Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HKMMS Conservation Proposal 20230908
HKMMS Conservation Proposal 20230908
CONSERVATION PROPOSAL
PURCELL
info@purcellap.com
www.purcellap.com
All rights in this work are reserved. No part of this work may be
reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means
(including without limitation by photocopying or placing on a website)
without the prior permission in writing of Purcell except in accordance
with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
Applications for permission to reproduce any part of this work should
be addressed to Purcell at info@purcellap.com.
Any materials used in this work which are subject to third party
copyright have been reproduced under licence from the copyright
owner except in the case of works of unknown authorship as defined
by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Any person wishing to
assert rights in relation to works which have been reproduced as works
of unknown authorship should contact Purcell at info@purcellap.com.
Purcell asserts its moral rights to be identified as the author of this work
under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
© Purcell 2023
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 4
Appendix A
The Hong Kong Museum of Medical Science Drainage System Inspection Report (Dated 9 January 2020)
Appendix A1
Appendix B
The Hong Kong Museum of Medical Science Structural Survey Report to the Main Building
Appendix C
CCTV Survey Report at No.2 Caine Lane, Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences (Dated 31 August 2019)
Appendix D
Termite Inspection Report at Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences (Dated 13 January 2020)
Appendix E
Last Manhole and Miscellaneous Survey, Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences (Dated 16 November 2020)
Appendix F
Manhole S1 Drainage Improvement Proposal by Architectural Services Department (Dated 29 March 2023)
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 History
The Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences, also
known as the Old Bacteriological Institute, is located at
2 Caine Lane, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong. A major plague
occurred in Hong Kong in 1894, resulting in more than
2500 deaths. The Tai Ping Shan area, where the Institute HKMMS
is located, was severely affected by the plague and all
the buildings within the area were demolished and burnt.
The Bacteriological Institute was built in response to the
plague in 1905-1906 to enable research of
bacteriological examination and disease control.
Three buildings were originally built on the site, including Location of Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences
the main block and two subsidiary blocks: one single- Map Source: Geographical Information System on Hong Kong Heritage
storey block for attendants’ accommodation, and one
two-storey block for stable and animal accommodation.
The single-storey attendants’ block is the current Annex
Building, the two storey animal accommodation block
was demolished in 1980s and converted to an open
space, i.e. Caine Lane Garden.
Over time, the use of the buildings has changed. They
became the Pathological Institute after World War II,
and then a medical store used by the Department of
Health in the 1970s. A major renovation was undertaken
in the mid- 1990s which converted the building into its
current use, the Hong Kong Museum of Medical
Sciences.
1.2 Architecture
A photo dated 1910s showing Bacteriological Institute and its surroundings.
The buildings are built in the colonial Edwardian style. Source: Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences, originally from UK
Descriptions from the Public Works Report Year 1905 National Archive
are abstracted as below:
Bacteriological Institute. The buildings comprised under this
heading were designed by Messrs. LEIGH & ORANGE, who
also supervised their construction. They occupy a site,
20,776 square feet in extent, in the upper part of the
Taipingshan Resumed Area and consist of a main block and
two subsidiary blocks-one for servants’ quarters and the
other for animal houses, &c. The main block contains a
basement, ground floor and upper floor, and affords the
following accommodation : - 4 laboratories, each 28' 0” x
18' 0", a library, a combined waiting-room and office, a
photographic room and a spare room, each 20’0” x 12' 0”,
a store-room, incubating room, heating chamber and
refrigerating room, besides a hall and staircase, small dark- A photo dated 1974 as the Vaccine Production Centre
room, lavatories, &c. Balconies extend along the whole of Source: Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences
the north front on the ground and upper floors and there
are verandahs on the east, south and west fronts. One of
the subsidiary blocks (a one-storied building) affords
accommodation for 11 Chinese attendants, with kitchen,
&c., whilst the other (a two-storied building) contains a
stable ( 4 stalls and 2 loose boxes); houses for 5 cattle and
8 calves; 2 sheep-pens and suitable accommodation for
08.09.23 JC 019-239069-DOC-013.docm Page 4 of 104
HONG KONG MUSEUM OF MEDICAL SCIENCES - MAIN BUILDING & ANNEX
CONSERVATION PROPOSAL
From the tenancy agreement, it is noted that any 1.5 Existing Information
structural repairs and repairs related to external fabric
During the preparation of this Conservation Proposal,
(including the roof structure and covering) to the
the following drawings and documents provided by
buildings shall be the responsibility of the landlord
HKMMS where been made available:
(executed by Architectural Services Department). The
maintenance and repair of internal finishes, staircase, and
drains shall be the responsibility of the tenant (HKMMS).
