Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 42

ACADEMIC STRUGGLES OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING PROGRAM (STEP)


STUDENTS OF ENHS IN THE NEW NORMAL: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL
STUDY

ADOLACION, CLAICE TRIXIE H.


GEGONE, ESTHER LUCIA G.
FABRO, RICHNEL JOHN P.
LONDRES, CHAIRIEL HOPE A.
SUDAYON, LOURFAYE ANNE A.

A JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL RESEARCH SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY


OF ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, POBLACION, ESPERANZA
SULTAN KUDARAT IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIRMENTS IN
RESEARCH 9

GRADE 9 PINK(SPFL)

JUNE 2023

Republic of the Philippines


Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
School ID:304589

APPROVAL OF RESEARCH PROPOSAL

June 14, 2023


Date
JHS Research Coordinator
This School

Ma’am/Sir;

This is to inform your good office that the Research Paper entitled,
ACADEMIC STRUGGLES OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE,
TECHNOLOGY, AND ENGINEERING PROGRAM (STEP) STUDENTS OF
ENHS IN THE NEW NORMAL; A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY has been
carefully scrutinized by the Research Committee as reflected by their respective
signatures below and is recommended for the approval of the Research Proposal.

ANGELICA J. SORNITO
Research Committee/Panelist Date & Signature

REINA KAREN SALCEDO


Research Committee/Panelist Date & Signature

JENNIFER L. EMEJAS
Research Committee/Panelist Date & Signature

LEILYN SANTIZO
Research Committee/Panelist Date & Signature

RODIE B. OÑOS
Research Committee/Panelist Date & Signature

Approved:
DR. ANALIZA G. SUMIDO
Junior High School Research Coordinator

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The completion of this undertaking could not have been possible

without the participation and assistance of so many people whose names may

not all be enumerated. Their contributions are sincerely appreciated and


gratefully acknowledged. However, the group would like to express their deep

appreciation and indebtedness particularly to the following:

Rodie B. Oños, our research adviser, for his guidance and constant

supervision as well as for providing necessary information regarding this

research and also for his endless support in completing this endeavor.

To the committee/panelist, Ma’am Reina Karen Salcedo, Ma’am

Jennifer L. Emejas, Ma’am Angelica J. Sornito, and Ma’am Leilyn Santizo

experts in the field of research and for helping the researchers, sharing their

expertise to improve the research study.

To Ma’am Lailanie Brille C. Valdez, English teacher, for your unending

support to the researchers, sharing your ideas and brilliant suggestion to

improve the study of the researchers.

To the validators, Sir Venscent G. Gegone MAEd Chem, Ma,am Reina

Karen Salcedo, and Ma,am Fairedel C. Danding for your help and support to

the researchers throughout the duration of the study.

To our parents, friends and others who in one way or another shared

their support, either morally, financially and physically, thank you.

Foremost, praises and thanks to God, the Almighty for his showers of

blessings throughout our research work to complete the research

successfully. We thank you.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Title Page……………………………………………..………………………………i

Approval sheet…………………………………………………..…………………..ii

Acknowledgement……………………………………………..……………………iii
Table of Contents……………………………………………...……………………iv

Chapter I:

Introduction…………………………………………………………..………………1

Framework of the Study…………………………………………………………….3

Statement of the Problem………………………………….……………………….4

Significance of the Study……………………………………………………………5

Definition of Terms…………………………………………………………………..6

Scope and Delimitation……………………………………………………………..6

Chapter II:…………………………………………………………………………….8

Review of Related Literature……………………………………………………….8

Academic Struggles…………………………………………………………………8

Science Technology and Engineering Program (STEP)…………………...….12

New Normal………………………………………………………………………..14

Chapter III:………………………………………………………………………….18

Methodology………………………………………………………………………..18

Research Design…………………………………………………………………..18

Research Locale…………………………………………………………………..18

Research Participants…………………………………………………………….19

Research ethics and protocols…………………………………………………..20

Research Instrument………………………………………………………………21

Data gathering procedure…………………………………………………………21

Data Analysis………………………………………………………………………23

Recommendations:…………………………………………………………………..

References……………………………………………………………………………

Appendices……………………………………………………………………………
Curriculum Vitae………………………………………………………………………

List of Figures:
Figure 1: Geographical Map of the Research Locale………………………….19
CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

Many areas of people's lives and the community as a whole have

changed as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. The only industries seriously

impacted by the aforementioned epidemic are those of medicine, trade, and

education. Additionally, its exceptional occurrence put the government's

system's readiness and initiative to the test. A plan for learning continuity has

been established for the field of education, and steps have been taken to

guarantee that students still have access to "education" despite the current

circumstances.

Implementing the various learning delivery modalities was part of the

Department of Education's (DepEd) learning continuity plan. These learning

modalities include in-person instruction, online instruction, blended learning,

and homeschooling. To protect the safety of both students and teachers, only

distance learning among these modalities was permitted to be used in public

schools. When using this modality, students complete modules at home while

listening to the radio or watching TV shows that feature educational

programming. They can also take online classes and complete assignments

and tests there. The "new normal" school configuration in our nation's

educational system looks like this. This new normal, as its name implies,

brought both many new changes and many new issues to the pupils.

According to the most recent study by (McNiff, 2020) the Coronavirus

pandemic had an immediate effect on students' mental health. When the

pandemic started in early March, the study noticed increases in melancholy


and anxiety right around the time that the school was pressuring students to

start remote learning. The researcher explained it by saying that these pupils

were less active as a result of the lockdown orders that were in place at the

time.

