Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF The Farm Bill A Citizen S Guide Daniel Imhoff Ebook Full Chapter
PDF The Farm Bill A Citizen S Guide Daniel Imhoff Ebook Full Chapter
Imhoff
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-farm-bill-a-citizen-s-guide-daniel-imhoff/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/nuclear-facilities-a-designer-s-
guide-1st-edition-bill-collum/
https://textbookfull.com/product/hiking-new-mexico-s-gila-
wilderness-a-guide-to-the-area-s-greatest-hiking-adventures-2nd-
edition-bill-cunningham/
https://textbookfull.com/product/farm-the-city-a-toolkit-for-
setting-up-a-successful-urban-farm-michael-ableman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-farmer-s-son-calving-season-
on-a-family-farm-first-us-edition-connell/
Monster Girl Farm A Farm LitRPG Story 1st Edition
Archer Simon
https://textbookfull.com/product/monster-girl-farm-a-farm-litrpg-
story-1st-edition-archer-simon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-joy-of-search-a-google-
insider-s-guide-to-going-beyond-the-basics-daniel-m-russell/
https://textbookfull.com/product/farm-management-patricia-a-
duffy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-guide-to-biblical-hebrew-
syntax-2nd-edition-bill-t-arnold/
https://textbookfull.com/product/citizen-spies-the-long-rise-of-
america-s-surveillance-society-joshua-reeves/
THE “Required reading for anyone who cares about what we eat.”
— from the foreword by Marion Nestle
FARM
BILL
A CITIZEN’S GUIDE
If you eat, pay taxes,
or care about our
nation’s food supply,
this book is
for you.
DANIEL IMHOFF
WITH CHRISTINA BADARACCO
THE FARM BILL
THE
FARM BILL
A Citizen’s Guide
Daniel Imhoff
With Christina Badaracco
vii
viii | Contents
In 2011, I had the idea of teaching a graduate course on the Farm Bill
to food studies students at New York University. As happens every four
years or so, the bill was coming up for renewal, and I thought it would
be useful for the students—and me—to take a deep dive into what
it was about. I knew help was available. Dan Imhoff had laid out the
issues with great clarity in his first book about this bill in 2007. I used
that book as a text.
I wrote about this experience in “The Farm Bill Drove Me Insane”
(Politico, March 17, 2016), which it most definitely did. The Farm Bill is
huge, encompassing more than a hundred programs, each with its
own acronym and set of interested lobbyists. The bill is unreadable,
consisting mainly of amendments to previous bills; it is comprehen-
sible only to lobbyists, a precious few congressional staffers, and oc-
casional brave souls like Imhoff willing to take it on. It costs taxpayers
close to $100 billion a year; most weirdly, 80 percent of this money cov-
ers the costs of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP,
formerly food stamps), which is stuck in the Farm Bill for reasons of
politics. The Farm Bill represents pork-barrel, log-rolling politics at its
worst.
Imhoff explains the bill as a fully rigged system gamed by Big Ag-
riculture in collusion with government. The public pays for this system
thrice over: at the checkout counter, in subsidized insurance premiums,
and for cleaning up the damage it causes to health and the environ-
ment. Despite these scandalous costs, the mere mention of the words
farm bill makes eyes glaze over. Why? This is a forest-versus-trees prob-
lem. The bill—the forest—is far too big and complicated to grasp. We
try to understand it by looking at the programs—the trees—one by
one. Hence: insanity.
ix
x | Foreword
Imhoff’s approach to the forest is to focus on the big-picture issues. Imhoff relates the history
the overriding issues that Farm Bills ought to ad- of Farm Bills, their origins, and their subsequent
dress. A rational agricultural policy should promote growth. Imhoff describes the system: how Big Agri-
an adequate food supply while protecting farmers culture works, how food stamps ended up in the bill,
against uncertain climate and price fluctuations. It what it all means for farming and food assistance,
should promote the health of people and the envi- and what kind of legislation is needed to promote a
ronment and do so sustainably. And it should pro- healthier food system.
vide incentives for people to farm and ensure a de- We should, Imhoff insists, rework the Farm Bill
cent living for everyone involved. Instead, the Farm to promote public health by supporting an agri-
Bills encourage an industrial agricultural system cultural system that grows food for people rather
incentivized to overproduce corn and soybeans to than for animals and cars. We should legislate that
feed animals and to make ethanol for automobiles, crops be grown sustainably so as to reduce agricul-
to the great detriment of public health and environ- ture’s contribution to greenhouse gas emissions,
mental protection. soil losses, and water pollution. Imhoff suggests
Nowhere are these problems more obvious twenty-five solutions to current agricultural prob-
than in the debates about the 2018 Farm Bill. As I lems. These should be required reading for anyone
write these words, the House of Representatives who cares about what we eat, today and in the
is working on a bill that seems less protective of future. It is too late to fix the 2018 Farm Bill, but
health and the environment than any previous ver- there is plenty of time and opportunity to make the
sion. To cut costs while maintaining support of Big next one a true citizens’ Farm Bill. To quote Imhoff,
Agriculture, the House aims to reduce SNAP enroll- “It’s time to question whether the industrial mega-
ments, eliminate conservation requirements, and farm model is the only way to feed a growing global
cut out even small programs that support small population or whether it’s even possible for such a
farmers or promote production of fruits and vege- system to survive without costly government sup-
tables, called “specialty crops” in US Department of ports and unsustainable environmental practices.”