Architectural drawings
1.4 Background and Scope of This Conservation • Refurbishment of the Pathological Institute (dated
Proposal 1989).
- Main Building Floor Plan
This report has been prepared based on visual
- Site Plan
observation and survey of condition from all readily
accessible locations and without any opening-up or
• Old Pathological Institute H. K. (Record Drawing
reference to structural drawings. Where elements are
dated 1992)
hidden behind furniture or concealed within the floor
- Site Plan
structure or otherwise obscured are out of reach, we
- North Elevation
have based our assessment on any associated evidence
- South Elevation
of defects. Therefore, the description of defects cannot
- East Elevation, Section
be regarded as comprehensive due to the limitation of
not disturbing historic fabric. It is therefore essential that
• Drawings by Llewelyn – Davies (dated 1993-1994)
the content of this survey report is to hand when any
- Site Plan
works are being undertaken so that any areas of
- Main Building Basement Plan
unknown condition can be identified and investigated.
- Main Building Ground Floor Plan
It shall be noted that for a normal FAS project, only - Main Building First Floor Plan
works intended to be executed are studied. However, - Outhouse Plan
in this specific FAS project at HKMMS, aspects not
proposed to be executed are also studied, such as the • Restoration to Pathological Institute (dated 1994)
condition of timber roof structure. This is to ensure the - Main Building Floor and location plan
condition of the buildings is well understood and a
Plan of Ceiling Joists (not dated)
forward working plan been proposed.
Plan of Roof Timber (not dated)
The following laboratory tests have been recommended
to be undertaken within this FAS project, these tests are • Renovation of Institute of Pathological at Caine Lane
directly related to repair items in the scope: (not dated)
- Existing Structural plan
- Paint analysis
- Ceiling plan, roof plan and sections
- Mortar analysis
- Timber species test to fretwork Building Services Drawing and Reports
The following laboratory tests/ opening up are not • Inspection of Buried Water Carrying Services for Lot
directly related to the repair items and therefore are not No. HKM-19 at Ex-Pathological Institute (Medical
proposed within this FAS project. They are only Museum), 2 Caine Lane, Mid-Level, Sheung Wan,
recommended to the museum if there is a need to Hong Kong, prepared by BUDA Engineering and
ascertain the structural strength of the building: Consultant Ltd dated 2009
- Carbonation testing of concrete
• Investigation Report on Water Leakage in the
- Brickwork strength test
Archive Room of Hong Kong Museum of Medical
- Opening up of fretwork to staircase to allow
Sciences, prepared by AECOM Asia Co. Ltd. dated
the survey of structural members
2017
- Timber species test to floor joists
- Timber species test to roof timber members
• Drainage layout plan retrieved from Drainage
Services Department dated 2017.
Character Defining Elements (CDE) to the interior of the building have been assessed and are categorised by
elements of a similar nature/ quality. In general, the higher the significance of the CDE, the smaller capacity of change
of change they can take. Disturbance to exceptional or high significance items is therefore required to be minimised,
unless it makes a positive contribution to its heritage value.
An internal condition survey was carried out throughout the Main Building, which is detailed in Section 4. In summary,
the basement floor is in fair condition, although there are some notable cracks and brick deterioration observed and
it has also suffered from lateral water penetration. The ground floor is generally in good condition, there are some
minor cracks on internal plastered walls and natural wear and tear to paintwork observed. The first floor is in fair
condition, however, water seepage is observed internally adjacent to the gutter on southwest elevation and cracks
are observed on a number of locations on internal walls.
Conservation policies are stated in Section 5 which are formulated from conservation principles set out in the Burra
Charter. This means that a cautious approach is required during the conservation works and should be carried out
with the appropriate knowledge, skills and conservation techniques.
Conservation goals in relation to the project have then been established using these principals and are outline in
Section 6, they include the following;
1. A termite survey carried out in January 2020 has revealed that there are no termites found in the main
building. A termite control system in the form of bait boxes will be installed in the Main Building and
external areas to future protect the historic fabric. Bait boxes are already installed in the Annex building.
Ongoing monitoring of the bait boxes will be provided to the Main building, Annex building, and external
areas within the Declared Monument boundary.
2. The structural condition of timber roof of the Main Building is fair. There is no evidence of damp or fungal
decay observed in the timber structure, however, there are various defects observed on the structural
members: notably, a number of shrinkage cracks on the timber purlins, a number of defective rafters, one
diagonal timber beam is sagged with its scarf joint opened up. It is recommended that the museum to
inform the landlord (Government Properties Agency) further review the condition of roof structural
members and covering and carry out necessary repairs to the roof.
