Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Spectroscopic Methods in Food Analysis 1St Edition Adriana S Franca Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Spectroscopic Methods in Food Analysis 1St Edition Adriana S Franca Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Spectroscopic Methods in Food Analysis 1St Edition Adriana S Franca Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/multiresidue-methods-for-the-
analysis-of-pesticide-residues-in-food-1st-edition-heinzen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/spectroscopic-methods-for-
nanomaterials-characterization-a-volume-in-micro-and-nano-
technologies-sabu-thomas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microbiological-methods-for-
environment-food-and-pharmaceutical-analysis-abhishek-chauhan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/food-analysis-laboratory-
manual-3rd-edition-s-suzanne-nielsen-auth/
Phenolic compounds in food : characterization and
analysis 1st Edition Gutiérrez Uribe
https://textbookfull.com/product/phenolic-compounds-in-food-
characterization-and-analysis-1st-edition-gutierrez-uribe/
https://textbookfull.com/product/hazard-analysis-and-risk-based-
preventive-controls-improving-food-safety-in-human-food-
manufacturing-for-food-businesses-1st-edition-hal-king/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mediations-of-disruption-in-
post-conflict-cinema-1st-edition-adriana-martins/
https://textbookfull.com/product/quantum-dots-applications-in-
biology-3rd-edition-adriana-fontes/
https://textbookfull.com/product/acrylamide-in-food-analysis-
content-and-potential-health-effects-1st-edition-gokmen/
Spectroscopic Methods
in Food Analysis
Food Analysis & Properties
Series Editor
Leo M. L. Nollet
University College Ghent, Belgium
Adriana S. Franca
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
and
Leo M.L. Nollet
University College Ghent
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made
to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all
materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all
material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not
been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged, please write and let us know so we may rectify in any
future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized
in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying,
microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the
publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://
www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923,
978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For
organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Names: Franca, Adriana S., editor. | Nollet, Leo M. L., 1948- editor.
Title: Spectroscopic methods in food analysis / [edited by] Adriana S. Franca
and Leo M.L. Nollet.
Description: Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
Identifiers: LCCN 2017008762 | ISBN 9781498754613 (978-1-4987-5461-3)
Subjects: LCSH: Food–Analysis. | Food–Quality. | Spectrum analysis.
Classification: LCC TX547 .S638 2017 | DDC 664/.07–dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017008762
Preface vii
Editors ix
Contributors xi
v
vi Contents
PART II APPLICATIONS
Chapter 11 Food Composition 317
Semih Otles and Vasfiye Hazal Ozyurt
Chapter 12 Food Authentication 327
Cristina Alamprese
Chapter 13 Food Adulteration 353
Daniel Cozzolino
Chapter 14 Food Quality 363
Nikolaos Nenadis, Anna Androulaki, and Maria Z. Tsimidou
Index 639
Preface
The determination of product quality and authenticity and the detection of adulteration
are the major issues in the food industry, causing concern among consumers and spe-
cial attention among food manufacturers. The concepts of food quality and authenticity
are quite broad, given the different demands of the manufacturer, consumer, oversight,
and legislative bodies that will ultimately provide healthy and safe products, taking into
account both economic and environmental issues. Given the inherent complexity of food
products, most instrumental techniques (e.g., chromatographic methods) employed for
quality and authenticity evaluation are time consuming, expensive, and labor intensive.
Therefore, there has been an increasing interest in simpler, faster, and more reliable ana-
lytical methods for assessing food quality attributes.
Spectroscopic methods have been extensively employed in the analysis of food prod-
ucts because they often require minimal or no sample preparation, provide rapid and
online analysis, and have the potential to run multiple tests on a single sample (i.e.,
nondestructive). Therefore, this book is dedicated to spectroscopic techniques that are of
relevance to food analysis.
This book is divided into three parts: Part I—Fundamentals and instrumentation,
Part II—Applications, and Part III—Food products. Part I begins with a comprehen-
sive and historic overview of spectroscopic methods (Chapter 1) followed by an exten-
sive discussion on fundamental and theoretical aspects as well as new trends on each
technique (Chapters 2 through 8), instrumentation (Chapter 9), and statistical analy-
sis (Chapter 10). Part II focuses on the specific application of these techniques in food
analysis, dealing with important issues such as composition (Chapter 11), authentication
(Chapter 12), adulteration (Chapter 13), and food quality (Chapter 14). Part III presents
the recent advances in spectroscopy for the analysis of specific food products including
beverages (Chapters 15 and 16), cereals (Chapters 17 and 18), coffee (Chapter 19), edible
oils (Chapter 20), dairy products (Chapter 21), fish and meat (Chapter 22), fruits and
vegetables (Chapter 23), and other food products (Chapter 24).