Agriculture parlance. This book should inspire better, smarter solutions.
At this moment, the outcome of the 2018 bill Get busy.
is uncertain, but The Farm Bill: A Citizen’s Guide has
Marion Nestle
a more generic purpose: to introduce readers to
Preface
xi
xii | Preface
is so enormous that it’s nearly impossible for one A significant revision of the book was under-
person to understand it all. A thick web of technical taken in anticipation of the 2012 Farm Bill reautho-
jargon and acronyms must be unraveled to break rization, which stretched into 2014. Since 1990, the
policies down to relatable concepts. Perhaps the legislation has been renewed every six years, often
short time frame was a blessing. It gave me little with significant new directions. In 2016, Island Press
time to fret about what I had signed up for. approached me about reintroducing the book with
Food Fight: The Citizen’s Guide to a Food and an even more direct and accessible format. Thanks
Farm Bill was published in early 2007. As the policy to a concerted effort by Christina Badaracco, graphic
debates continued into 2008, I made many dozens designer Timothy Rice, and the team at Island Press,
of appearances around the country helping audi- we are pleased to introduce a completely updated
ences understand how Farm Bill policies affected and revised primer on this most critical and timely
their regions and communities. The book’s dy- matter.
namic graphic approach gave readers easy access How can we use the Farm Bill’s precious funds
to extremely technical information. Food Fight was to incentivize positive outcomes related to public
quickly adopted by university instructors and gar- health, a vibrant and regenerative agriculture, pro-
nered wide mainstream media attention. It also tection of wild nature, and the creation of land-
directly inspired important efforts such as Whole- scapes resilient to climate change? We hope this
some Wave’s farmers market food stamp incentives, book informs and inspires you to become a policy
health impact studies within the Centers for Dis- champion in your own life and community.
ease Control and Prevention, and the City of Seat-
Dan Imhoff
tle’s Farm Bill Principles.
Acknowledgments
A book like The Farm Bill is only made possible with the careful man-
agement of a very large number of details and the help of true author-
ities in many wide-ranging fields. First, we would like to offer our sin-
cere appreciation to Emily Turner and her team at Island Press. Emily
was our editor and champion of this project, and her careful atten-
tion is evident throughout every chapter. Graphic designer Timothy
Rice, a long-time collaborator, clocked long hours refining charts and
illustrations. Many thanks go to Marion Nestle for her kind introduc-
tion to the book and many decades as a mentor, thought leader, and
guiding voice for policies that promote public health, humane animal
stewardship, environmental protection, and scientific and fiscal sanity.
We would like to particularly thank the following individuals, and
we apologize in advance if we have somehow failed to acknowledge
anyone’s contributions. Ferd Hoefner from the National Sustainable
Agriculture Coalition provided data about conservation programs. Tim-
othy Wise from Tufts University offered continued support and insight
about the impacts of NAFTA and corn dumping. Mary Hendrickson
from the University of Missouri shared data and insight about con-
solidation in the livestock industry. Chris Brown and Patricia Carrillo
guided us through ALBA’s impressive farmer incubation program. Jav-
ier Zamora from JSM Organics gave a most gracious organic farm tour.
Elanor Starmer of George Washington University and Rose Hayden-
Smith from the University of California, Division of Agriculture and Nat-
ural Resources, provided key background about the KYF2 (Know Your
Farmer, Know Your Food) initiative.
Thanks go to Honor Eldridge from the Soil Association for her
sidebar and international perspective on crop insurance. Tricia Kovacs
from USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service offered information about
xiii
xiv | Acknowledgments
USDA’s Local Food Compass Map. Scott Shimmin for Agriculture and Trade Policy contributed up-to-
from USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service date data on corn dumping as well as the sidebar
(NASS) helped in acquiring data about beginning she cowrote with Sophia Murphy.
farmers. Letitia Toomer-Jones from USDA’s NRCS Lynn Henning shared her unique investigative
provided key information about conservation grant skills on Farm Bill programs and concentrated ani-
applications. Claudia Hitaj from USDA’s Economic mal feeding operations in Michigan. Thanks go to
Research Service (ERS) helped with data about ag- Craig Cox from the Environmental Working Group
ricultural energy usage, and Marc Ribaudo from for reviewing our chapter about ethanol and to
USDA’s ERS provided data on nutrient management Dan Rubenstein from Princeton University, Garrett
on croplands. Gary R. Keough and Rosemarie Philips Graddy-Lovelace from American University, and
from USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Ser- Nina Ichikawa from the Berkeley Food Institute, who
vice shared a map of the distribution of beginning facilitated this collaboration between two authors.
farmers. Brenda Carson from USDA’s Farm Service Martha Noble again provided her invaluable exper-
Agency shed light on agricultural disaster designa- tise. Last but not least, thanks go to the supporters
tions. John-Michael Cross from the Environmental of Watershed Media, who for so many years have
and Energy Study Institute and Andy Olsen from made this critical work possible. We could not have
the Environmental Law and Policy Center helped done it without all of you, and for that we will be
us better fathom the Farm Bill’s renewable energy eternally grateful.
programs. Karen Hansen-Kuhn from the Institute
Part 1
Daniel Imhoff and Christina Badaracoo, The Farm Bill: A Citizen’s Guide, 3
DOI 10.5822/ 978-1-61091-975-3_1, © 2019 Daniel Imhoff.
