Tuesday, February 27, 2024

Lesson Plan Delivery and Evaluation Form

(To be completed only by Dr. Naltan)

Name Moe

Grade/ Subject Kg2

Date Wednesday, February 28, 2024

Assessor's Name Dr. Naltan Lampadan

Assessor's Title Faculty Dean

Instructions:

Read through the evaluation criteria and circle the most appropriate score for each criterion. Provide
comments for each section as relevant/ appropriate.

Criteria Marking Key:

5 = Excellent

4 = Very Good

3 = Good

2 = Average

1 = Needs improvement

CRITERIA (Total score = 80)

1. Lesson Plan:

-The lesson plan was organized 5

correctly with appropriate goals and
objectives.

2. Clear Behavioral Expectations:

- The students were given very clear

expectations. 4

- Classroom rules were reinforced.

1
3. Anticipatory Set/ Introduction to the
lesson

- The teacher gained the children's

attention.
4
- The class was quiet, seated and waiting
in anticipation.

- The teacher used aids, IT, pictures to

stimulate student's curiosity.

4. Procedural step in the lesson were

followed.

- The lesson had a logical flow.

- Remember, however, that you teach

4
children not to plan. Therefore, procedural
steps can change or be altered when
appropriate.

- Be flexible to capture a teachable

moment.

5. Content

- The teacher has a good working

knowledge and understanding of the topic
4
and objectives.

- Content was delivered accurately and

confidently.

6. Teaching manner

- Good eye contact

- Confident; encouraged students to

5
participate

- Positive facial expressions

- Student-centered methodology

7. Voice Projection

- Clear diction and enunciation

- Voice pitched at an audible level

5

- Voice projection was appropriate and

not above the noise of the class.

8. Pace of the Lesson

- Appropriate time for each step in the

lesson (be flexible) 4

- The lesson moved along at an

appropriate pace.

2
9. Rapport with Students

- Teacher demonstrates professional

distance.

- Teacher was firm, assertive, fair, and

friendly. 4

- Teacher showed that good rapport is

build on good teaching.

- Teacher encouraged positivie

communication.

10. Questions

- A good selection of HLQ (higher level

questions) and LLQ (lower level
questions) were asked.

- Wait time was appropriate. 4

- Teacher responded/ accepted answers

positively.

- Additional questions exteded the

student's thinking.

11. Effectiveness of the Lesson's

Resources/ Aids/ Materials

- IT-PPT/ overheads/ DVD

5
- Charts/ books/ pictures/ objects/
artifacts

- Drama, games

12. Student Involvement

- Students were actively participating and

engaged in learning.
5
- Collaborative learning process.

- Students remained on task.

13. Classroom managment: Whole class/

paired/ group teaching

- Students were given clear expectations.

4
- Students wee well organized and on
tasks.

- Behavioral expectations were reinforced.

14. Guided Practice

- The teacher circulated amongst the

students, answering questions,
5
explainning tsaks and assisting when
needed.

3
 15. The teacher gave praise when students
remained focused.

- Positive praise was given for appropriate:

5
behavior, thoughtful answers, being on
tasks, etc.

16. Closure

- The teacher returned to the initial 4

objectives to revise and appropriately sum
up the lesson at the conclusion.

Total Score: 71

General Comments:
Strengths:
Show respect for the participation of everyone.
Enthusiastic participation is encouraged.
Encourage dynamic engagement
Students have a sense of inclusivity and security that encourages their active involvement.
You provided a range of enjoyable activities.

Areas of Improvements:
Taking turn in answering the questions
Be consistent in reinforcing the rules