NATIONAL UNIVERSITY – LAGUNA

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
CRITIQUE

SUBMITTED BY:
CAPARAS,CLARENCE S
BS-CE211B

SUBMITTED TO:
ENGR. KENT PATRCK FERRARO

MAY 03, 2024

I. Introduction
The study examines the carbon footprint associated with different sampling
approaches for cervical screening in the UK. This topic is significant as cervical
screening is a critical public health measure, and assessing its environmental
impact can guide more sustainable practices. The researchers compare various
sampling methods to determine which has a lower carbon footprint while
maintaining effectiveness. The study aims to contribute to sustainability in
healthcare by providing evidence-based recommendations for reducing
environmental impact.

Using a comparative research design, the study analyzes the carbon

footprint of different approaches to cervical screening. It includes data on
materials used, transportation, and energy consumption to estimate the carbon
footprint for each approach. The results are presented through descriptive
statistics, such as means and ranges, to summarize the environmental impact.
The study's findings indicate which methods offer a better balance between
clinical effectiveness and reduced carbon footprint, guiding future policy and
practice in cervical screening.

About the Authors

The authors of this study are experts in healthcare, sustainability, and
environmental science. They are affiliated with reputable institutions that focus
on public health and environmental research. Their backgrounds include
extensive research in the healthcare sector, with a focus on sustainability and
reducing carbon emissions. The lead author is a recognized expert in
environmental health, while the co-authors have significant experience in public
health policy and cervical screening programs.

II. Objectives

• Quantify the Carbon Footprint: To measure and compare the carbon footprint
of different sampling approaches for cervical screening in the UK.

• Identify the Environmental Impact: To identify the primary sources of carbon

emissions in each sampling approach, such as transportation, energy use, and
materials.
 • Assess Clinical Effectiveness: To ensure that the chosen sampling approaches
maintain their effectiveness in detecting cervical cancer or precancerous
conditions.

• Provide Recommendations for Sustainability: To offer recommendations to

healthcare providers and policymakers on how to reduce the carbon footprint
while maintaining effective cervical screening.

• Contribute to Environmental Policy: To provide evidence-based data that can

inform future environmental policies in the healthcare sector, specifically in
cervical screening programs.

III. Methodology
In this study, the research design likely adopts a comparative approach to
assess the carbon footprint of alternative sampling methods for cervical
screening in the UK. The researchers gathered data on the resources required
for each sampling method, such as energy use, transportation, and material
consumption. These metrics were used to estimate the carbon footprint
associated with each approach. The analysis involved descriptive statistics to
summarize the carbon footprint for each method and identify the main
contributors to emissions. The study aimed to compare the environmental
impact across different approaches, ensuring that each method was analyzed
under consistent conditions to maintain the validity and reliability of the results.

IV. Data and Results

V. Critique
Descriptive statistics in a study like "A comparison of the carbon footprint of
alternative sampling approaches for cervical screening in the UK" would
typically be used to summarize key data and highlight trends. Given that this
is a comparative study, the application of descriptive statistics could involve
presenting means, standard deviations, ranges, and frequency distributions
to illustrate the carbon footprint across different sampling approaches.
Tables might be used to summarize the carbon footprint of each method,
while graphs or charts could visually represent these comparisons for easier
interpretation. The effectiveness of this approach depends on the clarity and
comprehensiveness of the data presentation.

If additional insights were needed, a deeper breakdown of the data could be

valuable. This might involve dissecting the carbon footprint into specific
components, such as transportation, energy consumption, and materials
used, to identify where the most significant environmental impacts occur.
Moreover, adding inferential statistics could enhance the analysis, providing
statistical tests that determine whether observed differences between
sampling methods are significant. Incorporating contextual information
about each method, like patient throughput or geographical variations, could
offer a more nuanced interpretation of the results.

To assess whether the study achieved its objectives, one would need to
 examine if the descriptive statistics and results aligned with the study's
goals. If the study aimed to identify which cervical screening approach has a
lower carbon footprint, the results should clearly indicate this. The
conclusions drawn from the data should be logical and consistent with the
descriptive statistics presented. If the study provides clear
recommendations for reducing the carbon footprint in cervical screening
and these recommendations are supported by the results, then the
objectives are likely met. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the study depends
on how well the descriptive statistics elucidate the environmental impact of
different screening methods and guide towards more sustainable practices.

REFRENCES

OBGYN. (n.d.). https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17007