LUPONG

TAGAPAMAYAPA
INCENTIVES
AWARDS
March 1, 2024

57TH BATCH LGOO

APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM
KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
SYSTEM of AMICABLY SETTLING
DISPUTES

LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
empowered under the Katarungang Pambarangay Law
to mediate, conciliate, and/or arbitrate disputes in the
barangay level to promote speedy administration of
justice.
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA INCENTIVES
AWARDS (LTIA)

Recognizes outstanding Lupong Tagapamayapa that

adequately demonstrate the ability to judiciously and
expeditiously resolve cases referred to them and
demonstrates exemplary performance and
commendable contributions in the promotion of KP.

Annual search
 HISTORY 101

TITLE OF THE AWARD

LEGAL BASIS PROGRAM

PD 1508 “Establishing a System of For 1982, 1987 and 1990

Amicable Settling Disputes at the “Gawad Tagapayapa Awards”
Barangay Level” (June 11, 1978)

For 1992, 1995 and 1996

RA 7160 otherwise known as the
“Lupong Tagapamayapa
“LGC of 1991”
Economic and Incentive Award”

E0 No. 394 “Establishing the 1997 – Present

Lupong Tagapamayapa “Lupong Tagapamayapa
Incentives Awards” (January 22, Incentives Awards (LTIA)”
1997)
LEGAL BASES

DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2023-022

“Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives and Awards
Enhanced Criteria and Guidelines”

Assessment Criteria
Awards Categories and Incentives
Awards Guidelines
Standard Official Entry and Documentation
report requirements
Online submission guidelines
Assessment and Selection Procedure
Awards and prizes
 LTIA OBJECTIVES
1 2
INTITUTIONALIZE
STRENGTHEN
GRANTS
the KP as an indigenous
conflict resolution structure Institutionalize a system of
at the grassroots; granting economic
benefits and other
incentives to Lupong
Tagapamayapa, herein
referred to as lupons, which
demonstrate exemplary
performance; and
3
AWARENESS
Generate greater
awareness among, and
support from, the various
sectors of the Philippine
society on the KP as a
potent vehicle toward
social order and human
development.
 PROGRAM COMPONENT

CONFERMENT OF AWARDS
4
DETERMINATION
3
VALIDATION
2
ASSESSMENT
Local
National

1
PROGRAM COMPONENT
CATEGORIES
HUC ICC/ 1st - 4th -
CC 3rd CM 6th CM

PRIZES
1st Runner Up 2nd Runner Up
National Winner Hall of Famer
Plaque of Plaque of
Trophy + Recognition Recognition Trophy +
300,000.00 + + 300,000.00
250,000.00 200,000.00

1st Runner Up 2nd Runner Up

Regional Winner
50,000.00
(Regional) (Regional)
30,000.00 20,000.00
NATIONAL AWARDS
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION &
NATIONAL BOARD OF JUDGES

Chairperson – SILG
Vice Chairperson – Secretary of Justice
Members:
National President, LnB
Supreme Court
Representative: NPOC
At least (2) Private Sector/ NGO
REGIONAL AWARDS
COMMITTEE (RAC)

Chairperson – Regional Director, DILG

Vice Chairperson – Regional State Prosecutor
(DOJ)
Members:
Executive Judge, Regional Trial Court
Representative, Regional Peace and Order
Council
President, Regional Chapter, LnB
Two (2) Region-based CSO Representatives
PROVINCIAL AWARDS
COMMITTEE (PAC)

Chairperson – Provincial Director, DILG

Vice Chairperson – Provincial Prosecutor (DOJ)
Members:
Executive Judge, Regional Trial Court
President, Provincial Chapter, LnB
Representative, Provincial Peace and Order
Council
Representative, Province- based CSO
CITY AWARDS COMMITTEE
(CAC)

Chairperson – City Director/ CLGOO, DILG

Vice Chairperson – City Prosecutor (DOJ)
Members:
Judge, Municipal Trial Court in Cities (MTCC)
President, City Chapter, LnB
Representative, City Peace and Order Council
Representative, City-based NGO
MUNICIPAL AWARDS
COMMITTEE (CAC)

Chairperson – MLGOO, DILG

Vice Chairperson – Provincial Prosecutor (DOJ)
Members:
Judge, Municipal Trial/ Circuit Trial Court
(MTC/MCTC)
President, Municipal Chapter, LnB
Representative, Municipal Peace and Order
Council
Representative, Municipal-based CSO
LOCAL AWARDS COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS

Initiate and coordinate the necessary activities for the

successful implementation of the LTIA in their
respective levels

Disseminate information on the Awards to generate

awareness and support from the public and private
sector in the region;
LOCAL AWARDS COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS

