Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Drugs in Pregnancy A Handbook For Pharmacists and Physicians 1St Edition Radhwan Nidal Al Zidan Author Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Drugs in Pregnancy A Handbook For Pharmacists and Physicians 1St Edition Radhwan Nidal Al Zidan Author Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Drugs in Pregnancy A Handbook For Pharmacists and Physicians 1St Edition Radhwan Nidal Al Zidan Author Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/pediatric-orthopedics-and-
sports-medicine-a-handbook-for-primary-care-physicians-2nd-
edition-amr-abdelgawad/
https://textbookfull.com/product/preceptor-s-handbook-for-
pharmacists-3rd-edition-lourdes-m-cuellar-and-diane-b-ginsburg/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-drugs-in-intensive-
care-an-a-z-guide-henry-paw/
https://textbookfull.com/product/membrane-characterization-nidal-
hilal/
Handbook of Nutrition and Pregnancy Carol J. Lammi-
Keefe
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-nutrition-and-
pregnancy-carol-j-lammi-keefe/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-arrhythmic-patient-in-the-
emergency-department-a-practical-guide-for-cardiologists-and-
emergency-physicians-1st-edition-massimo-zecchin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/pregnancy-all-in-one-for-
dummies-1st-edition-joanne-stone/
https://textbookfull.com/product/pregnancy-all-in-one-for-
dummies-joanne-stone/
https://textbookfull.com/product/developing-medical-apps-and-
mhealth-interventions-a-guide-for-researchers-physicians-and-
informaticians-alan-davies/
DRUGS IN PREGNANCY
A Handbook for Pharmacists and Physicians
DRUGS IN PREGNANCY
A Handbook for Pharmacists and Physicians
Apple Academic Press also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears
in print may not be available in electronic format. For information about Apple Academic Press products,
visit our website at www. appleacademicpress. com and the CRC Press website at www. crcpress. com
About the Author
1. Introduction.....................................................................................................1
2. Anti-Infective Agents ....................................................................................17
3. Cardiovascular Drugs...................................................................................81
4. Hematologic Drugs......................................................................................133
5. Drugs Affecting the Endocrine System .....................................................153
6. Drugs Affecting the Respiratory System...................................................195
7. Drugs Affecting the Central Nervous System...........................................223
8. Drugs Affecting the Autonomic Nervous System .....................................285
9. Drugs Affecting the Gastrointestinal System............................................309
10. Drugs Affecting the Musculoskeletal System ...........................................335
11. Drugs Affecting the Urinary Tract ............................................................373
12. Dermatologic Drugs ....................................................................................379
13. Diagnostic Agents ........................................................................................403
14. Vitamins and Dietary Supplements...........................................................413
15. Medicinal Herbs ..........................................................................................423
Index......................................................................................................................433
Abbreviations
compare the safety profile of the desired drug with its counterparts within
the same pharmacological group—at the same time.
I hope you find this handbook helpful!
—Radhwan N. Al-Zidan
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Humans have a long history of using different chemicals and herbs in treating
a variety of medical conditions in both genders. The use of such compounds
for pregnant women was not an exception. There is a translated Assyrian
Script, dating back 3500 years, which describes three different prescriptions
to relieve abdominal cramps in pregnant women [1]. However, the concern
about the safety of chemical agents (drugs and herbs) given to females
during pregnancy was not raised until the tragedy of the thalidomide. In
1957, thalidomide gained marketing approval as a safe over-the-counter
(OTC) drug for treating insomnia in pregnant women. Unfortunately, a few
years later case reports of phocomelia (malformation of the limbs) began to
accumulate. With thousands of children born with tragic limb deformities,
the health care providers and the public around the world were shocked by
the unforeseen relationship of thalidomide use in pregnant women and the
development of serious birth defects in the newborns.
The moral impact of the thalidomide tragedy and subsequent demands
of the public in the mid-1960s were the driving force for the researchers
and health care professionals to better scrutinize the potential effects of a
drug on both the conceptus and the mother. Furthermore, the governmental
regulations of drugs approval around the globe became more restricted
as to thoroughly examine the safety profile of the drug use in pregnancy
before granting marketing approval. In addition, the pharmaceutical compa-
nies became obliged to provide enough data, within the patient information
leaflet, about the use of their drug in pregnant women.
