Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interrelationships Between Survival, Sex, and Blood Pressure in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy
Interrelationships Between Survival, Sex, and Blood Pressure in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy
Israel; bSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; cSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv
University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; dSchool of Public Health, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel; eDiagnostic
Radiology Department University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
MSA-P, parkinsonian MSA; MSA-C, cerebellar syndrome MSA; Max, maximum; BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure;
SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation. The sex differences were nonsignificant in both MSA types for all variables.
0.6 + +
+ + + + +
+
0.4
+
Gender
+ +
0.2 Male
Female
+ + Censored
0
Fig. 1. K-M survival curve of sex difference 0 5 10 15 20 25
in survival (p = 0.0925) of MSA-P patients Duration, years
(n = 63) by sex. MSA-P, parkinsonian
MSA.
sures (Table 2, model 1) among the MSA-C patients, the model 1 did not differ between the MSA-P males and
maximum DBP decline was found to have a borderline females. In most models, age at onset and age at tilt test-
significant positive association with death risk among ing were found as either significant or borderline sig-
the males (HR = 1.18, p = 0.0665) but not among the nificant covariates.
females. When the model included BP and pulse 10-min
supine measurements (Table 2, model 2), there was no
association between those measurements and death risk Discussion
among either the males or females. In contrast, there
was a significant positive association between the 10- The results of this retrospective study yielded that MSA-
min supine SBP measurement and death risk (model 2) P and MSA-C patients have similar age at disease onset and
for the male MSA-P patients (HR = 1.06, p = 0.0354), similar survival time (median 12 years [95% CI: 8–28] and
and a borderline negative association (HR = 0.96, p = 10 years [95% CI: 8–13], respectively). These survival peri-
0.0878) for the female MSA-P patients. The results for ods are longer than those reported in 2 recent studies [1, 2,
MSA-P MSA-C
F M F M
HR, p value HR, p value HR, p value HR, p value
Model 1
Max SBP_drop 0.99, ns 1.05, ns 0.98, ns 0.92, ns
Max DBP_drop 1.00, ns 0.99, ns 1.05, ns 1.18, 0.0665
Max pulse_drop 1.00, ns 1.00, ns 0.98, ns 0.91, ns
Model 2
SBP_10 min supine 0.96, 0.0878 1.06, 0.0354 0.89, ns 0.97, ns
DBP_10 min supine 1.06, ns 0.93, ns 1.05, ns 1.08, ns
Pulse_10 min supine 0.96, ns 1.02, ns 0.97, ns 0.99, ns
11], and slightly longer than those cited in a number of predicting survival in the later stages of the disease. This
other reports [3–5, 10, 23]. Our findings of a higher sur- may have therapeutic implications as well as importance
vival were unexpected: they might have been due to differ- for the design and interpretation of future clinical studies.
ent criteria for the time of initial symptom onset or they Important strengths of our study are the consecutive
might reflect the longer life expectancy in the general pop- recruitment of MSA patients from 1 outpatient clinic and
ulation of Israel [24] and the referral of most MSA patients the medium size of the cohort that allowed subgrouping
to be treated and followed in a multidisciplinary special- by MSA type and sex for investigating a possible interac-
ized MSA clinic [25]. Our finding of a similar survival for tion between sex and BP. Another strength is the validity
MSA-P and MSA-C patients is in line with most of the of the BP measurements that were obtained during a uni-
other reports [1, 3–5, 10], with one exception [26]. fied prolonged (10 min lying and 40 min standing) tilt-
Survival of male patients in our study was somewhat testing setting which enabled the identification of delayed
better than that of female patients in the MSA-P group but OBPD [22]. The main limitation of this study is its retro-
not in the MSA-C group. Conflicting results have been spective nature. However, all included patients met con-
reported regarding sex differences in the survival of MSA sensus criteria for probable or possible MSA [12], and we
patients. Longer survival was described in males in some excluded those with competing diagnoses therefore the
studies [24, 27], while others showed no difference [1, 3, likelihood of misdiagnosis is probably low [30]. We did
4, 5, 10, 27, 28], or longer survival in females [7, 11, 29, 30]. not evaluate other signs of autonomic failure and other
We further tried to associate between BP parameter potential risk factors for death (i.e., sleep breathing disor-
changes and death risk. There was no significant associa- ders, syncope and falls, injuries, urinary tract infections,
tion between BP parameters and survival in our cohort and urosepsis) other than OBPD and 10 min supine BP
taken. However, an analysis stratified by MSA type and value, and we had no information on the official cause of
the patients’ sex did yield some different BP effects. Spe- death. However, intercurrent diseases had been consid-
cifically, 10-min BP values in the supine position were ered during the diagnosis process (e.g., patients with a
associated with increased mortality risk in the male MSA- clinical syndrome like the MSA but with autonomic fail-
P patients and decreased mortality in the female MSA-P ure which could be associated with diabetes were exclud-
patients. The severity of OBPD significantly increased the ed). Our conclusions are based on the results of measure-
mortality risk in the male MSA-C patients but not in the ments obtained during single prolonged tilt testing, and
female MSA-C patients (HR = 1.05, p = ns). we did not analyze heart rate fluctuations [31]. We fo-
Tilt-testing was performed late in the course of the dis- cused on the amplitude of the BP fall upon standing, with-
ease (the meantime from symptom onset to tilt testing out taking into account either the time needed to achieve
was 8.0 ± 4.7 years), demonstrating that it may help in such a fall or the absolute lowest BP value reached upon
References
1 Coon EA, Sletten DM, Suarez MD, Mandre prolonged survival: a diagnostic catch. Mov 15 Goldstein DS, Pechnik S, Holmes C, Eldadah
kar JN, Ahlskog JE, Bower JH, et al. Clinical Disord. 2012;27(9):1186–90. B, Sharabi Y. Association between supine hy-
features and autonomic testing predict sur- 9 Colosimo C, Berardelli A. Autonomic failure pertension and orthostatic hypotension in au-
vival in multiple system atrophy. Brain. 2015; and reduced survival in multiple system atro- tonomic failure. Hypertension. 2003; 42(2):
138(Pt 12):3623–31. phy. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 12):3466–8. 136–42.
