Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Obsessed by A Dream The Physicist Rolf Wideroe A Giant in The History of Accelerators Aashild Sorheim Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Obsessed by A Dream The Physicist Rolf Wideroe A Giant in The History of Accelerators Aashild Sorheim Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-second-physicist-on-the-
history-of-theoretical-physics-in-germany-archimedes-christa-
jungnickel/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-dream-of-reason-a-history-
of-western-philosophy-from-the-greeks-to-the-renaissance-new-
edition-gottlieb/
https://textbookfull.com/product/by-the-people-a-history-of-the-
united-states-james-w-fraser/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-history-and-future-of-the-
budget-process-in-the-united-states-budget-by-fire-paul-winfree/
A People s History of the World Chris Harman
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-people-s-history-of-the-world-
chris-harman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-people-s-history-of-the-
russian-revolution-neil-faulkner/
https://textbookfull.com/product/quantitative-finance-and-risk-
management-a-physicist-s-approach-2nd-edition-jan-w-dash/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-chronicle-of-prussia-by-
nicolaus-von-jeroschin-a-history-of-the-teutonic-knights-in-
prussia-1190-1331-nicolaus-von-jeroschin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-people-s-history-of-the-
portuguese-revolution-raquel-cardeira-varela/
Springer Biographies
Obsessed
by a Dream
The Physicist Rolf Widerøe –
a Giant in the History of Accelerators
AASHILD SØRHEIM
Springer Biographies
The books published in the Springer Biographies tell of the life and work of
scholars, innovators, and pioneers in all fields of learning and throughout
the ages. Prominent scientists and philosophers will feature, but so too will
lesser known personalities whose significant contributions deserve greater
recognition and whose remarkable life stories will stir and motivate readers.
Authored by historians and other academic writers, the volumes describe
and analyse the main achievements of their subjects in manner accessible to
nonspecialists, interweaving these with salient aspects of the protagonists’
personal lives. Autobiographies and memoirs also fall into the scope of the
series.
Obsessed by a Dream
The Physicist Rolf Widerøe – a Giant
in the History of Accelerators
Aashild Sørheim
Oslo, Norway
Translation from the Norwegian language edition: Besatt av en drøm. Historien om Rolf Widerøe by
Aashild Sørheim, © Forlaget Historie & Kultur AS, Oslo, Norway, 2015. All Rights Reserved. ISBN:
9788283230000
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication.
Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits
any noncommercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license
and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share
adapted material derived from this book or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license,
unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative
Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted
use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
This work is subject to copyright. All commercial rights are reserved by the author(s), whether the whole
or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or
information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed. Regarding these commercial rights a non-exclusive license
has been granted to the publisher.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does
not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective
laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the
editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors
or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
This translation has been published with the financial support of NORLA
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
To Professor Tor Brustad
who handed me the baton
- and then cheered me on
Preface
I tell of a man of the world, tall and dark. Particular about his after-shave;
trousers carefully pressed; gallant; cheerful in dance and fluent in speech.
Knows where the martini glasses are stored, preferably in neat lines. Accurate
German grammar. Less accurate English, but enthusiastically expressive.
When he addresses a meeting his message is clear, whether it be about the
storage of atomic waste or the treatment of cancer.
He is working in the garden, wearing a Mao suit that he bought in China.
What will the neighbours think? As if he would bother about that. His wife
might, but not him. He has brought some plants from overseas, carefully
transported in test tubes in his hand baggage. Home now, he is planting the
cuttings carefully in his overgrown garden, which despite all his loving care
looks like a wilderness.
When he has a cold, he treats it by dipping a plug of cotton wool in red
wine and putting it in his nostril. Doses himself with dietary supplements
and just to be sure, thumps his chest seven or nine times. ‘Alternative med-
icine’ some ten years before it became fashionable, practised by a man who
has several honorary doctorates in medicine and is among the company of
the great physicists.
Even before he had completed his doctorate at the age of 25, electrical
engineering companies were lining up to headhunt him. Philips, AEG,
Siemens, Brown Boveri or ASEA—he has either worked there himself or has
good friends who are senior figures in one company or another. Ever since
his student days, he has been almost married to his job. But he reads a bed-
time story and says the evening prayer with his children every evening. On
Sundays he dons knee breeches, packs a thermos and a lunch pack and goes
vii
viii Preface
I would like you to meet this person, and I am almost certain you have
not heard of him before. But I am almost as certain that having met him,
you will wonder why he isn’t better known.
