Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tsona 2010
Tsona 2010
Tsona 2010
ReVieW
Summary
The aim of the study was to evaluate the penetration of 69.57% and 44.66% respectively. Concentrations of line-
linezolid into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain tissue zolid were above the mIC90s for staphylococci and strepto-
after a single i.v. dose of 600 mg. The penetration of line- cocci. The concentrations obtained indicate good
zolid into cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue was studied penetration of linezolid into CSF and brain tissue and sup-
in 18 patients undergoing a neurosurgical procedure. line- port its use in the management of multidrug-resistant
zolid 600 mg i.v. was given with the induction of anesthe- Gram-positive CNS infections.
sia. mean concentrations of linezolid 2h after the final Key words: linezolid, oxazolidinone, CNS infections,
dose, in serum, cerbrospinal fluid and brain tissue were cerebrospinal fluid, brain, pharmacokinetics
assayed by HplC. CSF/serum and brain/serum ratios were
and the measures were performed at 251 nm. The retention dominantly via passive diffusion down a concentration gradient;
time of linezolid was 7.8 min. Serum, CSF and brain calibra- the major determinant of CSF penetration is solubility. Inflam-
tion curves of linezolid were linear over the whole operative con- mation also increases the permeability of the BBB to various
centration range (0–50 mg/mL). The lower limit of detection antibiotics.
was determined as 0.15 mg/mL. Linezolid is a synthetic antimicrobial agent with excellent oral
The intra-day reproducibility was <6.43% for quality-control bioavailability and activity against many multidrug-resistant
samples containing 1, 5 or 25 mg/L linezolid. The inter-day re- Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphy-
producibility was <11.58%. lococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
Serum and CSF aliquots (0.5 mL) were mixed with 3 mL of epidermidis (MRSE), penicillin-resistant pneumococci and van-
dichloromethane used as a deproteinizing solution and vortexed comycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Recent reports have de-
for 2 min. The resulting suspension was centrifuged for 15 min scribed the successful use of linezolid in patients with complex
at 4000xg. The clear subnatant was removed and evaporated multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections, including CNS in-
under a stream of nitrogen. The pellet was reconstituted with fections 5,8-17.
0.5 mL of mobile phase and vortexed for 1 min and an aliquot The mean serum concentration of linezolid 2 hours follow-
of 120 mL was injected for drug determination. ing an i.v. dose of 600 mg was 6.38 ± 2.48. These concentra-
Brain samples were homogenized with a Misonix XL2020 tions were above the MIC90 for the most relevant pathogens (2
Ultrasonic Processor (Sonicator®; Misonix Inc., New York, NY) mg/L for staphylococci and enterococci and 1 mg/L for pneu-
with the addition of 1 mL of 0.1M phosphate-buffered saline mococci), as reported recently by the LEADER 2004 surveil-
(pH 7.1). The resulting homogenized solution was centrifuged lance program 18. At the same time, the concentration in the
for 10 min at 4000xg. The supernatants were removed and brain was 2.63 ± 0.78 mg/Kg and in the CSF 5.06 ± 3.53
were injected for HPLC drug determination following the same mg/Kg. These concentrations were also above the MIC90 for
procedure described above for the serum and CSF samples. the most relevant pathogens. These findings parallel those of
Shaikh et al 11 who observed plasma and CNS concentrations
of 7.68 mg/L and 2.05 mg/L respectively 2 hours after the
RESULTS
end of infusion in a patient with vancomycin-resistant entero-
Eighteen patients (10 men and 8 women) with a mean ± SD coccus faecium meningitis. In another study by Villani et al 4
age of 55 ± 15.5 years and a mean weight of 75.4 ± 11.4 kg the trough concentrations of linezolid in plasma and CNS were
were included in the study. Two hours after the end of infusion between 0.54 -5.3 mg/L and 1.46-7 mg/L respectively. No
of 600 mg of linezolid the mean serum concentration was 6.83 study has ever evaluated the brain tissue concentrations.
± 3.32 mg/mL in Group 1 and 5.94 ± 1.55 in Group 2, while We have to take into consideration the limitation of the one
the concentrations from the CSF and brain were 5.06 ± 3.53 point design of the study. Clinical/bacteriological cure depends
mg/mL and 2.63 ± 0.78 mg /g, respectively. on the entire concentration-time curve.
There was no statistical difference between the concentra- There are some strains of S. aureus with an MIC of 2-4
tions in samples obtained from the CSF and brain (p = 0.06). mg/L and this could affect therapeutic failures when treating
CSF/serum and brain/serum concentrations of linezolid brain infections where the concentrations are only 2.63 ± 0.78
were 69.57% ± 22.13% and 44.66% ± 9.48%, respectively. mg/Kg.
