Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science Theory and Industrial Applications 1St Edition Philippe Wenger Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science Theory and Industrial Applications 1St Edition Philippe Wenger Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science Theory and Industrial Applications 1St Edition Philippe Wenger Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/new-trends-in-medical-and-
service-robots-human-centered-analysis-control-and-design-1st-
edition-philippe-wenger/
https://textbookfull.com/product/new-trends-in-educational-
activity-in-the-field-of-mechanism-and-machine-
theory-2014-2017-j-c-garcia-prada/
https://textbookfull.com/product/defoaming-theory-and-industrial-
applications-garrett/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mechanism-and-theory-in-food-
chemistry-wong/
Blockchain, big data and machine learning: trends and
applications First Edition Kumar
https://textbookfull.com/product/blockchain-big-data-and-machine-
learning-trends-and-applications-first-edition-kumar/
https://textbookfull.com/product/high-utility-pattern-mining-
theory-algorithms-and-applications-philippe-fournier-viger/
https://textbookfull.com/product/new-trends-in-medical-and-
service-robotics-advances-in-theory-and-practice-giuseppe-
carbone/
https://textbookfull.com/product/industrial-applications-of-
machine-learning-pedro-larranaga/
https://textbookfull.com/product/new-technologies-and-
branding-1st-edition-philippe-sachetti/
Mechanisms and Machine Science 43
Philippe Wenger
Paulo Flores Editors
New Trends in
Mechanism
and Machine
Science
Theory and Industrial Applications
Mechanisms and Machine Science
Volume 43
Series editor
Marco Ceccarelli
LARM: Laboratory of Robotics and Mechatronics
DICeM; University of Cassino and South Latium
Via Di Biasio 43, 03043 Cassino (Fr), Italy
ceccarelli@unicas.it
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8779
Philippe Wenger ⋅ Paulo Flores
Editors
123
Editors
Philippe Wenger Paulo Flores
CNRS University of Minho
Ecole Centrale de Nantes Guimarães
Nantes Portugal
France
EUCOMES 2016 is the sixth event in a series that was started in 2006 under the
patronage of International Federation for the Promotion of Mechanism and Machine
Science (IFToMM). The aim of the conference is to bring together European
researchers, industry professionals, and students from the broad range of disciplines
referring to mechanism science, in an intimate, collegial, and stimulating
environment.
The first edition of EUCOMES was held in February 2006 in Obergurgl
(Austria) and has continued subsequently in Cassino (Italy) in September 2008,
Cluj-Napoca (Romania) in September 2010, Santander (Spain) in September 2012,
and Guimarães (Portugal) in September 2014. The 2016 edition takes place in
Nantes, France, from 20 to 23 September 2016.
This book compiles the most recent research results in mechanism science,
intended to reinforce and improve mechanical systems in a variety of applications
in daily life and industry. It is published under the Machine and Mechanism Science
series and addresses issues related to: mechanism design an synthesis, mechanics of
robots, mechanism analysis, parallel manipulators, tensegrity mechanisms, cable
mechanisms, control issues, history of mechanisms, mechanisms for biomechanics
and surgery, and Industrial and nonindustrial applications. This book offers a
valuable addition to existing literature.
We are grateful to IFToMM, CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, Région-Pays-
de-la-Loire, and Atlanstic, which have supported EUCOMES 2016. We express our
grateful thanks to the staff of IRCCyN who helped in the organization of the
conference and to the members of the scientific committee for their valuable
support.
We also want to express our gratitude to all the authors for their interest in
participating in EUCOMES 2016 and for writing their manuscripts in a timely
manner.
v
vi Preface
We thank all anonymous and volunteer reviewers for their outstanding work,
which allowed the authors to get valuable feedback, and the Conference Springer
Book to be published as scheduled.
vii
viii Contents
Abstract This work proposes a procedure for the determination of the interfer-
ences between balls and raceways in four-contact-point slewing bearings due to
manufacturing errors. The procedure is applied to a particular case and finite ele-
ment analyses are performed for the friction moment calculation, considering dif-
ferent preloads. The results are used to evaluate the influence of manufacturing
errors in the friction torque of the bearing.