The move from the classroom to the computer is being made by

students and teachers at all educational levels as the number of confirmed

Covid-19 cases keeps increasing. As students and teachers have found, not

every subject lends itself to an easy transition to distant learning. Teachers

attempting to adjust to giving lectures online have encountered difficulties due

to distance learning (O'Keefe, 2020).

The Department of Education (DepEd) is supporting 198 republican

high schools around the nation that are putting the STE program into practice

as part of its continuous efforts to strengthen the teaching of Science,

Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP) in basic education. According

to Secretary of Education Armin Luistro, the specialist curriculum is taught in

two courses annually at the level of a select few conventional high schools

with a sizable enrollment.

There are students who are naturally gifted in the sciences, and we

have a responsibility to support them, Luistro continued, in accordance with

the government's national development agenda, which is mostly focused on

research and technology.

Additionally, concerns with professors and instructors, finances,

problems with parents or guardians, love lives, academic subjects,

requirements, and projects, oral and written exams, announced or


unannounced quizzes, and graded recitations are major reasons why

students struggle (Salvacion, 2004).

According to (Blona, 2005) some students struggle to deal with the

demands of adjusting to a new living situation, new friends, academic

pressure, and sexual worries, which leads to stress.

Due to the existing problems presented, the researchers decided to

explore on the academic struggles of Junior High STE Students of Esperanza

National High School (ENHS) in new normal education.

Framework of the Study

This study is anchored on Theory of Challenge and Support by

(Sanford, 1967). According to him, for growth to occur, a person needs a

balanced amount of challenge and support as appropriate for the task.

This foundational theory will certainly inform the way academic

advisors can achieve this balance with developmental advising. “Challenges

occur in situations for which a student does not have the skills, knowledge, or

attitude to cope (for example academic, social, psychological). Supports are

buffers in the environment that help the student meet challenges to be

successful. (Sanford, 1967) Keeping the theory in mind that these challenges

are a necessary and usually unavoidable part of the college experience,

student affairs professionals should not seek to eliminate them, but to support

students through these challenges.


The idea of challenge and support does not indicate that a student will

never fail or encounter bad repercussions, but it does suggest that there will

be people and systems in place to support the student while they learn from

the experience.

In addition, a person must be ready, physically and psychologically, in

order to grow. According to Sanford, when a person is given too much

support, they fail to learn, and when they are given too little support, they tend

to get frustrated by their challenges and quit trying.

This is related to challenge and support because students need to feel

like they have a strong support system to rely on in order to feel like they can

confront obstacles with confidence. The key is finding a balance between the

two because if students receive too much support, they may grow complacent

and comfortable since they aren't put in situations that may motivate them to

go beyond their comfort zone or accepted norms. However, if students feel

that they are continually being tested, they may feel overwhelmed and grow to

believe that they are unable to meet the constant barrage of demanding

requirements for their skills.

Statement of the Problem

This study explores on the academic struggles of Junior High School

STEP Students at Esperanza National High School Year 2022-2023 in the

New Normal Education.

Specifically, this study will be carried out to answer the following

questions:
1. What are the academic struggles of the Junior High School STEP

Students of ENHS in the new normal?

2. What are the causes of academic struggles of Junior High School

STEP Students in the new normal?

3. How do Junior High School STEP Students cope up with their

academic struggles in the new normal?

Significance of the Study

The findings of the study will be beneficial to the Students, Teachers,

School STEP Coordinator, School, Principal, DepEd, and Future

Researchers:

For the Students, the result of the study is to motivate them to open

themselves in the field as a STEP Students: Inspire them to pursue their goals

and encourage them to develop their creativity and skills which they can use

in the future.

For the Teachers, the result of the study will help them to be more

advance in knowledge and techniques in handling their STEP students based

on the academic struggles, this will be serve as basis for an intervention to

cater the needs of STEP Students in their academic journey.

For the School STEP coordinators, the result of the study will guide

the STEP Coordinators in decision making in upgrading their approaches in

dealing, to develop the behavior of STEP students.

For the School, the result of the study could provide them with the

baseline data to upgrade the STEP teachers in their teaching and strategies.
For the Principal, the result of the study will serves as a guide to

upgrade the curriculum of STEP and to train the STEP teachers on how to

handle STEP students who experienced academic struggles.

For the DepEd, the result of the study will be their basis to create a

program or seminars in informing the parents that children must not be

pressured.

For the Future Researchers, the result of the study is to know and

appreciate the academic struggles of Junior High School STEP Students.

Definition and Terms

For a better understanding of this study, the following terms are defined

in the context of this research.

Academic Struggles - it refers to the struggles of STEP students in their

academics.

Junior High School STEP Students - A Junior Students from grade 7 to 10

under STE program of Esperanza National High School.

New Normal - A new set-up of education in the Philippines.

Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP) - A special

science program offered in public school which focuses in Science,

Technology and Engineering.

Scope and Delimitation

This study will focus on the Academic Struggles encountered by the

Junior High School STEP Students of ENHS in New Normal set-up of

education. The study will be conducted within the SY. 2022-2023. The
participants of this study will be two (2) STEP Students in grade 7, two (2)

STEP Students in grade 8, two (2) STEP Students in grade 9, and two (2)

STEP Students in grade 10 of ENHS.


CHAPTER ll

Review of Related Literature

This chapter presents the literature reviews of Academic Struggles of

Junior High School Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP) in

New Normal. The said topics are comprehensively paraphrased to give

relevance to the present study and they will be very useful in discussing the

results of the study.

Academic Struggles

Education is crucial for producing trained labor that promotes economic

progress and resolves urgent struggles in a community. In order to graduate

with high academic status, students must also invest a lot of time in their

studies (Tadese, Yeshaneh, & Mulu, 2022). When teachers modify their

instruction to take into account the feedback from the students themselves

and make a distinction, they may be able to help academically struggling

public school students who drop out of regular education (Blaauw, 2016).