But first let me tell you a story of three people.
The German
Pedro Waloschek needs to write a book about him.
In a hotel in North Italy where they are attending a conference, two col-
leagues are sitting in the bar one evening. They are both physicists, in their
thirties and of Jewish origin. They both grew up in Austria. One is called
Pedro and one called Bruno. They have had unsettled lives, but they both
now live in Italy and they try to meet at conferences. There in the hotel by
Lake Como, they spent a long evening as Bruno spoke about an amazing
boss he had once had, who sorted out all sorts of things for him, even in his
private life. Pedro told me later that his friend Bruno seemed a little eccen-
tric, but the two of them had similar backgrounds and spoke the same dia-
lect. Even their surnames were rather similar, Waloschek and Touschek, and
they enjoyed talking together.
That August evening, Bruno spoke about his life during the war. Because
his mother was a Jew, he was expelled from high school, where however by
a little manipulation of the system he had managed to sit the exam. Then
he was excluded from the university in his home town of Vienna. He tried
to study in Rome and planned to continue in Manchester, but ended up
instead in Berlin to study mathematics and physics, aged 19. There he
worked secretly for the Luftwaffe, tasked with doing calculations on a pro-
ject involving radiation, with none other than Rolf Widerøe as his boss.
Pedro continues the story:
Pedro had no idea at that time that he himself would meet Widerøe almost
by accident 30 years later. However, the coincidences were wider than
that, as in fact he had come across him indirectly several times long before.
Unknown to him, there had been links as early as his schooldays. The first
was when he went to school in Argentina, aged 14. During the war his
father, a Jewish architect, had had the right to run his business in Vienna
removed and the family had fled to Buenos Aires. One of Pedro’s classmates
was a German who told him for the first time about ‘death rays’. Scientists
in Hitler’s Germany were apparently building the super-weapon that would
make the Allies’ planes fall like flies. His classmate had expanded the effect
of the wonder-weapon and vigorously maintained that even New York could
be bombed in this way. When Pedro came home, however, he learned that
rumours of such a wonder-weapon arose from time to time and disappeared
just as quickly.
People are still captivated by the dream of magic rays that can be used as
a weapon in space and that lie in the interspace between science fiction and
reality, between computer games where the enemy is exterminated by a laser
pistol and Ronald Reagan’s Star Wars. But what the boy had said was true.
The Germans really did have a death ray project—and it appeared that Rolf
Widerøe was involved in it.
When Pedro began his studies, he came across the fascination with rays
again. He met a lecturer who was almost obsessed with betatrons and how
they were made. So had this lecturer met the machine’s inventor? No, far
from it, but one of his professors had. The fascination had been contagious,
though Pedro didn’t understand—at that time—why the lecturer had to
promote the science of betatrons to others. As a student in the 1950’s, Pedro
obviously had no idea who was behind this type of machine. He just won-
dered why they were required to learn about something so obscure as analys-
ing ‘the stability of electrons in a particular type of accelerator, known as a
betatron’.
Forty years later, however, Pedro wrote a book about Rolf Widerøe, the
man who had invented the betatron. By then, Pedro had long since com-
pleted his doctorate and was now the information manager of a nuclear
research laboratory in Hamburg which the Norwegian had in his day been
involved in planning. Pedro was about to retire, and from his background
xii Preface
in the organisation he had long been aware that here was a story waiting to
be written. He sought out Widerøe, who was then almost 90 and was living
in Switzerland. The pair of them worked on the project for two years, and
the book was published in Germany in 1993. It consists of Widerøe’s own
memoirs and records of the conversations between the two of them, read
and approved by Widerøe himself. It is written mostly in the first person
and is considered as Widerøe’s authorised autobiography. It was later trans-
lated into several languages, but never into Norwegian.
