Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Human Rights in Child Protection Implications For Professional Practice and Policy Asgeir Falch Eriksen Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Human Rights in Child Protection Implications For Professional Practice and Policy Asgeir Falch Eriksen Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/child-rights-education-for-
inclusion-and-protection-primary-prevention-murli-desai/
https://textbookfull.com/product/energy-demand-challenges-in-
europe-implications-for-policy-planning-and-practice-frances-
fahy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/safeguarding-and-child-
protection-linking-theory-and-practice-jennie-lindon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/eu-personal-data-protection-in-
policy-and-practice-bart-custers/
Child Labor in the Developing World: Theory, Practice
and Policy Alberto Posso
https://textbookfull.com/product/child-labor-in-the-developing-
world-theory-practice-and-policy-alberto-posso/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sexuality-human-rights-and-
public-policy-chima-j-korieh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/school-peer-review-for-
educational-improvement-and-accountability-theory-practice-and-
policy-implications-david-godfrey/
https://textbookfull.com/product/visual-imagery-and-human-rights-
practice-sandra-ristovska/
https://textbookfull.com/product/new-technologies-for-human-
rights-law-and-practice-1st-edition-molly-k-land/
Human Rights in
Child Protection
Implications for Professional Practice and Policy
Edited by
Asgeir Falch-Eriksen and
Elisabeth Backe-Hansen
Human Rights in Child Protection
Asgeir Falch-Eriksen
Elisabeth Backe-Hansen
Editors
Human Rights in
Child Protection
Implications for Professional Practice
and Policy
Editors
Asgeir Falch-Eriksen Elisabeth Backe-Hansen
Norwegian Social Research Norwegian Social Research
Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo Metropolitan University
Oslo, Norway Oslo, Norway
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This book is an open access publication.
Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adapta-
tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to
the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if
changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons
license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s
Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the
permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or
the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any
errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
thank Oslo Metropolitan University for funding open access, and for
funding working seminars together with NOVA—Norwegian Social
Research.
vii
viii Contents
Index 255
Notes on Contributors
Editors
Contributors
Øivin Christiansen is a researcher at the Regional Centre for Child and Youth
Mental Health and Child Welfare, University of Bergen. He has substantial
experience in research on child protection services in Norway. His main fields of
interests are decision-making in child welfare organizations, children receiving
preventive services and foster care.
ix
x Notes on Contributors
ethics and situated research methodology (Palgrave, 2018, together with Iver
B. Neumann).
Tarja Pösö is Professor in Social Work at the University of Tampere, Finland.
She has studied child protection for many years. Her present research focuses on
the notions of ‘consent’ and ‘objection’ in child protection decision-making,
including risk-intelligent decision-making and how organizations can best sup-
port it. She is currently co-editing books about interviewing children (in
Finnish) and errors made (in English) in child protection. Her research focus is
on child law and children’s rights, including the right of the child to be heard,
the best interests of the child, child protection and asylum-seeking children.
Kirsten Sandberg is Professor of Law, University of Oslo and a member of the
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2011–2019, serving as the
Committee’s chairperson 2013–2015. Her research focus is on child law and
children’s rights, including the right of the child to be heard, the best interests of
the child, child protection and asylum-seeking children. She has lectured on
children’s rights to lawyers in Harare, Zimbabwe, and to law students in Yunnan,
China.
Marit Skivenes is a professor in political science at the Department of
Administration and Organization Theory at the University of Bergen, Norway,
and the Director of the Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism. She
has written numerous articles about the role of welfare policies, practices to
understand the legitimacy problems modern states face, and child protection
systems. She has led a range of international research projects and been awarded
several prestigious research grants, including a European Research Council
Consolidator Grant in 2016.
Line Marie Sørsdal is a PhD candidate in political science at the Department
of Administration and Organization Theory at the University of Bergen,
Norway. Her research interests are children’s rights, social policy and regulation,
and comparative public administration. She is also the research coordinator of
an EU H2020 consortium on the digital transformation of the state.
