Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook The Dynamical Projectors Method Hydro and Electrodynamics First Edition Leble Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook The Dynamical Projectors Method Hydro and Electrodynamics First Edition Leble Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/classical-electrodynamics-first-
edition-deraad/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-power-engineering-
part-a-advances-and-challenges-part-a-thermal-hydro-and-nuclear-
power-first-edition-badescu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-crisis-of-method-in-
contemporary-analytic-philosophy-first-edition-baz/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-first-course-in-the-finite-
element-method-si-edition-martin/
Exploratory Experiments Ampère Faraday and the Origins
of Electrodynamics 1st Edition Friedrich Steinle
https://textbookfull.com/product/exploratory-experiments-ampere-
faraday-and-the-origins-of-electrodynamics-1st-edition-friedrich-
steinle/
https://textbookfull.com/product/introduction-to-electrodynamics-
fourth-edition-david-j-griffiths/
https://textbookfull.com/product/being-freedom-and-method-themes-
from-the-philosophy-of-peter-van-inwagen-first-edition-keller/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-finite-difference-time-
domain-method-for-electromagnetics-first-edition-karl-s-kunz/
https://textbookfull.com/product/coulson-and-richardsons-
chemical-engineering-fourth-edition-volume-3a-chemical-and-
biochemical-reactors-and-reaction-engineering-r-ravi/
Dynamical Projectors Method in Hydro and
Electrodynamics
Dynamical Projectors Method in Hydro and
Electrodynamics
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, trans-
mitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter
invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval
system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access
www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC),
222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that pro-
vides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy
license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
1
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................xvii
Authors....................................................................................................................xix
ix
x Contents
Index...................................................................................................................... 275
List of Figures
5.1 (a) Evaluations in accordance with Eq. (5.14) for different B and
M = 0.2 before the formation of discontinuity in the wave profile.
kT4 (η)
(b) 2BT M2
in accordance to Eq. (5.16) for φ = exp(−η 2 ) (1) and
0
φ = −(1 + 2η 2 )−1 (2) .................................................................................... 93
5.2 Magnitude of acoustic pressure in a beam with initially planar front
equilibrium (Π < 0, Xs < 0) and non-equilibrium (Π > 0, Xs > 0)
stationary regimes ......................................................................................... 107
8.1 Relative error (in percent) of the expansion (8.72) at ω range [0.7, 0.9]
ω pe (a), and comparison of expressions for ca, (8.72)—solid line and
(8.71)—dotdotdash at ω range [0.6, 1.1] ω pe (b), ω pm = 1.1ω pe [19] ......... 193
8.2 (a) The solution (multiplied on f ) (8.105) as function of both
variables for p = 1GHz, q = 1.1p, I = 1GW /cm2 = 1013W /m2 , χ (3) =
10−20 m2 /V 2 [21], (b) velocity of propagation as function of amplitude
in logarithmic scale x = ln( f ) — lower line and for x = ln( 1f ) — upper
line, (c) the elliptic sinus modulus is plotted as the function of the same
variables ........................................................................................................ 201
8.3 The variables a — solid, b — dotdotdash as function of η. (a) the
case 1., (b) the case 2 .................................................................................... 219
xv
Preface
Generally, the way to a somewhat explicit formula that describes the evolution of
disturbances in a medium implies a number of crucial simplifications. Such names
of this procedure are “derivation” or “heuristic arguments.” The results often are
very impressive and begin to live their own history. A reader can find celebrated
examples in the frames of the linearized statements of problems in every textbook
on mathematical physics. Among them, we may list the D’Alambert (wave, string)
equation, Laplace-Poisson, and heat (diffusion) equations. Derivation of these equa-
tions is also a necessary element of the textbooks. Performing the procedure, one may
neglect some terms but very rarely meets attempts of their mathematical approval.
Recently, a boom in mathematical physics was observed in respect with similar
standard “minimal” nonlinear equations such as the so-called integrable ones. The
list of them includes a lot of entries and still grows. We would mention the most
known of them: there are Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) and nonlinear Schrodinger equa-
tions (NLSE), which describe the dynamics of one-dimensional wave packets in the
long wavelength domain (KdV case) and in a small vicinity of a (carrier) frequency
(NLSE case). In a sense, these equations are universal in small amplitude and dis-
persion realm. Considering the form of these equations, one understands that their
one-component and one-dimensional cases require a lot of explanation to embed the
resulting solutions in a general statement of problem, which is based on the original
multicomponent and multidimensional description. Special accent is made in respect
to a perturbation by nonlinearity in the context of the expansion of evolution operator
in a series with respect to powers of the small magnitude parameter.
