Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Microstates Entropy and Quanta An Introduction To Statistical Mechanics Don Koks Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Microstates Entropy and Quanta An Introduction To Statistical Mechanics Don Koks Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/statistical-mechanics-entropy-
order-parameters-and-complexity-2nd-edition-sethna/
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-introduction-to-statistical-
mechanics-and-thermodynamics-2nd-edition-robert-h-swendsen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/statistical-methods-an-
introduction-to-basic-statistical-concepts-and-analysis-2nd-
edition-cheryl-ann-willard/
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-introduction-to-statistical-
learning-with-applications-in-r-gareth-james/
Statistical Field Theory - An Introduction to Exactly
Solved Models in Statistical Physics 2nd Edition
Giuseppe Mussardo
https://textbookfull.com/product/statistical-field-theory-an-
introduction-to-exactly-solved-models-in-statistical-physics-2nd-
edition-giuseppe-mussardo/
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-introduction-to-statistical-
methods-and-data-analysis-7th-edition-r-lyman-ott/
https://textbookfull.com/product/introduction-to-basic-
statistics-1-don-ozisco/
https://textbookfull.com/product/non-equilibrium-statistical-
mechanics-prigogine/
https://textbookfull.com/product/introduction-to-statistical-
methods-design-of-experiments-and-statistical-quality-control-
dharmaraja-selvamuthu/
Don Koks
Microstates,
Entropy and Quanta
An Introduction to Statistical Mechanics
Microstates, Entropy and Quanta
Don Koks
Microstates, Entropy
and Quanta
An Introduction to Statistical Mechanics
123
ISBN 978-3-030-02428-4 ISBN 978-3-030-02429-1 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02429-1
Cover art: Central to statistical mechanics is the idea of counting the states accessible to a system. When
these states exist within some continuous space, they cannot be counted. Instead, we “tile” the space into
cells, with each cell defining a state, and then we count those cells. The ball on the front cover is a
schematic of this tiling of the velocity space of a free particle that moves in three spatial dimensions. For
real particles, the cells are so much smaller than the size of the ball that, to all intents and purposes, the
ball is a smooth sphere. The number of cells can then easily be found from the sphere’s volume.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
For my ancestors, and all those
who have gone before.
Preface
vii
viii Preface
are sometimes merely postulated with a breezy stroke of the pen in books
that announce themselves as introductions. Postulatory approaches to other
subjects can certainly work well; for instance, I admire Feynman’s approach
to electromagnetism in his Lectures on Physics, since, although he postulates
Maxwell’s equations at the very start, we never lose sight of the physics
in his discussions. In contrast, I struggle to see any physics at all in some
postulatory approaches to statistical mechanics, which can so easily ignore
the difficult questions that interest physicists.
I commence the subject of statistical mechanics with an archetypal obser-
vation: why does a drop of ink placed in a bathtub disperse? Once dispersed,
might it ever re-assemble into a drop? This question showcases the impor-
tance of counting the number of ways in which a system’s constituents can
be arranged, and leads to statistical mechanics proper via its fundamental
postulate. That discussion demands knowledge of the concept of energy, a
concept that was useful and intriguing to early astronomers studying plane-
tary orbits, but whose wider application was not well understood in the early
days of thermodynamics, 150 years ago. With a more modern understanding
of energy (or perhaps “acceptance” is a better word, since we still don’t know
what it is—if, indeed, asking what it is has any meaning), we are in a good
position to write down the laws of thermodynamics. Then, we can explore
heat engines, chemical processes and equilibria, and heat flow. The flow of
heat is a stepping stone to appreciating diverse related areas, such as parti-
cle diffusion and, in fact, the signal processing performed in a modern radar
receiver.
But no system is ever truly isolated; and the question of how to analyse
a system in contact with the wider world brings us to the Boltzmann dis-
tribution, with examples in paramagnetism, atomic energy levels, molecular
and crystal heat capacities, and data-transmission theory. The Boltzmann
distribution also sheds light on the motion of gas particles. I use that theory
to explore an atmosphere, as well as the molecular details of viscosity and
thermal conductivity.
