Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Simulating Enzyme Reactivity Computational Methods in Enzyme Catalysis Inaki Tunon Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Simulating Enzyme Reactivity Computational Methods in Enzyme Catalysis Inaki Tunon Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Simulating Enzyme Reactivity Computational Methods in Enzyme Catalysis Inaki Tunon Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/biomass-biofuels-biochemicals-
advances-in-enzyme-catalysis-and-technologies-1st-edition-sudhir-
p-singh-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-approaches-for-
studying-enzyme-mechanism-part-a-1st-edition-gregory-a-voth-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microbial-enzyme-technology-in-
food-applications-1st-edition-ray/
https://textbookfull.com/product/industrial-enzyme-
applications-1st-edition-andreas-vogel/
Computational Approaches for Studying Enzyme Mechanism
Part B, Volume 578 1st Edition Gregory Voth (Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-approaches-for-
studying-enzyme-mechanism-part-b-volume-578-1st-edition-gregory-
voth-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematics-for-enzyme-reaction-
kinetics-and-reactor-performance-2-volume-set-enzyme-reaction-
engineering-1st-edition-f-xavier-malcata/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microbial-fermentation-and-
enzyme-technology-1st-edition-hrudayanath-thatoi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/ligand-design-in-metal-
chemistry-reactivity-and-catalysis-1st-edition-mark-stradiotto/
https://textbookfull.com/product/zinc-enzyme-inhibitors-enzymes-
from-microorganisms-1st-edition-claudiu-t-supuran/
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP001
Editor-in-Chief:
Professor Jonathan Hirst, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP001
Edited by
Iñaki Tuñón
Universitat de València, València, Spain
Email: ignacio.tunon@uv.es
Vicent Moliner
Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
Email: moliner@uji.es
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP001 View Online
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research for non-commercial purposes or for
private study, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents
Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003, this publication may not
be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior
permission in writing of The Royal Society of Chemistry or the copyright owner, or in the
case of reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright
Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by
the appropriate Reproduction Rights Organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning
reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to The Royal Society of
Chemistry at the address printed on this page.
The RSC is not responsible for individual opinions expressed in this work.
The authors have sought to locate owners of all reproduced material not in their own
possession and trust that no copyrights have been inadvertently infringed.
Printed in the United Kingdom by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY, UK
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP005
Preface
To act on a bad idea is better than not to act at all. Because the worth of
the idea never becomes apparent until you do it. (Nick Cave, 20,000 Days
on Earth)
v
View Online
vi Preface
Preface vii
viii Preface
biological catalysts that are not formed by a protein structure but by RNA.
The large charge associated with these molecules and the presence of
counterions introduces additional peculiarities that are analysed in this
chapter. Damien Laage and coworkers focus in their contribution on an
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP005
important aspect of enzymatic catalysis: the role of the solvent and the
possibility of exploiting changes in its composition to acquire new catalytic
functions in enzymes. The authors show that simulations do not support the
simplistic and popular view of the solvent acting as a lubricant of protein
motions. The next chapter, by M. Alfonso Prieto and Carme Rovira, is de-
voted to a special class of enzymes whose study requires specific methodo-
logical treatments: metalloenzymes, enzymes that catalyse chemical
transformations making use of a metal centre present in the active site. The
authors show how density functional theory-based simulations are able to
unravel the molecular details in several relevant metalloenzymes. The final
chapter in this section tries to complete the circle: if we have been able to
understand and rationalise enzymatic reactivity using the tools provided by
theoretical and computational chemistry, it might be possible to use all this
knowledge and procedures to design new biological catalysts with new
functions. In their chapter Agustı́ Lledós, Jean-Didier Maréchal and
coworkers discuss this new and exciting research area at the frontier
between organic and inorganic chemistry, protein engineering and struc-
tural biology that challenges molecular intuitions and where molecular
modelling is a fundamental tool. The chapter analyses pros and cons of
current strategies, reviewing the work carried out to date.
Advances in simulating enzyme reactivity are key not only to a better
understanding of these complex biological machines but for their appli-
cation in, for instance, the development of new drugs or new environ-
mentally-friendly catalysts. In this regard, the combination of experimental
techniques and computer simulations pave the way to a quicker and deeper
understanding of their mode of action. The more we learn about the
foundations of processes governing chemical processes in living organisms,
including our bodies and cells, the better position we will be in to control
them, with corresponding benefits in fields such as biomedicine, bio-
technology, pharmacy, etc. Thus, one could say that the developments and
advances in computer simulations are closely linked to the improvements in
quality of life on our planet. We hope that this book will provide a reference
for those researchers that want to dive into this amazing field.