Both KdV and NLS equations contain only the first derivative in time, which
imposes the only direction of a wave’s propagation. This principally differs from
the previously mentioned D’Alembert equation. It is clear that considering an initial
stage of evolution of 1D small magnitude perturbation, we observe general propaga-
tion in both directions. This directly points out the complex content of the potential
development of general initial perturbations. Some kind of superposition should be
taken into account in mathematical description. The phenomenon is well studied in
the theory of 1D string evolution, but it needs some efforts to translate the apparatus
to the multicomponent field. In this book, we suggest a systematic realization of such
a program, which makes visible all ingredients and stages of the implementation of
the “minimal” equations into the general statements of problems in hydrodynamics
and electrodynamics. We consider mainly two kinds of the problems: initial (Cauchy)
and boundary regime problems.
A method of separating disturbances in a medium into specific components is
developed. A hydrodynamic system is locally split into coupled nonlinear equations
of interacting modes. Linearization provides independent modes with an individual
evolution. The corresponding projector operators allow us to formulate initial-value
problems for each mode and to introduce physical basis in order to follow interacting
xvii
xviii Preface
xix
xx Authors
Poland. Since 2011, she has served as a professor in the Department of Technical
Physics and Applied Mathematics at the Gdansk University of Technology in Poland
and is the author of approximately 90 publications in the field of nonlinear hydrody-
namics and acoustics.
1 Introduction
This book discusses the results published in papers devoted to the technique of
derivation of model evolution equations in terms of fundamental systems such as
hydrodynamics and electrodynamics. It also naturally includes initial or boundary
conditions that fix a type of a medium perturbation. Such universal approach is absent
in monograph or textbook literature. The contents of the book provide readers with
a practical tool that allows them to divide a space of solutions into subspaces with
specific behavior marked by such terms as direction of wave propagation, frequency
range, and, that is important to stress, characteristics of a medium. The characteris-
tics are expressed in terms of standard parameters of a matter, such as permeability
in case of electrodynamics or dissipation terms (equilibrium state and attenuation) in
hydrodynamics.
One such way is the introduction of a combinations of field variables, named
as modes, which correspond to their specific behavior. The simplest example that
appears already in one-dimensional (1D), or planar, dynamics may be described as
unidirectional waves; that is, waves with a fixed direction of propagation. In the case
of celebrated wave equation (the string equation in 1D) we have the d’Alembert
formula that gives the general solution of the initial (Cauchy) problem, with the
natural inclusion of the directed waves. A choice of initial condition that corresponds
to a wave, propagating, say, rightwards, is readily realized very easily with the help
of a technique discussed in this book, namely the dynamic projecting. This technique
splits the initial or boundary conditions space to the modal subspaces of the directed
waves. Readings of dispersion and/or dissipation (terms with higher derivatives) are
automatically taken into account within the algorithmic formalism, described already
in the example of introduction and with general detalization in Chapter 2. Account of
nonlinearity leads to interaction of the modes that are also automatically specified.
The simple case of nonlinearly directed wave leads to the celebrated Korteweg-de
Vries and nonlinear Schrödinger equations.
The general technique is universal, the steps are quite similar in both huge fields
of possible applications, in hydro- and electrodynamics. A transition to two- and
three-dimensional (3D) problems complicates calculations, but lies in the same road,
and may be either realized mechanically or one can effectively include the symbolic
computation programs because all the steps are written analytically. A good chance
to demonstrate a power of projecting the method relates to a case of atmosphere-
ocean waves physics, whose exponential equilibrium stratification admits, however,
a transition to equations with constant coefficients and separate directed acoustic and
internal waves.
An account of combined dissipation and nonlinearity in 3D hydrodynamics leads
to effective description of such important phenomena as heating and streaming. It is
a direct excitation of so-called entropy and rotation modes (non-wave or near-zero
frequency ranges). The application of the dynamic projecting technique allows to
use both periodic and nonperiodic acoustic sources for control of such processes.
1
2 Dynamical Projectors Method in Hydro and Electrodynamics
The impulse excitation is also included! Cumulatively, the combined dispersion and
nonlinearity allows to effectively describe electromagnetic pulses up to very short
ones (video) on the basis of generalization of Shafer-Wayne equations that includes
counter-propagating waves with a polarization account.