Quantum ideas then emerge, via Einstein’s and Debye’s theories of heat
capacity. The notion of fermions and bosons forms a springboard to the study
of electronic heat capacity, electrical conduction, thermal noise in electric
circuits, the spectra of light produced by hot bodies, some cosmology, the
greenhouse effect, and the modern technologies of light-emitting diodes and
the laser.
I have sprinkled the text with occasional short digressions, discussing top-
ics such as the factorial function in number theory, the energy–momentum
tensor in relativity, a little bit of signal processing, and decrying the short-
comings of modern analytical astronomy. Hopefully, these asides will only
enrich your interest without being a distraction.
Unlike some books on statistical mechanics, I have chosen to discuss a lot
of material before introducing the Boltzmann distribution. Thus, in those pre-
Boltzmann chapters, I invoke the equipartition theorem to approximate the
Preface ix
Also, whenever I have a quantity written in both non-bold and bold font in
one context—such as “a” and “a”—then a should be understood to be the
length of the vector a.
This book has benefitted from the contributions of my family, friends, and
colleagues—although, of course, I claim full ownership of my often-strong
opinions about physics in general. My undergraduate lecturers at Auckland
University, Graeme Putt and Paul Barker, provided my first instruction in
thermodynamics and statistical mechanics in the mid-1980s, and so laid out
the backbone for a later set of lectures of my own, which became this book.
All manner of details were donated by others. Brad Alexander gave me a
computer scientist’s view of entropy. Colin Andrew discussed scuba diving
and ocean pressure. Shayne Bennetts listened to my views on the principle
of detailed balance. Encouragement and some discussion of grammar came
from Ine Brummans. The modern puzzle that is liquid helium was spelled
out for me by Peter Mc Clintock. I discussed some ideas of presentation with
Steven Cohen. Occasional technical discussions took place with Scott Foster.
Roland Keir contributed his knowledge of physical chemistry. Harry Koks
informed me of some evolved wording in combinatorics, and Rudolf Koks
explained osmosis in humans. Mark Krieg improved my grammar. Hans Laue
discussed atmospheric temperature. Nadine Pesor helped me settle on the
use of some jargon. Robert Purvinskis was a sounding board on occasion.
Andy Rawlinson gave feedback on many ideas. Keith Stowe helped untangle
some knotty problems in the subject. Vivienne Wheaton prompted some early
deliberation on the Boltzmann distribution. The feedback of two anonymous
early referees certainly helped make a better final product. Springer’s proof
reader, Marc Beschler, gave a final and detailed burnish to my words. And the
entire text was much improved by the careful reading and many thoughtful
suggestions of Alice von Trojan.
Beyond that, I thank Springer’s Tom Spicer for having the confidence to
allow the project to go ahead, and Cindy Zitter for the details of making it
happen.
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535
List of Common Symbols
xvii
xviii List of Common Symbols
xxiii
Chapter 1
Preliminary Ideas of Counting, and Some
Useful Mathematics
Imagine a billiards table on which you place a single ball. You give the ball
a particular initial velocity, parallel to the sides, so that it bounces back and
forth on a single line from one end to the other. In the absence of friction, it
will roll on this line forever, and its motion will be as simple and ordered as
it could possibly be.
Now add more balls, one by one, trying to arrange for some given motion
each time a ball is added. Although they continue to be governed by Newton’s
laws, the range of motions available to the balls becomes phenomenally larger
each time we put another ball on the table. It very quickly becomes clear that
the entire motion of the balls effectively becomes more and more random, even
though it is not random at all. When we replace the balls by, say, molecules
of water in a filled bathtub, the range of motions available to the molecules
becomes so large that it surpasses any test or theory that mathematicians
have devised to ascertain or even define randomness.
The ergodic assumption of classical mechanics postulates that as the num-
ber of particles in our system is increased, with their initial conditions always
arranged to be highly randomised, the system will tend more and more to
spend an equal amount of time in the vicinity of each arrangement of particles
that is allowed by the external constraint of fixed energy.