It can be challenging to balance school whether you are in middle

school, high school, or college. Academic Struggles can cause stress and

mental health problems, even if education is often a source of inspiration and

personal growth for many individuals. On the other hand, problems with

mental health might make school difficult.

Being occasionally anxious and stressed out in school is normal.

Everybody has likely been anxious before an exam or disappointed after

receiving a poor grade. Yet it's critical to seek help from a therapist if your

academic struggles consistently result in considerable stress, anxiety, or

mental health issues.


According to Essel and Owusu (2017), an increase in class work puts

students under stress because they become frustrated when given more work

than they can handle, which makes it difficult for them to concentrate and

think clearly. A student’s workload can also contribute to their stress levels

because they won’t have enough time to complete all of their coursework to

their fullest potential when they have so many rigorous classes to take at

school. The student then starts to ponder a lot and becomes stressed out as a

result. Consequently, the student’s academic performance will be significantly

impacted. When they don’t comprehend what their teachers are teaching in

class, many pupils become frustrated. Some people also misinterpret what

the teacher stated in order to make it imply something else. Due to their

aggravation at not understanding what the lecturers are saying in class,

students become anxious and worry about failing the course.

Students have been dealing with many struggles in many areas of their

lives even before the Covid-19 pandemic. (Mazo, 2015) noted that difficulties

faced by children can be found anywhere, including at home, with friends, at

school, and in the classroom. That is right around the corner. That just cannot

be avoided because it is a reality of being a student. In actuality, many

students struggle every day. There are a variety of things that could cause it.

Each person experiences problems differently, as do the reasons behind them

and their severity.

No one is immune to it, regardless matter how well-off, sensible,

cunning, or intelligent he may be. Frustrations, mistakes, setbacks, defeats,

losses, changes, and disagreements will occasionally present challenges to

all students.
Stress is not a typical occurrence that can be ignored. To prevent its

worst effects, you must pay close attention to it as soon as the symptoms

appear and take the appropriate action (Mazo, 2015). Essel and Owusu

(2017), highlighted that introducing a stress management course and

participating in extracurricular activities can help students handle their

difficulties.

Another study’s findings about the sources of students’ stress indicated

that a variety of factors influence students’ levels of stress. These variables

included: personal, intellectual, environmental, and relationship variables. The

major source of stress for students in terms of relationship variables was

interacting with new individuals at work. While class burden was the primary

source of stress with regard to academic considerations, fears about the

future were the leading source of stress among students when it came to

environmental factors. Financial issues were the personal component that

students felt the most stress from (Essel & Owusu, 2017).

Ways to deal with trying and stressful situations are referred to as

coping mechanisms or coping strategies. Richard Lazarus and Susan

Folkman defined, coping is the total of cognitive and behavioral efforts that

are continually changing and intended to address specific pressures, whether

they be internal or external (Guevarra & Cimanes, 2017).

The study of Kwaah and Essilfie’s (2017), utilized a variety of stress-

reduction techniques, primarily self-distracting behaviors like watching TV and

listening to music and praying or meditating. Support from loved ones, friends,

and professors served as additional crucial stress coping mechanisms.


As coping affects how much stress-related psychopathological

symptoms manifest, identifying healthy and unhealthy teenage coping

mechanisms may help with the prevention and treatment of mental health

issues in children and adolescents. Research has shown that students’ usage

of particular coping behaviors has significant links with academic and mental

health outcomes, making it vital to investigate the extent to which high-

achieving students use various coping methods in response to their

demanding academic demands (Hearon, 2015).

(Perino et al., 2016) recommended that teachers can properly guide

and monitor their students in order to give an immediate response and help to

students who are experiencing various types of stresses. They did this in light

of the significance of effective coping mechanisms. Giving students the

inspiration to approach their challenges with optimism is one technique to

assist their students. Seminars for students that are specifically tailored to

their academic needs might be held by schools. For the purpose of making

the students aware of and ready for any potential stress they may experience,

this session will cover several coping techniques.

(Guevarra & Cimanes, 2017) supported this idea and suggested that

professors assist pupils in overcoming their difficulties. They said that the

teachers might act as the pupils’ stress-coping mechanism. They must

therefore be accessible to their students by offering them guidance on what is

morally correct. By developing programs and activities for the students that

will improve their coping mechanisms while dealing with stress, schools can

also assist the children.


According to (Ballane, 2019) one of the most crucial factors in

enhancing academic performance, particularly among students going through

changes, has been self-confidence. In addition, it has been identified because

students who have higher self-confidence levels are more receptive to

academic struggles and are more eager to learn. Thus, (Bryant, 2017)

focused on the variables influencing students’ academic motivation and sense

of self-efficacy. She came to the conclusion that each student’s perceived

self-efficacy was dependent on the sources they had developed throughout

their lives, particularly their complete mastery of those sources. Additionally,

she came to the conclusion that academic motivation is always founded on

individual academic self-efficacy with regard to persuasion, physiology,

affection, competence and wisdom.

Science Technology and Engineering Program (STEP)

STEP stands for Science, Technology, and Engineering Program.

Despite being widely used, the acronym STEP still lacks a defined meaning or

agreement between instructors. The phrase is now used to refer to any

occasion, measure, program or activity that incorporates one or more STEP

disciplines (Reeve, 2013). The word that has been embraced by organizations

like as governments, schools, enterprises, and industries leaders to convey

the vital need to educate.

Science is the study of nature, including the treatment or application of

facts, ideas, concepts, or norms related to various disciplines, as well as the

laws of nature related to physics, chemistry, and biology. Both a body of

previously established information and gathered over time and a method

(scientific inquiry) that produces new information.