Among others, there are problems that appear secondary, but, in our opinion, they
are of great importance. We mean diagnostics problems. The question that naturally
arises in physics, geophysics and other applied sciences, sounds: How to recognize a
wave (or non-wave perturbation) in an overall field? The application of the projecting
technique provides the answer for high-quality requirements, because the set of the
projectors is complete, and each of them is strictly attached to a specific perturbation
under consideration.
One more task that is very “hot” in applied modeling of the abundant problems
of hydro- and electrodynamics is building numerical codes. The division of the com-
ponents of the field with different scales and directions of propagation would be
very effective. Especially, it relates to the nonlinear problems in which interaction
of modes “spoils” the linear picture, and one needs effective tool for “cleaning” of
perturbations when a program simulates time or space evolution. The dynamic pro-
jecting technique may be effectively used in such applications.
A numerical evaluation of basic physical parameters is an effective tool to
present the results of a modeling in the form of tables or plots. Such a representation
of results is a necessaary ingredient of theoretical physics [1] and can be effectively
applied in various scales from nuclear to universe ones. In many cases, there are
difficulties of such direct modeling if scales of different orders contribute to the phe-
nomenon under simulation. In such situations, it is effective to separate the descrip-
tion into parts with different characteristic scales. Mathematically, we split a space
of solution into corresponding subspaces in order to follow the following underlying
calculations [2,3,5]. The division of the solution space can be realized by means of
projecting operators, which correspond to the eigenvectors of the evolution operator
of the problem under consideration [2]. Such a procedure leads generally to pseudo-
differential operators as elements of the matrix evolution operator. Further, essential
simplifications may be the corresponding we restrict ourselves by some frequency
or wavelength range, expanding the kernel of projecting operators in the vicinity
of the given frequency carrier. This restriction allows us to cut the series of corre-
sponding pseudo-differential operators at some level, restricting the matrix elements
by polynomials of some operator, including derivatives. Otherwise, in more com-
plicated conditions, e.g. for the so-called short, or ultrashort, pulses, we use some
wide-range approximation of the kernel. In wave theory, such a procedure is known
as an approximation of dispersion relation, valid in some frequency domain. In non-
linear models, we obtain a definition of modes that may interact during evolution.
This allows us to follow the wave perturbations and identify the modes content as
well as the concomitant non-wave perturbations. From a mathematical point of view,
we apply either a Freshet expansion of the evolution operator or some model approx-
imation of the operator.
So, from a modeling perspective, we suggest a combined analytic—numerical
scheme of integration of a multicomponent system of partial differential equations
Introduction 3
with two kinds of initial-boundary conditions. The problem may concern an ini-
tial (Cauchy) boundary condition of boundary regime problems (for an introduction
see [6]).
Briefly, the idea of this approach may be described by the simplest example, as
follows. Consider an evolution problem as the system of two equations with constant
coefficients:
∂ u(x,t) ∂ u(x,t) ∂ v(x,t)
−a −b = 0, (1.1)
∂t ∂x ∂x
∂ v(x,t) ∂ u(x,t) ∂ v(x,t)
−c −d = 0, (1.2)
∂t ∂x ∂x
A compact form of (1.1) and (1.2) is
ψt = Lψ, (1.3)
with matrices
u a∂x b∂x
ψ= and L = , (1.4)
v c∂x d∂x
introduces the evolution operator L and a state ψ of a system. The Fourier transfor-
mation in x
Z∞ Z∞
1 ikx 1
u(x) = √ ũ(k)e dk, v(x) = √ ṽ(k)eikx dk, (1.5)
2π 2π
−∞ −∞
may be written as
ψ = F ψ̃. (1.6)
In compact notation of derivatives by index, it yields the system of ordinary differ-
ential equations
ψ̃t = F −1 LF ψ̃ = L̃ψ̃, (1.7)
where the k-representation of the evolution operator takes the form
a b
L̃ = ik . (1.8)
c d
L̃Φ = ΦΛ (1.10)
with diagonal matrix Λ = diag{λ1 , λ2 }. We normalize the eigenvectors such that their
first components are units. It is easy to check that if λ1 6= λ2 , the inverse matrix exists
and
Φ−1 L̃ = ΛΦ−1 . (1.11)
4 Dynamical Projectors Method in Hydro and Electrodynamics
Let us establish a matrix P̃i so that P̃i Φ = Φi are eigenvectors of the evolution matrix
in Eq. (1.7). Moreover, the standard properties of orthogonal projecting operators
where I is the unit operator, are implied. By means of (1.11), one can prove that the
P̃i are expressed as the direct matrix product
where Φi is the ith column and (Φ−1 )i is the ith row of the matrix of solutions Φ
(1.10) [8] and the identity
L̃P̃i = P̃i L̃ (1.14)
holds. Explicit form of the eigenmatrix Φ in the mentioned normalization is given by
1 1
Φ= . (1.15)
φ1 φ2
λi − a
φi = , (1.16)
b
ik √
λ1,2 = [a + d ± ∆] (1.17)
2
if ∆ = (a−d)2 +4bc > 0, the eigenvalues λii are real and the equations are hyperbolic,
which corresponds to the wave propagation. It is the elliptic case, if ∆ < 0, whereas
the parabolic one, if ∆ = 0, requires individual consideration (see Section 2.1.3). The
idempotents in k-representation take the form
1 1
P̃1 = ⊗ −φ2 1 (1.18)
φ1 − φ2 φ 1
and
1 1
P̃2 = ⊗ φ1 −1 . (1.19)
φ1 − φ2 φ2
Similarly, evaluating the direct product and plugging (1.16) yields
√ ! √ !