2 Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Sharabi Y, Wu T. Sur- 10 Figueroa JJ, Singer W, Parsaik A, Benarroch 16 Fedorowski A, Stavenow L, Hedblad B, Berg
vival in synucleinopathies: a prospective cohort EE, Ahlskog JE, Fealey RD, et al. Multiple sys- lund G, Nilsson PM, Melander O. Orthostatic
study. Neurology. 2015;85(18):1554–61. tem atrophy: prognostic indicators of surviv- hypotension predicts all-cause mortality and
3 Low PA, Reich SG, Jankovic J, Shults CW, Stern al. Mov Disord. 2014;29(9):1151–7. coronary events in middle-aged individuals
MB, Novak P, et al. Natural history of multiple 11 Coon EA, Nelson RM, Sletten DM, Suarez (the malmo preventive project). Eur Heart J.
system atrophy in the USA: a prospective co- MD, Ahlskog JE, Benarroch EE, et al. Sex and 2010;31(1):85–91.
hort study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:710–9. gender influence symptom manifestation and 17 Liu R, Umbach DM, Peddada SD, Xu Z,
4 Watanabe H, Saito Y, Terao S, Ando T, Kachi survival in multiple system atrophy. Auton Tröster AI, Huang X, et al. Potential sex dif-
T, Mukai E, et al. Progression and prognosis Neurosci. 2019:49–52. ferences in nonmotor symptoms in early
in multiple system atrophy: an analysis of 230 12 Freeman R, Wieling W, Axelrod FB, Benditt drug-naive Parkinson disease. Neurology.
Japanese patients. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 5): DG, Benarroch E, Biaggioni I, et al. Consen- 2015;84(21):2107–15.
1070–83. sus statement on the definition of orthostatic 18 Loke H, Harley V, Lee J. Biological factors un-
5 Wenning GK, Geser F, Krismer F, Seppi K, hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and derlying sex differences in neurological disor-
Duerr S, Boesch S, et al. The natural history of the postural tachycardia syndrome. Clin Au- ders. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;65:139–50.
multiple system atrophy: a prospective Euro- ton Res. 2011;21(2):69–72. 19 Ndayisaba JP, Fanciulli A, Granata R, Duerr
pean cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(3): 13 Fanciulli A, Jordan J, Biaggioni I, Calandra- S, Hintringer F, Goebel G, et al. Sex and age
264–74. Buonaura G, Cheshire WP, Cortelli P, et al. effects on cardiovascular autonomic function
6 Calandra-Buonaura G, Guaraldi P, Sambati L, Consensus statement on the definition of in healthy adults. Clin Auton Res. 2015;25(5):
Lopane G, Cecere A, Barletta G, et al. Multiple neurogenic supine hypertension in cardiovas- 317–26.
system atrophy with prolonged survival: is cular autonomic failure by the american auto- 20 Ong KL, Tso AW, Lam KS, Cheung BM. Gen-
late onset of dysautonomia the clue? Neurol nomic society (AAS) and the european fed- der difference in blood pressure control and
Sci. 2013;34(10):1875–8. eration of autonomic societies (EFAS). Clin cardiovascular risk factors in Americans with
7 Kim HJ, Jeon BS. Multiple system atrophy Auton Res. 2018;28:355–62. diagnosed hypertension. Hypertension. 2008;
with prolonged survival. Mov Disord. 2012; 14 Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA, Brooks DJ, 51(4):1142–8.
27(14):1834. Mathias CJ, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Second 21 Gibbons CH, Freeman R. Clinical implica-
8 Petrovic IN, Ling H, Asi Y, Ahmed Z, Kukkle consensus statement on the diagnosis of mul- tions of delayed orthostatic hypotension: a
PL, Hazrati LN, et al. Multiple system atro- tiple system atrophy. Neurology. 2008; 71(9): 10-year follow-up study. Neurology. 2015;
phy-parkinsonism with slow progression and 670–6. 85(16):1362–7.