The engineering design process is informed by scientific knowledge.

Science incorporates knowledge based on facts from several investigations

into highly developed and well-tested theories. Theories that explain large

amounts of data and forecast the results of follow-up investigations. Despite

the fact that the methods employed to produce scientific hypotheses vary from

one field of study to another, sciences share this (NGSS, 2013).

Even though it is not a subject in the strictest sense, technology

includes both the actual technological products and the entire system of

individuals, groups, and institutions as well as the knowledge, techniques, and

tools used in their development and use. To meet their necessities and satisfy

their desires, people have been developing technology throughout history.

Science and engineering contributed significantly to the development of much

of modern technology, and both disciplines use technological tools. The

NGSS places a strong emphasis on fusing engineering and technology into

science teaching, which is noteworthy to notice. Committing to fully integrating

technology and engineering into the framework of science education by

elevating engineering design to the same level as scientific investigation in the

classroom. The central concepts of engineering and technology are accorded

the same standing as the central concepts of the other major science

disciplines, and they, too, support the “engineering problem-solving strategy

to “design” (NGSS, 2013).

The field of engineering encompasses both a body of knowledge

concerning the planning and production of manufactured goods as well as a

method for problem-solving. This procedure was created with limitations. The

natural laws or scientific principles are one restriction on engineering design.


Time, money, materials that are available, ergonomics, environmental

laws, manufacturability, and reparability. Technology is used in engineering as

well as notions from science and tools. Engineering is similar to science in

that it calls for both knowledge and a set of procedures. The primary objective

of engineering is to find solutions to issues that result from a particular human

need or desire. Engineers use their understanding of physics and

mathematics to accomplish this as well. As well as how well they comprehend

the engineering design process. Engineering is the process of defining a

problem, figuring out what is required, and then designing a solution to it. Due

to the importance of the design process in helping students comprehend

engineering as a profession and a potential career path, they give students a

setting in which to practice applying their scientific knowledge. In addition to

requiring specific knowledge, the work of engineers needs both individual and

team effort. Thus including both this framework contains engineering

standards and fundamental principles (NGSS, 2013).

New Normal

The process of adjusting to the COVID-19 outbreak is known as the

“New Normal”. As a result of their continued learning and adaptation after the

COVID-19 epidemic, humans will acquire new behaviors (Pragholapati, 2020).

Education in the new normal calls for a number of modifications because

teachers weren’t adequately prepared when the epidemic struck and schools

ceased holding in-person classes and suspended on-campus activities for the

purpose of student safety (Filho et al., 2021). The purpose of the study is to

determine the benefits, drawbacks, possibilities, and risks connected with the

new norm in public education in the Philippines utilizing the real-world


experiences of public school instructors. The phrase "new normal" initially

originated after the financial crisis to describe the enormous economic,

cultural, and social upheavals that led to precariousness and social unrest,

affecting societal perspectives and personal lifestyles. This phrase has been

used once more to describe how the COVID-19 epidemic has altered crucial

facets of human existence (Jamon et al., 2021)

The epidemic ushers in a “new” normal in which technology compels

new ways of working and learning. It drives education toward a greater

emphasis on technology, a tendency that is already well underway and is

being backed by market fundamentalism and commercialism (Pacheco,

2021).

One year after the COVID-19 outbreak, people are beginning to

comprehend how to combat the new coronavirus strain while regaining their

health, their economies, and their entire communities. While overcoming

significant obstacles, we must improvise, adapt, and prevail. Our immediate

attention should, in my opinion, be on addressing the complex issues brought

on by the epidemic by emphasizing resilience, recovery, and restructuring

because the new normal is still developing. As the COVID-19 epidemic broke

out, we were compelled to adapt to the new normal. This includes being

obliged to wear face masks and face shields in public, working from home,

having parents home-school their children, and being placed under lockdown

and quarantine. Distance learning must replace traditional classroom

instruction for students. Formerly taking place in a face-to-face setting in the

classroom, learning is now done remotely or at home using various media that

are readily available. The pupils became concerned since they employed
distance learning for their regular courses and to assess their academic

performance. The general capacity of students to absorb information is

constrained, and a variety of learning modalities is likely to result in cognitive

fatigue, impairing the capacity of students to acquire new material adequately

(Corpuz, 2021).

Khalid (2021) emphasized that the COVID-19 pandemic issue has

made distance learning a key component in all educational establishments,

including schools, colleges, and universities. Even though they encounter

difficulties in many ways, teachers and students must adapt to the distance

learning method in order for it to be used as usual. Some of them struggle

with anxiety and hopelessness. Past studies have shown that students

experience mental impairment and display symptoms of depression and

anxiety. Nevertheless, other studies revealed the exact opposite.

In addition, (Rasmitadila et al., 2020) said that in this Covid-19

pandemic, institutions, administrators, instructors, students, and even parents

found themselves unexpectedly involved in the distance learning process.

Schools have been forced into a learning flow that is complicated and

constrained as a result of the shift from direct instruction to indirect

approaches. This procedure has had a significant impact on the school,

teachers, and pupils (Mailizar et al., 2020). Individuals have unavoidably

encountered unique challenges and barriers in institutions during this process.

Closing schools, not having the necessary tools to engage in classes, being

unable to access internet resources from home, and being stuck at home for

an extended period of time have all had a psychological impact on students


(Apriyanti, 2020). Moreover, educational institutions’ poor technical

infrastructure can be evaluated.

