Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Reframing Resolution Innovation and Change in The Management of Workplace Conflict 1St Edition Richard Saundry Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Reframing Resolution Innovation and Change in The Management of Workplace Conflict 1St Edition Richard Saundry Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/alternative-approaches-in-
conflict-resolution-1st-edition-martin-leiner/
https://textbookfull.com/product/believers-skeptics-and-failure-
in-conflict-resolution-ian-s-spears/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-eu-promoting-regional-
integration-and-conflict-resolution-1st-edition-thomas-diez/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-palgrave-handbook-of-
workplace-innovation-adela-mcmurray/
Conflict Resolution Playbook Practical Communication
Skills for Preventing Managing and Resolving Conflict
1st Edition Jeremy Pollack
https://textbookfull.com/product/conflict-resolution-playbook-
practical-communication-skills-for-preventing-managing-and-
resolving-conflict-1st-edition-jeremy-pollack/
https://textbookfull.com/product/climate-change-migration-and-
conflict-in-bangladesh-1st-edition-islam/
https://textbookfull.com/product/climate-change-conflict-and-in-
security-1st-edition-panos-constantinides/
https://textbookfull.com/product/ronald-j-fisher-a-north-
american-pioneer-in-interactive-conflict-resolution-1st-edition-
ronald-j-fisher/
EDITED BY RICHARD SAUNDRY,
PAUL LATREILLE AND
IAN ASHMAN
REFRAMING
RESOLUTION
Innovation and Change in the
Management of Workplace Conflict
Reframing Resolution
Richard Saundry • Paul Latreille • Ian Ashman
Editors
Reframing
Resolution
Innovation and Change in the Management
of Workplace Conflict
Editors
Richard Saundry Paul Latreille
Plymouth Business School Sheffield University Management School
Plymouth University Sheffield, United Kingdom
Plymouth, United Kingdom
Ian Ashman
University of Central Lancashire
Lancashire Business School
Preston, United Kingdom
The editors would like to thank all the contributors for their work in
compiling this volume and also Sir Brendan Barber for writing the fore-
word. We would also like to acknowledge the support of the Advisory,
Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) in funding the empirical
research which features in a number of Chapters. Furthermore we would
like to acknowledge the funding of the Economic and Social Research
Council for the seminar series ‘Reframing Resolution – Managing Conflict
and Resolving Individual Employment Disputes in the Contemporary
Workplace’ (Grant number: ES/J022276/1) which provided the founda-
tion for this book.
v
Contents
1 Introduction 1
Ian Ashman, Paul Latreille, and Richard Saundry
vii
viii Contents
Index 369
Notes on Contributors
Ian Ashman is Director of the Institute for Research into Organisations, Work
and Employment at the University of Central Lancashire. He has researched and
published widely on various related subjects including downsizing, conflict,
engagement, leadership and ethics. He is interested in the application of existen-
tialism to these and similar topics.
Ariel Avgar is Associate Professor and Associate Dean at the School of Labor
and Employment Relations at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
His research interests include organizational conflict management and dispute
resolution and employment relations in the healthcare setting. He holds a PhD
in Industrial Relations from the ILR School at Cornell University.
Greg Bamber is a Professor in the Department of Management, Monash
University where he has served as: Director of Research & Discipline Leader:
Human Resources & Employment Relations. He has more than a hundred aca-
demic publications, including in many refereed journals. He has also published
numerous edited book chapters and several books.
Anthony Bennett is a freelance researcher and also a Director of RTB
Consultancy. He formerly worked as Senior Lecturer in HRM at Sheffield Hallam
University and the University of Central Lancashire. He is a practising mediator
and has research interests in conflict management, equality and diversity,
employee engagement and employee representation.
xi
xii Notes on Contributors
resolution, the workplace impact of domestic violence and the impact of domes-
tic violence and the role of trade union representatives.
Ryan Lamare is an assistant professor in the School of Labor and Employment
Relations at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research interests
include: labor and employment arbitration; ADR in the securities industry; the
development of ADR systems in organizations; the role of unions in politics;
employment relations and HR at multinational companies; and quantitative
research methods. He has published extensively on these issues and serves on the
editorial board at Human Resource Management Journal.
Paul Latreille is Professor of Management and Associate Dean for Learning and
Teaching at Sheffield University Management School. His research in applied
labour economics and employment relations focuses on workplace conflict,
mediation/ADR and Employment Tribunals. He has published extensively for
academic and policymaker/practitioner audiences, and has completed numerous
externally-commissioned projects.
David B. Lipsky is the Anne Evans Estabrook Professor of Dispute Resolution
in the School of Industrial and Labor Relations, and Director of the Scheinman
Institute on Conflict Resolution at Cornell University. He served as the national
president of the Labor and Employment Relations Association (formerly the
Industrial Relations Research Association) in 2006. In his research and teaching
activities he primarily focuses on negotiation, conflict resolution, and collective
bargaining. David Lipsky served as Dean of the School of Industrial and Labor
Relations at Cornell from 1988 until 1997.