Aiming to make it easier for the health care providers to deal with the
safety of drug use in pregnancy, a number of classification systems were
adopted in different countries around the globe. The United States Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) letter categorization system (A, B, C, D, and
2 Drugs in Pregnancy
X) was the most commonly used one since 1979. However, in December
2014, the FDA replaced the old categorization system with a completely
different pregnancy and lactation labeling rule (PLLR), which became
effective in mid-2015. By the year 2020, all the manufacturers of the FDA
approved prescription drugs and biologic products are required to comply
with the PLLR rule obligations [2]. Therefore, the need for books like this
one became inevitable to bridge the gap between the outdated FDA cate-
gorization system, which has been used for more than three decades, and
the considerably different style of information provided in accordance with
the PLLR rule. The FDA is changing the regulations and by 2020 the letter
categorization, which has been used for more than three decades, will be
removed from all of the FDA approved prescription drugs and biologic
products. Therefore, physicians and pharmacists urgently need a book that
merges the old categorization system with a considerably different style of
information provided in accordance with the PLLR rule.
From the 1st day until the 20th day after fertilization: Interestingly,
teratogenesis is unlikely to occur during this period. However, the
effect(s) of any harmful drug given during this period could lead
either to the death of the conceptus or to no adverse effects at all,
which is commonly known as the all-or-nothing effect.
From the 21st day until the 56th day after fertilization: The hall-
mark of this fetal period is characterized by organogenesis. Therefore,
teratogenesis is most likely to occur at this stage of conception. The
spectrum of harmful effects of a drug given during this period could
range from spontaneous abortion, through teratogenicity (revealed as
a gross anatomical defect), to a hidden embryopathy (like a perma-
nent subtle functional or metabolic defect that may become notice-
able later in life). Furthermore, the harmful effect(s) of the given drug
may result in increased rates of childhood malignancies (for example,
a child of a mother treated, during pregnancy, with radioactive iodine
for thyroid malignancy).
From the start of the 2nd trimester till delivery: The exposure of
the conceptus to a drug during this period is unlikely to cause terato-
genic effects because the stage of fetal organogenesis has completed.
However, the exposure of the fetus to certain drugs during this period
may lead to a change in the growth and/or function of the normally
4 Drugs in Pregnancy
Around the globe, the health care providers and the general public have
urged the legislators to put suitable regulations in order to oblige the phar-
maceutical companies to change the labeling of the manufactured drugs.
Consequently, a number of classification systems for drug safety during
pregnancy were developed and adopted in different countries, and the phar-
maceutical companies were required to use the classification systems.
The widely known classification systems are the United States FDA clas-
sification system, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
classification system, as well as the Swedish Catalogue of Approved Drugs
Swedish (FASS). However, there are significant differences between these
classification systems. For instance, Addis [11] found that only 25% of
drugs mutual to all three classification systems have the same risk factor.
The differences were mainly attributed to dissimilarity in definitions. This
variation is an indicator of the presence of a real problem in those classi-
fication systems. Accordingly, health care providers would be confused by
the different, and sometimes, contradictory classification of the same drug
by the different classification systems. That could lead to a misled medical
decision.
Nonetheless, the FDA classification system is widely known and
commonly used in the Middle East and the rest of the world. Therefore, it
will be discussed briefly in this chapter to give the reader a glimpse about the
fundamentals of the FDA letter categorization system. The pros and cons of
this system, and the shortcomings that pushed the FDA, recently, to replace
this system will be explained. The old-fashioned FDA letter categorization
system rates medication risk using categories (A, B, C, D, and X), depending
on the available data from human and animal studies, as described below:
The PLLR labeling changes became effective on 30 June 2015. All the
biologic products and prescription drugs applications submitted after 30
June 2015, should use the new PLLR format immediately. Whereas, labeling
of the prescription medications approved after 30 June 2001 will be phased
in gradually. However, by 2020, the manufacturers of all the FDA approved
8 Drugs in Pregnancy
prescription drugs and biologic products are required to comply with the
PLLR rule obligations.
The PLLR rule involves changes to the format and content of information
presented in the prescription drug labeling to assist the health care providers
in assessing benefit against risk and in the subsequent steps of counseling
the pregnant. Most importantly, the PLLR rule implementation removes the
pregnancy letter categories-A, B, C, D, and X. The PLLR rule also needs the
label to be updated when information becomes out-of-date.