All chapters have been written by renowned scientists who are experts in their
research fields. We would like to thank all contributing authors and colleagues for their
effort in producing this excellent book. They are the ones who made this project possible.
“As coisas tangíveis tornam-se insensíveis à palma da mão. Mas as coisas findas muito
mais que lindas, essas ficarão.” (Tangible things become insensible at the palm of the
hand. But finished things, more than beautiful, these will stay)
vii
Editors
Adriana S. Franca, PhD, received her BSc in chemical engineering in 1988 and MSc in
mechanical engineering in 1991 from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo
Horizonte, Brazil. She completed her PhD in agricultural and biological engineering from
Purdue University in 1995.
She is currently a professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, the
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and also teaches a grad-
uate course on food sciences. She has published 94 articles in international journals,
21 book chapters, and has presented more than 200 research papers at various interna-
tional conferences. Her research areas include food science, sustainable uses of agricul-
tural residues, coffee chemistry, heat transfer, microwaves, and spectroscopic methods.
For more information refer http://lattes.cnpq.br/1719405448685259.
Leo M.L. Nollet, PhD, received his MS (1973) and PhD (1978) in biology from the
University of Leuven, Belgium. He is an editor and associate editor of numerous books.
He edited for M. Dekker, New York—now CRC Press of Taylor & Francis—the first,
second, and third editions of the books entitled Food Analysis by HPLC and Handbook
of Food Analysis. The last edition is a two-volume book. He also edited the Handbook of
Water Analysis (first, second, and third editions) and Chromatographic Analysis of the
Environment, third edition (CRC Press).
With F. Toldrá, he coedited two books published in 2006 and 2007: Advanced
Technologies for Meat Processing (CRC Press) and Advances in Food Diagnostics
(Blackwell Publishing—now Wiley). With M. Poschl, he coedited the book Radionuclide
Concentrations in Foods and the Environment also published in 2006 (CRC Press).
Dr. Nollet has also coedited with Y.H. Hui and other colleagues, several books:
Handbook of Food Product Manufacturing (Wiley, 2007), Handbook of Food Science,
Technology and Engineering (CRC Press, 2005), Food Biochemistry and Food Processing
(first and second editions; Blackwell Publishing—now Wiley—2006 and 2012), and the
Handbook of Fruits and Vegetable Flavors (Wiley, 2010).
In addition, he edited the Handbook of Meat, Poultry and Seafood Quality, first and
second editions, (Blackwell Publishing—now Wiley—2007 and 2012). From 2008 to
2011, he published with F. Toldrá five volumes on animal product-related books, namely,
the Handbook of Muscle Foods Analysis, Handbook of Processed Meats and Poultry
Analysis, Handbook of Seafood and Seafood Products Analysis, Handbook of Dairy
Foods Analysis, and Handbook of Analysis of Edible Animal By-Products. Also in 2011
with F. Toldrá, he coedited for CRC Press two volumes: Safety Analysis of Foods of
Animal Origin and Sensory Analysis of Foods of Animal Origin. In 2012, they both
published the Handbook of Analysis of Active Compounds in Functional Foods.
ix
x Editors
xi
xii Contributors
CONTENTS
3
4 David Lee Nelson
KH b E D
h g Gf e d h F c h 4-1 3–1 a C B A
FIGURE 1.1 Solar spectrum with Fraunhofer lines. (From Gebruiker, M. V. 2005.
Spectrum-sRGB.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer_lines.)
10–16 10–14 10–12 10–10 10–8 10–6 10–4 10–2 100 102 104 106 108 λ (m)
Increasing wavelength (λ)
Visible spectrum
380
450
495
570
590
620
750
V B G Y O R
FIGURE 1.2 The electromagnetic spectrum. (From Ronan, P. and Gringer. 2013. File:
EM spectrum.svg and File: Linear visible spectrum.svg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Electromagnetic_radiation.)
the direction of energy and wave propagation, forming a transverse wave. Electromagnetic
waves can be characterized by either the frequency or wavelength of their oscillations, which
determines their position in the electromagnetic spectrum (Crowell 2013). Electromagnetic
radiation involves a wide range of wavelengths, as is shown in Figure 1.2. The electro-
magnetic spectrum refers to all the known frequencies and their linked wavelengths of the
known photons. The electromagnetic spectrum extends from above the long wavelengths
(high frequencies) used for modern radio communication to gamma radiation at the short-
wavelength (high-frequency) end, thereby covering wavelengths from thousands of kilome-
ters down to a fraction of the size of an atom (Mehta 2011). The range of energies involved
in this range of wavelengths varies from 12.4 feV to 1.24 Mev. In principle, the upper limit
for the possible wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation is the dimension of the universe.