For the CAC and MAC to select and submit to the PAC
the best performing Lupons within the component city
and municipalities. Respectively; and to the RAC in
case Highly Urbanized Cities (HUC) category, the best
performing Lupon within the HUC;

For the PAC to select and submit to the RAC the best
performing Lupons within the province;
LOCAL AWARDS COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS

The RAC to select and submit to the NAC the best

performing Lupons in the region and endorsed as
national nominee per category;

May secure funding and counterpart prizes from the

partner agencies and the private sector; and

May plan and implement appropriate awarding

ceremonies
LOCAL AWARDS COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS

* In case that the Lupon to be assessed is headed by the

LNB President, the LNB President shall inhibit and designate
the next-in-rank officer of the LNB Chapter

ROLE OF DILG

The DILG Regional, Provincial, City and Municipal Offices

shall provide technical and secretariat services to the RAC,
PAC, CAC and MAC, respectively.
 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.

1. Efficiency in Operations – 42pts

2. Effectiveness in Securing the settlement
of Interpersonal Dispute Objective of the
Katarungang Pambarangay – 20pts
3. Creativity and Resourcefulness of the
Lupong Tagapamayapa- 30pts
4. Area or Facility for KP activities – 5pts
5. Financial or Non-Financial Support –
3pts
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
Quality of working well in an organized manner

Observance of
Timely
Settlement Systematic Conduct of
Submission of
Procedure and Maintenance of Monthly
Reports to
Settlement Records Meetings
Court and DILG
Deadlines
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
A. OBSERVANCE OF SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE AND SETTLEMENT DEADLINES - 20PTS

5.0 points – submitted/presented the record book or logbook

reflecting all of the required details Two (2) photos with caption
a) Proper Recording of of the Record Book and
every dispute/complaint 2.5 points – submitted/presented the record book or logbook sample entries in the record
(5 POINTS) reflecting some of the required details book

0 points – no presented record book or logbook

At least 10 samples of Notices

Submitted/presented % of summons with complete and
b) Sending of Notices and to the Complainant/s and
accurate information issued within the prescribed period
Summons with complete Summons to the respondent/s
and accurate information with Officer’s Return and
5.0 points- 80.00-100% ; 3.0 points- 50.00% – 79.99% ;
(5 POINTS) Minutes of the Proceedings
2.00 points- 1.00% – 49.00% ; 0 - no submission
(+ KP Forms 7, 8 and 9)
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
A. OBSERVANCE OF SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE AND SETTLEMENT DEADLINES - 20PTS

% cases were resolved using any mode of ADR (supported by

minutes of proceedings) within the prescribed period

2. Settlement and Award

10 pts- 80.00% – 100.00% cases were resolved
Period At least 10 samples of
(10 POINTS) the Minutes of the
8pts- 60.00% – 79.99% cases were resolved
Settlement Proceedings
(At least 10 cases filed Four (4) photos with
6pts- 40.00% – 59.99% cases were resolved
under Lupong caption of on-going
Tagapamayapa within the procedure (mediation,
4pts- 20.00% – 39.99% cases were resolved
assessment period) conciliation or arbitration)

2pts- 1.00% – 19.99% cases were resolved

0 - no cases was resolved

 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
B. SYSTEMATIC MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS - 5PTS

1.Record of Cases
Two (2) photos with
caption of Record Books
For Cities: Computer
in reference to the
database with searchable
For cities: assessment year
case information
2 points if presented photos of the computer database with For cities, two (2) photos
(2 POINTS)
searchable engine. with caption of the
computer database with
For Municipalities:
For Municipalities: searchable case
a. Manual Records (Case
1 point if presented copy/photo of the manual record information
record book) (1 PT)
1 point if presented digital record filing For municipalities, one
b. Digital Record Filing
(1) photo each, with
(scanned copy of KP files)
caption of the manual
(1 PT)
and digital file
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
B. SYSTEMATIC MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS - 5PTS

2. Copies of Minutes of Two (2) photos with caption of

Lupon meetings with compilation of the Notices of Meetings,
1 point – complete and accurate compilation
attendance sheets and Minutes of Lupon Meetings with
notices (1 POINT) Attendance Sheets

3. Copies of reports
Two (2) photos with caption of
submitted to the Court and
1 point – complete and accurate compilation Compilation of Copies of Reports
to the DILG on file (1
submitted to the Court and to the DILG
POINT)

4. All records are kept on 1 point- judicial standard is observed, where filing
Two (2) photos with captions of the filing
file in a secured filing cabinets is secured with lock and have key
cabinet
cabinet(s) (1 POINT)
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
C. TIMELY SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND THE DILG - 7 PTS