According to Woloszyn (2020), many students have found remote

learning to be an emotional roller coaster. It has provided numerous options

for students to adopt online and modular learning environments. They have

faced a number of difficulties as a result, though. There are advantages and

disadvantages to the new system, despite the fact that it is in a different

setting. On the other hand, Wykowski (2020) emphasized that distance

learning has permeated many students' daily lives. Many schools are still

getting used to the challenges and advantages of the switch to distance

learning, which has required a lot of adjustment in a short amount of time.

Insights

In crafting our review related literature we learned that we must put an

effort if we want to succeed academically and live up to our aspirations. There

may be times when it seems pointless or difficult to jump through some

hoops. It can be challenging to learn from the challenges we encountered

while pursuing our academic objectives. We also learned that not only we

study technical knowledge at school, but we also learn how to manage

ourselves and the struggle.

Junior High School, Science, Technology, and Engineering Program

(STEP) students grapple with how they will fulfill their academic struggles in

the new normal brought on by the Covid-19 pandemic. Students need the

moral support of their friends and family to get through academic challenges.

Additionally, a lack of communication results in students losing interest in their

studies and could lead to them losing their morals and self-motivation.
CHAPTER lll

Methodology

This chapter represents the research design, research locale, research

participants, research ethics and protocol, research instrument, data gathering

procedure, and data analysis.

Research Design

The applied qualitative phenomenological design will be used to

determine the grasp of the phenomenon as experienced by student’s

interaction. The goal of the phenomenological study is to understand the

student’s interactions and how they experienced it. The phenomenological

approach developed independently from other qualitative designs, so

distinctive characteristics exist. The phenomenological approach is founded in

the philosophy of Edmund Husseri, which maintains that the self’s experience

of phenomena is the starting point for knowledge (Hultgren, 2021). The idea

of understanding the essences of a phenomenon is the primary key to this of

research. In other words, it is used to understand a phenomenon’s universal

nature 0by exploring the views of those who have experienced it.

Research Locale

The research will be conducted in Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat where

Esperanza National High School is located and where the participants will be

found. These students will be identified based on their academic struggles in

Junior High School as Science, Technology, and Engineering Program

( STEP) students.
Figure 1, show the geographical map of the locale of the study where the research

will be conducted. The map was obtained from the google map showing the detailed view of

the site and similarly with the wide range view of Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat.

Legend: Map of the school where the student’s of STEP selected as participants.

Research Participants

The participants of this study will be chosen and will be identified from

the students of Esperanza National High School (ENHS) under the Junior

High School Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STE) Program.


The participants will be selected from four (4) different Grade levels of Junior

High School of ENHS School Year 2022-2023.

There will be eight (8) participants from different grade levels as the

researcher will search in depth the information regarding to the academic

struggles of the Junior High School Science, Technology, and Engineering

Program (STEP) students of Esperanza National High School (ENHS).

From the eight participants, two (2) will be selected from the Grade 7

STEP students of Esperanza National High School; two (2) will be selected

from the Grade 8 STEP students of Esperanza National High School; two (2)

will be selected from the Grade 9 STEP students of Esperanza National High

School; and (2) will be selected from the Grade 10 STEP students of

Esperanza National High School.

Research ethics and protocols

Applications for ethical approval differ across institutions. Regardless,

the researchers focused on the benefits of a research and the risk to benefit

the ratio concerning participants. Nevertheless, they were effectively

addressed both to get ethical clearance. The researchers made it clear that

individuals will provide with sufficient information in order to make an informed

decision on their participation. In addition, the researchers will demonstrate

the ethical issues of consent, confidentiality is clearly defined. Plagiarism is a

form of theft of intellectual property. As a result, correct referencing, citation

styles, citing resources, and paraphrasing were carefully followed. The

participants were also asked for their permission to be photographed and

have their voices recorded.


Research Instrument

There will be two gathering tools to use in obtaining the data for this

study. Data gathering will be facilitated through motive questions for the

interview and focus group discussion.

A. Interview

The interview will be conducted through the use of motive questions,

which will be used to ask the participants regarding their academic struggles

in the new normal of education; follow-up questions will then be asked

regarding the academic struggles they encountered and how they address

such struggles, problems, and challenges.

B. Focus-Group Discussion

The motive questions for the focus group discussion (FGD) will be the

academic struggles of junior high school science, technology, and engineering

students in the new normal of education. Questions will also be asked about

the difficulties, challenges, and problems encountered by the participants in

the new normal. During the FGD, the researcher will allow the participants to

express themselves in vernacular or in any dialect they are comfortable with.

Data gathering procedure

A letter from the Principal of the Esperanza National High School is

requested to allow the researcher to conduct the study. The letter will first

handed personally to the Science, Technology, and Engineering (STEP)

Coordinator for approval. Upon approval, permission will also requested from
the various heads to gather the data from Science, Technology, and

Engineering (STEP) Students of the concerned school.

An orientation then is given to the participants on how the interview and

FGD will be administered. The privacy of open – ended responses, as well as

the identities of participants will be assured to be given utmost security. A

semi – structured interview is conducted to allow participants to share his/her

Academic Struggles they encountered as Science, Technology, and

Engineering Program (STEP) Students and how they address their Academic

Struggles.

Then directed interview will be conducted to gather data on the

practices utilized by the Administrator from the Science, Technology, and

Engineering Program (STEP) Students in Esperanza National High School

(ENHS). Follow up questions will be asked to explore the Academic Struggles

of Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP) Students. Focus

group discussion (FGD) will be conducted, and this is done in structured small

group interview. According to Taylor-Powell (2002), FGD focused on two

ways. First, the persons interviewed will be similar in some ways, being a

Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP) Students.

The participants heard the interacted with each other. Second, they

give either different or similar information and could expound on their

responses than when they will be individually interviewed.