4 | The Farm Bill
help counter the mounting trade deficit and feed ton, wheat, rice, or soybeans in countries without
the rest of the world (or so we are told) with a steady strong subsidy programs can be severely disadvan-
stream of exports. Then there’s the additional task taged. According to Tufts University agricultural re-
of supplying feedstock for ethanol, bioplastics, and searcher Timothy Wise, the dumping of subsidized
other products used as replacements for fossil fuels. US corn on the Mexican market, for instance, cost
To promote this massive farm output, the Mexico’s farmers as much as $200 per acre per year
government has embedded complex subsidies in from the passage of the North American Free Trade
various sections of the nearly 1,000-page Farm Agreement in 1994 until 2010.3 An estimated 2.3
Bill. Land payments, crop insurance, research assis- million small farmers in Mexico were forced to look
tance, export marketing, and many other programs for other work in the burgeoning maquiladoras—
serve to maintain an ample supply of certain foods manufacturing factories and sweatshops of US cor-
and commodity crops. The scale of government porations in cities like Juarez and Matamoros—or
intervention is such that talk of “free markets” is in fields, orchards, vineyards, slaughter plants, and
merely rhetorical. Conventional farmers stay afloat other sectors across the border to the north. At the
by farming the system rather than growing what same time, subsidization of corn for ethanol drove
might best serve their particular tract of land for up prices of corn exports in Mexico, increasing food
the long term or provide for more well-rounded, prices and resulting in food insecurity. Although
healthy diets. If the government removes all finan- Mexico grows predominantly white (“food”) corn
cial risks from growing corn, offers generous tax that is distinct from American yellow (“field”) corn,
breaks to ethanol producers, and writes six-figure their prices are closely correlated. 4 Rising prices pre-
checks to feedlot operators, for example, farmers vented further dumping in subsequent years, but
will plant corn and lots of it—even when the real recent evidence suggests that low prices are again
winners are the agribusinesses and food manufac- driving US dumping in export markets.5
turers that buy it. Massive farm worker migration is just one of
This scenario plays out each spring during the social costs of the government subsidizing an
what’s called the fight for dirt, when American oversupply of corn. Others are harder to measure.
farmers decide how much land to devote to each For instance, most corn that American farmers
commodity crop. Corn wins easily and is grown on grow isn’t eaten by people. Instead, it is fed to ani-
upward of 90 million acres of farmland, an area mals in livestock warehouses and feedlots. It is fer-
roughly the size of the entire state of Montana. Fig- mented into ethanol (with the residual grains fed to
ure 1 highlights many of the effects of this massive animals) or turned into sweeteners and hundreds
production. of other manufactured food ingredients. It contrib-
Then, because American farmers export 40 utes to a food system that relies heavily on farm
percent of the world’s corn and almost 40 percent chemicals, processing, packaging, and fossil fuels.
of the soybeans, these choices ripple across global The irony is that all this work conflicts with the
commodity markets.2 Farmers who grow corn, cot- government’s other major tasks in overseeing the
Figure 1 1. What Is the Farm Bill? || 5
Effects of Cornification
Taxpayer Subsidies. Direct payments and crop insurance total- Food Miles. Processed foods now
ing nearly $2.4 billion helped make corn the predominant crop travel more than 1,300 miles and
$$$ in 2014. Many small- and medium-sized farmers depend on sub- fresh produce travels more than
sides to survive while large operators use subsidies to get bigger. 1,500 miles from farm to table. California, Florida, and a number of
other states (and a growing number of countries) supply the nation’s
Corn Surpluses. 15.1 billion bushels were produced supermarkets with fruits and vegetables. Relatively little of this spe-
on more than 86 million acres in 2016. This created cialty crop production is supported by federal programs.
a surplus stock of 2.1 billion bushels. Very little of the corn is actually
fed directly to humans. Most goes to animal feed or is processed into Immigration. After the implementation of NAFTA in 1994, an
starches, corn oil, sweeteners, or ethanol for our gas tanks. estimated 1 .3 to 2.3 million Mexican campesinos were forced
to leave their lands and move elsewhere in Mexico or in the US
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. Con- to attain employment. Subsidized US corn, combined with the NAFTA
finement facilities, largely made possible and trade agreement, had a catastrophic effect on Mexican farmers.
profitable through the low costs of subsidized feed, house tens of
thousands of hogs, chickens, or cattle. Heavy concentrations of animal Rural Exodus. The farmer replacement rate has fallen as the
wastes, odor pollution, reliance on antibiotics, and dangerous work- number of beginning farmers replacing aging farmers has
places are just a few of the many health concerns. decreased by more than 23% in the last five years. Farmers
are now 17 years older than the average American worker, and we have
Food Deserts. Monoculture specialization of corn more farmers over the age of 75 than between 35 and 44. Many won-
and other grains for export is the reason we see “so der if the United States may permanently lose the skills and productive
much agriculture, so little food” in farming areas. Impoverished inner- farmland to remain an agricultural leader.
city areas, where access to supermarkets or farmers markets is limited
or nonexistent, also become food deserts. Obesity Crisis. The proportion of Americans who are over-
weight or obese climbed to 70.7% in 2014 and the child obe-
Dead Zones. Nutrient and chemical runoff from farms in the sity rate has more than tripled since the 1970s (now at 17%).