Figure 1.1 shows a comparison between the existing prescription drugs
labeling with the new PLLR rule labeling requirements.
FIGURE 1.1 The effect of the new PLLR rule on the Labeling Sections (8.1–8.3) of the
Prescription Drug & Biologic Products. The left side of the figure shows the old-fashioned
labeling, whereas the right side of the figure represents the newly approved structuring of the
sections (8.1–8.3). Reprinted from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration [13].
8.1 PREGNANCY
fetal body weight gain and delayed skeletal ossification but no teratogenic
effects were observed. Decreased fetal body weight and delayed skeletal
ossification were not observed at doses up to 10 and 5 times the MRHD in
rats and rabbits, respectively [see Data]. The estimated background risk of
major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown.
In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risks of major birth
defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies are 2–4% and
15–20%, respectively” [2].
The clinical considerations heading is optional. This heading deals with
the following aspects:
suddenly, will have a negative impact on the medical decisions of the physi-
cians. The study forecasted that by removing the pregnancy letter category,
healthcare providers are less likely to prescribe category B and C drugs,
which are the most common medications used during pregnancy [14].
Therefore, it is crucial to provide the healthcare providers with a reliable
source of information that combines the old-fashioned FDA letter classi-
fication and the new requirements of the PLLR rule. This book is the first
of its kind, in the category of books dealing with the use of drugs during
pregnancy, because the information provided for each drug will be a perfect
combination between the old-fashioned FDA letter categorization and the
“risk summary” that is required by the newly approved PLLR rule of the
FDA.
The information regarding each drug, described in this handbook, follows
the style of the monograph books. Therefore, there is a uniformed structure
in which the information is presented to the reader. In order to enable the
reader to develop a well-informed opinion about a drug safety profile during
pregnancy, three sections of data have been provided for each drug (i.e.,
FDA Category, Risk Summary, and Further Reading).
The reader is advised to have a look at the following example of warfarin
that has been shown in Figure 1.2:
The first set of information is represented by the old-fashioned FDA
letter categorization of the drug which is intended to interconnect the health
care providers, who have used this categorization system for decades, with
the new style of information that will be provided in the drug information
leaflets—in accordance with the new requirements of the PLLR rule.
Secondly, a summarization of the available human and/or animal studies
that have been performed to examine the safety of using the drug during
pregnancy is provided to the reader. The section of Risk Summary will help
the health care providers to develop a well-informed opinion on the safety
level of using the drug during pregnancy.
Regarding the data description of the animal reproduction studies, it is
noteworthy to mention the definition of the following expressions:
Animal Data Has Shown Low Risk: At doses ≤10 folds the human
dose, based on area under the curve (AUC) or body surface area
(BSA), the drug in question does not cause developmental toxicity
(structural anomalies, growth restriction, behavioral/functional defi-
cits, or death) in all the studied animal species.
12 Drugs in Pregnancy
4.1.9 WARFARIN
FURTHER READING:
Baillie, M., Allen, E. D., & Elkington, A. R., (1980). The congen-
ital warfarin syndrome: A case report. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 64,
633–635.
Kaplan, L. C., Anderson, G. G., & Ring, B. A., (1982). Congen-
ital hydrocephalus and dandy-walker malformation associated
with warfarin use during pregnancy. Birth Defects, 18, 79–83.
Lee, P. K., Wang, R. Y. C., Chow, J. S. F., Cheung, K. L., Wong,
V. C. W., & Chan, T. K., (1986). Combined use of warfarin and
adjusted subcutaneous heparin during pregnancy in patients with
an artificial heart valve. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 8, 221–224.
Ruthnum, P., & Tolmie, J. L., (1987). Atypical malformations in
an infant exposed to warfarin during the first trimester of preg-
nancy. Teratology, 36, 299–301.
FIGURE 1.2 The style used in the handbook for displaying the drug information. Three
layers of information are provided to the reader; the FDA Category, Risk Summary, and the
Further Reading sections.
Animal Data Has Shown Moderate Risk: At doses ≤10 folds the
human dose, based on AUC or BSA, the drug in question causes
developmental toxicity (structural anomalies, growth restriction,
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Transcriber’s Notes
pg 11 Changed: their alloted time has expired
to: their allotted time has expired
pg 19 Changed: for the wellbeing of all
to: for the well-being of all
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENDING THE
DEPRESSION THROUGH PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.