Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transference of Merit in Ceylonese Buddhism
Transference of Merit in Ceylonese Buddhism
Author(s): G. P. Malalasekera
Source: Philosophy East and West , Jan. - Oct., 1967, Vol. 17, No. 1/4 (Jan. - Oct., 1967),
pp. 85-90
Published by: University of Hawai'i Press
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Hawai'i Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Philosophy East and West
"Transference of Merit" in
Ceylonese Buddhism
Anumodand can take place with or without the knowledge of the doer
the meritorious act. All that is necessary is for the "beneficiary" to feel gl
ness in his heart when he becomes aware of the good deed. He could, if h
so desires, give verbal expression to his joy by saying "sadhu" once
several times. The word corresponds to "amen" and almost means "w
done." It thus becomes a sort of mental or verbal "applause." What is signi
cant is that in order to share in the good deed done by another, there mu
be actual approval of it and joy therein in the beneficiary's heart. The d
of the good deed cannot, even if he so desires, prevent another's anumoda
because he has no power over another's thoughts. Here too, as in all action
it is the thought which, according to Buddhism, really matters.
The classic example of this transference of merit, etc., is a story connec
with Bimbisdra, king of Rdjagaha, a contemporary of the Buddha an
great patron of Buddhism during his lifetime. It is said that the king on
invited the Buddha and a retinue of monks to his palace for a meal. At t
conclusion of the meal, there was heard a great din outside. The Budd
revealed that it was caused by some of Bimbisara's kinsmen who, after th
death, had been born as petas (evil spirits) and were suffering pangs
hunger and thirst. He told the king that it would be of no use to give the
food or drink because, on account of their evil deeds, they could not part
of such things. But, said the Buddha, if the merit the king had gained b
giving food to holy men were to be transferred to his departed kinsmen,
virtue of the merit so acquired, they would enjoy the fruits thereof and
delusions. The utter selflessness which renounces the fruits of one's labors
that others may profit thereby is a corollary of the unique Buddhist teaching
of anatta ("no-self").
The doctrine of "imputed righteousness" is not confined to Buddhism, but
the Buddhist theory is really quite different from the corresponding Western
idea, even from the Catholic doctrine of the transference of the righteousness
of saints.