Andrew Turnell is a social worker and a co-creator of the Signs of Safety
approach to child protection casework. Andrew acts as a consultant for many
international child protection systems focusing on teaching, distilling and
describing constructive on-the-ground casework and the organizational prac-
tices that support it.
Abbreviations
xiii
List of Pictures
xv
List of Tables
Table 4.1 Child protection systems, child well-being rank, child rights
index65
Table 4.2 The child protection laws 67
Table 4.3 Codes for identifying themes in the texts 68
Table 4.4 Main findings 70
Table 4.5 Strong discretion and material content 80
Table 4.6 Considerations in legislation that authorizes weak discretion 81
Table 5.1 Signs of safety assessment and planning framework 92
Table 7.1 CRC articles and out-of-home care 133
Table 7.2 Risk indicators in out-of-home care 137
Table 7.3 Satisfaction with life in out-of-home care 140
Table 10.1 Reasons for providing in-home measures 191
xvii
1
Child Protection and Human Rights:
A Call for Professional Practice
and Policy
Asgeir Falch-Eriksen and Elisabeth Backe-Hansen
1 Introduction
Professional practice is a defining trait of modernity, and democratic and
constitutional nation-states depend on professional practitioners and their
efforts to solve problems and coordinate activity in order to distribute state
services as accurately as possible, thus dealing with the particular problem
at hand of implementing human rights. Throughout modern history, legis-
lators in different democratic nation-states have developed complex systems
of implementation to make sure that public resources are distributed at the
street level according to their democratic intent, and in an accurate manner
aimed at solving particular problems. In this manner, state services at the
street level are provided according to predetermined political and legal dis-
tributive standards set by elected officials through regular law-making and
constitutional rights norms. Consequently, professional practice is a cen-
States Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and
educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental
violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or
exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care of parent(s), legal
guardian(s) or any other person who has the care of the child.
This right can be claimed by any child living within a jurisdiction claim-
ing to abide by the CRC. However, how or whether it will be answered
will vary. Although an international human rights standard has gradually
become a source for legitimizing the public protection of children, this
does not preclude certain strands of politics opposing rights-based pro-
tection. Still, rights-based protection has increasingly become a source of
reference and a standard to strive for across the globe (Gilbert et al. 2011).
If a child is maltreated, a rights-based public protection of children
will enter in loco parentis, in the place of the parent, and intervene to
sustain the child’s personal integrity and aid the child’s development.
Maltreatment, caused by the violence or neglect of care-givers to the det-
riment of the child, must lead to interventions proportionally to the
needs of the child.
4 A. Falch-Eriksen and E. Backe-Hansen
7 C
ontents of the Book
In Chap. 2, Kirsten Sandberg explains and explores the right to protec-
tion as it is embedded in CRC Art. 19. The chapter provides a legal
understanding of the child’s right to protection against maltreatment by
care-takers, and it also explores the obligations of states parties in imple-
menting the right to protection in professional practice and in policy. The
rights and obligations form the framework within which to exercise pro-
fessional judgment in the area of child protection, and specifying their
10 A. Falch-Eriksen and E. Backe-Hansen
8 Conclusion
We are living in a time when systems of child protection across modern
nation-states receive massive criticism both nationally and internation-
ally. In particular, this pertains to out-of-home placements of children,
against parents’ expressed wishes. Voluntary in-house measures are mostly
ignored in this context. Different nation-states’ politicians, public offi-
cials, NGOs, professionals, scholars, the traditional and new media, all
participate in these discussions, from various points of departure. Since
child protection is characterized by controversy as well as being an aca-
demic field submerged in normative complexity and uncertainty, answers
and heated discourses about what constitutes ‘the best’ type of protection
abound.
However, rights are an equalizer, and children living in jurisdictions
that claim to abide by rights should not experience widely different prac-
tices if said practices are supposed to abide by the same framework of
legislation. Although there are widely different ways to perform child
protection services, the CRC provides us for the time being a common
goal.
