rising unemployment levels, fall in price of assets, decreasing price of
commodities that results in low consumer confidence in the economy.
Let us look at some of the points of difference between inflation and recession.
Inflation Recession
Definition
How it is measured
Time Period
The perfect cross between AR and VR is the so-called mixed reality. This technology is
expected to become mainstream for consumers and businesses soon. It’s based on
enabling instinctive interaction with data, while eliminating screen-based work. Instead,
handheld devices can take over these stationary device tasks. The clear advantage is that
it will be easier to target centralized data anywhere and anytime.
Playing allows people to explore new and diverse settings. where they can
grow in a variety of different environments, all while discovering incredible
worlds. Playing video games helps develop interpersonal skills, boosts a
sense of accomplishment and develops the ability to perform under
pressure.Video games can deliver immersive experiences that inspire a wide
range of emotions, from joy to fear, surprise and pride.Playing stimulates the
brain and can help to develop memory, concentration skills, and attention to
detail.Video games can help to expand players knowledge across a variety of
subjects, from history, geography and science to foreign languages.Playing
Games allows players to strengthen bonds with other people by encouraging
cooperation and competition together.Some games can have a positive
impact on a players health by helping them get active or exercise a specific
part of their body or mind.Games give players the opportunity to create,
experiment, and let their imagination run wild, from track building and avatar
customisation to fanart, cosplay and streaming.
India of my dreams
The India of my dreams would be a country that is entirely
self-sufficient in all areas. I want India to be technologically advanced,
agriculturally advanced as well as scientifically better. Every barren
land in the country, which has not witnessed crop in ages, would be
cultivated for achieving food grains. I am proud of my country, where
agriculture is the backbone and pushes the GDP ahead. I am proud
that I live in a country with so rich soil containing suitable minerals
that help in agriculture and promote farming. Different states of India
have different varieties of soil, such as Gujarat has black soil that is
suitable for growing cotton, Kerala has soil that is suitable for rice
cultivation, and so on. One of the best things that happened in the
country was the Green Revolution, offering intensive agricultural
programs for farmers.
Women Empowerment
Empowering Poor
Employment Opportunity
No More Caste Discrimination
Corruption
Good Infrastructure and Sanitation
India of my dream should be an ideal country, which I can be proud of
and live with confidence. I want the coming generation to have a
better life and get everything they deserve for living in this country. I
want my country to be politically sound and unbiased, the democracy
of my country to be the strongest and successful. Corruption should be
eliminated from every aspect of our lives. Taxes should be practically
and judicially imposed, the difference between rich and poor should be
eliminated, and there should not be any kind of inequalities. This
dream nation should be the dream of every citizen living here, and
then only the desired result will be seen. Every citizen should work
and act accordingly so that our future generation will be proud of the
nation they are born in, and the other countries of the world will take
inspiration from India.
Nonetheless, restrictions on “fake news” are not the appropriate way to deal with these
consequences. Existing laws on defamation, legal provisions that protect the right to
privacy, and laws on public order that allow police forces to control the possible
consequences of public outrage already provide some protection from negative impacts.
All of these laws, of course, must respect the requirements of international standards on
freedom of expression: in short, they need to be written with clarity to allow individuals
to foresee the consequences of their actions, and they must be proportionate to the ill
that they seek to counter. Even less restrictive of freedom of expression, the detailed
prescriptions of professional ethics and mechanisms of self-regulation such as press
councils also serve to encourage media and journalists to publish reliable and accurate
information.
By contrast with finely-tailored legislation, any legal prohibition of “fake” news would
inevitably create a chilling effect upon the media and anyone that contributes to public
debate. Facts are by their nature complex and intricate, to the point that it is truly
impossible to avoid slight inaccuracies in reporting. Demanding that journalists only
publish reports that are absolutely true would simply be impractical. International case
law has indeed recognised that journalists contributing to public debates on topics of
general interest have the right to a certain degree of exaggeration or even provocation.
Enacting a legal duty of truth would provide public authorities with a powerful
instrument to control journalistic activities: allowing public officials to decide what
counts as truth is tantamount to accepting that the forces in power have a right to
silence critical voices. Journalists or human rights defenders could be sent to prison on
accusations of disseminating untrue statements about alleged wrongdoings by the
government. Activists that use purposely misleading information to raise awareness
through provocative stunts, such as the Yes Men, or satirical publications, such as The
Onion or The New Yorker’s Borowitz Report, would be destined to a similar fate.
Like ‘hate speech’ or ‘terrorism’, the notion of “fake news” is too vague to prevent
subjective and arbitrary interpretation. It would not be much reassurance to have
private entities like Facebook making these assessments instead of public authorities –
not to mention that these businesses may be subject to the influence of non-democratic
governments in certain countries where they operate.