The theoretical lower limit is thought to be the Planck length (1.616199(97) × 10 −35 m)
(Bakshi and Godse 2009). Although all the wavelengths shown in Figure 1.2 can be used
for analysis, the range of wavelengths usually employed in spectroscopy is relatively nar-
row and includes mainly the UV, visible, infrared (IR), ultrasound, and FM radio (nuclear
magnetic resonance [NMR]) regions.
Introduction to Spectroscopy 5
UV light was discovered by J. W. Ritter in 1801 (Thomas 1991). However, there remained
no method by which to measure UV radiation until the development of the photodetector
in the 1930s. The first commercial UV–visible (UV–Vis) spectrophotometer was intro-
duced by Beckman in 1941 (Buie 2011).
The absorbance of light in the UV–Vis region occurs when an electron is excited
and passes from a bonding or nonbonding orbital to an antibonding orbital. The
amount of energy required to excite an electron depends on the difference in energy
between the ground state and the excited state. Transitions of the σ–σ*, σ–π*, π–σ*,
or simple π–π* type require light in the vacuum UV region. However, conjugated π
systems exhibit π–π* transitions that absorb in the region between 200 and 800 nm.
In conjugated systems, the excited state is more greatly stabilized by resonance than
the ground state, so the difference in energy between the two states is smaller than in
nonconjugated systems (Silverstein et al. 1974). The smaller the difference in energy
between the ground state and the excited state, the greater is the probability that a
transition between the ground state and the excited state will occur. The intensity of
the absorbance is a function of this probability. For a given concentration, the inten-
sity of absorbance will be greater when the difference in energy between the ground
and excited state is small. And, this difference will be smaller when there is a greater
degree of conjugation in the molecule.
The nonbonding (n) electrons normally have a higher energy than the ground state
pi electrons. The nonbonding electrons are held less strongly. Therefore, the difference
in energy between the nonbonding orbitals and the antibonding (π*) orbital is small, and
the absorbance corresponding to this n–π* transition occurs at a longer wavelength than
the π–π* transition. However, the nonbonding orbitals are perpendicular to the π* orbit-
als, and there is very little overlap between the two. Therefore, the probability that a non-
bonding electron will be excited to a π* orbital is extremely small, and the intensity of the
corresponding absorbance will also be very low. This transition is said to be “forbidden.”
The absorption bands in the UV–Vis region are very wide. The electronic state is
made up of several vibrational energy sublevels. These different vibrational energy levels
are each composed of several rotational energy levels. The energy differences between the
vibrational levels are much smaller than the differences between electronic energy states
and the differences between rotational energy levels are even smaller. The electronic
excited state also has several vibrational and rotational energy sublevels. Excitation of
the electron involves a transition from any one of the vibrational and rotational levels in
the ground state to any of the vibrational and rotational levels in the electronic excited
state, resulting in several absorptions with small differences in wavelength that form very
wide bands.
UV–Vis spectroscopy has been widely used for the quantitative analysis of substances
that absorb in this region because of the high sensitivity of the method. The UV–Vis
detector has long been employed in chromatography, especially of proteins, and has been
especially useful in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of many
classes of compounds. It has also proved useful for the qualitative identification of pure
substances, although the quantity of information provided by the UV–Vis spectrum is
much more limited than that of some other spectroscopic techniques. The proposal by
R. B. Woodward (1941, 1942a,b) of a set of empirical rules for calculating the λ max of
the absorbance of unsaturated compounds was an important tool in the identification of
such compounds.