Child Protection and Human Rights: A Call for Professional… 13
References
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. An essay on the division of expert labor.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aristotle. (2014). Politics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The
revised Oxford translation, one-volume digital edition. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Burns, K., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2016). Child welfare removals by the state.
A cross-country analysis of decision-making systems. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Fox Harding, L. (2014). Perspectives in child care policy. London: Routledge.
Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (2011). Child protection systems:
International trends and orientations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, R. E. (1986). Welfare, rights and discretion. Oxford Journal of Legal
Studies, 6(2), 232–261.
Kriz, K., & Skivenes, M. (2014). Street-level policy aims of child welfare work-
ers in England, Norway and the United States: An exploratory study. Children
and Youth Services Review, 40, 71–78.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public
services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Molander, A., Grimen, H., & Eriksen, E. O. (2012). Professional discretion and
accountability in the welfare state. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 29(3),
214–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00564.x.
Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter. The moral and political logic of the
universal welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skivenes, M., & Sørsdal, L. M. (2018). The child’s best interest principle across
child protection jurisdictions. In A. Falch-Eriksen & E. Backe-Hansen (Eds.),
Human rights in child protection. Implications for professional practice and pol-
icy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14 A. Falch-Eriksen and E. Backe-Hansen
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction
in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original
author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and
indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the
chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons
license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds
the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copy-
right holder.
2
Children’s Right to Protection
Under the CRC
Kirsten Sandberg
1 Introduction
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) recognizes chil-
dren as rights holders and provides them with individual rights. The aim
of this chapter is to provide the reader with a legal understanding of
children’s right to protection against maltreatment in their homes and the
obligations of states parties in implementing this right in practice. The
rights and obligations form the framework within which to exercise pro-
fessional judgment in this area, and specifying their content is a pre-
requsite for rights to be realized.
Children’s rights under the CRC are commonly divided into three cat-
egories, and protection rights are one of those, beside provision rights
and participation rights (Hammarberg 1990, p. 100). However, chil-
dren’s rights are indivisible and holistic and should not be seen separately
or in isolation from each other. This book is about child protection, but
K. Sandberg (*)
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
e-mail: kirsten.sandberg@jus.uio.no
Scarcely was acquaintance renewed with her still quite youthful old
friend, Monsieur de la Rochefoucauld, than Ninon met for the first
time St Evrémond—Charles de St Denys, born 1613, at St Denys le
Guast near Coutances in Normandy—the man with whom her name
is so indissolubly connected, traversing nearly all the decades of the
seventeenth century into the early years of the eighteenth, his span
of life about equalling her own, and though for half of it absent from
her and from his country, maintaining the links of their intimacy in
their world-famed correspondence.
Like Ninon’s, his individuality was exceptional. A born wit, for even
in his childhood, the soubriquet of “Esprit” was bestowed upon him,
his three brothers being severally styled—“The Honest Man,” “The
Soldier,” and “The Abbé.” Charles de St Evrémond was distinguished
by a brilliant and singularly amiable intelligence. As a man of letters
he was rarely gifted; though he evaded, more than sought, the
celebrity attaching to the profession of literature, writing only, it may
be truly said of him—
“... in numbers
For the numbers came.”
He never put forward his own works for publication, and it was only
towards the close of his life that his consent was obtained for such
publication. During his lifetime, many of his pieces in prose and in
verse were printed and circulated in Paris and in London, where, at
the Courts of Charles II. and of William III., forty years of his life were
spent; but these were pirated productions, surreptitiously issued by
his “friends,” to whom he occasionally confided his compositions,
and they, for their own gain, sold them to the booksellers, who
eagerly sought them. These pieces were altogether unfaithful to their
originals, being altered to suit the particular sentiments of readers,
and added to, in order to increase the bulk of the volumes. The style
of St Evrémond’s writings has been the subject of encomium and
warm appreciation from numerous learned critics and litterateurs,
notably St Beuve and Dryden.
One contemporary editor, withholding his name, content with
styling himself merely “A Person of Honour,” has, at all events,
yielded due homage to St Evrémond’s character and genius.
Commenting on the essays which have come within his ken, he
writes—