a−d+ ∆ d−a+ ∆
1 b√ 1 − b√
P̃1 = √ 2
d−a+ ∆
, P̃2 = √ 2
a−d+ ∆
. (1.20)
∆ c 2 ∆ −c 2
F L̃F −1 = L, (1.21)
Introduction 5
F P̃i F −1 ≡ Pi (1.22)
and also commute:
F L̃F −1 F P̃i F −1 = F P̃i F −1 F L̃F −1 . (1.23)
In this “happy case” the projecting operators in k-representation are constant matri-
ces that do not depend on k. Hence, their x-representations coincide with these
established ones (1.20). Projecting the evolution Eq. (1.7) gives two independent
equations, which in fact are the first lines of
obtained by simple application from the left; the commutation (1.23) is taken into
account. We make use of the direct calculations:
√ !
1 a−d+ ∆
b√ u
P1 ψ = √ 2 =
∆ c d−a+ ∆ v
2
1 1 1
√ !
1 bv + u 2 a − 2 d + 2 ∆ Π
√ √ = 2cΠ√ , (1.25)
∆ cu + v 12 d − 12 a + 21 ∆ a−d+ ∆
√ !
d−a+ ∆
1 − b u
P2 ψ = √ 2 √ (1.26)
∆ −c a−d+ ∆ v
2
1 1 1
√
1 u 2 d − 2 a + 2 ∆ − bv
Λ√
=√ √ = .
∆ v 12 a − 12 d + 21 ∆ − cu − a−d+
2b
∆
Λ
u = Π + Λ,
1
√ 1
√ (1.28)
v = − 2b a − d + ∆ Λ + 2b d − a + ∆ Π,
The original system splits into the system of independent equations by means of
(1.24). √
Πt = 12 a + d + ∆ Πx ,
√ (1.29)
Λt = 21 a + d − ∆ Λx
6 Dynamical Projectors Method in Hydro and Electrodynamics
= Π + Λ,
u p
(1.36)
v = − bc (Λ − Π) ,
are real. They are convenient in the boundary problem of Laplace/Poisson equation
at half-plane solution.
The specific parabolic case (∆ = 0) corresponds to the unique eigenvalue
ik
λ= (a + d), (1.37)
2
Introduction 7
λs
which
also as ik − as = bφ1 . Plugging in the eigenvalue yields φ1 =
reads
s λ 1 a−d 1 a−d
b ik − a = − 2 s b or, for s = 1, φ1 = − 2 b .
We establish the second projecting matrix by use of the orthogonal to φ1 vector
φ2 , that is,
1
1 φ2 = 0. (1.39)
φ1
This gives
1
φ2 = − .
φ1
Using the basic formulas for the projectors (2.142) and (1.19), one arrives finally at
!
1 2
1 1 a−d b
4 a−d −2b
P1 = φ1 = 2 ,
φ1 + φ11 1 φ1 a − 2ad + 4b2 + d 2 −2b a−d
!
φ1 −1 a−d
1 a−d 2b
P2 = = 2 2 .