Corn Belt flow through the Mississippi River watershed and Lack of physical activity and poor nutrition—linked to subsidized and
have created a dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, decimating super-sized processed foods high in sugar, fat, and sodium—lie at the
fish and other marine life. There are dozens of other agriculturally in- root of the epidemic.
duced hypoxic zones, including in the Chesapeake Bay.
6 | The Farm Bill
food system: establishing healthy dietary guide- largely ignored by Farm Bill policies. We have be-
lines and doling out nutrition assistance to those come overeaters of the wrong things, and many
who are hungry. It might seem that subsidizing an critics say that Farm Bill policies are at least partially
industrial food system would make food inexpen- at fault and can play a dynamic role in reversing this
sive and abundant for everyone. The reality, however, crisis.
is that enrollment in the Supplemental Nutrition Today’s global headlines reflect crops unable to
Assistance Program, or SNAP (formerly called food adapt to rising temperatures, spiking health costs
stamps), hit an all-time high of almost 48 million due to high obesity rates, food shortages in certain
participants in 2013.6 In 2016, more than 41.2 million areas of the world, and disease outbreaks emanat-
people were living in “food-insecure” households, ing from ever-larger meat-, milk-, and egg-producing
implying that they lacked consistent and sufficient animal factories. The number of people affected,
food for active, healthy lives.7 and worried, about these problems is growing,
What’s more, all the mountains of cheap food and, increasingly, they are realizing that the path to
haven’t made us healthy, either. Indeed, our epi- reform ultimately leads to government policy. As the
demic of obesity hits the poor hardest. Fresh fruits, adage says, we reap what we sow, and in that regard
vegetables, and whole grains—the foods most there may be nothing more important than the Farm
recommended by USDA dietary guidelines—are Bill.
2. Why Does the Farm Bill
Matter?
On one level, we could make this a very short read by simply stating
As a result of the Farm that although the Farm Bill does matter to the average US citizen, it is
Bill, citizens pay a national a fully rigged game run by the immensely powerful farm lobbies and
monopolies that profit mightily from how our food is grown, processed,
food bill at least three
marketed, and distributed. Concerned citizens who do want to change
times: (1) at the checkout an unfair and unhealthy system for the better are going to fall short of
stand, (2) in taxes that reform. Sadly, that may be all too true. The next Farm Bill will probably
continue to prop up the industrial agriculture complex with tens of bil-
subsidize commodity crop lions of taxpayer dollars annually, as it has done for decades. But our
production, and (3) in nation’s food and farming system is far too important to us all to forgo
serious debate and the hard work needed to achieve urgent reforms.
environmental cleanup and Here’s why.
medical costs. If you eat, pay taxes, care about biodiversity, worry about the qual-
ity of school lunches, or notice the loss of farmland and woodlands,
you have a personal stake in the Farm Bill. If you’re concerned about
escalating federal budget deficits, the fate of family farmers, working
conditions for immigrant farm laborers, the persistence of hunger and
poverty, or how we support local and organic and pasture-raised food,
you should pay attention to the Farm Bill. There are dozens more rea-
sons the Farm Bill, and its attendant tens of billions of dollars, is critical
to our land, our bodies, and our children’s future (figure 2 gives a full
list of problems and solutions). They include:
• The twilight of the cheap oil age;
• The onset of unpredictable climatic conditions;
• Looming water shortages;
• Increasing dead zones caused in part by agricultural runoff;
Daniel Imhoff and Christina Badaracoo, The Farm Bill: A Citizen’s Guide, 7
DOI 10.5822/ 978-1-61091-975-3_2, © 2019 Daniel Imhoff.
Figure 2
Include requirements for on-farm conservation for all insurance and subsidy programs; make no net soil
loss a goal of farm programs through fully enforced Sodsaver, Sodbuster, and Swampbuster provisions
Better align crop supports with the most recent Dietary Guidelines for Americans; launch nationwide
farm-to-school, farm-to-college, and other fresh food distribution programs that also include a strong
educational and fitness component
Maintain food assistance programs including improved access to healthy foods; expand funding for SNAP-
Ed and SNAP at farmers markets; ensure that every American has access to affordable, healthy food
Increase funding to keep farmland and ranchland in agricultural use and open space rather than
subdivisions and sprawl
Make spending serve as true public investment with targeted results; combine funding sources
Shift subsidies toward green payments, such as the Conservation Stewardship Program, which rewards
farmers for environmental caretaking rather than overproducing export crops
Invest and offer loans to revitalize and diversify the rural sector; rebuild livestock processing
infrastructure
Add 100,000 new farmers and ranchers over the course of the next Farm Bill
Expand research into energy-effective farming systems and increase support for on-farm energy
conservation and renewable energy infrastructure
Invest in value-added processing and flexible supports for more diversified local and regional “specialty
crops”; increase funding for efforts like the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program in schools
Increase incentives for farming systems that protect watersheds; research alternatives to synthetic
fertilizers
Incentivize energy conservation, carbon sequestration, and pasture-based agriculture; implement cap-
and-trade
Expand grass-pastured livestock operations; place a moratorium on new CAFO creation; eliminate EQIP
funding for CAFO waste management; phase out nonveterinary, preventative antibiotic use in livestock
Expand wild habitat for native pollinators in and around farms; adapt new programs for beekeepers
End Renewable Fuel Standard that mandates corn ethanol use; evaluate role for advanced biofuels;
increase fuel efficiency
10 | The Farm Bill
• An aging farm population and lack of op- citizens pay a national food bill at least three times:
portunity for young farmers; (1) at the checkout stand, (2) in taxes that subsidize
• Expansion of corn ethanol production; commodity crop production, and (3) in environmen-
tal cleanup and medical costs related to the conse-
• Escalating medical costs related to obe-
quences of industrial commodity-based agriculture.