1 Introduction
developed by Aguirrebeitia et al. [4] for the calculation of the friction moment,
where these effects are taken into account.
Slewing bearings are usually preloaded by introducing slightly oversized balls,
avoiding thus the possible clearances due to the manufacturing tolerances. The
purpose of the preload is to improve the behavior of the bearing, reducing the
vibratory and runout phenomena in the assembly and increasing its stiffness [8].
However, the preload also carries an increment on the friction moment, so a bal-
anced solution has to be found.
The manufacturing errors are also a factor to be considered. This was studied by
Aithal et al. [5], who established that manufacturing tolerances affect the load
distribution among the balls.
The main goal of this paper is to explain a method to calculate the interferences
between the ball and the raceways of the bearing due to the manufacturing errors.
These errors are obtained for a particular case, and their effect in the friction
moment is evaluated by means of FE calculations.
In this section, a procedure for the determination of the interferences between the
ball and the different raceways due to the manufacturing errors is proposed. For this
purpose, an analytical model has been developed. This model needs the real shape
of the raceways as input, so some experimental measurements must be taken as a
first step.
Contact point
C
N
R O
Reported point
Fig. 2 Coordinate-measuring machine (left), measured points (centre) and graphical representa-
tion of the probe in contact with the raceway (right)
6 points would be needed at least per each circumferential position (see Fig. 2). To
obtain the general shape of a ring, these measurements must be taken for several
circumferential positions.
Since the measurements are taken for each ring separately, the relative position
between them once the bearing is assembled is unknown. The analytical model
described in the following subsection aims to determine this position, from which
the ball-raceway interferences will be calculated.
For the measurements, a coordinate-measuring machine (CMM) was used. As it
is shown in Fig. 2, especial attention must be taken when measuring surfaces are
not flat and perpendicular to the approximation direction of the sensor probe. For
the particular case to which concerns this work, the CMM was programmed to
report the point R according to Fig. 2. From the reported coordinates, it is
straightforward to place the location of the center of the probe (point O), from
which the coordinates of each raceway centre can be obtained, as well as its radius.
The results shown in this paper were obtained for a bearing with nominal
dimensions reported in Table 1. In order to check the repeatability, the measures
were taken twice for each ring. It was also checked that the different measures from
the same raceway were coherent between them.
Once the coordinates of the centres and the radii of the raceways are known for the
different circumferential positions, the next step in order to calculate the
ball-raceway interferences is to determine the relative position between the inner
and the outer ring. In this regard, the final spatial configuration will be the one with
6 I. Heras et al.
the minimum associated energy. The key of the proposed method lies on the
formulation and the minimization of the potential elastic energy of the system.
For this purpose, the ball-raceway contact model developed and validated by
Daidié et al. [6] is used. Taking advantage of this technique, the centres of the
raceways are linked each other by traction-only springs that simulate the stiffness of
the contacts, as shown in Fig. 3. This way, each pair of springs represents the four
contacts in each ball of the bearing.
For the formulation of the potential energy, the outer ring is fixed, while the
position of the inner ring will be a function of the relative displacements and
rotations between them.
Since manufacturing errors are being taken into account, the natural lengths of
the springs can be different from each other. For a given circumferential position,
and according to the numbering used in Fig. 3, the natural length of spring i is
given by:
On the other hand, the real length ðlÞ will be a function of the position of the
inner ring. Having both natural and real lengths, the summation of the interferences
corresponding to each contact pair linked by each spring will be calculated
according to the next expression:
δ = l − lN ð2Þ
̸2
Q = Kδ3 ð4Þ
This formula is applicable when no truncation of the contact ellipse exists and
only elastic deformations are involved, which is assumable with the load rates
involved in the studied case. From this expression, the total stiffness of the spring
i that links the raceway centres i and ði + 2Þ is obtained:
1 1 1
2 ̸3
= + ð5Þ
ðKTot
i
Þ ðK i Þ2 ̸ 3 ðK i + 2 Þ2 ̸ 3
Finally, the potential energy for the entire system formed by B balls will be
given by:
2 B h 1b 1b 5 ̸2 2b 5 ̸ 2 i
EP = ∑ K δ 2b
+ KTot δ ð6Þ
3 b = 1 Tot
Inasmuch as the interferences are functions of the five parameters that define the
final position of the inner ring, so will be the potential energy.