Vicent Moliner
Universitat Jaume I, Spain
Iñaki Tuñón
Universitat de València, Spain
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP009
Acknowledgements
The editors thank the authors for their contributions, and the editorial
staff of the Royal Society of Chemistry for their continuous and excellent
cooperation. All the experience gained in the years of research but also in
teaching to under- and postgraduate students has been used to edit this
book. In this regard, we want to thank our coworkers, our students and our
teachers.
ix
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP009 View Online
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP011
Contents
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Defining and Calculating the Catalytic Effect 2
1.2.1 Using a Logical and Useful Definition 2
1.2.2 Evaluating Reliable Activation Free Energies
by Computational Approaches 4
1.2.3 Electrostatic Transition State Stabilisation
(TSS) 5
1.3 What was Found by Reliable Computational
Studies? 6
1.3.1 General Findings 6
1.3.2 Quantifying the Source of Electrostatic
Contributions to Catalysis 8
1.4 What are the Problems with Other Proposals? 12
1.4.1 Ground-state Destabilisation by Steric Strain
Does Not Provide a Large Catalytic Effect 12
1.4.2 Dynamical Effects Do Not Contribute
Significantly to Enzyme Catalysis 13
1.4.3 Correlated Modes Clearly Exist in Proteins,
but They Also Exist in Solution 17
1.4.4 Problems with the Generalised Compression
Idea 18
1.4.5 RSD by Desolvation Effects Does Not Provide
Large Catalytic Effects 19
xi
View Online
xii Contents
Section I: Theory
2.1 Introduction 33
2.2 The Elements of Enzyme Kinetics, in Particular Rate
Constants 34
2.2.1 Rate Constants Experimentally Determined 34
2.2.2 Comparison of Experimental Rate Constants
with Theoretically Computed Values 36
2.2.3 A Note on Other Approaches 38
2.3 Typical Components of a Simulation Study of
Enzyme Catalysis 38
2.3.1 Structural and Other Background 38
2.3.2 Selection of QM and MM Regions and Methods 39
2.3.3 The Border of the QM Region and its
Embedding in the MM Region 39
2.3.4 Establishing the Potential-energy Surface 41
2.3.5 Establishing the Reaction Path or Swath 42
2.3.6 Development of a Free-energy Surface 42
2.3.7 Calculation of Rate Constants 42
2.4 Analytical Expressions for Rate Constants 44
2.4.1 The Stable States Picture 44
2.4.2 Variational Transition-state Theory 46
2.4.3 Hammes-Schiffer et al. and Klinman et al. 47
2.5 An Instructive Example: Rate Constants from the
Multiconfigurational Molecular Mechanics
Approach QM/MM–MCMM 47
2.5.1 Elements of the QM/MM–MCMM Approach 48
2.5.2 The Empirical Valence-bond Technique for
the QM Region 49
View Online
Contents xiii
3.1 Introduction 54
3.2 TST and Allied Theories for Enzyme Reactions 55
3.2.1 Assumptions and Structure of TST 55
3.2.2 TS Surface Recrossing Corrections to TST 58
3.3 Classical Enzyme Reactions 60
3.3.1 TST Analysis of an Enzymatic Inverse
Menshutkin Reaction: Catechol
O-methyltransferase 60
3.3.2 Analysis of Haloalkane Dehalogenase.
A Conventional SN2 Reaction 65
3.3.3 Beyond the FE Limit: The Michael Addition
Catalysed by Chalcone Isomerase 74
3.4 Enzyme Reactions Involving Quantum Nuclear
Motion 76
3.4.1 A Two-dimensional Perspective 77
3.4.2 Adiabatic PT 77
3.4.3 Non-adiabatic PT 79
3.4.4 Examples of Enzyme Reactions Involving
Quantum Nuclear Motion 80
3.5 Concluding Remarks 84
Acknowledgements 85
References 85
4.1 Introduction 89
View Online
xiv Contents
4.2 Vanilla MT 92
4.3 Relation Between Microscopic and Macroscopic
Concepts and Molecular Simulation 98
4.3.1 Microscopic Derivation of the Marcus
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-FP011
Contents xv
xvi Contents
Contents xvii
xviii Contents
Contents xix
xx Contents
References 450
Contents xxi
CHAPTER 1
Perspective on Computer
Modelling of Enzymatic
Reactions
ARIEH WARSHEL* AND RAM PRASAD BORA
1.1 Introduction
Understanding how enzymes work has both fundamental and practical
importance, as these remarkable molecules play a key role in controlling and
performing most life processes.1,2 In many respects the most crucial issue is
understanding the origin of the enormous catalytic power of enzymes.
Although some aspects of this puzzle were elucidated by biochemical and
structural studies, the source of the catalytic power of enzymes is still con-
troversial (e.g. see references in Warshel,1 Fersht2 and Warshel et al.3). The
current discussion is sometimes reduced to statements such as, ‘‘the enzyme
binds the transition state more strongly than the ground state’’, without
providing any clear idea as to how such extra stabilisation can be provided.
