FORM INTERNSHIP B.

1
LESSON PLAN AND DELIVERY EVALUATION FORM

Name: Naw Nay Tha Blay Paw Subject: Math Date: 1 March 2024

Instructions:
Read through the evaluation criteria and circle the most appropriate score for each criterion.
Provide comments for each section as relevant/appropriate.

CRITERIA MARKING KEY:

4 = Excellent
4 = Very Good
3 = Good
2 = Average
1 = Needs Improvement

Criteria for Grading

1. Lesson Plan 5

 The lesson plan was organized correctly, with appropriate goals and 4
objectives.
3

2. Clear Behavioral Expectations 5

 The students were given very clear behavioral expectations. 4

 Classroom rules were reinforced.
3

3. Anticipatory Set/Introduction to the Lesson 5

 The teacher gained the children’s attention. 4

 The class was quiet, seated and waiting in anticipation.
 The teacher used aids, IT, pictures to stimulate student’s curiosity. 3
 The teacher used an element of surprise to create curiosity and interest with
his/her students. 2

1
4. Procedural steps in the lesson were followed. 5

 The lesson had a logical flow. 4

 Remember, however, that you teach children not the plan. Therefore,
procedural steps can change or be altered when appropriate. 3
 Be flexible to capture a teachable moment.
2

5. Content 5

 The teacher has a good working knowledge and understanding of the topic 4
and objectives.
 Content was delivered accurately and confidently. 3

6. Teaching manner 5

 Good eye contact 4

 Confident; encouraged students to participate
 Positive facial expressions 3
 Student-centered methodology
2

7. Voice Projection 5

 Clear diction and enunciation 4

 Voice pitched at an audible level
 Voice projection was appropriate and not above the noise of the class. 3

8. Pace of the Lesson 5

 Appropriate time for each step in the lesson (be flexible) 4

 The lesson moved along at an appropriate pace.
3

9. Rapport with students 5

  Teacher demonstrates professional distance. 4
 Teacher was firm, assertive, fair, and friendly.
 Teacher showed that good rapport is built on good teaching. 3
 Teacher encouraged positive communication.
2

10. Questions 5

 A good selection of HLQ (higher level questions) and LLQ (lower level 4
questions) were asked.
 Wait time was appropriate. 3
 Teacher responded/accepted answers positively.
 Additional questions extended the student’s thinking. 2

11. Effectiveness of the Lesson’s Resources/Aids/Materials 5

 IT-PPT/overheads/DVD 4
 Charts/books/pictures/Objects/artifacts
 Drama 3
 Games
2

12. Student Involvement 5

 Students were actively participating and engaged in learning. 4

 Collaborative learning process.
 Students remained on task. 3

13. Classroom management Whole class/ paired/ group teaching 5

 Students were given clear expectations. 4

 Students were well organized and on task.
 Behavioral expectations were reinforced. 3

14. Guided Practice 5

4
  The teacher circulated amongst the students, answering questions, explaining 3
tasks and assisting when needed.
2

15. The teacher gave praise when students remained focused. 5

 Positive praise was given for appropriate: Behavior; thoughtful answers; 4

being on task, etc.
3

16. Closure 5

 The teacher returned to the initial objectives to revise and appropriately sum 4
up the lesson at the conclusion.
3

17. OVERALL SCORE

78/80

General Comments:
a. Strengths
- Implementing interactive and engaging teaching methods to keep students actively
involved in learning.
- Engaging in self-reflection and seeking feedback to continuously improve teaching
practices.

b. Areas of Improvements
- Explore more strategies for maintaining a structured and positive learning
environment so that you can use any strategies when students not in the mood of
learning.

Supervising Teacher Date