sity with a food system deficient in nu-
Most analysts, most legislators, and even many
trition education and access to healthy
farmers agree that our present course leaves the
foods;
United States unprepared to meet many of the
• Taxpayer subsidies to corporate farms re-
urgent twenty-first-century challenges outlined
gardless of economic need;
above. The silver lining is that Americans actually
• 44 million Americans, including 15 million have a substantial food and farm policy to debate.
children, who don’t get enough to eat.1 Conditions for change are ripe, but a national move-
ment with the political power to demand progres-
The Farm Bill matters because it makes some
sive reforms has been slow to materialize.
big mega-farms scandalously rich while it drives
family farmers out of business. It makes us fat, yet
at the same time it produces a fragile (rather than
a resilient) food system. It supports destructive
Our challenge is not to abolish
monoculture farming practices and then spends government support; rather, it is to make
billions trying to put bandages on the damage. It
certain we are investing in a viable future
artificially sets prices while officials tout the virtues
of “free markets” and “fair trade.” Its consequences for our food system.
contribute to poverty, rural exodus, and famine.2
Subsidies, now predominantly in the form of
insurance, do provide a critical safety net in some The Farm Bill matters because much-needed
years to family farms that continue to grow com- funds can drive small-scale entrepreneurship, on-farm
modity crops, helping them survive in unpredict- research, species protection, nutritional assistance,
able weather conditions and a competitive global healthy school lunches, job creation, and habitat res-
economy. But the biggest beneficiaries are absentee toration. Our challenge is not to abolish government
landlords, tractor dealers, and banks and insurance support; rather, it is to make certain we are investing
companies that service farmers as well as the corpo- in a viable future for our food system. That responsi-
rate agribusinesses, grain distributors, animal feed- bility now rests primarily with the parties who con-
ing operations, and ethanol producers that purchase trol the House and Senate Agriculture Committees
subsidized crops. What started as an ambitious tem- that write the Farm Bill. Will they continue massive
porary effort to lift millions of Americans out of eco- giveaways to corporations and surplus commodity
nomic and ecological desperation during the Great producers, or will they reward stewardship, promote
Depression and Dust Bowl (supported initially by a healthy diets, enhance regional food production, sup-
tax on food processors) devolved over decades into port family farms, address climate change, and make
a corporate boondoggle. As a result of the Farm Bill, it easier for hungry families to eat healthy foods?
3. Who Benefits from the Farm
Bill?
The Farm Bill is deceptively simple shorthand for the gargan-
Omnibus legislation: a law tuan package of legislation about food and farming that the US Con-
that addresses multiple gress drafts, debates, and ultimately passes every five to seven years.
Each bill, as well as the drafts now under consideration, actually has a
issues simultaneously.
formal name—such as the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977; the Fed-
eral Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996; the Farm Se-
curity and Rural Investment Act of 2002; the Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008; the Agricultural Act of 2014—but people gener-
ally refer to each as simply “the Farm Bill.” Since its origins in 1933 as
the Agricultural Adjustment Act, the bill has snowballed into one of
the most—if not the most—significant legislative measures affecting
land use in the United States.
The Farm Bill is an omnibus legislation because it simultaneously
addresses multiple issues. However, modern Farm Bills traditionally
have three primary thrusts: (1) food nutrition programs (now about 80
percent of gross outlays), (2) income and price supports for commod-
ity crops and other forms of crop insurance (about 13 percent), and (3)
conservation incentives (about 6 percent). In addition, the Farm Bill or-
ganizes its spending categories into “titles.” These categories include
trade and foreign food aid, forestry (because forests and woodlots are
important components of farms), agricultural credit, rural develop-
ment, research and education, nutrition, conservation, commodity pro-
grams, energy, horticulture, crop insurance, and miscellaneous (such
as disease monitoring in aquaculture)1 (figure 3). A number of policies,
such as food assistance, conservation, agricultural trade, credit, rural
development, and research, are actually governed by both the Farm
Bill and a variety of separate laws, which are sometimes renewed or
Daniel Imhoff and Christina Badaracoo, The Farm Bill: A Citizen’s Guide, 11
DOI 10.5822/ 978-1-61091-975-3_3, © 2019 Daniel Imhoff.
Farm Bill Titles
The order and total number of Farm Bill titles vary from bill to bill. In the 2014 Farm Bill, the titles run as
follows:
Mandatory Spending
Programs with mandatory funding are generally assured, whereas programs with discretionary funding
survive and perish at the hands of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. Certain program cat-
egories have achieved baseline levels of funding over the decades.
Each Farm Bill is actually a reauthorization of the programs dating back to the 1930s as well as an authori-
zation of new programs.