The essence of statistical mechanics can be seen at work when we carefully
place a drop of ink into a bathtub of pure water. Slowly but surely, the drop
spreads out. Suppose that the bathtub is made from an esoteric material that
insulates the mixture of water and ink from the wider world in every physical
way. This material prevents any heat from flowing between the outside world
and the water and ink. No vibration can pass through the material to or from
the outside world, and particles can neither be shed from the material nor
adhere to it. The energy of the water–ink mixture is thus a fixed quantity,
and the ergodic assumption applies. That is, if we wait long enough, the drop
will essentially reform at some time in the distant future; and, in fact, it will
eventually pass arbitrarily close to any configuration that we care to describe.
There will come a time when the spread of ink takes on the appearance of
Vermeer’s “Girl with a Pearl Earring”, the complete text of every book ever
written or yet to be written—and indeed, the same texts, but with one or
two or 3005 letters upside down—and every sculpture and picture ever made
or that will ever be made.
But we know from experience that this re-forming of the ink into a drop or
dispersing into the appearance of a Vermeer painting is not likely to happen
any time soon: we can be confident that no one has ever seen an ink drop form
spontaneously in a tub full of a water–ink mixture, or even a teaspoon full of
a water–ink mixture. Of course, the esoteric material that forms the tub walls
that we described above simply does not exist in Nature, and so no bathtub
is ever completely insulated from its environment. But this interaction with
1.1 The Spreading of an Ink Drop 3
2 14 5 3 1 9 14 82 23
the wider world does not affect the basic idea that only a comparatively few
arrangements of the water–ink molecules are recognisable to us as forming
any sort of pattern. So, as the ink molecules interact with the water molecules
and become dispersed, we ask the following question: in how many ways can
n molecules of ink be mixed with N molecules of water, while still retaining
the visual appearance of a distinct ink drop?
This question is not easily answered, because we must be clear about what
a drop is: need it have the same shape as the original drop? Must it be in
the same place? It’s sufficient for our purposes to count the total number of
molecular arrangements that put the ink drop in a chosen place with a chosen
shape in the tub, and we will ignore all molecular velocities. Although the
molecules’ arrangement is three dimensional, we can always construct a three-
dimensional grid in the bath, use it to pick the molecules out systematically,
and then lay them out along a line. Suppose we’ve done that for the ink
drop and water molecules in such a way for the chosen place and shape of
the drop, that the ink molecules all end up on the left end of the line, with
the water molecules continuing to the right. Suppose too that the ink and
water molecules are distinguishable, meaning we can label the ink molecules
1, 2, . . . , n and the water molecules 1, 2, . . . , N . The result is the arrangement
in Figure 1.1. The number of arrangements resembling the chosen drop will
then be the product of factorials, n! N!. The total number of ways in which
all n + N molecules can be laid out is (n + N )!. Let’s calculate the ratio r
of the total number of possible arrangements to the number of “ink drop”
arrangements, when n N :
n! ≈ nn e−n , (1.2)
mass of ink
n = NA × number of moles of ink = NA ×
molar mass of ink
volume of ink drop × density of ink
= NA ×
molar mass of ink
27 mm3 × 1000 kg/m3
= 6.022 ×1023 ×
18 g
−9
27 ×10 m3 × 1000 kg/m3
= 6.022 ×1023 ×
0.018 kg
20
' 9.0 ×10 . (1.5)
We see here the staggeringly large number of ways in which ink can be spread
out, compared to its remaining in a drop form at the place we specified. The
21
number 106.7 ×10 certainly looks large, but how can we comprehend its true
21
size? Consider that if you voice 106.7 ×10 as (approximately) “one million
million million million. . . ” at a normal talking speed, you will be saying the
word “million” for the next 30 million million years. Alternatively, reflect
on the economy of the decimal system: when we represent the number “one
million” by a “1” followed by six zeroes, with each zero just 1 cm across, the
length of this string of zeroes will be six centimetres—a deceptively compact
and efficient scheme for representing the idea of one million things. In con-
21
trast, writing 106.7 ×10 in this decimal system gives a “1” followed by a
string of zeroes whose length is about 7100 light years. That’s not how big
21
106.7 ×10 is; rather, that’s just how long its decimal representation is when
written down. The number itself is inconceivably large.