The proposed formulation was implemented in Octave and the minimization of
the potential energy was performed by means of a gradient based algorithm. For the
particular case studied in the present work, the results for the interferences can be
seen in Fig. 4.
modelization, only the sector corresponding to one ball is considered. Note that the
mesh was built putting special care to the contact region. Applied loads and
boundary conditions are detailed below:
• Outer ring: external surfaces fixed to the ground.
• Ball preload: simulated by imposing a specific thermal condition.
• Manufacturing tolerances: simulated by introducing an offset to the contacting
surfaces of the raceway, as done by Aithal et al. [5]. This supposes an
improvement over the previous model [4].
• Inner ring: external surfaces fixed while applying the preload and manufacturing
errors. Then, the rotation of the ring is applied.
In the contact surfaces, a typical value of 0.1 was taken for the friction coeffi-
cient, supposed that it is lubricated with grease [7].
In order to calculate the friction moment for the entire system, as many calcu-
lations as balls inside the bearing would be needed. For simplification purposes and
to avoid high computational costs, a Design Of Experiments (DOE) was planed
considering the 3 parameters related with the tolerances: the interferences in each
contact pair (two interferences) and the raceways radii. Taking pick and valley
values for these parameters, full factorial DOE was performed considering 3 levels
for the conformity ratio and 4 levels for the interferences. Based on (4) and [6], the
next functional approximation is proposed, where the given values for the constants
have been obtained by the least squares fitting with the points from the DOE:
8
( >
> n = 2.10
ð
C1 δn1 Þ + C2 ðδ1 + δ2 Þ
+ δn2 n <
Mf = ð1 − sÞm
if δ1 ⋅ δ2 ≠ 0 where
m = 0.73
ð7Þ
0 if δ1 ⋅ δ2 = 0 >
> C = 351
: 1
C2 = 131
where Mf is in (Nm) and δ in (mm). For the given values in (7), the proposed
formula shows an average error of 3.8 % for a single ball among the studied design
points of the DOE. This expression was used to calculate the results for every ball.
Calculation of the Ball Raceway Interferences Due … 9
Fig. 6 Friction moment VS ball preload, with (solid line) and without (dotted line) the effect of
the manufacturing errors
The model described in Sect. 2.2 was used to obtain the values of the interferences
for the case of nominal ball and balls with four different preloads, from +5 to
+20 μm. Feeding (7) with these values of the interferences, the contribution of
every ball to the friction moment in each case was obtained. The results are shown
in Fig. 6.
In order to evaluate the effect of the manufacturing errors in the friction moment,
four more FE calculations were performed, one per each preload case, considering
the nominal geometry. These results are given together with the previous ones in
the Fig. 6.
Table 2 shows the numerical values for the discrepancies between both cases
from Fig. 6. Here it can be seen that the effect of the manufacturing errors have a
great influence in the friction moment, ergo they must be considered when accurate
results are required.
This work presents a procedure for the calculation of the ball-raceway interferences
due to manufacturing errors in four-contact-point bearings. This procedure has been
applied to a particular case and the values of the interferences have been obtained.
The results have been used to perform FE analyses for the friction moment
10 I. Heras et al.
calculation, which prove that the manufacturing tolerances can have a significant
effect in the friction torque. Thus, not considering them can lead to underestimated
results.
The described analytical model can also be used to determine the load distri-
bution for a given external load. It would allow the inclusion of the stiffness of the
rings as well. The stiffness of each ring could be calculated by FE modelling via
superelemet techniques, reducing the elastic behaviour of the bearing to the centres
of the raceways. In comparison with the analytical models developed previously by
the authors [1–3], this model would be able to consider both manufacturing tol-
erances and the stiffness of the rings. Future research will develop these aspects.
For the final validation, some experimental tests are required for correlation
purposes. This way, two different test campaigns have been planned: one for the
determination of the friction moment using different preloads but no external loads,
and a second one for the friction coefficient calculation, which is needed to feed the
analytical model.
