Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference On Data Engineering and Communication Technology ICDECT 2017 Anand J. Kulkarni
Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference On Data Engineering and Communication Technology ICDECT 2017 Anand J. Kulkarni
Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference On Data Engineering and Communication Technology ICDECT 2017 Anand J. Kulkarni
https://textbookfull.com/product/proceedings-of-the-
international-conference-on-data-engineering-and-communication-
technology-icdect-2016-volume-1-1st-edition-suresh-chandra-
satapathy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/socio-cultural-inspired-
metaheuristics-anand-j-kulkarni/
https://textbookfull.com/product/information-and-communication-
technology-for-competitive-strategies-proceedings-of-third-
international-conference-on-ictcs-2017-simon-fong/
https://textbookfull.com/product/proceedings-of-international-
conference-on-computational-intelligence-and-data-engineering-
iccide-2017-1st-edition-nabendu-chaki/
CMBEBIH 2017 Proceedings of the International
Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering 2017
1st Edition Almir Badnjevic (Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/cmbebih-2017-proceedings-of-the-
international-conference-on-medical-and-biological-
engineering-2017-1st-edition-almir-badnjevic-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/proceedings-of-international-
conference-on-computational-intelligence-and-data-engineering-
proceedings-of-iccide-2018-nabendu-chaki/
https://textbookfull.com/product/intelligent-computing-and-
information-and-communication-proceedings-of-2nd-international-
conference-icicc-2017-1st-edition-subhash-bhalla/
Anand J. Kulkarni
Suresh Chandra Satapathy · Tai Kang
Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan Editors
Proceedings of the
2nd International
Conference on Data
Engineering and
Communication
Technology
ICDECT 2017
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Volume 828
Series editor
Janusz Kacprzyk, Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences,
Warsaw, Poland
e-mail: kacprzyk@ibspan.waw.pl
The series “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing” contains publications on theory,
applications, and design methods of Intelligent Systems and Intelligent Computing. Virtually all
disciplines such as engineering, natural sciences, computer and information science, ICT, economics,
business, e-commerce, environment, healthcare, life science are covered. The list of topics spans all the
areas of modern intelligent systems and computing such as: computational intelligence, soft computing
including neural networks, fuzzy systems, evolutionary computing and the fusion of these paradigms,
social intelligence, ambient intelligence, computational neuroscience, artificial life, virtual worlds and
society, cognitive science and systems, Perception and Vision, DNA and immune based systems,
self-organizing and adaptive systems, e-Learning and teaching, human-centered and human-centric
computing, recommender systems, intelligent control, robotics and mechatronics including
human-machine teaming, knowledge-based paradigms, learning paradigms, machine ethics, intelligent
data analysis, knowledge management, intelligent agents, intelligent decision making and support,
intelligent network security, trust management, interactive entertainment, Web intelligence and multimedia.
The publications within “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing” are primarily proceedings
of important conferences, symposia and congresses. They cover significant recent developments in the
field, both of a foundational and applicable character. An important characteristic feature of the series is
the short publication time and world-wide distribution. This permits a rapid and broad dissemination of
research results.
Advisory Board
Chairman
Nikhil R. Pal, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India
e-mail: nikhil@isical.ac.in
Members
Rafael Bello Perez, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, Universidad Central de Las Villas, Santa
Clara, Cuba
e-mail: rbellop@uclv.edu.cu
Emilio S. Corchado, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
e-mail: escorchado@usal.es
Hani Hagras, School of Computer Science & Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
e-mail: hani@essex.ac.uk
László T. Kóczy, Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Győr, Hungary
e-mail: koczy@sze.hu
Vladik Kreinovich, Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
e-mail: vladik@utep.edu
Chin-Teng Lin, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
e-mail: ctlin@mail.nctu.edu.tw
Jie Lu, Faculty of Engineering and Information, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
e-mail: Jie.Lu@uts.edu.au
Patricia Melin, Graduate Program of Computer Science, Tijuana Institute of Technology, Tijuana, Mexico
e-mail: epmelin@hafsamx.org
Nadia Nedjah, Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
e-mail: nadia@eng.uerj.br
Ngoc Thanh Nguyen, Wrocław University of Technology, Wrocław, Poland
e-mail: Ngoc-Thanh.Nguyen@pwr.edu.pl
Jun Wang, Department of Mechanical and Automation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin,
Hong Kong
e-mail: jwang@mae.cuhk.edu.hk
Editors
123
Editors
Anand J. Kulkarni Tai Kang
Symbiosis Institute of Technology School of Mechanical
