Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module-5 CD - RE9
Module-5 CD - RE9
Philosophy Department
OVERVIEW / OBJECTIVES
The introduction of innovation into the educational system is one significant
function of a school manager or an educational leader. A knowledge and understanding
of this concept will help you to become an effective teacher of an effective learning
center or school. An effective teacher at present or in the future whether you are assigned
in a large or small school, in the rural or in the urban sector, developed or under-
developed school.
There are two lessons in this module. Lesson 1 introduces some local and global
innovations which can be used as examples for curriculum making and lesson 2 tackles,
issues, concerns and some responses to these.
INTRODUCTION
As man seeks for development, innovations are inevitable. This is also true in
education. With the demand brought about by the fast changing society, it is most likely
that innovations will occur. In curriculum, changes and modifications are being
introduced to keep pace with the changing world. With emerging theories of learning,
instructional delivery and management, learning and teaching styles, modes of living and
other societal changes in science and technology led educators to introduce innovations.
Here are the simple steps in using the Integrated Unit Design (Thematic Based)
1. Decide on a unit theme that will allow all subject areas to join. Example:
Philippine Festivals.
2. Identify the major concepts to serve as a “common thread” for all the subject
areas. Example: Historical Background or Origin, Purposes of the Celebration,
Dance steps, Costumes, Music, others.
3. Brainstorm and list generalizations that will be derived from the study of the
theme.
4. Write questions that would facilitate the understanding and mastery of the
generalization.
5. For each subject area, write instructional objectives to be accomplished.
6. Identify instructional activities which will accomplish the objectives.
7. Based on the objectives, perform the activities.
8. Conduct culminating activity where all subject areas learning will be applied.
9. Design a scoring guide or rubric to assess the performance of the task in the
culminating activity.
Using what learners already know as a starting point, they generate questions
about things they do not know yet. They design a method of investigation and gather
information on their own.
This new Teacher Education Curriculum was implemented by CMO 30, s, 2004.
There are two teacher education degrees which are offered by the Teacher Training
Institutions. These are the Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd) and the Bachelor
of Secondary Education (BSEd). The BEEd is structured to meet the needs of
professional teachers for elementary schools and special education programs and the
BSEd for the needs of professional teachers in the high schools in the Philippines.
The new teacher education curriculum is made up of three components. For both
the BEEd and the BSEd, a sixty-three (63) unit general education is required.
Professional Education courses for BEEd is fifty four (54) units while the BSEd requires
fifty one (51) units. The specialization or content courses required for the elementary
teachers is fifty seven (57) units and those who will be teaching in the high school are
required sixty (60) untis of content. Both degree courses require one hundred seventy
four (174) units.
The General Education Courses continue to follow the existing general education.
This is mandated in CHED Memo No. 59. s. 1996.
The Professional Education Courses are clustered into three which are theory and
concept courses, methods and strategy courses and field study courses. Some of the
peculiar features of the Professional Education Courses are as follows:
1. All the subjects will be taught in an integrated manner.
2. Discussion of theory and concepts should always be linked to the development
of methods and strategies and to experiential learning during the field study.
3. All courses should be taught using a wide range of teaching-learning approaches
and assessment procedure, including the use of technology.
4. All courses must have a research requirement which may take the form of a
term paper, case study, action research or other forms of research as maybe
appropriate.
5. The theory and concept courses provide the broad framework within which
students can understand, rationalize, and reflect on the various methods and
strategies related to teaching.
6. The methods and strategy courses in the program aim to develop a wide range
of skills to facilitate and evaluate learning in diverse types of students in a
variety of learning environments.
7. The field study courses are intended to provide students with practical
experiences in which they can observe, verify, reflect on, and actually
experience different components of the teaching-learning processes in actual
school setting.
8. There will be special topic courses in seminar form which will be three one-unit
courses. Special topics are based on the perceived needs of the students and the
expertise of the faculty.
The Content Courses for BEEd is sum up to fifty seven (57) units. These
correspond to the various learning areas in the elementary education curriculum. These
are courses in addition to the General Education Courses which include Science,
Mathematics, English, Filipino, Social Studies, Music, Arts, and Physical Education,
Home Economics and Livelihood Education, and Values Education. The BEEd student
may also take fifty seven (57) units in Special Education of Pre-school Education for
Mathematics, Physical Sciences, natural Science, English, Filipino, Social Studies,
Values Education, Technology Education, Music, Arts, Physical and Health Education
and Islamic Studies.
The curricular program of BTTE shall impart knowledge, skills, attitudes, values
and experiences that will provide prospective teachers with the necessary competencies
essential in effective teaching.
The specific body of knowledge, skills, attitudes, values and experiences include
general education component, professional studies component, specialization component
and instructional technology component.