Acknowledgments The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of
Economy and Competitiveness through project number DPI2013-41091-R, and also the support of
the University of the Basque Country through project number UFI 11/29.
References
1. Aguirrebeitia, J., Plaza, J., Abasolo, M., Vallejo, J.: General static load-carrying capacity of
four-contact-point slewing bearings for wind turbine generator actuation systems. Wind
Energy 16(5), 759–774 (2012)
2. Aguirrebeitia, J., Abasolo, M., Avilés, R., Fernández de Bustos, I.: General static load-carrying
capacity for the design and selection of four contact point slewing bearings: finite element
calculations and theoretical model validation. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 55, 23–30 (2012)
3. Aguirrebeitia, J., Plaza, J., Abasolo, M., Vallejo, J.: Effect of the preload in the general static
load-carrying capacity of four-contact-point slewing bearings for wind turbine generators
theoretical model and fin. Wind Energy 17(10), 1605–1621 (2013)
4. Aguirrebeitia, J., Abasolo, M., Plaza, J., Heras, I.: FEM model for friction moment
calculations in ball-raceway contacts for applications in four contact point slewing bearings.
In: 14th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Taipei, Taiwan, 25–30 Oct
2015
5. Aithal, S., Siva Prasad, N., Shunmugam, M.S., Chellapandi, P.: Effect of manufacturing errors
on load distribution in large diameter slewing bearings of fast breeder reactor rotatable plugs.
In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical
Engineering Science, pp. 1–12 (2015)
6. Daidié, A., Chaib, Z., Ghosn, A.: 3D simplified finite elements analysis of load and contact
angle in a slewing ball bearing. J. Mech. Des. 082601–1–8 (2008)
7. Joshi, A., Kachhia, B., Kikkari, H., Sridhar, M., Nelias, D.: Running torque of slow speed
two-point and four-point contact bearings. Lubricants 3(2), 181–196 (2015)
8. Kang, S.H., Tesar, D.: An analytical comparison between ball and crossed roller bearings for
utilization in actuator modules for precision modular robots. In: ASME 2003 Design
Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering
Conference, Chicago, pp. 1221–1230, 2–6 Sept 2003
Calculation of the Ball Raceway Interferences Due … 11
9. Leblanc, A., Nelias, D.: Ball motion and sliding friction in a four-contact-point ball bearing.
J. Tribol. 129(4), 801–808 (2007)
10. Leblanc, A., Nelias, D.: Analysis of ball bearings with 2, 3 or 4 contact points. Tribol. Trans.
51(3), 372–380 (2008)
Meshing Analysis for TA Worm Drive
Yaping Zhao
Abstract The meshing analysis for the TA worm is performed. The formulae to
determine the key points on the boundary of the contact zone are proposed. Based
on this, the strategy to obtain the contact lines and the instantaneous contact points
is put forward. The existence of the constant contact line is proved and verified
numerically. The numerical consequences manifest that the local meshing quality is
relatively good. The meshing analysis makes clear that the way to improve the
meshing behaviour further is to remove the constant contact line by the
modification.
1 Introduction
The TA worm drive is also called the Hindley worm drive or the globoidal worm
drive, which was initially invented by Henry Hindley in 1765 [1, 2]. Afterwards,
Cone greatly boosted the Hindley worm drive and got his related patent in 1932
[3, 11]. The basic design and manufacture methods of the TA worm drive were
preliminarily summarized in Ref. [6].
Starting from the 1950s, Litvin made the fitful researches on the meshing prin-
ciple of the TA worm drive on the basis of the strict meshing analysis [9, 10, 12].
Nevertheless, his work only includes the development of the equations of the tooth
surfaces of the worm pair and excludes the computations of the meshing limit
functions, the normal vector of the instantaneous contact line, the induced normal
curvature, etc.
Y. Zhao (✉)
Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
e-mail: zhyp_neu@163.com
Beginning from the 1980s, some authors [7, 8, 13, 14] performed the meshing
analysis for the TA worm drive. Among them, merely Hu [8] provided the
numerical results but his results are lack of reliability.