Symbiosis International University and Aerospace Engineering
Pune, Maharashtra, India Nanyang Technological University
Singapore, Singapore
Suresh Chandra Satapathy
Department of CSE Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan
PVP Siddhartha Institute of Technology Faculty of Industrial
Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India and Systems Engineering
Tarbiat Modares University
Tehran, Iran
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721,
Singapore
Preface
v
Organizing Committee
Organizing Chair
Dr. Anand J. Kulkarni, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India
Organizing Co-chair
Dr. Tai Kang, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Dr. Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
TPC Chair
Dr. Anand J. Kulkarni, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India
Publication Chair
Dr. Suresh Chandra Satapathy, Vijayawada, India
Organizing Committee Chairs
Dr. Anand J. Kulkarni, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune, India
Dr. Tai Kang, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Dr. Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Special Session Chair
Dr. Saeid Kazemzadeh Azad, Atilim University, Turkey
Program Committee Chairs
Dr. Suresh Chandra Satapathy, PVP Siddhartha Institute of Technology,
Vijayawada, India
Technical Program Committee
Dr. Luigi Benedicenti, University of Regina, Canada
Dr. Anand J. Kulkarni, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, India
Dr. Saeid Kazemzadeh Azad, Atilim University, Turkey
Dr. Siba K. Udgata, University of Hyderabad, India
Dr. Sanjay Darvekar, University of Pune, India
Dr. Ganesh Kakandikar, University of Pune, India
Ganesh Krishnasamy, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Dr. Suwin Sleesongsom, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Thailand
vii
viii Organizing Committee
ix
x Contents
xvii
xviii About the Editors
Tai Kang holds bachelor of engineering from the National University of Singapore
and Ph.D. from Imperial College, London. He is currently an associate professor at
the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological
University, Singapore. He teaches various undergraduate and graduate courses in
design, design optimization, and finite element analysis. His research interests
include optimization, evolutionary computation, collective intelligence, structural
topology/shape optimization, compliant/flexural mechanisms, folding/unfolding of
3D folded structures, mathematical modeling of industrial/manufacturing processes,
and modeling and vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure interdependencies.
1 Introduction
Evolution (DE), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Evolutionary Strategy (ES), and Particle
Swarm Optimization (PSO) which employ various repair methods [4]. In this paper,
CI method with probability-based constraint handling approach was used to solve
three engineering design problems, namely spring design, welded-beam design, and
pressure vessel design.
2 Literature Review
Over the years, various optimization approaches have been applied to the selected
engineering design problems. Among the commonly used techniques for these prob-
lems are GA-based co-evolution model and a feasibility-based tournament selec-
tion scheme, an effective Co-evolutionary PSO (CPSO) for constrained engineering
design problems and a hybrid PSO (hPSO) with a feasibility-based rule for con-
strained optimization [5–7].
Cagnina et al. [1] developed a constrained version of PSO for solving engineering
optimization problems. In this method, two particles are compared, and if both are
feasible the one with better fitness function value is selected. If both are infeasible, the
one with lower infeasibility is selected. The approach contains a constraint handling
technique as well as a mechanism to update the velocity and position of the particles.
The approach was tested by solving four problems, three of the problems have been
adopted here (A01, A02, and A03). The best solution they found was compared to
that obtained from different methods like Mezura and CPSO. The values obtained
by this method are similar to those obtained in [8].
The hybrid CPSO exploits simulated annealing and penalty based method for
handling constraints.
The approach was tested by solving three of the problems adopted here (A01, A02,
and A03). The best solution they found was compared to that obtained from different
methods like CPSO, structural optimization, self-adaptive constraint handling [5, 6,
9–11]. The solution attained in [8] was significantly better for all the problems (A01,
A02, and A03) as compared to the other methods.
Cohort Intelligence is a relatively recent technique which has been used to solve
engineering design optimization problems in this paper. The performance of CI
method is compared to the techniques in hCPSO as they have attained better results
as compared to the earlier methods [1, 8].
3 Problem Definition
are three design variables: the wire diameter d (x 1 ), the mean coil diameter D (x2 ),
and the active coils P (x3 ). The mathematical formulation of this problem is:
Minimize: f (−→x ) (x3 + 2)x2 x12
Subject to:
→ x 3 x3
g1 −x 1− 2 4 ≤0
7178x1
→ 4x22 − x1 x2
g2 −
1
x + −1≤0
12,566 x2 x13 − x14 5108x12
→
g3 −
140.45x1
x 1− ≤0
x22 x3
→ x 2 + x 1
g4 −x −1≤0
1.5
where 0.05 ≤ x1 ≤ 2, 0.25 ≤ x2 ≤ 1.3, and 2 ≤ x3 ≤ 15 (Table 1).