% of Reports Submitted on Time

5.0 points – 80.00% - 100.00% submitted on time
To the Court (5 POINTS) Transmittal Memo or Letters and copies
Presented/submitted of settlement or the arbitration award to
4.0 points – 60.00% - 79.99% submitted on time
copies of settlement or the the court within five (5) days from the date
arbitration award to the of the award or from the lapse of the ten-
3.0 points – 40.00% - 59.99% submitted on time
court within five (5) days day period repudiating the settlement.
from the date of the award
2.0 points – 20.00% - 39.99% submitted on time
or from the lapse of the ten- (+ KP Form No. 16 Amicable Settlement
day period repudiating the or KP Form No. 14 Agreement for
1.0 point – 1.00% - 19.99% submitted on time
settlement. Arbitration)

0 point – 0% of reports submitted on time

 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
C. TIMELY SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND THE DILG - 7 PTS

To the DILG (Quarterly)

2 points - Submitted/presented of the required report to the
(2 POINTS)
DILG within the prescribed period

Copies of transmittal letters Submitted KP reports to the

1 point – submitted/presented partial report of the DILG within
must be stamped as DILG with date and time
the prescribed period.
received by the DILG. No stamped of receipt
score will be given in the
0 point - the required report to the DILG was not submitted or
absence of the said DILG
submitted beyond the prescribed period
stamped document
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
D. CONDUCT OF MONTHLY MEETINGS FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY (KP) - 10 PTS

Notice of Meeting
(2 POINTS) 2 points – minimum of 12 meetings with KP-related matters,
complete details, each Lupon member must sign (indicating
-Should only be given their name, date and time of receipt) when receiving notices of
Copies of Notices of Meetings
scores if the agenda of the meeting.
with Name and date and time
meeting is confirmed to
stamped receipt of each Lupon
directly pertain to 1 point – anything beyond the compliance document, with
Members
administration of the incomplete details
Katarungang
Pambarangay 0 point - no data presented
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1.EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION
D. CONDUCT OF MONTHLY MEETINGS FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY (KP) - 10 PTS

Number of months with KP-related meetings with

minutes and attendance sheets conducted:

8.0 points = 12 months

Minutes of Meeting Copies of Minutes of Meetings with

6.0 points = 9-11 months
(8 POINTS) Attendance Sheets

4.0 points = 6-8 months

Should show matters Three (3) photos of on-going meetings
relating to KP with caption
2.0 points = 3-5 months

1.0 point = 1-2 months

0 point = no meeting
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
2. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF KP
Quantity of settled Quality of Settlement At least 80%
cases against filed Cases compliance with the
terms of Settlement
The no. of settled cases Zero cases repudiated;
over the number of cases Non-recurrence of cases At least 80% compliance with the
terms of settlement or award after
filed x 100% settled the cases have been settled
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT
OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF KP
QUANTITY OF SETTLED CASES AGAINST FILED - 10 PTS

With a minimum of 10 cases settled, the

percentage of cases received by the Lupon
resulting to settlement:
To Compute:
Quantity of settled cases
10.0 points = 100%
against filed
8.0 points = 80.00% - 99.99% The no. of settled cases over the
(10 POINTS)
6.0 points = 60.00% - 79.99% number of cases filed x 100%
4.0 points = 40.00% - 59.99%
2.0 points = 1.00% - 39.99%
0 point = 0%
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT
OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF KP
QUALITY OF SETTLED CASES - 2 PTS

Quality of Settlement of
Cases (2 POINTS)
1 Point - for non-recurrence and zero cases
repudiated (out of the total number of settled cases) To Compute:
1. Zero cases repudiated
(1 POINT)
0 point - at least one (1) (out of the total number of The no. of settled cases over the
2. Non-recurrence of cases
settled cases) number of cases filed x 100%
settled
(1 POINT)
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT
OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF KP
AT LEAST 80% COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT OR AWARD AFTER THE CASES
HAVE BEEN SETTLED (8 POINTS)

% compliance with the terms of settlement or award

8.0 points – 80.00% - 100.00% compliance

At least 80% compliance At least 10 samples of proof of
with the terms of 6.0 points – 70.00% - 79.99% compliance compliance (e.g. Acknowledgement
settlement or award after receipts, ledgers, certifications, etc.)
the cases have been 4.0 points – 60.00% - 69.00% compliance
settled (+ KP Form No. 16 Amicable Settlement or
2 points – 50.00% - 59.99% compliance
(8 POINTS) KP Form No. 14 Agreement for
Arbitration)
1 point – 49.99% and below compliance
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
3. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