21
Here is another way of picturing the size of 106.7 ×10 . Use (1.2) and some
21
numerical manipulation to write 106.7 ×10 as a factorial:
21
106.7 ×10 ≈ (3.3 ×1020 )! . (1.7)
1.1 The Spreading of an Ink Drop 5
We will be content to examine the size of the “slightly smaller” number 10 20!,
which we’ll do by shuffling cards. Consider that a deck of 3 cards can be
shuffled in 3! = 6 ways. This is not a large number of different arrangements
(permutations), of course, and certainly not large enough to form the basis of
any real card game.1 A deck of 4 cards can be shuffled in 4! = 24 ways—still
not large—but the number of ways in which a deck can be shuffled grows
quickly with its size. A deck of 10 cards can be shuffled in 10! = 3,628,800
ways, and if we count each of those arrangements at one count per second, the
job will take six weeks to complete. Counting the 11! possible arrangements
of 11 cards at the same speed will take over a year. With 12 cards, we’ll need
15 years of counting, and with 15 cards, the count will take over 41,000 years.
These times are shown in Table 1.1.
Suppose that to be more efficient, we enlist the entire world’s population,
with each person magically able to count one million arrangements per sec-
ond. Counting the possible arrangements of 15 cards in this way will take
0.2 milliseconds; 20 cards will take 6 minutes; 25 cards will take 70 years,
and 30 cards will take one thousand million years. What about a real deck
of 52 cards? Counting its possible arrangements in this way will require
3.7 × 1044 years. If you take a deck of cards and shuffle it well, you can
Table 1.1 Time required to count the possible arrangements of cards in a deck
Number Time for one person Time for world’s population
of cards to count arrangements to count arrangements, with
in deck at 1 count/second each person counting 106/second
3 6 seconds negligible
4 24 seconds
5 2 minutes
10 6 weeks
11 1.3 years
12 15 years
15 41,400 years 0.2 milliseconds
20 see −→ 6 minutes
25 70 years
30 1.2 thousand million years
52 3.7 × 1044 years
1000 2 × 102544 years
10,000 1035,636 years
21
1020 102 ×10 years
1
A welcome evolutionary change to the words “permutations” and “combinations” is
worth mentioning here. An effort is now being made in some high-school curricula to
de-mystify combinatorics by discarding the dry jargon of these terms. Permutations
are now being called “arrangements” (think of arranging flowers), and combinations
are now “selections” (think of selecting books for a library). I used “arrangements”
in some of the above discussion, but decided to retain the old words in other places,
since my use of them is a little peripheral to the main subject anyway.
6 1 Preliminary Ideas of Counting, and Some Useful Mathematics
be as good as completely certain that the arrangement you are holding has
never appeared in human history, and will never appear again.
This thought experiment has only taken us up to envisaging the size of 52!,
the number of permutations of a deck of 52 cards; we still need to work up to
1020!. The amount of time needed for the world’s population to count the 1020!
permutations of 1020 cards is simply unfathomable. We can write down the
21
number of years required (which is 102 ×10 , or 102,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 ,
1,956,570,552,000,000,000,000
more accurately 10 ), but we gain no real ground; we
21
end up only trying to gain a feel for a new number (102 ×10 years) that
21
looks just like the one we started with (r ' 106.7 ×10 ). No matter how we
write these numbers down, they have no meaning for us.
Enlisting more people with higher count rates does not help here. Sup-
pose we employ 10100 people, who each count 10100 permutations per second.
Counting the permutations of 1000 cards will take them 102360 years. For
21
10,000 cards: 1035,452 years. And for 1020 cards: 102 ×10 years, where the
single significant figure used here makes that number appear to equal that
in Table 1.1, but the two numbers of years are different. In the end, we have
gained nothing by switching the counting from the world’s population at one
million per second, to 10100 people counting 10100 per second.
The above discussion of ever-changing ink patterns in a bathtub assumed
the tub had no connection to the outside world. But a real bathtub does
interact with the outside world, and so we can never really treat the water–
ink mixture in isolation. The heat of the bathtub walls affects the liquid,
tending to keep the water and ink molecules maximally mixed. And, of course,
those walls interact with their environment, and so on outward, until we find
ourselves obliged to consider the universe as a whole. Such considerations
form part of the subject of quantum cosmology, which sits at the cutting edge
of modern physics.
being able to swap two particles: if we try to swap two particles, we accomplish
nothing: at a deep level, the final configuration is unchanged from the initial
configuration.