Waloschek had for many years been a correspondent for the monthly
journal CERN Courier, published by the world’s biggest accelerator labora-
tory in Geneva. The editor of the journal wanted to commission a review
of the book about the Norwegian who had been a consultant when the
laboratory was set up. Nothing came of his request. The editor wanted
a Scandinavian to do the job but found nobody to take it on, whether in
Norway, Sweden or Denmark. So the biography of one of CERN’s pioneers
did not get a mention in the centre’s own monthly journal. Pedro said that
nobody up there in the North was interested in Rolf Widerøe.
But one person was interested: a retired professor in Oslo.
The Norwegian
Tor Brustad wants to restore his reputation.
In a shielded bunker in the Radium Hospital, a new machine was being
installed in the 1950s. A machine to treat cancer, the newest and most
advanced in the World, was being fine-tuned. An enormous black colossus
of 2 by 2 by 2 metres, well mounted in a shielded bunker, a monster not in
the least like today’s hi-tech medical equipment but able to produce incred-
ibly strong radiation, 31 million electron volts. A machine specially devel-
oped; such equipment is not bought ‘off the shelf ’. International research
had concluded that high-energy radiation was about to revolutionise the
treatment of cancer, and Norway’s investment was leading the way. Only
one such machine had been built before in Europe. A representative from
the suppliers, the Swiss company Brown Boveri, is in Oslo to take care of the
adjustments.
One day a newly appointed research assistant, Tor Brustad, comes into
the bunker, curious about the marvel that they had been busy installing and
testing for over a year. He sees a man upside-down in the machine with an
adjustable spanner in one hand and a soldering iron in the other.
Preface xiii
Now, over sixty years later, that is what Prof. Brustad tells me about his
first meeting with Rolf Widerøe. At that time, the Radium Hospital was in
the process of setting up a treatment centre that combined medicine and
technology. Obvious today, but revolutionary then. Brustad was one of the
experts from the University of Oslo brought in to take part in the devel-
opment. He later became head of the hospital’s medical physics depart-
ment and head of technology and research at the cancer research institute’s
biophysics department. He started and took part in a specialised medi-
cal-technical course at what was then the Norwegian Technical College in
Trondheim. He continues:
At Oslo University I had obviously learned about accelerators and also heard
about the new type, called the betatron, which an American was said to be
developing. Widerøe, on the other hand, was unknown to me. I had never
heard of him during my training, even though I was specialising in nuclear
physics.
He realised eventually that the Norwegian Rolf Widerøe from Brown Boveri
had been the first person in the world to try to build such a machine.
Indeed, it was he who had pioneered the idea of the betatron, which would
create many new possibilities by propelling particles on a round course
instead of along a straight line. The purpose of an accelerator is to accelerate
charged particles to high energy. Widerøe’s boyhood dream had been to find
an ingenious way to do this. At an early stage, he had the idea that it should
be possible to accelerate charged particles in a glass tube shaped like an enor-
mous doughnut. The particles would go round the circuit faster and faster,
increasing their energy with each turn.
Widerøe did not manage at first to put his idea into practice. An
American, Donald Kerst, built on Widerøe’s method and achieved this 13
years later. Now Widerøe had gone on to build a machine himself, with
higher energy and greater therapeutic potential than the American model.
xiv Preface
After going round the circuit a million times, the particles would achieve
a very high speed. For this to happen, there needs to be no hindrance block-
ing their way; there would need to be a vacuum. A changing magnetic field
would impart energy to the particles and a magnetic steering field would
hold them in position round the course. When the particles had built up
high enough energy, they would be brought out through two small openings
in the ‘doughnut’. The high energy particles could have numerous applica-
tions: in hospitals, to treat cancer; in industry, to show and test the internal
structure of materials; and in research, to advance understanding of nuclear
physics.
The Radium Hospital had now acquired such a state of the art apparatus.
At that time radiotherapy had been shown to be effective in treating cancer.
Deep-seated tumours were still a problem, however, because the necessary
high doses of radiation would damage the healthy tissues they had to pass
through on their way to the tumour. Physicists thought that the solution to
this problem was to create X-rays with much higher energy than had been
possible before. But that needed new technology. The answer came in the
form of what were called accelerators, and the founding father of acceler-
ator technology was Rolf Widerøe. He had built the world’s first accelera-
tor, a linear accelerator that had been the topic of his doctorate in 1927,
and he went on to develop betatrons that were successful both medically and
commercially. Later, he was honoured with numerous prizes and his work
came to be included in advanced physics courses the world over. But when
young Brustad met him in the Radium Hospital with the spanner and the
soldering iron in his hands, not many of those present associated him with
ground-breaking science. He was just Brown Boveri’s betatron man. The
focus of attention was on the epoch-making equipment rather than on the
underlying research and how it had come to fruition. Far less on who had
first had the idea.