The purpose of focus group interviews will be develop a broad and

deep understanding rather than a qualitative summary. The emphasis is on

the insights responses, and opinions of the participants. In this study, the

participants will be considered experts in their fields and, at the same time,
Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP) Students in

Esperanza National High School. Motive questions will be asked from the

participants who are follow – up by more specific questions regarding their

Academic Struggles as Science, Technology, and Engineering Program

(STEP) Students. The responses of the participants will be recorded and

transcribed. Themes and categories will be identified based on the

commonalities of the responses of the participants.

The motive questions for the interview will be used in the conduct of

FGD. These will be, however, further followed – up with questions on the

Academic Struggles encountered by the Science, Technology, and

Engineering Program (STEP) Students and how they addressed their

Academic Struggles.

Data Analysis

Data gathered through FGD and interviews will be analyze using

phenomenology. Phenomenology emphasize the formulation of concepts from

the nature of things through the way people experiences. Phenomenology is

an approach to qualitative research that focuses on the communality of a live

experience within a particular group. The fundamental goal of the approach is

the to arrive at a description of the nature of the particular phenomenon

(Creswell, 2013). Phenomenology is the philosophical name for the method of

inquiring into the meanings of our experience as we live them. The method is

phenomenological reflecting on pre-reflective or live experience.

REFERENCES
Apriyanti, C. (2020). Distance Learning and Obstacles During COVID-19
Outbreak. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id

Ballane, G.P (2019). Understanding of Self-confidence in High School


Students (Doctoral dissertation , Walden University)

Blaauw, J. (2016). Listening to the Voices of Struggling Students: A Literature


Review. Teachers and Curriculum. 16(2), p55-60.

Blona, R. (2005). Coping with stress in a changing world.

Bryant, S.K (2017). Self-Efficacy Sources and Academic Motivation: A


Qualitative Study of 10th Graders

Creswell, J.W. (2013). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).


Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1149107.pdf

Corpuz, J.C.G. (2021). Adapting to the culture of ‘new normal’: an emerging


response to COVID-19. Journal of Public Health. 43(2), p. e344–e345,
https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab057

Essel, G. & Owusu, P. (2017). Causes of students’ stress, its effects on their
academic success, and stress management by students (Master’s
thesis, Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences, Finland).

Filho, L., & Wall, T. (2021) Impacts of Covid-19 and social isolation on
academic staff and students at universities

Guevarra, R. & Cimanes, R. (2017). Stress coping mechanism and its


impact to their age among Senior High School students at Parañaque
National High School-Baclaran. International Journal for Innovative
Research in Multidisciplinary Field,3(7).

Hearon, B. (2015). Stress and coping in High School students in accelerated


academic curricula: Developmental trends and relationships with
student success (Master’s thesis, University of South Florida, U.S.A).

Jamon, B.E.V., Boholano, H.B., Cabanes-Jamon, M.G., Pardillo, M.F.


(2021). Teachers lived experiences in the new normal in Philippine
public schools: A phenomenology. International Journal of Research.
8(02), p773-782

Khalid, (2021). A Review of Psychological Impact on Students Online


Learning during Covid-19 in Malaysia. Retrieved from: DOI:
10.4236/ce.2021.126097

Kwaah, C.Y. & Essilfie, G. (2017). Stress and coping strategies among
Distance Education students at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education,18(3).
Mailizar, Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary School
Mathematics Teachers’ Views on e-Learning Implementation Barriers
During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.ejmste.com

Mazo, G. (2015). Causes, effects of stress, and the coping mechanism of the
Bachelor of Science in Information Technology Students in a Philippine
university. Journal of Education and Learning,9(1),71-78.

McNiff, S. (2020). Students struggle with mental health in pandemic. Health


Days News.

Next Generation Science Standards, (NGSS). (2013). Next Generation


Science Standards (Online)

O’Keffe, J. (2020). Distance learning poses challenges for students, teachers.


Business Mirror.

Pacheco, J.A (2021). The “new normal” in education. PROSPECTS.

Perino, G. A., Gomez, Q. M., Abecia, M. F., Moneva, J. (2016). Coping


strategies of Senior High School graduating students with academic
tasks. International Journal of Science and Research,7(12).

Pragholapati, A. (2020). New Normal “Indonesia” After COVID-19 Pandemic

Rasmitadila, A., R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E.,


Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The Perceptions of
Primary School Teachers of Online Learning During the COVID-19
Pandemic Period. Retrieved from https://www.ejecs.org

Reeve, E.M. (2013). Implementing Science, Technology, Engineering, and


Mathematics (STEM) Education in Thailand and in ASEAN (Online).

Salvacion, S. (2004). Stress profile of students of the University of the


Philippines College of Dentistry.

Sanford, N. (1967). The Challenge of Support. Retrieved from


https://therainmakercompanies.com

Tadese, M., Yeshaneh, A. & Mulu, G.B. (2022).Determinants of good


academic performance among university students in Ethiopia: a cross-
sectional study.

Wykowski, E., & Woloszyn, N. (2020). The Ups and Downs of Online
Learning.Retrieved from https://spotlight153.com
Appendices

Republic of the Philippines


Department of Education
Region XII
DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion, Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
FB Page: DepEd Tayo Esperanza NHS

May 29, 2023

Ma’am,

We, the researchers are asking your permission to scrutinize our

research proposal entitled “Academic Struggles of Junior High School

Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP) Students of ENHS in

the New Normal: A Phenomenological Study”.

Your suggestions, comments and critics will be greatly appreciated for

the improvement of the study.

Truly yours,

Adolacion, Claice Trixie H.

Gegone, Esther Lucia G.

Fabro, Richnel John P.

Londres, Chairiel Hope A.

Sudayon, Lourfaye Anne A.

