Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 3 - Growth Rate in TE
Lecture 3 - Growth Rate in TE
Still looking at why there was no economic growth before the 18th century
We have derived an expression for y (GDP/Capita) but now we want to focus on the
GROWTH of Y
- We need to manipulate this expression into another expression that tells us how y
changes overtime
• In growth models, we are interested in allowing variables to change with time (t)
• So really, we should write ALL variables in our current models (Y, A X and L) as
functions of time – Y(t), A(t) …….
• However, we don’t as that would take too much time so we continue to call them Y,
A, X and L – BUT REMEMBER that they are functions of Y
When we work with growth, we will often be interested in taking the first
derivative of a variable with respect to time.
• This derivative tells us how the variable, A, changes as time increases by one unit (eg. as
one year passes in this case)
This expression shows us the change in GDP/capita, as one year goes by ( dy / dt ) divided by
the initial GDP/capita which allows us to get a growth rate
The change in log y overtime can be calculated by taking the first derivative with respect to t
as we are looking at the change overtime. Therefore, it is d log y divided by dt
As the right hand side has to equal the left hand side, we do the same process and we take
the derivative of those variables with respect to time as well.
To conclude how it is done:
Taking the derivative of log y with respect to y gives us 1 / y using differentiation rules.
- Same applied for d log A and the other variables
Once we replace d log A / dA with 1/ A and multiply it by the cofactors (such as A dot, X
dot…) we have obtained the expression we want:
• This expression tells us the growth rate will be affected by these variables
- The growth rate of A, X and L
• g is notating the growth rate of GDP
• A is showing the technological progress (growth rate of technology)
Technological Progress
- In the 16th century, people worked in the land using simple tools and their hands
- There was a big improvement in the 19th century where machines were used to harvest
wheat and work the lands – assumed they can now produce more
- Now, only one machine is needed
Technological progress should therefore be viewed in a much more broad sense than just
the invention of modern technology and machinery
We learn that technological progress is the only engine of growth in a traditional economy
- Population growth does not lead to g increasing, only an increase in A does that
Can we explain why there was no growth before the 18th century?
- This meant the technological progress was always offset by the population growth
- Explains why the GDP/capita and income of society stayed the same despite massive
advances in technology – eg. 18th century England was much more densely populated
than Babylon which is why they weren’t richer
- However, we have to consider why these two parts are equal in the different eras
- Is it due to an economic reason or by coincidence?
Conclusions