In the investigations of Dong [5], the meshing analysis for the TA worm gearing
was made more completely and plenty of numerical examples were supplied.
Nonetheless, he calculated the curvature parameters of the worm surface in line
with the theory of locus surface.
Recently, Zhao [15] laconically figured down the curvature parameters for the
helicoidal surface of a TA worm by means of a direct method whereas his work did
not contain the meshing analysis.
Besides, a common deficiency of the preceding studies is that it fails to explain
the process of the meshing analysis clearly. For example, how to determine the key
points on the boundary of the contact zone of the worm pair was not interpreted
obviously in the literature. This work well surmounts such shortcomings in this
aspect.
O2 j2
d
jo2
rb
io2 i2
ko1=k1
ko2=k2
a
io1
j1
i1
jo1 r1
j2
O2
rd r2
jo2
d 2
io2
i2
where xod = − u cos φd − rb sin φd , yod = − u sin φd + rb cos φd , and u and φ are the
two parameters of Σ 1 . The symbols, R½ ko⃗ 2 , φd , R io⃗ 1 , π2 , and R½ k1⃗ , − φ denote
the rotation transformation matrices [4].
A unit vector αξ⃗ is set up to be along the tangential orientation of the parameter
u-line of Σ 1 , namely
ð αξ⃗ Þ1 = − cos φd cos φ i⃗1 + cos φd sin φ j⃗1 − sin φd k1⃗ , ð3Þ
such that
αη⃗ 1
= ð n⃗1 Þ1 × ð α⃗ξ Þ1 = αηx i⃗1 + αηy j⃗1 + αηz k1⃗ , ð4Þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi2
−1
where αηx = i12 D ½i12 ðxod + aÞ sin φ − u sin φd cos φ, D= ðxod + aÞ2 + iu2 ,
12
αηy = i12− D1 ½i12 ðxod + aÞ cos φ + u sin φd sin φ, αηz = − i12uD cos φd .
During the engagement of a TA worm drive, also as shown in Fig. 1, two
rotatable coordinate systems, σ 1 and σ 2 , are linked to the worm and the worm gear,
respectively. When the rotation angle of the worm is φ1 , the interconnected rotating
angle of the worm gear is φ2 and φ2 = φ1 ̸ i12 .
16 Y. Zhao
If assuming that the worm rotates around k⃗o1 with the angle velocity
j ω1⃗ j = 1 rad ̸ s, the relative angle velocity and the relative velocity of the worm pair
can be worked out as
1 yod xo1 − a
ð ω1⃗ 2 Þo1 = ⃗o1 + ko⃗ 1 , ð V ⃗12 Þo1 = − yo1 i⃗o1 + xo1 j⃗o1 − o⃗ 1 , ð5Þ
i12 j i12 i12 k
2 φ −φ φ −φ φ − φ
Φðu, φ, φ1 Þ = sin 1 Aϕ cos 1 + Bϕ sin 1 , ð6Þ
i12 D 2 2 2
rb u
where Aϕ = u
, Bϕ = ðxod + aÞða cos φd − uÞ.
sin φd cos φd
i12
From Eq. (2) and with the aid of Eq. (6), the tooth surface equation of the TA
worm gear can be achieved in σ 2 as
where x2 = ðxo1 − aÞ cos iφ121 + yod sin iφ121 , y2 = − ðxo1 − aÞ sin iφ121 + yod cos iφ121 .
From Eq. (6), it is uncomplicated to acquire the meshing limit function and the
outcome is
1
Φφ1 = Aϕ cosðφ1 − φÞ + Bϕ sinðφ1 − φÞ . ð8Þ
i12 D
where !
ð1Þ
Nξ = τξ V 12 ∙ α⃗η o1 + ð ω⃗12 Þo1 ∙ αη⃗ o1 ,
o1
!
ð1Þ !
Nη = τξ V 12 ∙ð α⃗ξ Þo1 + 2H ð1Þ V 12 ∙ αη⃗ o1 − ð ω⃗12 Þo1 ∙ð αξ⃗ Þo1 .
o1 o1
ð1Þ
In Eq. (9), τξ is the geodesic torsion of Σ 1 along αξ⃗ and H ð1Þ is its mean
curvature.