Researchers

Rodie B. Oños, MAGS Lailanie Brille C. Valdez

Research Adviser Critic Reader

Republic of the Philippines


Department of Education
Region XII
DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion, Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
FB Page: DepEd Tayo Esperanza NHS

May 29, 2023

Reina Karen C. Salcedo

Teacher l

Ma’am,

We are submitting to you our Focus Group Discussion and Interview

question for our proposed research entitled " Academic Struggles of Junior

High School Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP)

Students of ENHS in the New Normal: A Phenomenological Study”.

In this regard, please evaluate the motive questions which we have

formulated to gather the needed data for our study.

Your suggestions and comments will be greatly appreciated to improve

and validate our instrument.

Truly yours,

Adolacion, Claice Trixie H.

Gegone, Esther Lucia G.

Fabro, Richnel John P.

Londres, Chairiel Hope A.

Sudayon, Lourfaye Anne A.

Researchers

Republic of the Philippines


Department of Education
Region XII
DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion, Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
FB Page: DepEd Tayo Esperanza NHS

May 29, 2023

Fairedel C. Danding

Teacher ll

Ma’am,

We are submitting to you our Focus Group Discussion and Interview

question for our proposed research entitled " Academic Struggles of Junior

High School Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP)

Students of ENHS in the New Normal: A Phenomenological Study”.

In this regard, please evaluate the motive questions which we have

formulated to gather the needed data for our study.

Your suggestions and comments will be greatly appreciated to improve

and validate our instrument.

Truly yours,

Adolacion, Claice Trixie H.

Gegone, Esther Lucia G.

Fabro, Richnel John P.

Londres, Chairiel Hope A.

Sudayon, Lourfaye Anne A.

Researchers

Republic of the Philippines


Department of Education
Region XII
DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion, Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
FB Page: DepEd Tayo Esperanza NHS

May 29, 2023

Venscent G. Gegone, MAED CHEM

Teacher lll

Sir,

We are submitting to you our Focus Group Discussion and Interview

question for our proposed research entitled " Academic Struggles of Junior

High School Science, Technology, and Engineering Program (STEP)

Students of ENHS in the New Normal: A Phenomenological Study”.

In this regard, please evaluate the motive questions which we have

formulated to gather the needed data for our study.

Your suggestions and comments will be greatly appreciated to improve

and validate our instrument.

Truly yours,

Adolacion, Claice Trixie H.

Gegone, Esther Lucia G.

Fabro, Richnel John P.

Londres, Chairiel Hope A.

Sudayon, Lourfaye Anne A.

Researchers

Republic of the Philippines


Department of Education
Region XII
DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion, Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
FB Page: DepEd Tayo Esperanza NHS

Validation Rating Scale for Qualitative Research Instrument

Instruction: Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement with the


statements provided below by encircling the number that corresponds to your best
judgment. This survey instrument validation rating scale is taken from the criteria for
evaluating the survey questionnaire developed by Good and Scates (1975) as
modified by Oducado (2021).

1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Undecided 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree

Criteria Rating Scale


1. The items in the instrument are relevant to answer the
1 2 3 4 5
objectives of the study.
2. The items in the instrument can obtain depth to constructs
1 2 3 4 5
being measured.
3. The instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the
1 2 3 4 5
construct being measured.
4. The items in the instrument are stated clearly.
1 2 3 4 5
5. The items on the instrument can elicit responses which are
1 2 3 4 5
stable, definite, consistent and not conflicting.
6. The terms adapted in the scale are culturally appropriate. 1 2 3 4 5
7. The layout or format of the instrument is technically sound. 1 2 3 4 5
8. The responses on the scale show a reasonable range of
1 2 3 4 5
variation.
9. The instrument is not too short or long enough that the
1 2 3 4 5
participants will be able to answer it within a given time.
10. The instrument is interesting such that participants will be
1 2 3 4 5
induced to respond to it and accomplish it fully.
11. The instrument as a whole could answer the basic purpose
1 2 3 4 5
for which it is designed.
12. The instrument is culturally acceptable when administered in
1 2 3 4 5
the local setting.

Comments and Suggestions:


_______________________________________________________________

Reina Karen C. Salcedo


Name and Signature of Validator
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion, Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
FB Page: DepEd Tayo Esperanza NHS

Validation Rating Scale for Qualitative Research Instrument

Instruction: Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement with the


statements provided below by encircling the number that corresponds to your best
judgment. This survey instrument validation rating scale is taken from the criteria for
evaluating the survey questionnaire developed by Good and Scates (1975) as
modified by Oducado (2021).

1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Undecided 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree


Criteria Rating Scale
13. The items in the instrument are relevant to answer the
1 2 3 4 5
objectives of the study.
14. The items in the instrument can obtain depth to constructs
1 2 3 4 5
being measured.
15. The instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the
1 2 3 4 5
construct being measured.
16. The items in the instrument are stated clearly.
1 2 3 4 5
17. The items on the instrument can elicit responses which are
1 2 3 4 5
stable, definite, consistent and not conflicting.
18. The terms adapted in the scale are culturally appropriate. 1 2 3 4 5
19. The layout or format of the instrument is technically sound. 1 2 3 4 5
20. The responses on the scale show a reasonable range of
1 2 3 4 5
variation.
21. The instrument is not too short or long enough that the
1 2 3 4 5
participants will be able to answer it within a given time.
22. The instrument is interesting such that participants will be
1 2 3 4 5
induced to respond to it and accomplish it fully.
23. The instrument as a whole could answer the basic purpose
1 2 3 4 5
for which it is designed.
24. The instrument is culturally acceptable when administered in
1 2 3 4 5
the local setting.

