Professional Documents
Culture Documents
European Gas Markets Post War Outlook
European Gas Markets Post War Outlook
In a nutshell ....................................................................................1
Facts & figures .................................................................................2
Title Transfer Facility (TTF) gas price ................................................................................ 2
CAROLE NAKHLE
The disruption of Russian gas pipeline supplies to Europe has created a short-term opportunity for LNG growth,
but EU targets for the long term look more aspirational than realistic.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (left) and Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo visit the Fluxys SA gas terminal,
on the sidelines of a bilateral energy summit at the port of Zeebrugge, Belgium, on Feb. 14, 2023.
In a nutshell
European gas trade has been globalized through LNG
Non-Russian exporters, like the U.S., are seizing the opportunity
The EU’s long-term green energy projections appear overly ambitious
In 2022, Europe witnessed a perilous energy crisis. Natural gas prices soared, hitting a historic
high of more than 330 euros per megawatt hour in August 2022. The main culprit was tight gas
1 | Page Instagram: @css_with_waqas WhatsApp: +92 312 9421112
supplies following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, coinciding with several disruptions affecting
alternatives to natural gas: low wind-generation capacity, nuclear-power outages in France,
drought affecting hydropower generation in Norway and curtailed coal transportation in
Germany. These problems limited the scope for substitution.
Fast forward to over a year later, and European energy markets seem to have gone from
scarcity to plenty. Gas prices have hovered between 22 and 30 euros per megawatt hour since
the beginning of this year. The crippling 2022 crisis seems to have been forgotten by many,
even though the war in Ukraine is still ongoing – along with rising tensions in the Middle East
and Houthi militant attacks on Red Sea shipping, which threaten the liquefied natural gas (LNG)
trade.
Several developments have led to this drastic change, chief among them the evolution of the
gas trade and its globalization through LNG. This trend is unlikely to be reversed. The European
Union has attracted LNG cargoes to fill the gap left by the loss of Russian pipeline gas, resolving
a major crisis within a relatively short period.
Since the fallout with Russia, the European gas market has undergone structural shifts in
supply, creating opportunities for non-Russian exporters. Whether these opportunities are
temporary or long-lasting will largely depend on the EU’s ability to deliver on its
ambitious green energy targets, set in 2022 under dire circumstances that have since subsided.
Europe saw a significant reduction in natural gas demand, which fell by 7 percent in 2023 to its
lowest level since 1995. This came in response to high prices but also subdued economic
activity (not only in Europe but also in competing markets, primarily Asia) as well as mild
weather. The EU’s gas import needs subsequently declined to their lowest levels in recent
years.
Meanwhile, the increased power generation from renewables and the improving availability of
nuclear power helped alleviate some of the pressure on gas demand. In the last quarter of
2023, Europe’s power producers generated more electricity from wind than from coal for the
first time. Prolonged maintenance shutdowns in France are now complete and the country’s
nuclear power generation recovered in 2023. In 2024 it is expected to boast the most available
capacity in at least five years, boosting electricity exports to neighboring countries.
Although EU gas demand peaked in 2010 and is today around 19 percent lower than that high,
natural gas continues to play a vital role in the European energy system. It is the second-largest
While substitutes exist for each usage of gas, these are not always readily available. Green
energy is gradually capturing market share from fossil fuels, but to replace gas at scale, the EU
needs to significantly expand investment – a process that takes time. Furthermore, because of
the intermittency problem related to electricity generation from renewable energy, gas is the
typical fuel of choice for generating back-up power.
While Europe has seen some fuel sources replaced with others, substitution has mostly taken
place between different suppliers of natural gas. The large supply gap created by Russia’s
decision to halt most gas deliveries to Europe was largely filled by LNG and Norwegian pipeline
supplies. In addition to LNG, the key alternatives to Russian gas are Norway (which sends
mostly pipeline gas but also LNG) and pipeline gas deliveries from North Africa. Azerbaijan also
delivers gas to Southeast Europe and Italy.
Of these sources, however, LNG – which is transported by tanker and thus more mobile than
pipeline gas – remains an indispensable supplement for the EU to replace Russian pipeline gas
at current levels of consumption. This is simply because deliveries from Norway, North Africa
5 | Page Instagram: @css_with_waqas WhatsApp: +92 312 9421112
and Azerbaijan are limited by production and/or pipeline capacity and are likely to stay at
current levels, with limited upside potential through the middle of this decade.
The United States has been the biggest beneficiary of the supply shock in Europe. Nearly 70
percent of U.S. LNG exports were destined for Europe in 2022, up from 32 percent in 2021. In
2023, the country still provided nearly half of the EU’s total LNG imports – exceeding supplies
from the Middle East, Africa and Russia combined. Ironically, LNG deliveries from Russia to the
EU also received a boost in 2022, up by almost 30 percent from 2021 levels, before marginally
dropping in 2023.
Presented in May 2022, it suggested that an earlier EU-wide target of 32 percent from
renewable energy by 2030 needed upward revision to accelerate the green transition. The
European Commission proposed increasing the target to 45 percent by 2030. As part of the
plan, the EU also committed to phasing out Russian gas by 2027 and to generally minimizing the
bloc’s reliance on imported fossil fuels, as Europe transitions to a green-dominated energy
system.
The war in Ukraine and the disruption of Russian gas pipeline supplies to Europe have created
at least a short-term opportunity for LNG suppliers to fill Europe’s gas consumption gap. The
continent has a well-established infrastructure for LNG receiving terminals, with more planned
following the war.
However, whether Europe will be a stable long-term customer – let alone a growing one –
depends on several factors. These primarily include the alternative gas supply options available
from within Europe (including supply from alternative fuels); the evolution of European gas
demand, particularly whether ambitious policy targets can be met; and the availability as well
as price of alternative energy sources.
The REPowerEU plan implies that there may be little or even no scope to increase imports of
LNG over the longer term (beyond 2030). However, the targets in that plan look rather
aspirational. For instance, to achieve them, the roll-out of wind and solar power through 2030
will have to exceed four times the historic growth rate for wind and six times the historic rate
for solar.
The potential long-term demand for natural gas, and LNG in particular, is therefore linked to
the question of how widely Europe will miss its policy targets. This is what many LNG exporters
are now trying to figure out.