If the ink molecules are identical among themselves, and the water molecules
are identical among themselves, then both groups will certainly be identical
classical. In that case, the n! permutations of n ink molecules cannot be told
apart, and must be counted as a single configuration; and the same is true
for the N water molecules. In other words, our calculations above have over-
counted by factors of n! and N!. We conclude that the number of molecular
arrangements in which the ink can form a drop, or a Girl with a Pearl Ear-
ring, or anything else, is not n! N!, but simply 1: there is only a single way
in which a given configuration can exist if all of its particles are identical.
Of course, this idea of having over-counted by a total factor of n! N! also
applies to the case when the identical-classical particles are dispersed. There,
too, we must divide the number (n + N )! of distinguishable configurations
by n! N! to give the number of identical-classical configurations.
In summary, for the distinguishable molecules analysed in (1.1)–(1.6),
8 11
3
4
10
5
14 9
2 12
13
7
1
6
Fig. 1.2 Numbered particles are confined to a room in which they can move freely.
If we partition the room as shown, what is the chance that, at some given moment,
3 particles will be found in part 1, 4 particles in part 2, and so on?
1.2 Wandering Gas Particles 9
Bin 1 Bin 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 7 6 3! 4! rows, each
with the same
combination in
1 3 2 4 5 6 7 each bin
7! rows, each
with a different 1 3 2 4 5 7 6
permutation
1 2 4 3 5 6 7
3! 4! rows, each
1 2 4 3 5 7 6 with the same
combination in
each bin
etc.
Fig. 1.3 Counting combinations by the “trick” of counting permutations and then
correcting for the resultant over-counting
REFERENCES.
[1] Kobert: Lehrbuch der Intoxikationen, 2te Aufl., 1906, p. 361.
[2] Oliver, Sir T.: Lead Poisoning. 1891.
[3] Dixon Mann: Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, p. 495.
[4] Stockvis: International Congress of Industrial Hygiene. Brussels, 1910.
[5] Ménétrier: Meillère’s Le Saturnisme, pp. 131-136.
[6] Kussmaul and Meyer: Deutsches Archiv für Klin. Med., ix., p. 283.
[7] Tanquerel: Traité des Maladies de Plomb, ou Saturnines. Paris, 1839.
[8] Bernard: Meillère’s Le Saturnisme, p. 155.
[9] Bokai: Trib. Med., June 11, 1891.
[10] Riegels: Kobert’s Lehrbuch der Intoxikationen, p. 363.
[11] Galvini: Rivista Clinica, fasc. iii., 1884.
[12] Tanquerel: Ibid.
[13] Pal and Mannaberg: Revue Générale de Villaret, Gaz. des Hôp., Fév.
16 and 19, 1903.
[14] Westphal: Archiv f. Phys. u. Nervenkr., 1874.
[15] Dejerine: Mém. de la Soc. de Biologie, 1879, et Exposé de Titres, p.
58, 1894.
[16] Eichhorst: Ueber Bleilähmung. Virchow’s Archiv, 1890, p. 217.
[17] Ramond: Maladies du Système Nerveux, t. xi. 1895, 1896.
[18] Marie and Babinski: Meillère’s Le Saturnisme, p. 193.
[19] Vulpian and Steiglitz: Archiv für Psych., 1892, xxiv., p. 1.
[20] Erb: Berl. Klin. Woch., 1884, p. 110.
[21] Hitzig: Studien über Bleiverg. Berlin, 1868.
[22] Boerwinkel: Virchow’s Archiv, Bd. cxx., 1890.
[23] Eichhorst: Ibid.
[24] Potain: Bull. Med., 1887.
[25] Vulpian: Maladies du Système Nerveux. 1879.
[26] Oppenheimer: Zur Kennt. der Exp. Bleiverg. Berlin, 1898.
[27] Oeller: Path. Anatom. der Bleilähmung. München, 1883.
[28] Steiglitz: Archiv für Psychiatrie, Bd. xxiv., 1892.
[29] Hitzig: Ibid.
[30] Westphal: Archiv für Psychiatrie, Bd. xix., 1888.
