Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

FORM INTERNSHIP B.

1
LESSON PLAN AND DELIVERY EVALUATION FORM

Name: Naw Nay Tha Blay Paw Subject: Jolly Phonic Date: 1 Feb 2024

Instructions:
Read through the evaluation criteria and circle the most appropriate score for each criterion.
Provide comments for each section as relevant/appropriate.

CRITERIA MARKING KEY:

4 = Excellent
4 = Very Good
3 = Good
2 = Average
1 = Needs Improvement

Criteria for Grading

1. Lesson Plan 5

 The lesson plan was organized correctly, with appropriate goals and 4
objectives.
3

2. Clear Behavioral Expectations 5

 The students were given very clear behavioral expectations. 4


 Classroom rules were reinforced.
3

3. Anticipatory Set/Introduction to the Lesson 5

 The teacher gained the children’s attention. 4


 The class was quiet, seated and waiting in anticipation.
 The teacher used aids, IT, pictures to stimulate student’s curiosity. 3
 The teacher used an element of surprise to create curiosity and interest with
his/her students. 2

1
4. Procedural steps in the lesson were followed. 5

 The lesson had a logical flow. 4


 Remember, however, that you teach children not the plan. Therefore,
procedural steps can change or be altered when appropriate. 3
 Be flexible to capture a teachable moment.
2

5. Content 5

 The teacher has a good working knowledge and understanding of the topic 4
and objectives.
 Content was delivered accurately and confidently. 3

6. Teaching manner 5

 Good eye contact 4


 Confident; encouraged students to participate
 Positive facial expressions 3
 Student-centered methodology
2

7. Voice Projection 5

 Clear diction and enunciation 4


 Voice pitched at an audible level
 Voice projection was appropriate and not above the noise of the class. 3

8. Pace of the Lesson 5

 Appropriate time for each step in the lesson (be flexible) 4


 The lesson moved along at an appropriate pace.
3

9. Rapport with students 5


 Teacher demonstrates professional distance. 4
 Teacher was firm, assertive, fair, and friendly.
 Teacher showed that good rapport is built on good teaching. 3
 Teacher encouraged positive communication.
2

10. Questions 5

 A good selection of HLQ (higher level questions) and LLQ (lower level 4
questions) were asked.
 Wait time was appropriate. 3
 Teacher responded/accepted answers positively.
 Additional questions extended the student’s thinking. 2

11. Effectiveness of the Lesson’s Resources/Aids/Materials 5

 IT-PPT/overheads/DVD 4
 Charts/books/pictures/Objects/artifacts
 Drama 3
 Games
2

12. Student Involvement 5

 Students were actively participating and engaged in learning. 4


 Collaborative learning process.
 Students remained on task. 3

13. Classroom management Whole class/ paired/ group teaching 5

 Students were given clear expectations. 4


 Students were well organized and on task.
 Behavioral expectations were reinforced. 3

14. Guided Practice 5

4
 The teacher circulated amongst the students, answering questions, explaining 3
tasks and assisting when needed.
2

15. The teacher gave praise when students remained focused. 5

 Positive praise was given for appropriate: Behavior; thoughtful answers; 4


being on task, etc.
3

16. Closure 5

 The teacher returned to the initial objectives to revise and appropriately sum 4
up the lesson at the conclusion.
3

17. OVERALL SCORE 78/80

General Comments:
a. Strengths

Miss Chi had empathy for the students. She also had patience with kids, which is very
important.
She is also showing enthusiasm and engagement as a teacher, as well all know, which shows
reflection on lifelong learning.

b. Areas of Improvements
Just be firm about every rule and regulation in the class. Remember, you are the boss in your
class; enjoy every moment.

If you’re not sure about the word or sound, you’re doing great because you don’t hesitate to
ask questions.

Supervising Teacher Date

You might also like