3. The structural condition of timber staircase of the Main Building is generally good. As there is no major
structural defects observed to the staircase, however, a number of treads and riser are found slightly loose, it
is recommended to take off these treads, inspect the condition of the blocking, and refix securely.
4. The most common issue found with regards to joinery is defective paint and natural wear and tear of
paintwork. Where paintwork is in poor condition it is recommended to repaint such areas within this FAS
project.
5. There are a number of cracks identified in the Main Building, mainly on basement floor and first floor on the
internal walls and ceilings. They are classified into different categories so that different repair methods
applied. Brick stitching and local dentist replacement are recommended as a general approach to reinforce
and reconnect cracked walls.
6. There are above ground and below ground external stormwater drainage systems within the site.
a. As there are a number of mature trees within and around the site, the above ground drainage
system is vulnerable to leaves and debris blockage. Cleaning of leaves are debris will be essential as
museum’s daily maintenance works.
b. The below ground drainage system is malfunctioning. Manhole S1 is blocked, damaged and there is
no connection pipe to the public drainage system. Stormwater backflows to the gully trap near the
Main Building and after heavy rainwater laterally penetrates the external wall of the Main Building
into the basement.
c. A series of works are proposed in this FAS project to rectify defective drainage system, including
renewal of underground drainage pipework, reforming surface channels, and reconstruction of the
manhole S1. The outgoing drainage of S1 will be repaired by Architectural Services Department in
their drainage improvement proposal.
7. Leaf guards to the gutters are proposed to be installed to both the Main Building and Annex Building as
improvement works within the FAS project. This is a sensible, practical solution to a site surrounded with
trees. Its installation will minimise the risk of gutter and rainwater pipe blockage and consequent damage to
historic fabric. It will also reduce (but not eliminate) the amount of maintenance required.
8. The issue of dampness and ventilation is then discussed. Whilst the dampness issue to the basement floor of
the Main Building can largely been resolved by rectification of site-wide drain pipes and manholes,
nevertheless, use of correct equipment at correct timing is essential to keep the museum ambient
temperature and humidity at comfort and appropriate level and to avoid damage to historic fabric.
9. The existing access ladder and access hatch to the roof void of the Main Building is not fit-for-purpose. The
existing ladder is only installed at 3m above the floor, the existing access hatch is bulky to handle. Both are
lack of user friendliness. To meet current safety standards, a new proprietary permanent retractable ladder is
proposed in this FAS project together with enlarging the access hatch opening size. The existing plywood
walkway in the roof void will also be renewed on a like-for-like basis but securely fixed, with new handrails
installed on the walls where practical.
The purpose of all these approaches is to maintain the Monument in good state of repair so its heritage value can be
preserved. Thus, the building can be used by the museum’s staff and enjoyed by the public to a modern standard
whilst not diminishing its heritage value.
The criteria used to assess the significance of each element are: (i) the association with the operation of the Old
Bacteriological Institute; and (ii) its architectural quality. Where these criteria conflict, the resultant assessment score
is aggregated. Where necessary, the assessment is explained further in the notes column.
Only interior CDE’s are identified in this report since the exterior façade of the building is managed by other parties,
namely the Architectural Services Department. Each entry in the schedule is accompanied by a photograph of a
sample of the item described. Similar examples of each item can be seen by observation.
Level of Meaning
significance
Exceptional Where an individual space or element is assessed as displaying a strong contribution
to the overall significance of the place. Spaces, elements or fabric exhibit a high
degree of intactness and quality, though minor alterations or degradation may be
evident.
High Where an individual space or element is assessed as making a substantial contribution
to the overall significance of the place. Spaces, elements or fabric originally of
substantial quality, yet may have undergone considerable alteration or adaption
resulting in presentation which is either incomplete or ambiguous. The category also
includes spaces, elements or fabric of average quality in terms of design and materials,
but which exhibit a high degree of intactness.
Moderate Where an individual space or element is assessed as making a moderate contribution
Positive
to the overall significance of the place. Spaces, elements or fabric originally of some
intrinsic quality, and may have undergone alteration or degradation. In addition,
elements of relatively new construction, where the assessment of significance is
difficult, may be included. This category also includes original spaces, elements or
fabric of any quality which have undergone extensive alteration or adaption.
Low Where an individual space or element is assessed as making a minor contribution to
the overall significance of the place, especially when compared to other features.
Spaces, elements or fabric originally of little intrinsic quality, any may have undergone
alteration or degradation. This category also includes original spaces, elements or
fabric of any quality which have undergone extensive alteration or adaption to the
extent that only isolated remnants survive (resulting in a low degree of intactness and
quality of presentation).