Settlement Sustained Info

Participated
Coordination Drive on KP
Technique KP Training/
with concerned IEC Materials
utilized by the Seminar within
agencies re: IEC Activities
Lupon the assessment
Disputes Filed Innovative
for settling KP cases
Campaign Strat
period
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
3. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SETTLEMENT TECHNIQUE UTILIZED BY THE LUPON - 10PTS

10 points – five or more settlement technique

A. Settlement Technique utilized
utilized by the Lupon
(10 POINTS) 8 points – at least four settlement technique utilized
Two (2) photos with caption of each
Note: Settlement 6 points - at least 3 settlement technique utilized
techniques to be Settlement Techniques utilized by the
considered are those that 4 points - at least 2 settlement technique utilized Lupon within the assessment period
are within the KP process
and procedures. 2 points - at least 1 settlement technique utilized

0 point – no report
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
3. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
COORDINATION WITH CONCERNED AGENCIES RELATING TO DISPUTES FILED - 5 PTS

Coordination with
Certified True Copy of any proof of
Concerned Agencies
coordination (Certificate of Appearance,
relating to disputes filed 5 points - with proof of coordination relative to
letters or other written documents)
(PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR, the filed disputes
DENR, Office of the
Two (2) photos each, with caption for
Prosecutor, Court, DOJ, 0 point - without proof of coordination relative to the
each coordination activity with
CHR, etc.) filed disputes
concerned agencies relating to disputes
file
(5 POINTS)
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
3. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SUSTAINED INFORMATION DRIVE TO PROMOTE KP - 5PTS

Two (2) photos with caption of the

For Cities:
information drive conducted by the LT in
2 points - IEC materials produced
the promotion of KP in their community
Sustained information 1 point – IEC activities conducted
drive to promote 2 points - Innovative Campaign Strategy
Copies of pamphlets, leaflets, tarpaulins
Katarungang
and other IEC materials produced by the
Pambarangay (5 POINTS) For Municipalities
Lupons
2 points - IEC materials produced
2 points – IEC activities conducted
Two (2) photos of Innovative Campaign
1 point - Innovative Campaign Strategy
Strategy utilized by the Lupon
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
4. AREA OR 5. FINANCIAL OR
FACILITY FOR KP NON-FINANCIAL
ACTIVITIES SUPPORT
Municipalities: Support
Cities: Support from
Office or Space from POs,
Office or Space for KP Matters both National
Exclusive for NGOs,
may be shared/ and Local
KP Matters used for other
Private
Government
Barangay Matters Sector
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
4. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES
AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES - 5PTS

For cities:
5.0 points – office or room for exclusive use during
For cities – the office or KP proceedings with tables, chairs and other
space should be exclusive furniture and necessary equipment
for KP matters Three (3) photos with caption of the
2.0 points – office or room for shared use during KP building or space used exclusively for KP
For municipalities – KP proceedings with tables, chairs and other furniture and LT concerns, furniture, fixtures and
office or space may be and necessary equipment equipment used in the operation of the
shared or used for other KP Office.
Barangay matters. For municipalities:
5.0 points – office or room designated for KP
proceedings equipped with tables, chairs and other
furniture and necessary equipment
 MC 2023-022, Sec. 5.1.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
5. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT
FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT - 3 PTS

Certified True Copies of any proof of

2 points - received support from both National &
From City, Municipal, support such as Deed of Donation,
Local Government
Provincial or NGAs Resolution, MOA, Appropriations
(Excluding the regular appropriations for the barangay
(2 POINTS) Ordinance, Vouchers, Acknowledgment
and incentives from the DILG programs)
Receipts, among others

1 point – received support from either the

From People's Certified true copies of any proof of
organization or individual
Organizations, NGOs or support such as Deed of Donation,
Private Sector Vouchers, MOA, Acknowledgment
0 point – no support received from either the
(1 POINT) Receipts, among others
organization or individual
 OVERALL
ADJECTIVAL RATING
PERFORMANCE

95-100 Outstanding or Excellent

90-94 Very Satisfactory

85-89 Satisfactory

80-84 Fair

75-79 Poor

Below 75 Very Poor

Only the highest ranked Lupons with the OPR of not lower than 90 points is
qualified to compete at the National Level Final Assessment and Selection
 AWARDS CATEGORIES, INCENTIVES
AND GUIDELINES

Highest Ranking Lupon to be Endorsed to National Level

The rank one (1) or National Winner for three (3) consecutive years in the
same awards category shall be a recipient of a Hall of Fame Awardee

Lupon hailed as HALL OF FAME AWARDEE can only join

LTIA again after three (3) years
THANK
YOU!
ALL THE BEST BATCH 57!