The curvature interference limit function can be acquired as
! !
Ψ = Nξ V 12 ∙ð αξ⃗ Þo1 + Nη V 12 ∙ α⃗η o1 + Φφ1 . ð10Þ
o1 o1
Meshing Analysis for TA Worm Drive 17
The induced principal curvature and the sliding angle can be figured out as
0 1
ð12Þ Nξ2 + Nη2 B Ψ − Φφ 1 C
kN = , θvt = arcsin@ ! qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi A. ð11Þ
Ψ V 12 2
Nξ + Nη2
o1
The basic parameters of the TA worm pair under consideration are a = 250 mm,
i12 = 40, and Z1 = 1, where Z1 is the number of worm thread. The geometrical
design computation in this study is performed in accordance with the approach
proposed in Ref. [5].
The contact zone and the instantaneous contact lines of the worm drive are shown
in Fig. 2. The contact zone A′B′EF is denoted by symbol Σ 2B , which corresponds to
the second factor of the meshing equation Φ = 0 (See Eq. (6)). On the worm gear
tooth surface, the lines AB, CD, and EF match together and constitute the constant
contact line, which corresponds to the first factor of the meshing equation, namely
φ1 = φ. On the other hand, the lines AB and CD are the representatives of the inlet and
outlet portions of the worm, so that the parameters of points A and C can be attained as
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðAÞ )
1 2 φd 2rb Lw
uA = uC = da2 − rb2 , = arctan pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi ∓ arcsin pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi , ð12Þ
4 ðCÞ 2 − 4r 2 2da2
φd d a2 b
Fig. 2 Conjugate zone and contact lines of worm drive. a worm, b worm gear
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Nightmare on
the nose
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Language: English
By Evelyn E. Smith
The day dawned when Incubus was to make her debut at Belmont.
The odds on her were a hundred to one. Laughing softly to himself,
Watson put five hundred dollars on her nose.
"You crazy, fella?" the seller said to him. "The horse to bet on is
Godlove's Pamplemousse. He's a natural to win."
"Incubus is my own horse," Watson explained patiently.
"Oh, I guess it's like my kid. He plays the pianner and stinks but I
gotta clap for him all the same."
"Why didn't you give her some hip reducing exercises," Godlove
sneered as the jockey led Incubus out into the paddock. "She'll never
get through the starting gate with that spread."
"Take it easy," Watson told her, as she reared. "Now, listen," he said
to the jockey, a sullen young apprentice—all he could get—"she
responds to direction very well. Talk to her. She practically
understands."
"Oh, sure," the jockey jeered. "Is snookums gonna win the race for
daddykins?"
"Ess," replied Incubus.
The jockey stared at her and at Watson. Watson laughed, a trifle too
hard. "I'm a great ventriloquist," he explained. "Can't break myself of
the habit."
"Well, you better begin now," the jockey said, "because I'm
temperamental and when I'm emotionally disturbed the horse senses
it."
"The horses," the announcer declaimed through the loudspeaker,
"are at the post.... They're off!... All of them, that is, except Incubus.
She can't get through the starting gate. She's stuck."
"Yah, wear a girdle!" the crowd called derisively.
With a wrench of sheer rage Incubus pulled herself through the gate
and dashed after the other horses. "In the backstretch it's
Pamplemousse in the lead with Disestablishmentarianism and
Epigram running half a length behind and.... But who's this coming
up from the rear? It's Incubus! She's ahead by a length.... By two
lengths.... By three lengths! What a horse! What a jockey! He's
giving her the whip!... Oh, oh, something's wrong. Incubus has lost
her rider! Too bad, Incubus."
The horses raced up the stretch, with Incubus keeping five lengths
ahead of Pamplemousse as per direction. She was much annoyed to
discover that he had won the race.
"But I won it!" she kept whispering to Watson as he led her off. "I was
first. This is a frame-up. I'm going right to the judges and raise an
objection."
"It doesn't count if you don't have the jockey on you," he told her.