12
3. Who Benefits from the Farm Bill? | 13
modified as stand-alone bills. (The Child Nutrition global trade, the call for less government spending,
Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Food Safety Mod- the concentration of food distribution and process-
ernization Act are recent examples of stand-alone ing centers, and low commodity prices took a toll on
legislation that addresses food and agriculture the farm sector and rural communities. Corporate
issues.) Increasingly, though, Congress prefers to agribusinesses and mega-farms then succeeded in
combine many of these laws into a single, mam- tilting subsidies completely in their favor. Although
moth reauthorization of multiple statutes at the control of today’s agriculture is concentrated in a
same time it renews the farm commodity pro- small number of corporate operations, the public
grams.2 This omnibus nature of the Farm Bill keeps perception of US agriculture is still rooted in nos-
the public in the dark: it’s nearly impossible for any talgic notions like the father and daughter in Grant
one person to understand the full extent of every- Wood’s classic painting American Gothic, the illus-
thing that’s covered. trations of Norman Rockwell, and the iconic images
Although more than three-fourths of the Farm of the Western cowboy.
Bill budget is currently devoted to safety net nutri- Many Americans believe, for example, that the
tion programs, it is commodity subsidies, crop insur- tens of billions of dollars the government spends
ance, and price supports that most people equate on agriculture primarily support farms where a
with the heart of the legislation.3 At their noblest, husband and wife work from dawn to dusk grow-
subsidy payments to farmers are intended to pro- ing crops, with roosters crowing from fence posts
vide an income safety net in this economically and and cows grazing on rolling pastures. The real pic-
meteorologically volatile profession, thereby pro- ture is not so idyllic. Commodity payments primarily
tecting the food supply and strengthening rural go to large monoculture operators who grow corn
communities. Some programs genuinely invest in and other feed grains, wheat and other food grains,
the long-term stability of the food supply and stew- rice, peanuts, sugar, cotton, soy, and oilseeds as well
ardship of the land. That was particularly true in as to dairy producers. Three in four farmers get no
the 1930s and 1940s, when the bill’s defining goals commodity payments at all. Meanwhile, the top 5
involved idling land to prevent oversupply of crops percent of subsidy recipients (often producer coop-
and installing contour strips to protect the soil in eratives, Native American tribes, and large corporate
exchange for loans and price supports for storable entities) averaged more than $700,000 each be-
foods. tween 1995 and 2016. 4,5 Another common perception
Along the way, though, the Farm Bill became is that Farm Bill subsidies that pay farmers not to
an engine driving surplus production of commodity grow crops have made soil erosion a relic of the Dust
crops and a gravy train for powerful corporations Bowl. Less than 10 percent of the US Department of
that purchased and traded them. The bill’s original Agriculture (USDA) budget is linked to conservation
focus on the public good was derailed. After mod- practices, however. According to the USDA’s Natural
est reforms over five decades, political realities and Resources Conservation Service, nearly 2 billion tons
global economics collided in the 1980s. Increased of cropland soil—our most valuable nonrenewable
Figure 3
n
bi
illi
llio
n
n
llio
5
llio
n
bi
ou $1.
llio
bi
bi
4
m .8 b s $1
s*
1.
bi
6
.2
3.
$4
tle
.7
28
$2
90
Ti
e
$
ne
nc
es
$3
n
er
tio
la
ra
iti
th
n
el
su
va
io
O
$1
isc
In
rit
er
m
%
de
ns
ut
op
31
a
%
N
Co
Co
Cr
0.
Tr
32
5%
%
%
%
%
0.
76
36
48
.9
82
79
5.
0.
8.
4.
*Includes titles for horticulture, research, energy, rural development, forestry, and credit.
14
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
and at a mile’s distance. The weavers allege, in excuse of their retreat, that the
butcher squadron had been ordered up to assist the tailors, and that they did not
incline to engage with these men of blood.’—C. M.
A circumstance somewhat like the Tain 1733. Oct. 30.
entertainment, in honour of Governor Macrae, took
place in Edinburgh, on this king’s birthday, which was observed with unusual
rejoicings, on account of the recent stimulus to loyalty from the marriage of the
Princess Royal to the Prince of Orange. ‘David Campbell, his Majesty’s Tailor for
Scotland, came to this kingdom from Jamaica, purely on design to solemnise the
day. He accordingly entertained at his lodgings in the Abbey his Majesty’s Blue
Gowns [a set of licensed beggars, corresponding in number to the king’s years,
which were now fifty], and at night he kept open table, where several gentlemen
were entertained, all the royal healths were drunk, and those of every remarkable
person of the illustrious name of Campbell, with the sound of trumpet and other
music.’—C. M.
The Caledonian Mercury gives a droll, chirping Oct.
account of an association which, it is easy to see, had
in view the prevention of an over-severe excise system for Scotland. Yesternight,
says the paragraph, ‘there came on, at the Parrot’s Nest in this city, the annual
election of office-bearers in the ancient and venerable Assembly of Birds; when the
Game-cock was elected preses; the Blackbird, treasurer; the Gled, principal clerk;
the Crow, his depute; and the Duck, officer; all birds duly qualified to our happy
establishment, and no less enemies to the excise scheme. After which an elegant
entertainment was served up; all the royal and loyal healths were plentifully drunk
in the richest wines; the glorious 205; all the bonny birds, &c. On this joyful
occasion nothing was heard but harmonious music, each bird striving to excel in
chanting and warbling their respective melodious notes.’ The glorious 205, it may
be remarked, were those members of the House of Commons who had recently
thrown out a bill for increasing the tax on tobacco.
‘John Park, some time dempster to the Court of 1734. Mar. 6.