φ1 + φ11 −1 φ11 a − 2ad + 4b2 + d 2 2b b
4 a−d
4b2 −2ab
1
P1 = ,
a2 + 4b2 −2ab a2
av − 2bu
π = −2b .
a2 + 4b2
4b2 u − 2abv
a b 1
LP1 ψ = ∂ .
c 0 a + 4b2
2 a2 v − 2abu
8 Dynamical Projectors Method in Hydro and Electrodynamics
a∂ λ + 2a b2 ∂ λ
a b λ
LP2 ψ = ∂ 2b =
c 0 a λ c∂ λ
gives, finally,
2 a2 + 2b2
λt = a∂ λ + b2 ∂ λ = ∂λ.
a a
To compare the results with the conventional analysis of the system (1.1) and (1.2),
we rewrite it in the following manner:
ut = aux + bvx ,
vt = cux + dvx .
Multiplying the second equation by λ and taking a sum of equations, we obtain
(b + λ d)
− (a + λ c) = − ,
λ
yields
b − aλ + dλ − cλ 2 = 0.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
1154. Shimnu seems to be the Buddhist word for “devil.” Cf.
Neander, Ch. Hist. vol. II. p. 181. Prof. von Le Coq (J.R.A.S.
1911, p. 300) says it is of Soghdian origin. Chavannes et
Pelliot, op. cit. 1ère ptie, p. 523, n. 3, seek to show that it is the
equivalent of Ahriman.
1155. On this word see p. 323 supra; cf. Chavannes et Pelliot, op.
cit. 1ère ptie, p. 542, n. 2, which seems to summarize all that
there is to be said about it, and p. 342 infra.
1157. This was the name of the owner, which was Raimast Parzind
in the Tun-huang text of Sir Marc Stein.
1161. The words “of the Messenger” [God] are not in Prof. von Le
Coq’s version.
1162. Cf. Chavannes et Pelliot, op. cit. 1ère ptie, pp. 503, n. 1. On
this being mentioned in a paper in the J.R.A.S. 1913, Dr F.
Denison Ross said that he thought the date should be put 300
years later, J. cit. p. 81. He has since withdrawn this (J.R.A.S.
1913, pp. 434-436).
1165. Ormuzd, “the whole circuit of the sky,” although he calls him,
more Graecorum, Zeus, “the sun and moon, the earth, fire,
water and the winds,” were “the only gods whose worship had
come down to the Persians from ancient times” in the days of
Herodotus. Cf. Herodotus, Bk I. c. 131.
1170. The Past, Present and Future, called the “Three Moments” in
the Tun-huang treatise. See Chavannes et Pelliot, op. cit. 11me
ptie, pp. 114, 116.
1177. The word vusanti does not seem to be explained by Prof. von
Le Coq. Has it any connection with the Sanskrit vasanta
“spring”? In that case, the 50 days fast may have been
continuous like the Christian Lent and the Mahommedan
Ramadan. But it seems more likely that it refers to the weekly
fast on Sunday which, the Fihrist notwithstanding, seems to
have been incumbent on all the Manichaeans, Elect and
Hearers alike. So Chavannes et Pelliot, op. cit. 2me ptie, p.
111, n. 2. See n. 4, p. 349 infra.
1178. Prof. von Le Coq says (J.R.A.S. 1911, p. 307) that this word is
as yet unexplained and may belong to another language than
Turkish. One is almost tempted to see in it a corruption of the
Yom Kippur or Day of Atonement of the Jews. Judaism is the
last religion from which the Manichaeans would have
consciously borrowed; but the Jews have always taken their
goods where they found them, and it may well be that both
Jews and Manichaeans were here drawing from a common
source.
1182. So Baur, op. cit. This was doubtless true in the West and in
lands where they were exposed to severe persecution.
1183. This explains its translation from its original Pahlavi into the
language of the converts and each copy bearing the name of
the owner.
1184. See Cumont, Cosmog. Manich. p. 56, for authorities. Cf. also
de Stoop, op. cit. p. 22. As has been many times said above,
every religion and sect at the time accused the others of these
filthy practices, without our being able to discern any proof of
the justice of the accusation in one case more than in another.
In any case, St Augustine, here the chief authority, could not
have known of it at first hand, as he had never been more
than a Hearer, and he himself says (contra Fortunatum, Bk I.
App.) that while he had heard that the Elect celebrated the
Eucharist, he knew nothing of the mode of celebration. Cf.
Neander, Ch. Hist. II. p. 193.
1202.
Nowhere is this curious theory, which forms the base of most
Mediaeval Cabala and magic, more clearly stated. Thus the
Tun-huang treatise says in describing the fashioning of the
body of man by the devils (as in the Μέρος τευχῶν Σωτῆρος),
“there is not a single formation of the universe (or cosmos)
which they did not imitate in the carnal body” (Chavannes et
Pelliot, op. cit. 1ère ptie, p. 527); and in the next page “The
demon ... shut up the five natures of Light in the carnal body
of which he made a little universe (microcosm).”
