Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Affiniti Chromatography of Heme-Binding Proteins An Improved Method For The Synthesis of Hemin-Agarose (1982)
Affiniti Chromatography of Heme-Binding Proteins An Improved Method For The Synthesis of Hemin-Agarose (1982)
244
0003-2697/82/060244-07$02.00/O
Copyright 0 1982 by Academic Press, Inc.
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
IMPROVED METHOD FOR HEMIN-AGAROSE SYNTHESIS 245
Synthesis of hemin-agarose. Hemin (200 phate, pH 7.5), either directly or after prein-
mg) was dissolved in DMF ( 15 ml) and CD1 cubation with 2.5 nmol of hemin at 37°C for
(200 mg) was added immediately. The mix- 20 min. The hemin-agarose beads were
ture was heated at 80°C for 15 min and then washed three times with 0.5 M NaCl-10 mM
cooled at room temperature for 30 min. The sodium phosphate, pH 7.5 (0.5 ml) and the
derivatized hemin in DMF was added to 10 adsorbed protein was released and solubi-
ml of aminoethyl-agarose (4.5 pmol diami- lized with 100 ~1 of electrophoresis sample
noethane/ml packed gel), which had been buffer containing 1% SDS, 2.5% 2-mercap-
washed successively with distilled water (200 toethanol, 0.0625 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8),
ml), 33% DMF (50 ml), 66% DMF (50 ml), and 0.25 M sucrose. Sample eluates were
and finally 100% DMF ( 100 ml). The cou- boiled for 2 min before loading on the gel.
pling reaction was allowed to proceed at SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was
room temperature for 18 h while the tube performed according to the method of
was shaken gently. The brownish colored Laemmli (9).
beads were washed on a sintered glass funnel
with decreasing concentrations of DMF: RESULTS
100% DMF (100 ml), 66% DMF (50 ml), Synthesis and Properties of Hemin-
and 33% DMF (50 ml). After washing with
Agarose
distilled water (200 ml), the resin was re-
washed with 25% pyridine until the wash had Preliminary attempts to couple hemin to
no color (about 200 ml) and finally with aminoethyl-agarose were carried out using
distilled water (200 ml). The hemin-agarose 1 - ethyl - 3 - (3 - dimethylaminopropyl)car-
can be stored at 4°C with appropriate pre- bodiimide (EDC) as the coupling agent, as
servatives. While controlled studies have not is usually recommended for the conden-
been conducted, it is recommended as a pre- sation of carboxyl groups (10); however, this
caution against degradation that light and reagent requires a pH of 4-6 for optimal
oxygen be excluded during storage. coupling. At this pH range, solubility prob-
Determination of hemin immobilized on lems with hemin were encountered even
agarose. The conjugated hemin was released when dimethyl sulfoxide, dioxane, or di-
from the agarose by heating the hemin- methylformamide-water mixtures were used
agarose (50 ~1) in 0.1 M NaOH (3 ml) at as the solvent phase. As a result the coupling
75°C for 30 min. After cooling to room tem- efficiency was rather low.
perature, 1 ml of pyridine was added and the These problems were largely eliminated
residual agarose beads (colorless) were re- by using 1, I’-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) as
moved by centrifugation. The hemin deriv- the coupling agent in pure DMF, as is prac-
ative released from the matrix was converted ticed in the esterification of fatty acids ( 11).
to pyridine hemochrome by reducing the fer- The carboxyl groups of hemin are deriva-
ric iron with sodium dithionite and the ab- tized initially to imidazolides with CD1 in
sorbance at 420 nm was recorded immedi- DMF. The progression of the reaction is vi-
ately. For standards, 1 mM heme in pyridine sualized by the conversion of a brownish
(freshly prepared) was mixed with nonder- hemin solution to one with a red tinge. This
ivatized aminoethyl-agarose and the mixture color change is probably caused by the co-
treated in the same way as the hemin-aga- ordination of the heme iron with imidazole
rose. that is released from CDL For the coupling
Detection of heme-binding proteins in reaction, a 13-fold excess of the hemin acyl-
serum. Serum (50 ~1) was shaken with 40 imidazolide was used with respect to the
~1 of hemin-agarose (added as a 50% sus- number of aminoethyl groups on agarose.
pension in 0.5 M NaCl- 10 mrvi sodium phos- This increases the likelihood of having one
246 TSUTSUI AND MUELLER
SERUM CALF F!AT HUMAN RABBIT similar to that of hemopexin in the native
-II
HEWN gel system (Fig. 6~). We have recently pu-
TREATMENT ; - - + - +
rified this protein (HBP.93) by affinity chro-
matography on hemin-agarose ( 15). Several
lines of evidence have suggested that HBP.93
**p #@‘-HBP(93K)
has about 30 heme-binding sites per mole-
cule. This observation is consistent with the
* -~ --Hpx(GSK)
fact that the binding of HBP.93 was not in-
hibited by the presence of hemin in a low
concentration (Fig. 5, lane 6) although the
I*---
binding was completely abolished with a
higher hemin concentration (data not shown).