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) of linezolid is <2 Our results demonstrate a good degree of penetration of
mg/L for staphylococci and enterococci and <1 mg/L for pneu- linezolid in the brain and excellent penetration of linezolid in
mococci. The concentrations of linezolid in serum, CSF and CSF. CSF/serum and brain/serum ratios were 69.57% and
brain and the MIC90s for the most relevant pathogens are shown 44.66% respectively.
in Figure 1. In conclusion, these data suggest that linezolid will be suc-
cessful in the treatment of Gram-positive infections of the cen-
tral nervous system, as demonstrated by the good brain and CSF
DISCUSSION
concentrations observed in our study.
Treatment of infections in the CNS is complicated due to
different permeability of various antibiotics across the blood-
brain barrier (BBB). The therapy for patients with brain abscess REFERENCES
can be further complicated due to limited penetration of antibi- Shinabarger DL, Marotti KR, Murray RW, Lin AH, Melchior EP,
1
otics into the abscess cavity. Antibiotics enter the CSF pre- Swaney SM et al. Mechanisms of actions of oxazolidinones: effects of line-
FIGURE 1 - Concentrations of
linezolid related to the MIC90s of
staphylococci, enterococci and
pneumococci.
LINEZOLID PENETRATION INTO CEREBROSPINAL FLUID AND BRAIN TISSUE 19
zolid and eperezolid on translation reactions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother comycin-resistant enterococcus meningitis with linezolid. Eur J Clin Micro-
1997;41: 2132–6. biol Infect Dis 2001;20:432-434.
2
Diekema DJ, Jones RN. Oxazolidinone antibiotics. Lancet 2001; 358: 10
Krueger WA, Kottler B, Will BE, Heininger A, Guggenberger H, Unertl
1975-1982. KE. Treatment of meningitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epi-
3
Rybak MJ, Hershberger E, Moldovan T, Grucz RG. In vitro activities of dermidis with linezolid. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42:929-932.
daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid and quinupristin–dalfopristin against 11
Shaikh ZH, Peloquin CA, Ericsson CD. Successful treatment of van-
staphylococci and enterococci, including vancomycin-intermediate and -re- comycin-resistant enterococcus faecium meningitis with linezolid: case re-
sistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44: 1062–6. port and literature review. Scand J Infect Dis 2001;33:375-379.
4
Villani P, Regazzi MB, Marubbi F, Viale P, Pagani L, Cristini F, et al. 12
Zeana C, Kubin CJ, Della-Latta P, Hammer SM. Vancomycin-resis-
Cerebrospinal fluid linezolid concentrations in postneurosurgical central nerv- tant enterococcus faecium meningitis successfully managed with linezolid:
ous system infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002;46:936-937. case report and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:477-482.
5
Viale P, Pagani L, Cristini F, Stefini R, Bergomi R, Colombini P, et al. 13
Lutsar I, Friedland IR. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of
Linezolid for the treatment of central nervous system infections in neuro- cephalosporins in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000;39: 335-
surgical patients. Scand J Infect Dis 2002;34:456-459. 343.
6
Lutsar I, McCracken Jr GH, Friedland IR. Antibiotic pharmacodynam- 14
Lorenzo AV, Spector R. The distribution of drugs in the central nerv-
ics in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:1117-1127. ous system. Adv Exp Med Biol 1976;69: 447-461.
7
Moise PA, Birmingham MC, Forrest A, Schentag JJ. Linezolid use in 15
Spector R, Lorenzo AV. Specificity of ascorbic acid transport system
patients who are intolerant to or fail vancomycin. In Proceedings of the For- of the central nervous system. Am J Physiol 1974;226: 1468-1473.
tieth Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 16
Lo WD, Wolny A, Boesel C. Blood-brain permeability in staphylococ-
Toronto, Canada, 16 September 2000. Abstract 2233, p. 487. American cal cerebritis and early brain abscess. J Neurosurg 1994;80: 897-905.
Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA. 17
Fenstermacher JD, Blasberg RG, Patlak CS. Methods for quantifying
8
Gill CJ, Murphy MA, Hamer DH. Treatment of Staphylococcus epi- the transport of drugs across brain barrier systems. Pharmacol Ther
dermidis ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infection with linezolid. J Infect 1981;14:217-148.
2002;45:129-132. 18
Draghi DC, Sheehan DJ, Hogan P, Sahm DF. In vitro activity of line-
9
Hachem R, Afif C, Gokaslan Z, Raad I. Successful treatment of van- zolid against key Gram-positive organisms isolated in the United States: Re-
sults of the LEADER 2004 Surveillance Program. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 2005; 49(12): 5024–5032.