Several decades later the former research assistant finally had time to look
further into something he had been wondering about for so long. There was
something about Rolf Widerøe, and Prof. Emeritus Tor Brustad wanted to
get to the bottom of it. No-one wanted to know about him. Brustad knew
that Widerøe had been imprisoned in 1945 and that there had been wild
rumours about what he had been up to during the war. He was said to
have been almost personally responsible for the bombing of London. But
what had he really been doing, and for what had he been condemned? If
indeed he had been condemned. What was rumour and what was reality?
It appeared that nobody had wanted—or perhaps dared—to approach the
Preface xv
community he claimed that the time was long ripe to give Widerøe his
deserved place as the pioneer of accelerator technology. Widerøe was not
a traitor. It was Norway that had betrayed him. The following year, Tor
Brustad summarised his source material in an article in the scientific jour-
nal Acta Oncologica. He asked rhetorically why the inventor of the particle
accelerator had been overlooked in his homeland, and criticised the aca-
demic community for having reduced Widerøe to ‘a footnote in the history
of physics in Norway’.
Yes, Widerøe had indeed worked in Germany during the war, from 1943
to 1945. Yes, he had done top-secret research. Yes, he had worked on a pro-
ject under the control of the Luftwaffe, who had sent German officers to
Oslo to recruit him. But his research had nothing to do with the steering
system of Hitler’s V2 bombs, as had been alleged. During the war years in
Germany he had developed a machine for treating cancer, a betatron of
15 megaelectronvolts (MeV), the forerunner of the 31 MeV one he later
installed in the Radium Hospital.
Yes, there was a big ‘but’. Why on Earth had Widerøe worked in
Germany in the pay of the Nazi authorities? Other people than Tor
Brustad had wondered about that. The court documents Brustad found in
the National Archive had something important to say about that, namely
that Widerøe should not have been arrested. But the documents didn’t
say everything. They clarified the formal account, but said little about the
human story. The thin, typewritten A4 sheet entitled ‘Treason Case 3418’
said nothing about Widerøe’s motive, and nothing about which side the
man was on.
People had formed their own conclusions, but now there was someone
who was trying to think a little differently.
The Dane
Søren Bentzen tries to understand him.
In a grand seventeenth century house, Rosendal Manor by the Hardanger
Fjord, the Dane, Søren Bentzen, is among the gathering of cancer and radi-
otherapy experts attending a conference in spring 1997 in connection with
the centenary the previous year of Wilhelm Röntgen’s discovery of what
later came to be called ‘Röntgen rays’ or ‘X rays’. One of the contributions
makes a particular impression on Bentzen. It is not what you would expect
in a room full of cancer researchers. It has no formal technical language and
not a single Latin expression. It is about Rolf Widerøe, who had died the
Preface xvii
year before and to whom the speaker thought great injustice had been done,
especially by his own people. The speaker—Tor Brustad from the Radium
Hospital—delivered a strong personal appeal to give Widerøe the honour
and respect he deserved for his scientific achievements and to do him justice
by restoring his public reputation, now that the finds in the archives had
cleared him of the accusations of having developed German weaponry.
‘That’s all very well,’ thought Bentzen, ‘but what about the ethical issues
Widerøe must have faced?’ Bentzen recognised in these the same issues as
he himself had faced in his research. This was the aspect of Widerøe’s story
that gripped Bentzen. What is right and what is wrong when you choose
whether to research a topic or to listen to conflicting advice round about
you? Bentzen had studied both physics and medicine and was world-
renowned in the field of medical ethics. He eventually became a professor at
the University of Maryland School of Medicine, USA. He has held numer-
ous appointments in medical physics and published many academic papers.