Neutral Where an individual space or element is assessed as having an unimportant
relationship with the overall significance of the place. Spaces, elements or fabric are
assessed as having little or no significance.
The following monitoring indicators are used in this report to denote the condition and priorities.
“See crack report” – Refer to Appendix B1, Crack Observation and Repair Proposal prepared by Purcell
and endorsed by MLP Engineering Ltd, for scope of repair, responsibility and priority. The building shows a number of
cracks in the masonry superstructure. These present varying degrees of priority and responsibility and are therefore
assessed separately.
For room numbers in the condition survey, refer to the following plans.
Main Building
B06 Storeroom
B06 General - - General appearance of
appearance the storeroom.
G07 Pantry
G07 General - - General appearance of the
appearance pantry.
G08 Storeroom
G08 General - - General appearance of the
appearance room.
G10 Storeroom
G10 General - - General appearance of the
appearance room.
G11, G12, G13, G14 The HK Tuberculosis, Chest & Heart Diseases Association Gallery
G11 General - - General appearance of the
appearance gallery.
G12
G13
G14
G15 Toilet
G15 General - - General appearance of the
appearance toilet.
103 Storeroom
103 General - - General appearance of the
appearance storeroom.
104 105 Verandahs (maintained by Architectural Services Department, not surveyed in this report)
106 Gordon King Gallery
106 General - - General appearance of the
appearance gallery.
111 Office
111 General - - General appearance of the
appearance office.
113 Balcony (maintained by Architectural Services Department, not surveyed in this report)
Staircases
Timber Staircase G/F-1/F
ST01 General - - General appearance of
appearance timber staircase from G/F-
1/F.
Cross reference to section
5.4 of the Structural Survey
Report for the condition of
the staircase.
Annex Building
Item Element Condi- Priority Observations and Reference Photo
tion Recommendations
Ground Floor
A01 and A02 Toilets
A01 General - - General appearance of the
appearance toilet.
A03.5 Timber doors Fair A Paint wear and tear and As above
deterioration is observed
on the timber doors.
Repaint 2 nos. of timber
doors, colour to match
existing.
A04 Room
A04 General - - General appearance of the
appearance room.
A05 Room
A05 General - - General appearance of the
appearance room.
In accordance with the definition of ‘Conservation Principles’ as stated in The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of
Cultural Significations, The Burra Charter, 2013 (Burra Charter), the following conservation principles should be
adopted in the FAS project:
Article 1. Definitions
1.4 Conservation means all the processes of looking after a place so as to retain its cultural significance
1.5 Maintenance means the continuous protective care of a place, and its setting.
1.6 Preservation means maintaining a place in its existing state and retarding deterioration.
1.7 Restoration means returning a place to a known earlier state by removing accretions or by reassembling existing
elements without the introduction of new material.
1.8 Reconstruction means returning a place to a known earlier state and is distinguished from restoration by the
introduction of new material.
3.1 Conservation is based on a respect for the existing fabric, use, associations and meanings. It requires a cautious
approach of changing as much as necessary but as little as possible.
3.2 Changes to a place should not distort the physical or other evidence it provides, nor be based on conjecture.
4.1 Conservation should make use of all the knowledge, skills and disciplines which can contribute to the study and
care of the place
4.2 Traditional techniques and materials are preferred for the conservation of significant fabric. In some circumstances
modern techniques and materials which offer substantial conservation benefits may be appropriate.
Contents, fixtures and objects which contribute to the cultural significance of a place should be retained at that place.
Their removal is unacceptable unless it is: the sole means of ensuring their security and preservation; on a temporary
basis for treatment or exhibition; for cultural reasons; for health and safety; or to protect the place. Such contents,
fixtures and objects should be returned where circumstances permit and it is culturally appropriate.
15.1 Change may be necessary to retain cultural significance but is undesirable where it reduces cultural significance.
The amount of change to a place and its use should be guided by the cultural significance of the place and its
appropriate interpretation.
15.4 The contributions of all aspects of cultural significance of a place should be respected. If a place includes fabric,
uses, associations or meanings of different periods, or different aspects of cultural significance, emphasising or
interpreting one period or aspect at the expense of another can only be justified when what is left out, removed
or diminished is of slight cultural significance and that which is emphasised or interpreted is of much greater cultural
significance.
Maintenance is fundamental to conservation. Maintenance should be undertaken where fabric is of cultural significance
and its maintenance is necessary to retain that cultural significance.
