Site/ Development Selection Criteria

Evaluation Matrix Environmental and Physical Factors

Table
RATING

Site Evaluation % 1 2 3 4 5
Parameteres

Evaluation of 10% Insufficient Quite bigger Area is Area is more Enough and
Land Area area than exactly fit no than from the huge area
insufficient excess, no exact
less

Evaluation of 10% Accessed Accessed by Accessed by Accessed by Near and

Land by private the UV and the jeepneys, the tricycles, accessible
Accessibility cars private cars UV, and bus, with all types
private cars jeepneys, of
UV, and transportation
private cars s (land, sea,
air)

Site Soil Criteria 10% Site soil is Site soil is Site soil is Site soil has Site soil is
not suitable partly good suitable for better soil best for
for building for building building characteristic building
structure structure structure s for building structure
structure

Utilities and 10% No existing No existing No existing Adjacent Utilities and

Services utilities and utilities and utilities and services and services are
services services services utilities present within
within the within the the lot
area but far area but near
away from from the site
the site

Pedestrians 10% No There is a There is a The is a Many

pedestrians pedestrian pedestrian pedestrian pedestrian
but only one but only two but only three access
access access access

Natural Hazards 10% Highly High Moderate to Moderate to Low

susceptibilit susceptibility high high susceptibility
y and to flood; near susceptibility susceptibility to flood; far
hazardous from fault line to flood; far to flood; far from fault line
area to from fault line from fault line
flood; very
 near fro,
fault lines

Site Drainage 5% No drainage Only 1 More than 1 Accessible to Accessible to

drainage line connecting of many all drainage
drainage line drainage

Site Topography 10% Steep slope Quite steep Average Relatively flat Totally flat
site land slope site slope site site land land
land land

Climate 10% Hot Quite hot Warm Cool Normal

temperature temperature temperature temperature temperature

Orientation 10% No wind and The site has The site has The site has The site has
sun satisfactory good sun good sun and excellent sun
orientation sun and wind orientation wind and wind
orientation and orientation orientation
satisfactory
wind
orientation

Future 5% No potential Relevant Some Has enough Has large

Expansion to future variances variances are area for area for
expansion; area approved for additional additional
areas approved to future amenities for amenities for
surrounded. future expansion the property the property
expansion development development
with sift area
surroundings

Total 100% Bad Site Potential site Good site Better site Excellent site
Selected selected selected selected selected
(0% - 24%) (25% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 99%) (100%)
Table 2.1.1: Site Criteria Evaluation Base Parameter for Environmental and Physical Factors

Evaluation Matrix Socio-Economic and Cultural Factor

Table
RATING

Site Evaluation % 1 2 3 4 5
Parameters

Site Potential 25% No potential Small Medium Large Exellent

(jobs, residential, potential Potential Potential potential
commercials,
industrials)
 Main Road 25% Not Has Has minor Has short Direct Access
Access accessible pathways to road to minor roads to major roads
minor roads access first to access
to access before major first before
first before road major roads
major road

Public 25% The The The The The residents

Acceptance of residents residents residents residents and
the Proposed and the and and and the government is
Site government government government government willing to
is against to is not willing is willing to supports the cooperate and
the to cooperate cooperate in project supports the
development in the project the project project

Must be within 25% Rural Areas Road to Developing Highly Total and
Urban Areas development status urbanized Perfectly
status urban site
status

Total 100% 1.00 - 1.99 2.00 - 2.99 3.00 - 3.99 4.00 - 4.99 5.00 Excellent
Bad Site Potential site Good site Better site site selected
Selected selected selected selected (100%)
(0% - 24%) (25% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 99%)
Table 2.1.2: Site Criteria Evaluation Base Parameter for Socio-Economic and Cultural Factors

Evaluation Matrix Legal, Institutional, Administrative, and Aesthetic Factors

Table
RATING

Site Evaluation % 1 2 3 4 5
Parameters

Zoning 20% No Zoning must Zoning Zoning Total zoning

compliance be approved needs relates for compliance
first certification building
and establishes
approval

Ownership 25% Award Leasing Government Corporation Sole Owner

Land Value 35% Charity Less value Lesser value Normal High amount
but can amount; but
appraise affordable reasonable
anytime
Compatibility with 20% Nonsense Small scale Small to Medium to High
Land Use of medium large scale compatibility
compatibility scale of of with adjacent
compatibility compatibility lots and
buildings

Total 100% Bad Site Potential site Good site Better site Excellent site
Selected selected selected selected selected
(0% - 24%) (25% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 99%) (100%)
Table 2.1.3: Site Criteria Evaluation Base Parameter for Socio-Economic and Cultural Factors

SITE DESCRIPTION SITE OPTIONS

Environmental and Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Physical Factors
Criteria Overall Critical Equivalent Critical Equivalent Critical Equivalent
Rating Ranking Percentage Ranking Percentage Ranking Percentage

Evaluation 10 4 8 3 6 3 6
of Land
Area

Evaluation 10 4 8 3 6 1 2
of Land
Accessibili
ty

Site Soil 10 3 6 3 6 3 6
Criteria

Utilities 10 4 8 3 6 2 4
and
Services

Pedestrian 10 4 8 2 4 4 8
s

Natural 10 3 6 5 10 5 10
Hazards

Site 5 3 3 3 3 2 2
Drainage

Site 10 4 8 4 8 4 8
Topograph
 SITE DESCRIPTION SITE OPTIONS

Environmental and Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Physical Factors

Climate 10 3 6 3 6 3 6

Orientation 10 4 8 4 8 4 8

Future 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
Expansion

Total 100 40 75 37 69 35 64
Note: How to calculate equivalent percentage - (Critical Ranking Score / Critical Ranking Highest Score x
Overall Rrating in Decimal) x 100 = Equivalent Percentage

Table 2.1.4: Site Evaluation for Environmental and Physical Factors

SITE DESCRIPTION SITE OPTIONS

Socio-Economic and Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Cultural Factor
Criteria Overall Critical Equivalent Critical Equivalent Critical Equivalent
Rating Ranking Percentage Ranking Percentage Ranking Percentage

Site 25 4 20 4 20 2 10
Potential
(jobs,
residential,
commercia
ls,
industrials

Main Road 25 4 20 5 25 3 15
Access

Public 25 4 20 3 15 2 10
Acceptanc
e of the
Proposed
Site

Must be 25 4 20 3 15 2 10
within
 SITE DESCRIPTION SITE OPTIONS

Socio-Economic and Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Cultural Factor

Urban
Areas

Total 100 16 80 15 75 9 45
Note: How to calculate equivalent percentage - (Critical Ranking Score / Critical Ranking Highest Score x
Overall Rrating in Decimal) x 100 = Equivalent Percentage

Table 2.1.5: Site Evaluation for Socio-Economic and Cultural Factor

SITE DESCRIPTION SITE OPTIONS

Legal, Institutional, Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Administrative, and
Aesthetic Factors
Criteria Overall Critical Equivalent Critical Equivalent Critical Equivalent
Rating Ranking Percentage Ranking Percentage Ranking Percentage

Zoning 20 4 16 4 16 4 16

Ownership 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

Land 35 5 35 3 21 3 21
Value

Compatibil 20 4 16 4 16 4 16
ity with
Land Use

Total 100 18 92 16 78 16 78
Note: How to calculate equivalent percentage - (Critical Ranking Score / Critical Ranking Highest Score x
Overall Rrating in Decimal) x 100 = Equivalent Percentage