After the seminar in Hardanger, Widerøe’s fate continued to fascinate
Bentzen. The more he thought about this man, whom he didn’t really know
very much about, the more fascinated he became. He must have had an
interesting life, with his important positions, many friends, healthy leisure
pursuits and countless business visits to many parts of the world. Altogether
this appeared quite normal, but Bentzen saw that Rolf Widerøe had faced
a stark choice, whether or not to go to Germany in 1943. That must have
been an almost existential problem for Widerøe in 1943, when his coun-
try was occupied by the Germans and people saw the situation as black and
white. Are you for us or against us? Widerøe faced a fateful decision, and its
consequences affected the whole of the rest of his long life.
Researchers are coming up against more and more moral and ethical
questions. Should we carry out research on fertilised eggs? A pig’s heart in
a human being, is that going too far? What about cloning a sheep? A cow?
A human? Bacteria that feed on oil, so that we can win more oil from the
North Sea? Great! But what if they damage the marine environment? Should
we permit a trial, or should we do more research first? Or stop the research?
Should we allow good to be done even when it can lead to something bad?
Is the best the enemy of the good? Such are the eternal dilemmas that a
researcher faces. As an expert in ethics, Bentzen knew a lot about this.
Almost ten years later, in September 2006, Bentzen came across Widerøe’s
story again. This too was at a medical conference in Norway, and this
time he was one of the speakers. This time too, what absorbed his atten-
tion most was not recent therapeutic advances. He was to be awarded the
Widerøe Prize and had to give a speech of thanks. The prize takes the form
xviii Preface
The invitation was signed by the head of the clinic and the head of research.
The statement could not have been more clear. Widerøe had been officially
and formally recognised, once and for all. The oncology establishment had
quietly and calmly given Widerøe his place in the official history of radio-
therapy. Tor Brustad’s rehabilitation project was taking effect.
In his speech of thanks for the prize, Søren Bentzen tells the international
gathering that ‘There is a direct line from Widerøe’s creative genius to the
high-tech cancer therapy machines we see here today’. And so he contin-
ued his speech, talking not about technological details but about Widerøe’s
life history, which he had been interested in ever since the conference at
Rosendal Manor.
Bentzen continued from where Prof. Brustad’s documentation had left
off. He tried to think himself into Widerøe’s situation and imagine what had
led him to his fateful decision to go to Germany during the war. He had
come to this conclusion: ‘Widerøe was not a victim of his political convic-
tions’, he said with the emphasis on ‘not’. He was quite simply a human
being, a scientist who became a victim of his professional commitment. That
is what fascinates me, and perhaps that is what we can learn today from his
story’.
Bentzen may have been talking not just about Widerøe’s choice and his
day to day life. He may have been talking about all researchers who face
the ethical problems that modern research has put into the order of the day
Preface xix
and that can’t be answered by looking them up in a book. He may also have
been addressing politicians who have to deal with such impossible questions
because they are required to take a position on them. Most of all, perhaps,
he may have been talking to himself as a member of international research
ethics committees expected to give advice on questions which people have
barely been able to formulate fully and to which nobody has yet drafted
answers.
It’s about the conflict between pursuing one’s research objective and at
the same time considering what is right. Researchers have a lot of power.
When should they use it and when should they not use it? Is it the research-
er’s responsibility to say ‘Yes, that’s fine’ or ‘Stop, I won’t take part in this?’
Or should others do this?
‘The researchers have the responsibility. Most people are not qualified to
understand the issues’.
‘Of course not,’ comes the reply, ‘people have to use their common sense’.
‘Really?’
The more voices join the clamour, the more difficult it becomes for public
and politicians when they either cannot form an opinion or are divided in
their views.
The hard, practical choice that Widerøe faced in 1943—whether to work
in Germany or not—is beyond the experience of those of us who were born
after World War ll. Nowadays we all think more globally, but at the same
time more individually.
For today’s ‘Generation Me’ who are raised across borders and want to
make their own way in life, the problem is almost incomprehensible. There
are so many wars. You can’t stop living because of that. ‘I have my own life
to think about’. Many people also thought thus prior to 1940. But war
affects a population, new norms arise, new things appear self-evident. War is
war.
The fact that the world has changed doesn’t exactly make it easier to put
oneself into Widerøe’s situation.
‘Which glasses shall we use to look at it? Old or new?’