Justiciary, and who lately stood a trial there for
horse-stealing, was whipped through the city, pursuant to his sentence; by which
also he stands condemned to transport himself, 1734.
never again to return to Scotland, on pain of being
whipped quarterly till he is again transported. He is a very old man, with a
graceless gray head, gray beard, and but one hand, having left the other in some
scrape.’—C. M.
‘When Mr Adam Fergusson, minister of Killin, Apr. 19.
came to Perth to intimate the sentence of the
commission (which looses Mr William Wilson’s pastoral relation in that burgh),
Mr Fergusson was met in the suburbs by several of the inhabitants, who fell upon
the gentleman, though vested with supreme authority, and attended by several
armed men; yet they were all severely cudgelled, and obliged to retire, re infectâ.’—
C. M.
‘Died here, the Rev. Mr John Maclaren, one of the July 12.
ministers of the city; esteemed a well-meaning man,
and void of hypocrisy.’—C. M.
‘On Saturday was se’nnight [Dec. 28, 1734], died at 1735. Jan. 9.
Balquhidder, in Perthshire, the famous Highland
partisan, Rob Roy.’—C. M.
‘Died, in the 12th year of her age, the Lady Jane Jan. 24.
Campbell, fourth daughter to his Grace the Duke of
Argyle.... His Grace has no male issue, but several daughters living, and it is the
peculiar right of this family, that when they marry any daughters, their vassals are
obliged to pay their portions, and are taxed in order to it, according to the number
of their cattle.’—C. M.
We find at this time a beginning to that system of Aug. 18.
emigration to America by which the Highlands were
so much depopulated during the eighteenth century. ‘The trustees for the colony of
Georgia have projected a settlement of Highlanders from this country, and have
actually sent round for Inverness and Cromarty a ship commanded by Captain
Dunbar, to take in 160 men, women, and children, who are to be settled on the far
boundary of the river Alatamaha, who will be a gallant barrier in case of a war with
France and Spain. And Mr Oglethorpe, with the other trustees, are applying to the
society in Scotland for Propagating Christian Knowledge to send a minister along
with them who speaks Irish, with proper encouragement; and we are assured the
society are so well satisfied with the project, that they have amply instructed their
committee of directors to close in with it.’—C. M.
‘The annual friendly meeting of the gentlemen of 1736. Jan. 19.
the name of Wilson, was held at the house of Jean
Wilson, spouse to Arthur Cumming, periwig-maker, opposite to the City Guard;
the Right Hon. Alexander Wilson, Lord Provost of the city, preses. There were
present about forty gentlemen and others of that clan, who were served at supper
by persons of the name. The entertainment was sumptuous, and choice wines went
merrily round.’—C. M.
‘A very uncommon chain of events happened here Jan. 21.
[Lanark] t’other week. Elizabeth Fairy was
proclaimed in order to marriage on Sunday, was accordingly married on Monday,
bore a child on Tuesday; her husband went and stole a horse on Wednesday, for
which he was banished on Thursday; the heir of this marriage died on Friday, and
was decently interred on Saturday; all in one week.’—C. M.
‘The 4th inst., several young gentlemen of this Feb. 9.
place [Montrose] acted Mr Allan Ramsay’s
celebrated Pastoral Comedy, for the diversion of the gentlemen and ladies of and
about this town, with all the dresses suitable, and performed it with so much spirit
and humour, as agreeably surprised the whole audience; to oblige whom they re-
enacted it and the farce of the Mock Doctor two succeeding nights. The money
taken, after deducting the necessary charges, being very considerable, was
distributed among the poor.’—C. M.
‘This week, several gentlemen laid a wager that a Mar. 13.
horse, twenty-six years old, belonging to Mr. Pillans,
brewer, should not draw 101 stone-weight up the West Bow to the Weigh-house;
and yesterday it was surprisingly performed, one of the wagerers riding on the top
of all.’—C. M.
Nine unfortunate young women—‘very naked and July 9.
meagre beings’—‘made an amende honorable
through the several streets of the city [of Edinburgh], 1736.
the hangman attending them, and drums beating to
the tune of Cuckolds-come-dig.’—C. M.
While Allan Ramsay was preparing his playhouse, an Italian female rope-dancer,
named Signora Violante, performed in Edinburgh and some other Scottish towns.
It was announced that she danced a minuet on the rope, as well as it could be done
on the floor—danced on a board placed loosely on the rope—danced on the rope
with two boys fastened to her feet—danced with two swords at her feet—the rope
being no thicker than penny whip-cord. In Edinburgh, the scene of her
performances was the ‘Old Assembly Hall.’—C. M.
‘A grand convention was held of the adherents to 1738. Mar. 22.
the seceding ministers of the Church of Scotland, in
a square plain on Braid Hills, two miles south of this city. About 10 before noon,
Mr Thomas Mair, minister of Orwel, in Kinross-shire, opened the service of the day
(standing in a pulpit reared up within a tent), with a sermon from Jeremiah i. 5. At
noon, Mr William Wilson, one of the ministers of Perth, preached from Ezekiel
xxii. 24, and afterwards baptized ten children, brought thither some 20, some 30
miles off. At four afternoon, Mr Ralph Erskine, one of the ministers of
Dunfermline, preached from Hosea xxiii. 9, &c. The apparent tendency of these
sermons was to excite devotion and fervour, a renewal of solemn engagements, to
deprecate sin in general, and those of this corrupt age in particular: and it was
observed that it was no proper expedient either to wash away sin, or indemnify the
sinner, to purchase indulgences at the hand of the kirk-treasurer, and some other
tenets that savoured of a popish tincture were soundly lashed. There were about
5000 hearers at each sermon (I mean of the household of faith), some of whom
from South Britain and Ireland, besides the ungodly audience, consisting of many
thousands, some of whom set fire to furze; others hunted the hare around ’em to
create disturbance, a certain huntsman having laid a plot to carry off the collection.