"That's the rule."
"Flap the rules!" she said. "You mean without that pee-wee it doesn't
count? A fine thing! I hate the rules, I hate the rules, I hate the rules!"
She stamped her foot. "He hit me with a whip, the little bastard, so I
gave him the old heave-ho."
"Aw, come on now, Incubus, we'll get another jockey who won't whip
you. You see how easy you can win a race?"
She tossed her head. "I'm not so sure I want to run again."
"You know you want to run, Incubus. You've made a big impression, I
could see that."
"Who cares what people think?"
"I saw Pamplemousse giving you the eye," Watson murmured.
"Good-looking horse, isn't he? Any filly'd be glad to have him
interested in her."
"Oh, I dunno," Incubus said. "He's all right, I guess, if you like them
tall and dark. But, okay, I'll try it again for you, Watson."
Godlove accosted them again as Watson led Incubus into her stall. "I
take back what I said about your horse, Watson," he apologized.
"She looks like a fiend, but she runs like one too. With the proper
handling, she might be a stake horse." He looked speculatively at
Incubus. "Give you five thousand for her, big rump and all."
"Not on your life."
Godlove shrugged. "Suit yourself. But she'll have to run in another
claimer, you know." He left, laughing softly.
After two weeks of steady diet and vigorous massage, during which
her hip measurements were considerably reduced, Incubus was
entered in a four-thousand-dollar claimer. Even though she was still
a maiden she was favored next to Pamplemousse by the players, for
her unusual first start had not passed unnoticed. Watson bet another
five hundred, to obtain which he had mortgaged the old homestead.
But this time he could get only even money.
"Remember, Incubus," he instructed her as he buckled her saddle, "if
Godlove claims you you know what to do."
"Sure do. Shall I let him live afterward?"
"Yeah, let him live. Just make it uncomfortable for him.... Now look
here, sonny." This to the new jockey. "She doesn't like the whip. You
saw what she did to her last boy?"
The jockey nodded and gulped.
"All you have to do is sit on her and let her go where she wants.
Then you'll be all right."
"I wooden even get near her," the boy said, "if I didn't have an aged
mother to support."
The starter waved the yellow flag and the horses were off. Incubus
raced neck and neck with Pamplemousse until they were a furlong
from the finish line. Then she surged ahead to win by five lengths.
When she rode into the winner's circle the crowd booed, as is their
pleasant custom with winning horses and jockeys.
"A popular figure, eh?" Incubus sneered. "Tcha!"
"Y'know, Mr. Watson," the jockey said as he was assisted from the
horse with a dazed but beatific smile on his face, "I'm so steamed up
over this win I even thought Incubus was talking to me."
The men standing around laughed. "You've let excitement go to your
head," Godlove remarked. "Personally I would never hire a jockey
who has no emotional equilibrium."
The jockey reached a tentative finger toward Incubus' nose. "Good
horse," he said. "Good Incubus."
"I think you're pretty nice yourself," Incubus murmured out of the side
of her mouth. There was a stricken silence.
Reuben Godlove's eyes narrowed. "That jockey who rode her the
other day told me about your ventriloquism," he informed Watson.
"Seems like a pretty cheap trick if you ask me." The others
murmured agreement, color flowing back into their faces.
"Anyhow, now that she's my horse," Godlove went on, taking
possession of Incubus' bridle. "She's going to be trained serious."
"Now?" Incubus asked Watson.
"Later," he whispered back.
"That ain't funny, Watson," Godlove assured him. As he led Incubus
off she looked back over her shoulder and winked.
"Mr. Watson," the jockey said, following him off the field, "you're not
really a ventriloquist, are you? That horse talks, doesn't she?"
Watson nodded.
"You gonna let Godlove get away with her?" The boy's voice rose to
a shrill squeak.
"I'll claim her back in the next race."
"Yeah, but you can't claim her back less'n you've entered another
horse in the same race and you don't have another horse, do you,
Mr. Watson?"
Watson's jaw dropped. "I never thought of that! What'll I do?"
"You've got to get another horse, Mr. Watson. Do you have enough
money?"