A02: Welded-beam design optimization problem.
The welded-beam design problem is referred to from [12] in which the welded
beam is designed for minimum fabrication cost, subject to constraints of shear stress
τ , bending stress in the beam σ , buckling load on the bar Pc, and end deflection on
the beam δ. Four design variables x1 , x2 , x3 , and x4 are considered for minimizing
the fabrication cost.
→The mathematical formulation of this problem is:
Minimize: f − x 1.10471x2 x12 + 0.04811x3 x4 (14 − x2 )
Subject to:
→ →
g1 −x τ − x − 13,000 ≤ 0
−
g2 →x σ − →
x − 30,000 ≤ 0
→
g3 −x x1 − x4 ≤ 0
−
g4 →x 1.10471x12 + 0.04811x3 x4 (14 + x2 ) − 5 ≤ 0
→
g5 −x 0.125 − x1 ≤ 0
− →
g6 →x δ − x − 0.25 ≤ 0
− →
g7 x 6000 − Pc −
→ x ≤0
where
→
τ −
x2
x (τ )2 + (2τ τ ) + (τ )2
2R
6000 MR
τ √ , τ
2x1 x2 J
Table 1 Solution vector A01 (spring design)
→ → → → →
Parameter x1 x2 x3 g1 −x g2 −x g3 −x g4 −x f −x
Best solution 0.05157 0.35418 11.43864 −9.00443 −0.13467 −4.04831 −0.72948 0.01266
Optimization of Constrained Engineering Design Problems …
5
6 A. S. Shastri et al.
x2 x22 x + x 2
1 3
M 6000 14 + ,R + ,
2 4 2
2 x + x 2
√ x2 1 3
J 2 x1 x2 2 +
12 2
→ 504,000 −
σ − ,δ →
65,856,000
x x
3
x4 x3 30 × 106 x4 x33
x3 x46 ⎛ 6
⎞
− 4.013 30 × 10 6 x3 4 30×10
( )⎠
Pc →
12×10 6
36 ⎝
x 1−
196 28
Subject to:
→
g1 −x −x1 + 0.0193x3 ≤ 0
−→
g2 x −x2 + 0.00954x3 ≤ 0
→
g3 −x −π x32 x42 − 43 π x32 + 1,296,000 ≤ 0
−
g →
4 x x − 240 ≤ 0
4
The CI algorithm for the stated engineering design optimization problems was coded
in MATLAB 7.8.0 (R2009a), and simulations were run on a Windows platform using
Intel Core i5 processor. The suitability of CI algorithm to solve constrained optimiza-
tion problems was reaffirmed by applying it to engineering design problems. These
well-known design problems have been solved by various optimization techniques
and solutions from different methods that are available for comparison. Table 1
represents the comparisons between the solutions obtained from CI algorithm and
that obtained from SiC-PSO and CPSOSA in terms of the best solution, mean, and
standard deviation (SD).
It can be observed from Table 1 that the solution obtained from CI method in
terms of the best solution is precisely comparable to those obtained by CPSOSA.
Whereas the standard deviation (SD) obtained from CI algorithm is substantially
better than those obtained from CPSOSA and SiC-PSO. The values of the mean
obtained for CI algorithm are consistent with the best solution. The performance of
Cohort Intelligence method was also measured in terms of the computational time,
number of function evaluations (FE), and convergence. Parameters such as the num-
ber of candidates and reduction factor are also listed. The function evaluations (FE)
required for CI algorithm are less as compared to 24,000 objective function evalua-
tions performed by SiC-PSO, as stated in [1]. The time required for computation is
also reasonable.
The solution convergence plots for the spring design function, welded-beam
design function, and pressure vessel design function are presented in Figs. 1, 2,
and 3, respectively, which exhibit the overall evolution of the cohort by improving
individual behaviors as shown in Table 4. Initially, the behavior of the individual
candidates can be distinguished. As the sampling interval reduces and the cohort
evolves, we do not see significant improvement in the behavior of the candidates. At
a particular point, it is difficult to distinguish between the behaviors of the candidates.
The cohort is considered to be saturated, and convergence is said to have occurred.
10 A. S. Shastri et al.
1.5 Candidate 2
Weight of Spring
Candidate 3
0.5
0
1 50 99 148 197 246
Learning aƩempts
function Candidate 1
12 Candidate 2
Candidate 3
10
0
1 50 99 148 197
Learning aƩempts
300
design function Candidate 1
Candidate 2
200 Candidate 3
100
(Thousands)
0
1 50 99 148 197 246
Learning aƩempts
Optimization of Constrained Engineering Design Problems … 11
References
1. Cagnina LC, Esquivel SC, Coello CAC (2008) Solving engineering optimization problems
with the simple constrained particle swarm optimizer. Informatica 32(3):319–326
2. Kulkarni AJ, Durugkar IP, Kumar M (2013) Cohort intelligence: a self supervised learning
behavior. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC).