FIG. 5. Selective binding of serum heme-binding pro- The other minor bands seen on the gel are
teins to hemin-agarose. The indicated sera were incu-
bated with hemin-agarose with (+) or without (-)
probably the proteins nonspecifically bound
preincubation with hemin as described in the text. After to the resin since the binding of these pro-
removing the nonadsorbed proteins by washing the teins was not precluded by preincubating the
beads with NP buffer, the adsorbed proteins were eluted serum with a large dose of hemin.
with a buffer containing 1% SDS and analyzed by elec-
trophoresis in 7.5% polyacrylamide gels. Protein bands DISCUSSION
corresponding to the hemopexin (Hpx) in calf, rat, hu-
man, and rabbit sera and the heme-binding protein of The preparation of hemin-agarose using
rabbit serum (HBP) are labeled. CD1 as a condensing agent has several ad-
vantages over the procedures using EDC
a protein with an apparent molecular weight
RABBIT HUMAN
of 65,000-70,000 from all sera tested (lanes I
1-3, and 5). Since serum albumin and he- ‘S a b c IS
mopexin migrate to similar positions in the
SDS-gel system, the bound proteins from
human and rabbit sera were further electro-
phoresed in a native gel system to separate
these proteins (Fig. 6). Most of the stained
material was detected at the position of he-
mopexin and no band corresponding to al-
bumin was demonstrable. The identity of the
protein as hemopexin was further confirmed -
by amino acid analysis (Table 1). The cor- -*
responding coefficient between the corre- FIG. 6. Absence of binding of albumin to hemin-
sponding amino acid values was 0.94. Thus, agarose. Rabbit serum and human serum (5 ml each)
the hemin-agarose binds hemopexin but not were diluted with NP buffer to 20-fold and loaded on
serum albumin. When serum was preincu- small columns (2.0-ml bed) of hemin-agarose. After
washing the columns with 500 ml of NP buffer, the
bated with just enough hemin to saturate the
adsorbed proteins were eluted and fractionated by ap-
binding site of hemopexin (one site per mol- plying a decreasing pH gradient (pH 7.5-3.5). Fractions
ecule), the binding of this protein to the containing proteins were pooled, dialyzed against dis-
hemin-agarose was abolished (Fig. 5, lanes tilled water, and then subjected to electrophoresis in
4 and 6). a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel prepared according to
In rabbit serum, another protein was re- Laemmli (9). omitting SDS. Whole serum (S); rabbit
serum proteins eluted at pH 6.3-5.3 (a), pH 5.2-4.8
tained by the resin (Fig. 5, lanes 5 and 6); (b), pH 4.7-4.1 (c), and human serum proteins eluted
this protein had a molecular weight of ap- at pH 6.3-5.3 (d), and pH 5.1-4.1 (e). Serum albumin
proximately 93,000 and showed a mobility is marked by the arrows.
IMPROVED METHOD FOR HEMIN-AGAROSE SYNTHESIS 249
REFERENCES L., and Moldave, K., eds.), Vol. 12B, pp. 747-
769, Academic Press, New York.
1. Lo, S., Aft, R., and Mueller, G. C. (1981) Cuncer 9. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature (London) 227,680-
Rex 41, 864-870. 685.
2. Suttnar, J., Hrkal, Z., Vodrazka, Z., and Rejnkova, 10. Cuatrecasas, P., and Anfinsen, C. B. ( 1971) in
J. (1979) .I Chromatogr. 169, 500-504. Methods in Enzymology (Jackoby, W. B., ed.),
Vol. 22, pp. 345-378, Academic Press, New
3. Suttnar, J., Hrkal, Z., Vodrazka, Z. (1977) J.
York.
Chromarogr. 131,453-457.
II. Ko, H., and Royer, M. (1974) J. Chromatogr. 88,
4. Conway, T. P., and Muller-Eberhard, U. (1973)
253-263.
Fed. Proc. 32, 469.
12. Muller-Eberhard, U., and Morgan, W. T. (1975)
5. Olsen, K. W. (1980) Anal. Biochem. 109,250-254.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 244, 624-650.
6. Olsen, K. W., Carey, D., Thompson, N., and Hutch- 13. Morgan, W. T. ( 1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 535,
inson, M. E. (1978) Fed. Proc. 37, 1514. 319-333.
I. Winterhalter, K. H., and Huehns, E. R. (1964) J. 14. Hrkal, Z., and Muller-Eberhard, U. (1971) Bio-
Biol. Chem. 239, 3699-3705. chemistry 10, 1746- 1750.
8. Schapira, G., Rosa, J., Malenknia, N., and Podieu, 15. Tsutsui, K., and Mueller, G. C. (1982) J. Biol.
P. ( 1968) in Methods in Enzymology (Grossman, Chem., in press.