‘Old, because that was when he lived’.
‘But if those who think Widerøe was ahead of his time are right, what
then?’
‘Then you can use today’s glasses’, another voice says alluringly.
‘Forget the glasses’, calls another. ‘Try to stand in his shoes’.
‘Is that possible? To see things from somebody else’s position?’
‘Well, apparently not, but perhaps we should try’.
Bentzen had a lot to think about after the meeting at Rosendal Manor.
xx Preface
***
For there was more to be discovered, that nobody knew about. There were
archives yet to be explored, conversations that had not yet taken place. Was
it right of Pedro Waloschek to get caught up in Hitler’s radiation weapon?
Didn’t Tor Brustad try to understand Widerøe by portraying him as a
humanist and a man trying to do good? Did Søren Bentzen make him unde-
servedly a passive sacrifice for his scientific ardour? And what about people
who are still unheard, stones that are still unturned? Do we know everything
about his role during the war?
This book could have been an anthology of accounts from people who
had met him or had told about him—the German, the Norwegian, the
Dane and all the others. It started out as that, a pious wish by the author
Preface xxi
to assemble and edit copious and widely varied material into some sort of a
unified whole. To find the sum, and perhaps even the truth, in all that had
been written and said. Bring it out and up into the light, so that the man
could get the place he deserved. Not to make him either greater or less than
he was.
But then it appeared that there was more material to draw on. So much
that had not been said or written about this man who lived for almost a
century. Born 1902. Died 1996. Known throughout the world, except in
Norway.
Have you only heard of one Widerøe?
The one with the airline?
Yes, that’s right. That’s his brother, Viggo, a pioneer of flight.
But Rolf flew at least as high in his own sphere, physics. And he had a
mysterious past, of which his brother was a part.
Rolf Widerøe’s life spanned most of the twentieth century, from 1902 to
1996. Many of the people who knew him and assisted with the research for
this book had retired or died when the Norwegian original was published in
2015, and others have retired or died since. I have been able to thank them
all personally as the work progressed, but I now express my thanks again
both to the living and to the departed, without distinction.
I wish first to thank the members of the Widerøe family, who have all
been supportive and helpful from the very start, who have released source
material and who have continued to answer my questions over many years.
I am also grateful to Prof. Tor Brustad at the Norwegian Radium Hospital
who drew my attention to Rolf Widerøe and who throughout the process
of researching and writing the book was conversation partner and physics
teacher, and who made all the material from his work in the Norwegian
National Archives available to me. Professor Pedro Waloschek in Hamburg,
the physicist who wrote both a book about Widerøe and a book about accel-
erators, taught me so much and finally gave me his whole archive, but sadly
died before my book was ready.
Thanks are also due to Finn Aaserud, Director of the Niels Bohr Archive
in Copenhagen, and Jan Sigurd Vaagen, Director of Academia Europea and
Professor at the University of Bergen—two physicists with an interest in the
history of science, who in their younger days took the initiative to arrange
for a tape-recorded interview with Widerøe, and who both encouraged and
assisted me in bringing their material to a wider audience.
xxiii
xxiv Acknowledgements
The helpful and inspiring people who have also assisted include:
Peter Day, Research-Journalist and expert at The National Archives in
London;
Dr. Paul Forman at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C.;
Professor Søren M. Bentzen, now at the University of Maryland School of
Medicine;
Professor Egil Lillestøl of CERN and the University of Bergen;
Norbert Lang, former Chief Archivist at BBC/ABB Switzerland;
Christian Gerber and Karsten Drangeid, who also were staff members at
BBC/ABB;
Finn Lied, formerly Norwegian Industry Minister and Director of the
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment;
Gunnar ‘Kjakan’ Sønsteby, who was a leading member of the Resistance;
Haakon Sandvold, formerly General Manager of ÅSV/Hydro;
Olav Aspelund, holder of a Norwegian State Bursary;
Professoressa Giulia Pancheri at the Frascati Laboratory in Italy;
Arnold Kramish, American physicist and author;
Knut Bjerkan, a colleague who has patiently supported me with research and
advice.
The scientists working at CERN, especially Dr. Ing. Heiko Damerau, Dr.