Louise McArdle is Principal Lecturer and Leader of the Strategy and Enterprise
Division in the School of Management at the University of Central Lancashire.
She is also a member of the Institute for Research into Organisations, Work and
Employment and has previously published in the areas of workplace flexibility,
TQM and Fair Trade.
Eric J. Neuman is Associate Professor of Management at the Heider College of
Business at Creighton University and earned his PhD from the University of
Michigan. In addition to research on intragroup conflict, he has studied
deregulation, corporate political activity, corporate foundations, and social net-
work methodologies
William Roche is Professor of Industrial Relations and Human Resources at the
School of Business, University College Dublin and Honorary Professor at the
Management School, Queen’s University, Belfast. He has published extensively in
xiv Notes on Contributors
xv
xvi Abbreviations
xvii
List of Tables
xix
xx List of Tables
I. Ashman
iROWE (Institute for Research into Organisations, Work and Employment),
University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
e-mail: iashman@uclan.ac.uk
P. Latreille
Sheffield University Management School, Sheffield, UK
e-mail: p.latreille@sheffield.ac.uk
R. Saundry
Plymouth Business School, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
e-mail: richard.saundry@plymouth.ac.uk
and Thompson 1999; Saundry and Dix 2014). While a significant onus is
often placed on the direct costs to the organization of individual employ-
ment disputes, the underlying conflict, which gives rise to such disputes,
has major implications for the health and well-being of employees as well as
threatening the psychological contract and limiting productivity (De Dreu
2008). Consequently, finding ways to manage and resolve workplace con-
flict is a key issue for employers, trade unions and policymakers.
This book introduces new empirical research from scholars brought
together through a seminar series funded by the UK Economic and
Social Research Council (ESRC) entitled ‘Reframing Resolution –
Managing Conflict and Resolving Individual Employment Disputes in the
Contemporary Workplace’ that concluded in September 2013. This in turn
developed from a programme of research into conflict management in the
UK funded by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas)
from which a number of the contributions in this volume are drawn.
For the most part, the evidence presented in the following chapters is
located within the setting of the UK economy. However, the issues raised
have relevance worldwide, and so to facilitate wider international contex-
tualisation and comparison, as well as reflect international contributions to
the seminar series itself, there are chapters focusing on experiences in the
USA, Ireland and Australia. The aim of the book is to advance our under-
standing of contemporary theory and practice relating to the management
of employment conflict and the extent to which innovative approaches are
being developed and diffused. It seeks to contribute not only to academic
debates but also to provide key insights for management and union prac-
titioners responsible for day-to-day handling of conflict in the workplace.
Each chapter is self-contained and can be read independently of the
other contributions. However, when taken as a whole, the content of
this book presents a general argument that changes in the management
and regulation of work have created a ‘resolution gap’ that current policy
approaches and organizational strategies fail to acknowledge or address.
For instance, the erosion of workplace representation, the changing
nature of the human resource management function and the question-
able people management abilities of many front-line managers are trends
that are not confined to the UK, and so a particular emphasis of this
book is to examine how organizations in the UK, USA, Ireland and
Introduction 3
individuals, but they express reservations about the decline of employee rep-
resentation in organizations and especially through recognized trade unions.
There is some evidence that non-unionized employee representatives and
employee engagement strategies in high-trust environments may help work-
ers to voice their concerns pertaining to conflict and dispute, but that such
alternatives do not replace sufficiently the absence of trade union representa-
tion. In the last Chap. 8 of Part 2, Ian Ashman examines a context specific site
for organizational conflict – the downsizing or restructuring event. His own
field study of ‘downsizing envoys’ – the people that deliver face-to-face the
news of redundancy to victims – shows that whilst downsizing and restructur-
ing is generally traumatic and rife with potential for conflict, it is by no means
inevitable or predictable. He provides a compelling account of the challenges
faced by ‘envoys’ and highlights the unexpected disputes and alliances that
can occur among the various protagonists during downsizing exercises.
Part 3 of this book retains the empirically grounded approach to under-
standing conflict but shifts attention to dispute resolution. Mediation
and other alternative dispute resolution practices are often seen as an
antidote to some of the problems and challenges outlined in Parts 1 and
2. Mediation in particular, is argued to provide a successful and cost
effective way of resolving conflict, as well as having a positive effect on
the conflict-handling abilities of any parties who experience it first-hand.