6 David Lee Nelson
A development that increased the usefulness of UV–Vis spectroscopy was the use of
derivatives of the original spectra (Griffiths et al. 1982; Rojas et al. 1988). The first to
fourth derivative of the spectra can be obtained, and this mathematical technique has
been incorporated into the instrumentation. This technique permits the identification and
quantification of mixtures of substances, whereas this identification is much more dif-
ficult or impossible in the original spectrum. This technique has been used in many stud-
ies, such as the determination of tyrosine in proteins (Ragone et al. 1984), the detection
of toxic substances (Gill et al. 1982), the study of the fractions obtained from the partial
hydrolysis of casein and other proteins (Silvestre et al. 1993), and the determination of
phenylalanine in wheat flour (Carreira et al. 2009).
The development of the diode-array detector was especially useful because it became
possible to simultaneously measure the absorbance at several wavelengths, and the spec-
trum could be registered while determining the concentration of the substance eluted from
a column. Another more recent development is the use of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy
for the analysis of substances, including food and nanostructures (Gao and Wachs 2000;
Morales et al. 2007; Rossel et al. 2006; Liu 2016), although this spectroscopic technique
has been more extensively used in the mid- and near-infrared (NIR) regions. Reflectance
spectroscopy does not require modification of the sample and can be applied for qual-
ity control on the production line. This technique is one of the advancements in spec-
troscopy that has been made possible by the development of multivariate analysis and
other chemometric techniques, without which the spectra obtained would make no sense.
Instrumental modifications necessary for the recording of reflectance spectra have also
played a major role in this type of analysis and in the use of microspectroscopy, where
the spectrometer is adapted to a microscope and spectra can be obtained from minute
particles or cells (Les 2010).
When the substance does not absorb significantly in the UV–Vis region, derivatiza-
tion can be performed to obtain a product that does absorb in this region. An example
is the preparation of phenylthiohydantoin (PTH) derivatives of amino acids that do not
have aromatic rings (Nollet and Toldrá 2012). Of course, it is essential that the reaction
be 100% complete.
plant, and animal tissues. Later, the American Instrument Company collaborated with
Dr. Robert Bowman who designed and marketed the first spectrophotofluorimeter (SPF)
in 1956 (National Institutes of Health 2016). Antimalarial research actually initiated
the invention of the SPF as an analytical instrument that can determine the presence of
analytes that fluoresce. The story dated back to 1940, during World War II, when scien-
tists in the United States were required to determine the amount of drug that reached the
malarial parasites in a patient’s blood for a clinical trial of antimalarial drugs. Bernard
Brodie and Sidney Udenfriend of Goldwater Memorial Hospital in New York City
designed a new test using an instrument called a fluorometer that could determine the
amount of the drugs in the blood plasma from the intensity of the fluorescence emitted
from the drug, because many of the drugs used in the trial fluoresce. This observation
helped them to come up with a critical dose of a drug to minimize adverse side effects
(National Institutes of Health 2016).
Normally, only aromatic or highly unsaturated organic compounds fluoresce. One
of the advantages of fluorescence spectroscopy over absorption spectroscopy is the fact
that these compounds can be detected in the presence of substances that do not fluoresce.
Therefore, they can be detected in mixtures without the competition of nonfluorescing
compounds. The technique has several advantages and some limitations. If the compound
to be analyzed does not fluoresce, it must be derivatized or tagged to form a product that
does fluoresce. An example is the detection of polyamines and biogenic amines when they
are separated by HPLC (Ubaldo et al. 2015; Custódio et al. 2015; Kalac and Glória 2009;
Fernandes and Glória 2015). These amines do not fluoresce, so they are treated with
o-phthalaldehyde to produce a fluorescent derivative that can be detected by the fluo-
rescence detector. A 100% conversion to the derivative is necessary. o-Phthalaldehyde,
4-dimethylaminobenzenesulfonyl chloride, 1-dimethylaminonaphthalene-5-sulfonyl
chloride, and 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate have also been used
to prepare fluorescent derivatives of amino acids and peptides (Nollet and Toldrá 2012).
In fluorescence spectroscopy, the substance absorbs light in the UV, visible, or NIR
region of the electromagnetic radiation. The electrons are excited from a singlet ground
state to one of several singlet excited states (Figure 1.3). The electron then decays to the
3
Nonradiative
S1 2 transition
1
0
Absorption
Fluorescence
Energy
3
S0 2
1
0
Ground state
FIGURE 1.3 Jablonski diagram showing the intersystem decay and fluorescence after
absorption of light. (From Jacobhed. 2012. Jablonski diagram. https://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Fluorescence.)