Comments and Suggestions:

___________________________________________________________________

Fairedel C. Danding
Name and Signature of Validator

Republic of the Philippines


Department of Education
Region XII
DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion, Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
FB Page: DepEd Tayo Esperanza NHS

Validation Rating Scale for Qualitative Research Instrument

Instruction: Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement with the


statements provided below by encircling the number that corresponds to your best
judgment. This survey instrument validation rating scale is taken from the criteria for
evaluating the survey questionnaire developed by Good and Scates (1975) as
modified by Oducado (2021).

1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Undecided 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree

Criteria Rating Scale


25. The items in the instrument are relevant to answer the
1 2 3 4 5
objectives of the study.
26. The items in the instrument can obtain depth to constructs
1 2 3 4 5
being measured.
27. The instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the
1 2 3 4 5
construct being measured.
28. The items in the instrument are stated clearly.
1 2 3 4 5
29. The items on the instrument can elicit responses which are
1 2 3 4 5
stable, definite, consistent and not conflicting.
30. The terms adapted in the scale are culturally appropriate. 1 2 3 4 5
31. The layout or format of the instrument is technically sound. 1 2 3 4 5
32. The responses on the scale show a reasonable range of
1 2 3 4 5
variation.
33. The instrument is not too short or long enough that the
1 2 3 4 5
participants will be able to answer it within a given time.
34. The instrument is interesting such that participants will be
1 2 3 4 5
induced to respond to it and accomplish it fully.
35. The instrument as a whole could answer the basic purpose
1 2 3 4 5
for which it is designed.
36. The instrument is culturally acceptable when administered in
1 2 3 4 5
the local setting.

Comments and Suggestions:

___________________________________________________________________

Venscent G. Gegone, MAED CHEM


Name and Signatures
of Validator
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
ESPERANZA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion, Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
FB Page: DepEd Tayo Esperanza NHS

Research Instrument

Focus Group Discussion

Participant’s Demographic Profile

Name of Participant:________________________________________
Name of School:___________________________________________
Address:_________________________________________________
Year Level:________________
Age:__________

The Focus Group Discussion (FGD) is a predetermined semi-


structured interview to elicit responses and general discussion among the __
participants from Junior High Science, Technology, and Engineering Program
(STEP) Students in Esperanza National High School. The given period is
between 60-90 minutes.

The following questions will be used to assess a deeper level of


understanding of the Junior High School Science, Technology, and
Engineering Program (STEP) in their academic struggles.

1. What are the academic struggles of the Junior High School STEP students

of ENHS in the new normal?

1.1 What are the struggles you faced in terms of academics?

1.1.1 What are the most pressing academic struggles that you faced?

1.1.2 What are the primary factors that contributed to the struggles

that you faced in academics?

1.1.3 Can you recall a specific instance that you faced struggles in

your studies?
1.2 What support did your teacher and parents give you with, in order to

help in solving your academic struggles under the new normal?

1.2.1 What support did you receive from your teachers during the new

normal?

1.2.2 How did your parents support you in coping with the academic

struggles in the new normal?

1.2.3 As an STEP student, what are the positive feedbacks you

received lately from your teachers/ parents?

1.3 How did you adapt the study routines to overcome the struggles in the

new normal?

1.3.1 What are the struggles that you encountered while adapting the

study routines during new normal?

1.3.2 What changes did you make to your study routines to adjust the

struggles in the new normal?

1.3.3 As an STEP student, what lesson did you learn from adapting

your study routines to overcome the struggles in the new

normal?

2. What are the causes of academic struggles of Junior High School STEP

students in the new normal?

2.1 What are the struggles/problems of Junior High School STEP

students in the new normal?

2.1.1 What are examples of causes of academic struggles as a Junior

High School STEP student in the new normal?

2.1.2 As an STEP student, what are the factors that can affect your

academic performance and how will you address the problem?


2.1.3 What makes you experienced those academic struggles?

2.2 What are the effects of the struggles in your academic performance as

an STEP student?

2.2.1 What are the academic struggles you encountered as an STEP

student?

2.2.2 How do you maintain the integrity despite these struggles?

2.2.3 With those struggles/problems you encountered, which do you

have affected your academic performance the most?

2.3 What are your reflections as a Junior High School STEP student on

the struggles you experienced?

2.3.1 As a Junior High School STEP student, do you think that with

the new normal setting, academic struggles have worsened? If

yes, how has it worsen?

2.3.2 In what way that the new normal setting affected your academic

performance?

2.3.3 How did you carry out other responsibilities in the new normal

despite the academic struggles?

3. How did Junior High School STEP students, cope up with their academic

struggles in the new normal?

3.1 As an STEP student, does technology help Junior High School STEP

students with their academic struggles?

3.1.1 What are the uses of technology in your academics as a Junior

High STEP student?

3.1.2 As a Junior High School STEP student, what are the effects of

using technology in your academics?


3.1.3 As a Junior High School STEP, how does technology make your

academic tasks easier?

3.2 What are the strategies that you employed to overcome these

struggles?

3.2.1 What specific strategies did you implement to address the

struggles you experienced as a Junior High School STEP

student?

3.2.2 Did you seek an advice and support from others? What kind of

support you receive from them?

3.2.3 How did your parents assist you in coping with the academic

struggles in the new normal?

3.3 As a Junior High School STEP student, what are the coping

mechanisms you use during the new normal?

3.3.1 As a Junior High School STEP student, do your classmates help

you in dealing with academic struggles in the new normal?

3.3.2 Based on your experience as a Junior High School STEP

student, does time management help you in dealing with

academic struggles in the new normal?

3.3.3 What have you done to cope up with the struggles you faced in

your academics as a Junior High School STEP student?

You might also like