As such it may therefore offer an opportunity to counter the management
skills deficit identified in Chap. 6. Some commentators and indeed poli-
cymakers have even suggested that mediation can transform the culture
of conflict management. Ultimately, however, most mediation research
has tended to adopt either a managerial focus, emphasizing the organiza-
tional experiences and impact of mediation, or one which highlights the
role of mediators themselves, so the voice of disputants has largely been
absent. In Chap. 9, Tony Bennett examines the mediation process from
the disputant’s perspective by drawing on a unique dataset of in-depth
interviews with employees who have taken part in workplace mediation.
He explores the trajectory of individual disputes and assesses participants’
views of the effectiveness of mediation provision and the sustainability
of the outcomes. The chapter not only sheds light on key issues such as
workplace justice and the voluntary nature of mediation but also high-
lights lessons for organization in implementing mediation strategies. He
6 I. Ashman et al.
finds that while mediation offers a positive and often cathartic opportu-
nity to voice concerns, the more pragmatic focus on resolution often fails
to address underlying concerns of justice.
Justice, and how it is seen to be done, is clearly a major concern for
trade unions, which have often adopted a somewhat sceptical opinion of
mediation, viewing it suspiciously as a managerial tool designed to under-
mine the ability of unions to enforce the ‘rights’ of the members through
more conventional grievance processes. Perhaps surprisingly then, Virginia
Branney, in Chap. 10, argues that whilst union representatives do place sig-
nificant store in rights-based procedures, they nevertheless have a generally
positive attitude to the use of mediation in specific contexts. Branney draws
on her own recent survey of trade union representatives, the first such study
of the attitudes of union activists and officers towards workplace media-
tion, and asks whether the wider use of mediation offers an opportunity to
extend trade union influence over decision-making, or whether it may be a
threat to their traditional representative role? She argues that mediation is
not a replacement for more conventional grievance procedures but might
provide a means through which unions can achieve improved outcomes for
their members and at the same time demonstrate their effectiveness.
The next two chapters offer examples from outside the UK of how ADR
techniques have been used in innovative ways. While much of this book
emphasizes and examines trends towards the management of individual
conflict, it is important not to neglect the collective dimension. To this
end, in Chap. 11, Bill Roche looks at the growing field of the private facili-
tation of collective bargaining in Ireland during both dispute and non-dis-
pute situations. Drawing on interviews with prominent and experienced
privately-engaged facilitators and on detailed case studies, his discussion
explores the nature and objectives of private facilitation, the influences on
the use of private facilitators and the consequent outcomes. By contrast,
Bernadine Van Gramberg, Julian Teicher and Greg Bamber, in Chap. 12,
examine developments in the approach taken by the Australian Fair Work
Commission (the national employment tribunal provider) in responding
to the growing number of unrepresented parties appearing at tribunals.
Using evidence from interviews with tribunal members, they explore and
discuss apparent the shift towards using ADR methods in the context of
the growing individualization of Australian employment relations.
Introduction 7
To end Part 3, Louise McArdle and Pete Thomas offer, in Chap. 13,
a critical account of the development of in-house mediation schemes
by applying critical discourse analysis to a body of Acas-funded qual-
itative case study research data to explore the antagonistic relations
in an organization and the role of articulation in the development of
mediation. They focus on the importance of organizational context,
and caution against the use of mediation as a panacea for workplace
conflict. In some respects their conclusion is fairly consistent with more
mainstream accounts which argue that mediation alone is unlikely to
have any material impact on organizational approaches to conflict
management. Their emphasis that the role of key actors (in their case
particular managers and trade union officials) in the development of
mediation schemes must be placed in context of the conjuncture of
social and power relations and institutional structures that are found
in organizations echoes aspects of the arguments presented by Ariel
Avgar, Eric Neuman and Wonjoon Chung in Chap. 5.
To close the book, Part 4 provides an assessment of significant innova-
tions in conflict handling across the USA, UK and Ireland. The idea of
‘integrated conflict management systems’ (ICMS) has gained increased
traction in the USA in recent years, and Chap. 14, presented by David
Lipsky, Ryan Lamare and Ariel Avgar, reviews the development of ICMS
by drawing on their ground-breaking study of the conflict manage-
ment practices of Fortune 1,000 corporations. Their evidence suggests
that there has been a diffusion of innovative conflict resolution tech-
niques among these ‘blue-chip’ organizations, and that there are signs
of coherent and complementary bundles of rights and interest-based
processes being adopted. They examine the factors and forces that have
been driving such developments. Traditionally, it has been argued that
ADR has been largely triggered by a desire to avoid unionization and,
perhaps more importantly, by the high cost of employment litigation
in the USA. However, Lipsky and his co-authors suggest that moves
towards ICMS represent strategic managerial choices taken in response
to competitive and regulatory pressures but also in pursuit of wider
organizational goals.
Their conclusion is supported by Paul Latreille and Richard Saundry’s
detailed case study (Chap. 15) of the introduction of a more integrated
8 I. Ashman et al.