ère
1203.
Chavannes et Pelliot, op. cit. 1 ptie, p. 514.
1204.
Op. cit. pp. 528, 529.
1205.
Their Chinese names are discussed by MM. Chavannes and
Pelliot (op. cit. 1ère ptie, pp. 521, n. 1, 542, n. 1, 543, nn. 1, 2,
and 544, n. 1), wherein are gathered nearly all that can be
said about them. The learned commentators decide that their
functions still remain mysterious. But see next note infra.
1206.
W. Radloff, Chuastuanift, das Bussgebet der Manichäer, St
Petersburg, 1909, pt I. pp. 19, 20. Von Le Coq, J.R.A.S. 1911,
p. 294: “when the Gods Kroshtag and Padwakhtag, the
Appellant and Respondent, should have brought to us that
part of the light of the Fivefold God that, going to God, is there
to be purified.” One is inclined to compare this with Jeû and
Melchizidek receiving and purifying the light won from this
world, or with Gabriel and Michael in the Pistis Sophia bearing
the heroine upward out of Chaos; but the parallel may be
accidental and is easily pushed too far.
1207.
Like the “Twin Saviours” of the Pistis Sophia, whose functions
are never even alluded to in that document.
1208.
See notes 2 and 3, p. 327 supra.
1209.
M. de Stoop’s Essai sur la Diffusion du Manichéisme is most
informing on this head. See also A. Dufourcq’s Thesis quoted
in n. 2, p. 351 supra. A very brief summary of the history of
the sect was given by the present writer in J.R.A.S. 1913, pp.
69-94.
1210.
For the enquiry by Strategius, afterwards called Musonianus,
and Prefect of the East under Constantius, see Ammianus
Marcellinus, Bk XV. c. 13. Cf. Neander, Ch. Hist. IV. 488 sqq.
That the persecution instituted against them by Diocletian
slackened under Constantine and Constantius, see de Stoop,
op. cit. pp. 40, 41.
1212.
Gibbon, Decline and Fall, III. p. 153. Justinian put to death not
only convicted Manichaeans, but those who being acquainted
with members of the sect, did not denounce them. See de
Stoop, op. cit. p. 43.
1213.
The Manichaeans seem always to have been favoured by the
better classes and high officials of the Empire who maintained
for some time a secret leaning towards Paganism. See de
Stoop, op. cit. p. 84. The case of Barsymès, the banker or
money-changer whom Theodora made Praetorian Prefect,
and who was allowed according to Procopius (Anecdota, c.
XXII. 7) to profess Manichaeism openly, was doubtless only
one of many. It is apparently this Barsymès who is invoked in
the Turfan texts as “the Lord Bar Simus,” see Müller,
Handschriften-Reste, pp. 45, 59.
1214.
That this was the professed policy of the sect seems plain
from the words they attributed to Manes himself: “I am not
inhuman like Christ who said: Whoso denieth me, him will I
deny. I say unto you: Whoso denieth me before man and
saves himself by this falsehood, him will I receive with joy, as
if he had not denied me.” Cf. de Stoop, op. cit. p. 46, quoting
Cedrenus; Al Bîrûnî, Chronology, p. 191.
1215.
Von Le Coq, Exploration Archéologique à Tourfan, Confces
au Musée Guimet (Bibl. de Vulg. t. XXXV.), 1910, p. 278.
1216.
de Stoop, op. cit. pp. 86, 144.
1217.
Neander, Ch. Hist. III. pp. 34, 35.
1218.
Op. cit. III. p. 46.
1219.
Sozomen, Hist. Eccl. Bk V. c. 5, for instances. Cf. Neander,
op. cit. III. pp. 66, 67.
1220.
Neander, op. cit. III. p. 96.
1221.
Op. cit. III. p. 100.
1222.
S. Dill, Roman Society in the Last Century of the Western
Empire, pp. 143-166.
1223.
Eusebius, Vita Constantini, Bk III. cc. 64, 65.
1224.
Op. cit. c. 66.
Transcriber’s Notes:
Footnotes have been collected at the end of the text, and are
linked for ease of reference.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK
FORERUNNERS AND RIVALS OF CHRISTIANITY : BEING
STUDIES IN RELIGIOUS HISTORY FROM 330 B.C. TO 330 A.D.,
VOL. 2 (OF 2) ***
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.