James Gillies and Dr. David Dallman have made a major contribution to
the preparation of this English edition, checking the translated text very
thoroughly for accuracy in scientific description and technical terminology.
For me, as someone who is not a physicist, it has been very reassuring to
be able to consult leading experts, whose input has definitely enhanced the
work.
In translating the book from Norwegian to English, Frank Stewart has
worked closely both with the expert physicists and with myself. I am par-
ticularly grateful for his commitment to the topic and his emphasis on try-
ing to combine factually accurate translation with sensitive preservation of
the personal, informal tone of my original text.
The English edition came into being in an unorthodox way, in a tripar-
tite collaboration between Springer Publishing House, myself as author, and
CERN as a major supporter. It was all made possible by Prof. Dr. Norbert
Holtkamp, Deputy Director of the US National Accelerator Laboratory in
Stanford, who took the initiative in engaging accelerator scientists and agen-
cies throughout the world to fund the translation.
Acknowledgements xxv
1 A Comfortable Home 1
At the Same Time, Somewhere Else 3
A Family of Entrepreneurs 3
The Eldest Son Would Study 5
Ham and Aquavit 5
Spent 30 Øre on Steel Wire 7
King Oscar ll Comes to Visit 9
The Wealthy Family from Romsdal 10
Hiding Grandpa in the Oven 11
King Solomon’s Mines 14
Into the Atomic Age 15
Electrical Engineering 16
Student Social Life 18
An Idea on the Side … 19
… Set Aside for Now 21
‘It Won’t Work!’ 23
It Still Won’t Work! 25
Needs Must 26
Headhunted 28
Keeping an Eye on the Competition 30
Aeronautics and Airshows 31
The World’s Best Relays 33
Onwards and Upwards 35
The Brothers Take Off 36
Dance of Love 38
xxvii
xxviii Contents
A Workhorse 109
The Rest of the Alphabet 110
Meeting with the Great and Famous 111
The Big Questions 113
Doris and Petra 115
Twenty Years Teaching 117
The Art of Compromise 119
Between a Rock and a Hard Place 121
My Uncle Wasn’t Boring 122
A Surprising Uncle 124
A Brother-in Law Who Is Both Social and Antisocial 125
Curiosity Takes New Directions 128
Two Pretty Dresses 130
Doctor Honoris Causa 131
Come and Sit Down, My Boy 134
New Triumphs 141
More Prizes and Honours 146
Nevertheless 148
Around the World 149
Lacking Only the Nobel Prize 150
Just in Time 153
The Same Enthusiasm 154
The Patent He Didn’t Talk About 156
The First Love 157
The Impossible 158
K . F. K o e h l e r Ve r l a g L e i p z i g
Generaloberst Freiherr von
Hausen
Erinnerungen an den
Marnefeldzug
Mit Bildnis des Verfassers, verschiedenen
Karten und Gefechtsskizzen und einer
einleitenden vortrefflichen historischen Studie
von
Friedrich M. Kircheisen
Preis geheftet etwa M. 10.—, gebunden etwa M. 14.50
Generaloberst von Hausen war zu Beginn des Krieges Führer der 3.
Armee, die dem Gegner an der Marne solche kraftvolle Schläge versetzte,
daß Joffre und Foch jeden Augenblick glaubten, das französische
Zentrum würde durchbrochen werden.
Hausen hat die Operationen seiner Armee musterhaft geleitet, trotzdem er
an Typhus erkrankt war. Seine Erkrankung war tatsächlich der Grund, daß
er vom Kaiser seines Kommandos enthoben wurde, während die Legende
sich bildete, daß Hausen an der nichtgewonnenen Schlacht schuld sei.
Hausens Erinnerungen bedeuten eine
Ehrenrettung der 3. Armee und ihres Führers.
Sie basieren auf den Unterlagen des Großen Generalstabes, die ihm zur
Verfügung standen, und sind untermischt mit höchst lebenswarmen
persönlichen Eindrücken, so daß nicht etwa ein militärtechnisches oder
polemisches Buch entstanden ist, sondern ä u ß e r s t s p a n n e n d e ,
fließend geschriebene Feldaufzeichnungen.
Die beiden weißen Völker!
(The two white nations!)
Deutsch-englische Erinnerungen eines
deutschen Seeoffiziers
von
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.