"Well, the purse from this race is almost two thousand, and I made
another thousand betting on Incubus. And, of course, Godlove gave
me four thousand for her. But that won't be enough to buy a decent
horse and maintain him—expenses are terrific."
The jockey chewed his lower lip thoughtfully. "I know what you can
do," he said at length, "you can buy Prunella. She's set at a price of
five thousand dollars but her owner's pretty disgusted with her—she
has good lines but she finished last in twenty-seven starts—and I
think you could have her for four thousand in cash."
Prunella, a meek-looking chestnut filly with big brown eyes and a
vicious temper, was enthusiastically disposed of for four thousand
and installed in Incubus' vacant stall. Watson shed a silent tear to
see Incubus' second-best saddle hanging there on the wall.
In the dead of night he slipped into Godlove's stable. Incubus was
awake, reading the Morning Telegraph. "Look at the picture they
have of me," she snapped. "Obviously taken by an enemy. Next time
Watson, remember—my right profile is the best."
"I'll remember," he promised and told her what had happened.
"You're sure this Prunella isn't taking my place in your affections?"
she demanded severely. "That all this isn't a subterfuge?"
"My God, no! She quits before she starts."
"All right," Incubus said. "Now, I am reliably informed by the stable
grapevine that Godlove's entering me in a six-thousand-dollar
claimer. You spent almost all your money on Prunella—how're you
going to claim me?"
There was dead silence in the stable.
"These men," she sighed. "Without us females to think for them
they'd be lost. The answer is simple. Prunella's got to win that race.
Then you'll have the purse, plus whatever you can bet on her, and
you'll get good odds."
"Prunella win the race! She couldn't beat a speedy snail."
"She'll win the race." Incubus grinned happily.
The weather was clear and the track fast. Incubus was running at
three to five—Prunella ninety-eight to one. Reuben Godlove
appeared with his arm in a sling and a bandage on his forehead and
glowered at Watson. "A fine trainer you are," he snarled.
"Let's see how well you've done with her," Watson suggested,
smiling amiably.
The starting gate opened and all the horses dashed out—all except
Prunella, who sauntered forth and stood admiring the view. Incubus
turned, ran back and nipped Prunella viciously in the forequarters.
With a whinny of rage Prunella proceeded to chase Incubus, who
was showing a fleet pair of heels along the track. But there were six
horses between Prunella and her attacker.
With a thrust of her powerful shoulders, Incubus sent Dernier Cri
staggering into the geraniums that bordered the field. She thrust a
hoof into the path of Kropotkin and sent him and his rider sprawling
on the track. She murmured something into Epigram's ear and that
black colt turned light grey and refused to budge another step.
There were now three horses between Incubus and Prunella.
Polyhymnia suddenly started to run backward. Sir Bleoberis buried
his head in the sand and pretended he didn't notice the race was still
going on. Cachucha—who had hitherto not been known as a jumper
—hurdled the rail and dashed into the crowd of astonished players.
Still Incubus ran lightly before Prunella, half a length ahead, kicking
dust in her face and making irritating remarks, while the enraged filly
laid her ears back and bared white teeth to snap at her rival. One
length before the finish line Incubus suddenly stopped short, leaving
momentum to carry Prunella over the line to victory!
Prunella had won the race. Incubus was second but was disqualified
for conduct unbecoming a horse and a lady. It was never determined
who had run third.
"Together again at last, Watson," Incubus said during the joyful
reunion in the paddock. "Ah, but it's been a long, long time...."
"Two weeks," commented the jockey, who had ridden Prunella.
"Listen, pipsqueak," Incubus told him irately. "I've spent the whole
two weeks cooking up this speech and I don't want a half-pint like
you spoiling it. It's been a long, long time, Watson...."
Prunella nickered.
"None of your lip, either," Incubus said. "Where would you have been
if I hadn't won your race for you? Oh, you can run if you want to, can
you? Ha! Ha! Plater!"
Prunella neighed angrily.
"Okay, Watson'll enter you in a claimer without me and we'll see what
you can do." She turned toward her owner. "And now, Watson, I trust
you have a hot tub prepared. I'm so-o-o-o tired...."
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.