8 David Lee Nelson
lowest singlet excited state via vibrational relaxation and internal conversion and then
returns to the ground state with the emission of light. Therefore, the wavelength of the
light emitted is longer than the wavelength of the absorbed light. This shift to a longer
wavelength is known as the Stokes shift. The λ max of the light emitted does not shift
with the wavelength of the light being absorbed; only the intensity of the light emitted
is affected because the intensity of the light emitted depends on the number of excited
molecules, and the number of molecules that become excited depends on the wavelength
of the light being absorbed. The spectral range for most fluorescence measurements is
200–1000 nm (Wehry 1997). As with absorption spectroscopy, there is a transition from
the lowest singlet state to a variety of vibrational levels in the ground state, so the emis-
sion band is relatively wide.
Fluorescence spectroscopy is orders of magnitude more sensitive than most other
methods of detection of organic compounds. One of the reasons for the greater sensitiv-
ity when compared to UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy is the fact that any light emitted
is compared to a black background. In absorption spectroscopy, if the concentration of
the sample is very dilute, the difference between the absorbance of the sample and that
of the reference cell will be minimal. That is, the amount of light transmitted will be
nearly the same, and two large values with only a slight difference between them will
be compared. In fluorescence spectroscopy, there is zero light emitted by the reference,
so any light emitted by the sample can be more easily detected. Detection limits down
to 10 −10 mol L −1 or lower can be reached, and extremely small samples can be used. The
sensitivity depends on the quantum yield, which represents the efficiency of the fluores-
cence process. It is defined as the ratio of the number of photons emitted to the number
of photons absorbed. Another important factor is the lifetime of the excited state because
it represents the time available for the excited electron to interact with its environment
(Lakowicz 1999).
An advantage of fluorescence spectroscopy over the UV–Vis absorption technique is
the fact that two frequencies (absorption and emission maxima) are available for iden-
tification of a compound rather than only one. If two sample constituents with similar
absorption spectra fluoresce at different wavelengths, they may be distinguished from one
another by the appropriate choice of emission wavelength. Or, if two compounds have
similar fluorescence spectra but absorb strongly at different wavelengths, they may be
distinguished by proper choice of excitation wavelength (Wehry 1997). When the fluores-
cent spectrum is composed of contributions from a mixture of compounds, synchronized
scanning spectroscopy can be used to distinguish between the components of the mixture
(Sikorska et al. 2005). In synchronized fluorometry, the absorption spectrum and the
emission spectrum are recorded simultaneously with a constant difference in wavelength
between the two.
Another advantage is that the technique is fast and simple and the equipment is
relatively robust so that it can be used in the field for preliminary analyses. It is also
possible to detect emissions remotely if fiber optics or excitation with lasers is employed.
This advantage means that the technique can be used for environmental studies and for
the control of food products during production without the necessity for extraction or
other types of modification of the product. In these cases, filter fluorometers can be used
because the intensity of fluorescence at single excitation and emission wavelengths can be
measured to detect specific analytes without the need for high resolution or array detec-
tors. Portability, low cost, and small size are most important. A large number of photons
can be transmitted by filters, and this characteristic makes them useful for trace analyses.
Laboratory fluorometers usually employ grating monochromators.
Introduction to Spectroscopy 9
One of the limitations of the use of fluorescence spectroscopy is the fact that the
glassware and solvents utilized must be very clean so that no fluorescent impurities will
interfere with the fluorescence from the sample. Extensive cleanup of mixtures, such as
chromatography, may be required, and this process can be time consuming. Solvents that
absorb in the UV region cannot be used. Another possible interference is the presence of
substances that absorb in the same region in which the analyte emits light, thereby reduc-
ing the quantum yield.
Photobleaching can sometimes occur, especially in the case of fluorescent probes that
might be submitted to radiation over a prolonged period. Photobleaching occurs when a
photolytic reaction causes a rupture in one or more bonds and results in the loss of fluo-
rescence (ThermoFisher Scientific 2016). The last type of interference involves quenching,
which can occur when some substance interacts with the excited state of the molecule and
inhibits fluorescence. The possibility of quenching in mixtures means that care should
be exercised during calibration. Quenching can be caused by collision with another mol-
ecule, such as iodide, oxygen, and acrylamide, or by the formation of a nonfluorescing
complex. This latter type of quenching occurs in the ground state. Quenching can also
occur because of attenuation of the incident light by either the fluorophore or some other
species (Lakowicz 1999).