[31] Chvostek: Neurol. Centralblatt, 1897.
[32] Kolisko: Die Bekämpfung der Bleigefahr in der Industrie, von Leymann,
p. 21. 1908.
[33] Quensel: Archiv für Psychiatrie, Bd. xxxv., 1902.
[34] Nissl: Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Bd. xlv., 1892; Bd. iv. 1897.
[35] Berchthold: Die Bekämpfung der Bleigefahr in der Industrie, von
Leymann, p. 23. 1908.
[36] Sorgo: Wien. Med. Woch., 1900.
[37] Steiglitz: Archiv für Psychiatrie, Bd. xxiv., 1892.
[38] Prévost and Binet: Revue Médicale de la Suisse Romande, ii., 1889.
[39] Mott: Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, vol. iv., p. 117.
[40] Glibert: Le Saturnisme Expérimental: Extrait des Rapports Ann. de
l’Insp. du Travail, 1906.
[41] Mott: Ibid.
[42] Gull and Sutton: Kobert’s Lehrbuch der Intoxikationen, 2te Aufl.,
1906, p. 370.
[43] Zinn: Berl. Med. Woch., 1899.
[44] Fresenius Babo: Liebig’s Annalen, vol. xlix., p. 287. 1844.
[45] Blum: Wien. Med. Woch., No. 13, 1904.
[46] Jaksch: Klinische Diagnostik.
[47] Kobert: Ibid., p. 369, and general Literature, p. 376.
[48] Oliver, Sir T.: Lead Poisoning. 1891.
[49] Charcot: Leçons sur les Maladies du Foie et des Reins. Paris, 1882.
[50] Gombault: Archiv für Physiologie, 1881.
[51] Hoffer: Dissertation, Freiburg, 1883.
[52] Von Leyden: Zeit. für Klin. Med., 1883.
[53] Gayler: Ziegler’s Beitr., ii., 1888.
[54] Glibert: Ibid.
[55] Cornil: Journal de l’anat. et physiol., No. 2, 1883.
[56] Brault: Loc. cit.
[57] Hoffer: Loc. cit.
[58] Klemperer: Kobert’s Lehrbuch der Intoxikationen, 2te Aufl., 1906, p.
370.
[59] Kleinenberger: Münch. Med. Woch., No. 8, 1904.
[60] Gayler: Loc. cit.
[61] Kleinenberger: Loc. cit.
[62] Uhthoff: Handbuch der Aug. Lief. Leipzig, 1901.
[63] Pflueger: Die Bekämpfung der Bleigefahr in der Industrie, von
Leymann, p. 21. 1908.
[64] Oeller: Ibid.
[65] Pal: Zentralbl. f. innere Med. Leipzig, 1903.
[66] Heubel: Path. und Symp. Chron. Bleiverg. Berlin, 1871.
[67] Rosenstein: Virchow’s Archiv. 1897.
[68] Oliver, Sir T.: Lead Poisoning. 1891.
[69] Mott: Ibid.
[70] Seifert: Berl. Klin. Woch., 1884.
[71] Sajous: Archiv für Laryng., iii., 1882.
[72] Elschnig: Wien. Med. Woch., 1898.
[73] Rambousek: Die Bekämpfung der Bleigefahr, von Leymann, p. 15.
1908.
[74] Elschnig: Loc. cit.
[75] Oliver, Sir T.: Lead Poisoning. 1891.
[76] Moritz: St. Petersb. Med. Woch., 1901.
[77] Emden: Die Bekämpfung der Bleigefahr, von Leymann, p. 19.
[78] Gravitz: Deutsche Med. Woch., No. 36. 1899.
[79] Zinn: Berl. Klin. Woch., 1899.
[80] Otto: Revue Méd., 1892.
[81] Silbert: Ibid.
[82] Escherich: Die Bekämpfung der Bleigefahr, von Leymann, p. 18.
[83] Mattirolo: Ibid., p. 19.
[84] Marchet: Ibid., p. 19.
[85] Jores: Ziegler’s Beitr., Bd. xxxi., 1902.
[86] Glibert: Ibid.
CHAPTER VI
PATHOLOGY—Continued[A]
[A] This chapter is the work entirely of one of us (K. W. G.)