The search for the origin of enzyme catalysis is frequently guided poorly
by overlooking the crucial need to select a proper reference state. This
issue has been carefully addressed in ref. 3, which defines a reference stat
where we have the reaction in a water cage as in the enzyme active site. This
unique ‘chemistry-filtered’ reference selection3 allows one to focus on the
key issues in enzyme catalysis in a well-defined way, asking what is the real
1
View Online
2 Chapter 1
difference in the environment (and its interaction with the reacting sub-
strate) that makes such an enormous difference.
One of the points that we have tried to emphasise is our view that enzyme
catalysis is too complex to be resolved experimentally without the use of
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-00001
Figure 1.1 A schematic description of the free energy profile for an enzymatic
reaction and for the corresponding solution reaction. Figure 1.1(A)
describes the free energy Dg zp and Dg zcat associated respectively with kcat/KM
and kcat. Figure 1.1(B) describes the energetics of a reference solution
reaction.
Reprinted with permission from A. Warshel, P. K. Sharma, M. Kato,
Y. Xiang, H. Liu and M. H. Olsson, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3210–3235.3
Copyright (2006) American Chemical Society.
4 Chapter 1
Computational Approaches
Attempts to explore the origin of the catalytic power of enzymes should be
based on quantitative methods for calculating the rate constant for reactions
starting from the structure of the given enzymes. Obviously the key point in
such calculations is the validity of the calculated activation free energies.9
The general QM/MM strategy provides a generic way of obtaining potential
surfaces and, in principle, activation free energies of chemical processes
in enzymes. This approach5 has gained popularity in recent years and has
been used in a variety of forms (for reviews see Kamerlin et al.10). However,
implementation of rigorous, ab initio QM/MM approaches in quantitative
calculations of activation free energies is still extremely challenging.
Nevertheless, significant progress has started to be made in recent
works.7,8,11–17 Furthermore, semi-empirical QM/MM studies with reasonable
PMF calculations, and in some cases even with least energy paths, can be
used to assess the validity of some catalytic proposals.18–20
Despite the future promise of well sampled ab initio QM/MM evaluations
of activation barriers, we prefer to focus here on the empirical valence
bond (EVB) method,1,21,22 because even at this stage it provides what is
probably the most effective available way for quantifying the catalytic effect
and determining its origin. The EVB method is a QM/MM approach, which
describes the system with two or more resonance states (or more precisely,
diabatic states) corresponding to classical valence-bond structures (which
are basically described as empirical force fields). These diabatic states are
allowed to interact with the surroundings through their electrostatic charge
distribution and then mixed in an effective Hamiltonian using the same
mixing terms (off-diagonal terms) in solution, in the gas phase and in so-
lution (an assumption that has gained major support from our constrained
density functional theory calculations (CDFT)).23
The free energy surfaces are described as a function of the diabatic
energy gap that is taken as the generalised free energy surface where the
overall free energy barrier is obtained by a specialised free energy per-
turbation umbrella sampling approach (FEP/US).24 This approach allows
us to sample the EVB energy surface in an effective way by molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations. Now, because trajectories on the reactant
surface will reach the TS only rarely, it is usually necessary to run trajectories
on a series of potential surfaces (‘mapping’ potentials) that drive the system
adiabatically from the reactant to the product state.24 In the simple case of
two diabatic states the mapping potential (em) can be written as a linear
combination of the reactant and product potentials and the FEP/US provides
a way to obtain the ‘PMF’ (or the free energy functional) along the energy gap
coordinate.
View Online
The FEP/US approach can also be used to obtain the free energy functional
of the individual diabatic states for the reactant and product states (the
free energy functional) represent microscopic equivalents of the Marcus
parabolas in electron-transfer theory.25 The intersection of this free energy
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-00001
6 Chapter 1
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-00001
Figure 1.2 The activation free energies of representative enzymatic reactions (Dg zcat)
and the corresponding reference solution reaction for the same mech-
anism as the enzymatic reaction (Dg zp,w) and the actual mechanism in
water (Dg zw,w). The notation of the different enzymatic reactions is
defined in ref. 3.
Reprinted with permission from A. Warshel, P. K. Sharma, M. Kato,
Y. Xiang, H. Liu and M. H. Olsson, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3210–3235.3
Copyright (2006) American Chemical Society.
of the enzyme active site, it has been very hard to reach unique experimental
conclusions about the overall electrostatic effect. Furthermore, even in
the seemingly unique case in which a mutation of an ionised group to a
non-polar group leads to a large reduction in kcat, it has been very hard to
Published on 16 November 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626831-00001