The lifetime of the excited state can furnish some information regarding its interac-
tions with other molecules in the environment. The lifetime of the excited state might be
sufficiently long so that the solvent molecules can reorient themselves around the mol-
ecule. This relaxation of the solvent is responsible for the Stokes shift caused by the
solvent (Lakowicz 1999). The Stokes shift can indicate whether a protein is folded or if
the fluorophore (tryptophan) is exposed to the solvent water. The shift for a tryptophan
residue buried within the protein molecule will be different from that of a residue on the
surface. Labeling with extrinsic probes can also be used to determine the environment
within a macromolecule.
Fluorescence anisotropy measurements can furnish information regarding the size
and shape of proteins. Fluorescence anisotropy involves the photoselective excitation
by polarized light. Those fluorophores whose absorption transition dipole is parallel to
the electronic vector of the excitation will be preferentially excited. The population of
molecules will be partially oriented, and the light emitted will be partially polarized.
Fluorescence anisotropy can be reduced by rotational diffusion. If the fluorophore is
bound to a large molecule such as a protein or a membrane, rotational diffusion becomes
very limited and anisotropy is more easily observed (Lakowicz 1999).
If the emission spectrum of the fluorophore overlaps with the absorption spectrum of
another molecule, the energy of the excited state can be transferred by resonance without the
emission of light (Lakowicz 1999). The effect depends on whether the two species are free in
solution, covalently linked, or trapped within a membrane or nucleic acid molecule. Resonance
energy transfer can be used to measure distances between sites on a macromolecule.
There are two types of fluorescence measurements: steady-state and time-resolved
measurements. The steady-state measurement is the more commonly used. The time-
resolved measurement measures the rate of decay of the intensity of the emitted light
or the anisotropy. The anisotropic decay furnishes information regarding the molecular
shape and flexibility. The decay in intensity also furnishes information regarding the con-
formation of the molecule or the presence of more than one conformation.
Fluorimetric detectors are widely used in chromatography, especially HPLC, and
in electrophoresis. Capillary electrophoresis is a relatively new technique that achieves
10 David Lee Nelson
the computer transforms the signals of all of the transmitted wavelengths into a spectrum
using a mathematical technique, the Fourier transformation. Instead of a prism or grat-
ing, an interferometer is used. The spectrum is obtained in a few seconds instead of a few
minutes. After passing through the interferometer, the beam passes through the sample
and impinges on the detector. The signal that is measured is digitized and sent to the com-
puter where the transformation takes place. FTIR still involves the transmission of light
through the sample and, thus, suffers from some of the same limitations that dispersive
instruments possess (Thomas 1991; Blum and John 2012).
This technique has been used for the study of proteins and protein–ligand interactions
(Jung 2000). It has also been used for the characterization of spoilage fungi (Shapaval
et al. 2013) and for the study of phospholipids in edible oils (Meng et al. 2014). Other
examples of the use of FTIR for the analysis of foods include its use for the determination
of thermoxidized olive oil (Tena et al. 2013), the study of defective and normal coffees
(Craig et al. 2012), the detection of H 2O2 in food (Şansal and Somer 1999), the study of
the secondary structure and conformation changes in polyphenol oxidase (Baltacioğlu
et al. 2015), and the detection of adulteration in food (Rodriguez-Saona and Allendorf
2011).
Although transmission measurements are used, the diffuse reflectance measurements have
proved to be much more useful for the analysis of food. New techniques of surface analy-
sis (Chabal 1988) and reflectance analysis (NUANCE 2016) have been employed. These
techniques facilitate the monitoring of foods during the production process without the
destruction of the sample. Thus, the detection of adulteration and the determination of
the quality of the product can frequently be accomplished more rapidly. The technique is
called attenuated total reflectance (ATR). It is a sampling technique used in conjunction
with IR spectroscopy that enables samples to be examined directly in the solid or liquid
state without further separation and purification (Carter et al. 2010). In this aspect, it is
similar to Raman spectroscopy (RS) (Mauricio-Iglesias et al. 2009).
A beam of IR light is passed through an ATR crystal so that it reflects at least once
off the internal surface in contact with the sample. This reflection forms an evanescent
wave, which extends into the sample to a depth of 0.5–2 μm with each reflection along
the top surface (NUANCE 2016). The exact value is dependent on the wavelength of the
light, the angle of incidence, and the indices of refraction for the ATR crystal and the
medium being probed (Minnich et al. 2010), the efficiency of sample contact, the area of
contact with the sample, and the crystal material (SpectraTech 2000).