Preservation is appropriate where the existing fabric or its condition constitutes evidence of cultural significance, or
where insufficient evidence is available to allow other conservation processes to be carried out.
Restoration and reconstruction should reveal culturally significant aspects of the place.
Restoration is appropriate only if there is sufficient evidence of an earlier state of the fabric.
20.1 Reconstruction is appropriate only where a place is incomplete through damage or alteration, and only where
there is sufficient evidence to reproduce an earlier state of the fabric. In some cases, reconstruction may also be
appropriate as part of a use or practice that retains the cultural significance of the place.
22.1 New work such as additions or other changes to the place may be acceptable where it respects and does not
distort or obscure the cultural significance of the place or detract from its interpretation and appreciation.
22.2 New work should be readily identifiable as such but must respect and have minimal impact on the cultural
significance of the place.
• To carry out termite inspection to structural timber and joinery, and to introduce a termite control system
(i.e. bait boxes) in the building to provide long-term termite control measures.
• To record the existing condition of structural timber elements, especially the roof structure, to inform decisions
about its future repair, which may include replacing the roof covering (any repair works to the roof coverings
are to be carried out by the Architectural Services Department).
• To record the existing condition of joinery, and to repair and redecorate any joinery that is in poor condition
• To carry out minor repairs to the main timber staircase by re-fixing loose timber balusters.
• To redecorate timber staircase from G/F to 1/F
• To carry out repairs to internal brickwork and plaster, including repairing cracks and defective plaster works
• To repair/ replace damaged or improperly restored encaustic floor tiles
• To install a permanent means of maintenance access to and within the Attic to enable safe regular inspection,
cleaning and maintenance works by installation of retractable ladder and safe access walkway.
• To install leaf guards on the eaves gutters to minimise the need for maintenance and the risk of gutter/outlet
blockage.
• To overhaul the existing drainage channel at the roof valley of the southwest elevation.
External Drainage
• To replace defective manholes and underground pipework to maintain the rainwater drainage system
functioning as intended.
Annex Building
• To monitor the existing bait boxes installed in the Annex Building for a year in three months intervals.
• To repair internal brickwork and pointing
• To install leaf guards on the eaves gutter to minimise the need for maintenance and the risk of gutter/outlet
blockage.
Main Building
6.4 Joinery
The most common issue found with regards to joinery is
defective paint. In a lot of areas the defect is simply wear
and tear rather than other inherent problems. Where
paintwork is in poor condition it is recommended to
repaint such areas within this FAS project. Areas where
paint decoration is in fair condition, are not proposed to
be repainted within this FAS project, however, we
recommend the Museum to repaint these elements
within a period of 5 years, or when there is a future
refurbishment/ redecoration project. Paint wear and tear observed on timber doors
1) Any accumulated debris, vegetation, and leaves d. Size of the manhole (350 mm dia.)
in the existing channels, outlets, and catchpits does not allow entering for repair and
shall be cleaned regularly, this is a routine maintenance
maintenance responsibility of HKMMS.
The defects at manhole S1 is the root cause of
the mal-functioned external rainwater drainage
2) Any blocked weep holes shall be rodded. In this
system, therefore replacement of manhole S1
case, removal of vegetation is a routine
is vital to rectify the existing rainwater drainage
maintenance responsibility of HKMMS, and any
system on site. We consider that it is necessary
mud blockage shall be reported to CEDD for
to reconstruct the entire manhole for future
clearance.
use with a reasonably long period of operation.
It is proposed this work to be carried out within
3) Multiple cracks and fractures are found on
this FAS project.
underground pipes between manhole S3 to S2,
therefore it is proposed to renew the pipework 7) The reconstructed manhole S1 will then be
with new 100mm dia. cast iron pipe. Since the connected ArchSD’s drainage improvement
depth for excavation is shallow (<0.8m), no works.
additional planking shoring is required. Straight
cut excavation is proposed. This is to be carried 8) The descriptions of each section excavation
out within this FAS project. are as below:
Annex Building
External Area
6.18 Timber staircases (External)
There is a timber staircase with a flight of 13 steps laid
on existing granite steps connecting Caine Lane and the
Museum. There is evidence of old termite infestation on
the timber stair components and termite bait box has
been installed. Four steps are found substantially
damaged by rot. The badly rotten four steps will be
replaced on a like-for-like basis, and other minor decay
will be repaired by epoxy resin. Then the entire staircase
will be redecorated. Colour contrast anti-slip nosing tape
is to be installed following the redecoration.
8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Website of Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences, https://www.hkmms.org.hk/en/home/
Hongkong. Report of the Director of Public Works, for the Year 1905