IEEE, pp 1396–1400
3. Kulkarni AJ, Tai K (2011) Solving constrained optimization problems using probability col-
lectives and a penalty function approach. Int J Comput Intell Appl 10(04):445–470
4. Shastri AS, Jadhav PS, Kulkarni AJ, Abraham A (2016) Solution to constrained test problems
using cohort intelligence algorithm. In: Innovations in bio-inspired computing and applications.
Springer, pp 427–435
5. Coello CAC (2000) Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization
problems. Comput Ind 41(2):113–127
6. Coello CAC, Montes EM (2002) Constraint-handling in genetic algorithms through the use of
dominance-based tournament selection. Adv Eng Inform 16(3):193–203
7. He Q, Wang L (2007) A hybrid particle swarm optimization with a feasibility-based rule for
constrained optimization. Appl Math Comput 186(2):1407–1422
8. Zhou Y, Pei S (2010) A hybrid co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization algorithm for
solving constrained engineering design problems. JCP 5(6):965–972
9. Hernandez Aguirre A, Mũnoz Zavala A, Villa Diharce E, Botello Rionda S (2007) COPSO:
Constrained optimization via PSO algorithm. Technical report no. I-07–04/22-02-2007. Center
for Research in Mathematics (CIMAT)
10. Belegundu A (1982) A study of mathematical programming methods for structural optimiza-
tion. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa
11. Arora JS (2004) Introduction to optimum design. Elsevier, Boston
12. Rao SS (1996) Engineering optimization. Wiley, New York
Application of Blowfish Algorithm
for Secure Transactions in Decentralized
Disruption-Tolerant Networks
"Denver ja Lattimer unohtivat yhden asian", sanoi hän. "Se oli se,
että minulla on silmät. Sieltä, missä olin vähän aikaisemmin kuin te
juoksitte vastaani, saatoin nähdä vuorenharjanteen. Näin Denverin
kiipeevän sinne ja pidin silmällä mihin hän kätkeytyi. Sitäpaitsi,
vaikka en olisi nähnytkään häntä, niin —" Hän pysähtyi, pani
molemmat kätensä Josephinen olkapäille ja loi häneen katseen,
jossa oli moitetta ja samalla ihailua.
"Te ette valehtele vakuuttavasti, Jo", sanoi hän, "te ette ole kylliksi
harjaantunut siihen. Mutta te teitte suurenmoisen työn —
suurenmoisen työn!"
Neljäsneljättä luku.
Josephine arveli, ettei hän olisi sama. Mahdollisesti olisi hän yhtä
taipumaton ja jyrkkä, mutta Josephinen kotiseudun ankarien lakien
alaisena murtuisi hänen terästahtonsa ja hänen täytyisi hillitä
väkivaltaisia taipumuksiaan. Laki ei siellä olisi hänen kädessään,
vaan koko kansan käsissä, joka sitä vain valitsemainsa edustajain
kautta toteutti. Sen vuoksi hän ei olisi sama Brannon siellä.
"Tehän olette aikeissa jättää meidät", sanoi hän. "Kuulin sen juuri
eräältä miehistä. Tulin sanomaan hyvästiä teille."
"Enhän toki" sanoi hän, silmät leimuten, "te olette ollut erittäin
mielenkiintoinen."
"Brannon", sanoi Josephine — sillä kun hän nyt oli lähdössä pois,
tahtoi hän olla varma siitä, ettei Brannonille jäänyt pahaa mieltä, sillä
hän muisti sen illan kun Brannon oli pannut kätensä hänen päänsä
päälle miltei hyväillen, "oletteko varma, että minä olen mielestänne
ollut ainoastaan mielenkiintoinen?"
"Niin."
"Mitä ei tehnyt?"
"Ei hän vihannut sinua. Eikä koskaan tule sitä tekemäänkään. Kun
sinä puhuit hänen kanssaan kuistilla juuri ennen lähtöä, niin hän
sanoi —"
"Kuuntelitko sinä?" syytti Brannon. Hän taivutti itseään Bettyn
puoleen nähdäkseen hänen kasvojaan hämärässä ja huomasi, että
ne olivat tulipunaiset.
"Minä — minä en voinut sille mitään, Brannon. Minä olin näet juuri
tulossa ulos ja kun minun piti — piti —"
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.