The number of reflections can be varied by varying the angle of incidence. The beam
is collected by a detector as it exits the crystal. Most modern IR spectrometers can be
converted to ATR by mounting the ATR accessory in the spectrometer’s sample compart-
ment (WOW 2016; Sawant 2016).
The sampling surface is pressed into intimate contact with the top surface of a crys-
tal such as KRS-5, ZnSe, or germanium. To obtain internal reflectance, the angle of
incidence must exceed the critical angle. This angle is a function of the refractive indices
of both the sample and the ATR crystal. The evanescent wave decays into the sample
exponentially with distance from the surface of the crystal over a distance on the order of
micrometers. The depth of penetration of the evanescent wave is defined as the distance
from the crystal–sample interface at which the intensity of the evanescence decays to 1/e
12 David Lee Nelson
(37%) of its original value. Different crystals have different refractive indices because of
the crystal material. Different crystals are applied to different transmission ranges (ZnSe
for 20,000–650 cm−1 and Ge for 5500–800 cm−1) (NUANCE 2016; Sawant 2016). In
a spectrum obtained by transmission, the path length is the thickness of the sample. In
ATR, the effective path length (EPL) can be calculated as
The EPL is directly related to the absorbance intensity. An increase in either the depth
of penetration or in the number of reflections will increase the absorbance intensity of
the spectrum. The penetration depth of the IR energy into the sample is proportional
to the wavelength. In other words, the depth of penetration decreases when the wave-
number increases. Thus, the relative band intensities in the ATR spectrum decrease with
increasing wavenumbers when compared to a transmission spectrum of the same sample
(SpectraTech 2000; Suraj 2013).
Examples of the use of ATR include the study of the structure, orientation, and
tertiary structure changes in peptides and membrane proteins (Vigano et al. 2000),
the study of the structure of potato starch (van Soest et al. 1995), the drying process
of sodium alginate films (Xiao et al. 2014), and the determination of linoleic acid in
potato chips (Kadamne et al. 2011). Micro-ATR IR spectroscopy has also been investi-
gated (Suraj 2013). ATR-IR has been applied to the microfluidic flow of aqueous solu-
tions in microreactors (Greener et al. 2010) or in flow cells (Carter et al. 2010; Minnich
et al. 2010).
The NIR and far-IR regions of the spectrum originally furnished much less information
about the composition of material because of the wide, overlapping peaks and weak
absorbance. NIR began to be employed in 1938, but its use only took hold in the 1980s.
The first work on the analytical exploitation of the NIR spectral region involved the
determination of the amount of water in gelatin by employing its absorption in the NIR
region (Ellis and Bath 1938). Barchewitz was the first to apply NIR spectroscopy for the
analysis of fuel (Barchewitz 1943). Other studies were performed in the 1950s (Evans
Introduction to Spectroscopy 13
et al. 1951; White and Barrett 1956; Whetsel et al. 1958) on the use of NIR for the study
of mixtures and its obedience to Beer’s law (Pasquini 2003). NIR spectroscopy is a type
of vibrational spectroscopy that employs photon energy (hν) in the energy range from
2.65 × 1019 to 7.96 × 1020 J, which corresponds to the wavelength range from 750 to
2500 nm (Pasquini 2003).
The technique has various advantages: It is fast, nondestructive, and noninvasive,
and requires very limited sample preparation. The radiation is highly penetrating and
can be used for analyses on the production line. Nearly any molecule containing CH,
NH, SH, or OH bonds can be detected. Because of its high penetrability, which allows
the detection of substances within the upper layers of tissue, NIR has been employed
for the study of the brain and muscle physiology (Ferrari and Quaresima 2004). Several
constituents can be measured simultaneously (Osborne 2006). However, because of the
large number of wavelengths and absorbances that must normally be computed, the tech-
nique requires the use of chemometric techniques and computer control and analysis. It
also requires good standards that are adequate for defining the data points that should
be measured. It is a secondary method of analysis. A primary method is required to fur-
nish the analytical results necessary for modeling of the NIR spectral data. The model
may be very complicated and may need to be updated frequently because of changes in
the sample matrix. Robust models might require that many samples be analyzed by the
primary method. Also, the technique is not very sensitive; the limit of determination is
approximately 0.1% (Pasquini 2003).