Model A is offered for high school graduates who could meet the admission
requirements of the College. The characteristics of the model are as follows:
a. The program of study for the general and professional education subjects is based
on CHED Memo 30, s, 2004.
b. The technology major subjects are based on the competency standards indicated
in the Training Regulations of the Technical Education and Skills Development
Authority (TESDA).
c. The interfacing of CHED and TESDA provides students to exit after one, two
or three years with specific job opportunities and/or allows them to continue
their subjects for the four years of BTTE giving full credits to all subjects taken
in the previous years.
d. If the student prefers to work after one year of study, he could exit the ladderized
program with certificate of achievement. He/she is also qualified to take the
assessment for National Certificate (NC) administered by TESDA.
e. Students who opt to finish the four year BTTE degree should meet the criteria
for admission to the degree. after finishing the four years BTTE program,
he/she can be issued their Diploma which qualifies them to take the Licensure
Examination for Teachers.
a. Students will have at least one year industry experience aside from the industry
immersion or the on the job training (OJT).
b. On the Job Training (OJT) or industry experience is a requirement leading to a
four year Baccalaureate degree (Ladderized Bachelor of Technical Teacher
Education).
c. Students in this model intent to become prospective teachers in their respective
areas of specialization.
The course was based on a Competency Framework for Southeast Asian School
Heads which SEAMEO INNOTECH developed and validated with the Ministries of
Education from ten SEAMEO member states. The framework consists of general and
enabling sub-competencies that describe what school heads are expected to do and
improve on to make them more successful in performing their work.
The course is facilitated by assigned tutors from partner training institutions and
the SEAMEO Innotech and the technical staff of SEAMEO Innotech.
2. Learning Modality – After the students get their learning package, they can
immediately study at their own pace and time. Learners should be able to manage
their time such that they will finish one module in two weeks and two modules in
four weeks. During the period, the students should study the printed modules and
check on the Discussion Forum on-line in the iFLEX. Learners and the tutors
should interact among themselves. Aside from the class interactions during
discussions, each student is required in hard to submit assignments, reflection
paper and action plan either in hard or soft copies to the tutor for evaluation. The
three requirements make the learning portfolio which the tutor will evaluate, give
feedback on. They become the basis for the learner’s rating.
3. Evaluation System – Each learner will be given feedback in the form of
qualitative narratives by the tutors for their outputs. They will also receive a
rating for each major requirement and for their participation in the discussion
group. The ratings will be issued by the tutor which has an equivalent as follows:
A = 3 Excellent
B = 3 Pass
C = 1 Deficient
Learners who successfully complete the course will be awarded a Certificate of
Completion by SEAMEO INNOTECH and academic credits from partner training
institutions.
3. Time Table – The duration of time expected of all learners to finish the course is
50 hours which is equivalent to a 3 unit course. The time spent includes self-
study of the module, participation in the on-line discussion, preparation and
submission of the module activities which are the contents of the learning
portfolio. A maximum of 2 weeks is given to accomplish each module. For the
current course, there are 2 modules; hence a maximum of four weeks is expected.
Approximately 2 weeks after the completion of the course, individual rating will
be released.
Let us now look into other innovations in curriculum that are happening in other
parts of the world. These are but examples of the myriad of innovations in education
worldwide. Later you will add to the examples in your activities.
One classroom is set up for reading, one for writing and one for mathematics.
Each of the three teachers in each cluster becomes content specialist for one the three
Project CHILD subject areas. He/she is also responsible for one grade level
classroom.
Learners from each grade level in the cluster move among the classrooms to
spend one hour per day working in each of the three major areas. Thus the teachers
will work in their specialized field with the same learners for three years.
Learners follow a precise management plan for moving from one station to the
other. Goals are set and activities are recorded in a book called “passport”. Required
curriculum content is covered in sex-week thematic units.
2. Brain-Based Learning
For two thousand years there have been primitive models of how the brain works.
Up to the middle of 1990’s, the brain was compared to a central switchboard. In
1970, the brain theory focused on the right and left brain. Paul McClean later used
the concept of triune brain to refer to the revolution of the human three part brain.
According to triune theory, survival learning is in the lower brain, emotions were in
the mid-brain, and higher order thinking took place in the upper brain. However, the
current brain theory embraces the whole systems, complex brain model.
In the last two decades, neuroscientists have been doing research related to the
improved teaching practices. Based on the findings and conclusions from these
researches, information was taken and incorporated into books and resource
references about learning. Classroom practices were modifies using new theories of
teaching and learning based on these findings. Some noted authors included Marian
Diamond of the University of California; Howard Gardner, Harvard University,
Thomas Armstrong, among others.
From the principles regarding the brain-based theory several interactive teaching
elements emerged. These are orchestrated immersion, relaxed alertness and active
processing. Let us explain each one of these.
ANALYSIS
Read the situation and think about these questions. Give your personal reflection
based on the current and future condition of our education.
