Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Va. Legislators Letter Against in Service Request
Va. Legislators Letter Against in Service Request
HOUSE OF DELEGATES
RICHMOND
TIM HUGO
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS:
POST OFFICE BOX 13842 EDUCATION (Chair)
ROANOKE, VA 24037 APPROPRIATIONS
PUBLIC SAFETY
Thirty-Eighth DISTRICT
May 7, 2024
Re: Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC’s Request to Place Project Facilities in Service, Docket Nos.
CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000, and CP21-57-000
As members of the Virginia General Assembly, we respectfully request that the Director
of the Office of Energy, Terry Turpin, deny Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC’s “Request to Place
Project Facilities In Service,” dated April 22, 2024. Mountain Valley Pipeline is still currently
under construction, is not “mechanically complete," has had recent sedimentation problems and
an alarming pipe failure last week during hydrostatic testing. The pipeline has significant
percentages of final restoration remaining and has not met necessary requirements of the October
3, 2023 consent agreement with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
Granting “in-service” status to the project by May 23, 2024 — the deadline suggested by project
developers — would be premature and the request should be denied.
Virginians along the route understandably have years-long concerns about the
construction of the project. Many of those concerns are shared by PMHSA and were outlined in
the August 11, 2023 Notice of Proposed Safety Order from the agency. Concerns within the
NOPSO include the condition of the pipe and inadequate construction and reporting practices.
For many, there are concerns and questions remaining about the integrity of pipe left degrading
for years in the sun, left in standing water and potentially without cathodic protection. For those
along the route and within the blast zone, these concerns are compounded with the existing
geohazards of the route: steep slopes, karst terrain and siting through a seismic zone.
That is precisely why all safety, testing and reporting requirements must be performed as
required by the consent agreement before “in-service” permission is granted. As the drinking
water, farms and livelihoods of many along the route have already been negatively impacted,
adherence to the consent agreement is imperative to minimize further harm. The project is not
yet at a stage to obtain “in-service”’ permission.
Thank you for your time and attention to this critical matter.
Sincerely,
Rae Cousins
Delegate, 79th District