Although absorption measurements are used, the diffuse reflectance measurements
have proved to be much more useful for the analysis of food. New techniques of surface
analysis (Chabal 1988) have been employed. These techniques facilitate the monitoring
of foods during the production process without the destruction of the sample. Thus, the
detection of adulteration and the determination of the quality of products can frequently
be accomplished more rapidly. The NIR region is composed principally of overtones and
combination bands corresponding to absorptions in the mid-IR region, as well as the NIR
region. The bands observed in the NIR region are weak and generally poorly resolved.
Each successive overtone band is approximately an order of magnitude less intense than
the preceding one. Thus, several choices of absorptions of different intensity contain-
ing the same chemical information are available. Because water absorbs weakly in this
region, high-moisture foods can be analyzed (Osborne 2006).
The first type of instrument employed was the dispersive type, which used diffraction
gratings. These instruments were used in the early days of NIR spectroscopy and are still
being used. They are of relatively low cost compared with other NIR instruments. The
main disadvantages of dispersive instruments are the slow scan speed and a lack of wave-
length precision, which deteriorates during long-term operation because of mechanical
fatigue. Also, the presence of moving parts limits the use of dispersive instruments in the
field. However, the development of linear sensor arrays allows the entire spectrum to be
scanned in a few seconds, and the lack of moving parts in such instruments means that
the dispersive optics have a longer lifetime.
The NIR instruments may use filters to determine the wavelengths to be detected.
These instruments are more limited with respect to the range of wavelengths available, but
are less expensive and are used mostly for measuring the quantities of specific substances
such as water, proteins, and fats. They are usually more robust and have found use in the
field or in the online control of production (Morimoto et al. 2001). NIR instruments that
use filters are more robust because the optical parts are not harmed by environmental
humidity. The detectors for the NIR spectral region are usually based on silicon, PbS, and
14 David Lee Nelson
InGa. The last has a high sensitivity and response speed. When high-powered radiation
sources are used, these detectors can impart a very high signal-to-noise ratio.
Light-emitting diode (LED)-based instruments can produce NIR radiation with a
bandwidth of about 30–50 nm, centered in any wavelength of the spectral region. The
instruments can employ a set of LEDs as sources of narrow NIR bands (Ellekker et al.
1993; Evans et al. 1993) or use them to produce a polychromatic, highly stable source
whose radiation is dispersed by using common monochromator devices such as those
based on gratings or filter optics (Goto 1989). The LED and filter instruments are of
lower cost, they are smaller, and they can be more adequate for use in the field (Pasquini
2003).
The fourth type of instrument is based on acousto-optic tunable filters (AOTFs) (Abe
et al. 1996). Such instruments utilize a technology that involves no moving parts. They
are capable of very high speeds over a wide range of the spectral region. The scan speed
is very fast, and random access to a large number of frequencies is possible.
The type of spectrophotometer of choice for research utilizes the interferometer and
Fourier transform to convert the intensities of the individual frequencies. These instru-
ments possess the highest precision and accuracy of wavelength, a high signal-to-noise
ratio, and a high scan speed, although they are slower than AOTF-based instruments
(Kays and Barton 2003). These instruments do not have entrance or exit slits that can
limit the intensity of the radiation reaching the detector. The wavelength accuracy is
better than 0.05 nm and the resolution can reach values below 1 nm in the NIR region.
However, the instruments are more expensive than the dispersive or filter types, and they
are less robust than the filter or AOTF-based instruments.
Some of the applications of NIR spectroscopy include agricultural products, indus-
trial food products, precision agricultural or soil analyses, polymer processing, polymer
quality characteristics, fuel quality control, fuel production processes, petroleum, envi-
ronmental analyses, textiles, biomedical or clinical analyses, pharmacy and cosmetics,
and NIR imaging (Williams and Norris 1987; Pasquini 2003). NIR spectroscopy is used
routinely for the compositional, functional, and sensory analysis of food ingredients,
process intermediates, and the final products (Pasquini 2003).
NIR spectroscopy has been used to determine protein content (Kays et al. 2000) and
soluble and insoluble dietary fiber (Kays 1998; Kays and Barton 2002) in cereal foods and to
predict gross energy and usable energy (Kays and Barton 2003). Evans et al. (1993) utilized
NIR spectroscopy to determine the authenticity of orange juice. It has also been employed to
determine the protein and lactose contents of goat’s milk (Diaz-Carrillo et al. 1993) and the
protein, casein, and fat contents in cow’s milk (Laporte and Paquin 1999). Studies of starch
and water in cereal food products have been performed (Osborne 1996). The control of the
variation in water content of foods (Wahlby and Skjoldebrand 2001) is another application.