Situation:
Teacher Pilar is one of the best in their school. She has been a Grade VI teacher
for almost thirty years. Parents and her peers all agreed that she makes almost all her
children learn. She has been a very good teacher in almost all subject areas, though she
likes to teach best Science. When a new principal Mr. Perez came, he introduces an
innovation which is the use of technology. All school children in the intermediate grades
should learn how to use the computers. The task of teaching was to be done by all
intermediate teachers and Teacher Pilar was one of them with the new assignment, she
felt frustrated. She felt it was a heavy burden on her to use the technology, though the
children were all excited to learn. Because of her fear of something new which she could
not handle, she lost her motivation to teach day after day. She would absent herself from
school more often and neglected her obligation as a teacher. The best teacher before has
now become a liability to the school, because of an innovation.
2. As the new principal, how would you respond to the situation such that
you still continue to introduce the innovation and yet save Teacher Pilar
from all the frustrations and anxiety?
Philosophy Department
OVERVIEW / OBJECTIVES
Curriculum manages and educational experts are always looking for better way to
achieve better learning through teaching. However, since curriculum innovations seemed
to be difficult for many, issues and concerns have been raised about curricular
innovations. The newness of the idea to the users raises issues which need to be
addressed. Certain aspects need to be clarified in order to overcome the attitude and
feelings that create some concerns.
INTRODUCTION
This section will focus on some issues and concerns related on the curriculum.
Responses of different sectors will also be presented.
Some curricular innovations are results of bandwagon but are not well supported
by managers. In the desire of some schools to be part of the global educational
scenario, changes and innovations are drastically implemented even if the school
is not ready. Some schools for example implement a curriculum that is
technology-dependent when there are not enough computers in the classroom.
There are no interned connections either. But they have to show that they are also
keeping abreast of the development even if their equipments are insufficient.
Lack of regular monitoring and evaluation. After a new curriculum has been
installed, it is left unattended. Inadequate monitoring activities to find out
curricular strengths or weaknesses and problems are being encountered. Very
little means is provided to find out if the implementation is running smoothly or
not. When the time of implementation ends, sometimes there is no evaluation
aspect, thus the innovation cannot be judged as failure or success for it to be
continued or not.
Innovations results to teacher burn out. With so many new changes taking place
in the curriculum, many teachers are getting burn out. They get tired so easily
and motivation is very low. It is because they cannot cope with rapid changes that
take place. They themselves cannot adjust to the changes that are being
introduced. They would prefer the “good old” days and stick to what they had
been doing which are not anymore compatible with the times.
These are few of the many issues and concerns in innovation. When something
new is introduced, there will always be complaints. Anybody who is removed from a
comfort zone will always have some reactions. However, the issues presented are also
valid. These are taken from various observations of practitioners and curriculum
implementers. In order to lessen the negative impact of the different issues, some
responses have to be presented.
In summary, like any endeavor, to improve quality education issues and concerns
will always be raised. This is true with innovations, be it small or big. Just like when we
want to change for the better there will always be obstacles to overcome, or when we are
removed from our comfort zones, we will always have some complaints. For every
action, there will always be a corresponding reaction. Each enumerated issue and
concern gets a corresponding response. This is natural law.
Instruction: in every statement, encircle your answer that reflects truly your
opinion. There is no right or wrong answer here. Use the legend below as reference
before you circle your answer.
With your group, interview three teachers ( 1 from elementary 1 from high school
and 1 from college ) as your informants.
1.1 What issues or concerns do you have in the implementation of the Basic
Education Curriculum? (for elementary and high school teacher)
2.1 What issues and concerns do you have in the implementation of the new
teacher education curriculum for college? (for the college
instructors/professors)
3.1 What responses have you made regarding the issues and concerns?
2. Bring your report to the class and include a copy in your portfolio.
ANALYSIS
After reading the inputs and doing the activities, let us think deeply about this
lesson.
1. If you are at present a classroom teacher, what innovation in the curriculum will
you introduce? Describe the innovation. Why will you introduce it?
2. Can you give justification why future teachers like you would welcome
innovations?
ENRICHMENT
Its time to find out, how much you have learned from the lesson.
Instruction: In Column A is a list of issues identified in curriculum innovation.
Match each item with the responses to address the issues.
Andres, Tomas Q. (1989) Curriculum Development in the Philippine Setting. Manila: National
Bookstore.
Carlson, R.O. (1975) Adoption of Educational Innovations. Eugene, Oregon: Center for the
Advanced Study of Educational Administration.
Clemente, Alejandro W. (1986) Philippine Education into the 21st Century. Quezon City: Valerio
Publishing House.
Colinares, Nilo E. and L.P.E. dela Rosa (eds.) (2005) Philippine Education in the Third
Millennium: Trends, Issues and Challenges Concerns. Northern Samar: 6 NSEnterprises.
Drucker, Peter F. (1993) Management Tasks and Responsibilities. New York: Harper and Row.
Kral, Thomas (ed). (1999) Teacher Development (Making the Right Moves). Washington, D.C.
Legaspi, Dennis C. (2006) “Examine the Philippine ICT Imperative”, World Competitiveness
Yearbook. Laussane, Switzerland: Institute for Management Development.
Philippine Yearbook 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2005 and 2006.
CMO 30. s. 2004. Revised Policies and Standards for Teacher Education Curriculum.