The convention dispersed at 7 at night.’—C. M.
In consequence of a butcher’s dog going mad, and Apr. 7.
biting some others of her species, the magistrates of
Edinburgh ordered the slaughter of all the butchers’ dogs in the city, and,
commanding the seclusion of all other dogs whatsoever, put a shilling on the head
of every one which should be found abroad. There then took place a crusade
against the canine species, which seems to have been nearly the sole Scottish
incident reported in London for the year. ‘The street cadies went very early into
obedience to this edict; for the drum had scarce gone round to intimate the same,
when they fell a-knocking on the head all suspicious or ill-affected curs, some of
which they hanged on sign-posts, &c.; and with difficulty could they be restrained
from killing the dogs that lead the blind about the streets, or attacking the ladies
with their lap-dogs. A detachment of the City Guard was ordered down to the
butcher-market, when they made very clean havoc of all the dogs there. Saturday,
at noon, the town-officers being provided with large oaken clubs, went a dog-
hunting, and killed every cur they could see or hear of; so that nothing was to be
seen but chasing, hacking, and slashing, or heard other than the lamentation of
butchers’ wives, &c., for the loss of Credit, Honesty, Turk, Twopenny, Cæsar, &c.’
Three days later, the magistrates of Leith ordered all the dogs of their town to be
put to death. Accordingly, the curs were driven into the harbour, and drowned, or
else knocked on the head. ‘Several gentlemen and others,’ it is reported, ‘have sent
off their dogs to the country, and a certain writer has despatched his favourite
Tipsy to Haddington in a cloak-bag. Patrick Kier in Multries-hill having tied up his
dog, the beast gnawed the rope, and getting loose, rushed into the room on his
master, and bit him severely. The dog was immediately killed, and Mr Kier carried
to the sea and dipped.’—C. M.
Lord Lovat having occasion at this time to travel 1740. July 30.
from his house of Beaufort, in Inverness-shire, to
Edinburgh, with his two daughters, made an effort to get his coach ready, and,
after two or three days spent in its repair, set out on 1740.
his journey. Passing through Inverness without
stopping, he came the first night to Corriebrough. To pursue his own narrative, as
given in a letter to a friend:[772] ‘I brought my wheel-wright with me the length of
Aviemore, in case of accidents, and there I parted with him, because he declared
that my chariot would go safe enough to London; but I was not eight miles from
the place, when on the plain road, the axle-tree of the hind-wheels broke in two, so
that my girls were forced to go on bare horses behind footmen, and I was obliged to
ride myself, though I was very tender, and the day very cold. I came with that
equipage to Ruthven late at night, and my chariot was pulled there by force of men,
where I got an English wheel-wright and a smith, who wrought two days mending
my chariot; and after paying very dear for their work, and for my quarters two
nights, I was not gone four miles from Ruthven, when it broke again, so that I was
in a miserable condition till I came to Dalnakeardach, where my honest landlord,
Charles M‘Glassian, told me that the Duke of Athole had two as good workmen at
Blaire as were in the kingdom, and that I would get my chariot as well mended
there as at London. Accordingly, I went there and stayed a night, and got my
chariot very well mended by a good wright and a good smith. I thought then that I
was pretty secure till I came to this place. I was storm-stayed two days at Castle
Drummond by the most tempestuous weather of wind and rain that I ever
remember to see. The Dutches of Perth and Lady Mary Drummond were
excessively kind and civil to my daughters and to me, and sent their chamberlain to
conduct me to Dumblain, who happened to be very useful to us that day; for I was
not three miles gone from Castle Drummond, when the axle-tree of my fore-wheels
broke in two, in the midst of the hill, betwixt Drummond and the bridge of Erdoch,
and we were forced to sit in the hill, with a boisterous day, till Chamberlain
Drummond was so kind as to go down to Strath, and bring wrights, and carts, and
smiths to our assistance, who dragged us to the plain, where we were forced to stay
five or six hours till there was a new axle-tree made, be that it was dark night
before we came to Dumblain, which is but eight miles from Castle Drummond, and
we were all much fatigued. The next day, we came to Lithgow, and the day after
that we arrived here, so that we were twelve days on our journey by our
misfortunes, which was seven days more than ordinary.’
‘Friday [Jan. 7], died William Mackintosh of 1743. Jan. 10.
Borlum, Esq., aged upwards of 80 years of age. He
has been prisoner in the Castle these 15 years for his accession to the Rebellion
1715.’—E. E. C.
‘On Thursday last [Jan. 13], died the Honourable Jan. 17.
Colonel John Erskine of Carnock. He was a True Old
Whig.’—E. E. C.
‘Friday, the place of one of the Principal Clerks of Jan. 17.
this city was conferred on Mr William Forbes, writer,
he paying, as a consideration for the same, in room of Mr Home deceased, £1410
sterling.’—E. E. C.
Apr. 14.
‘Thursday last, died at Sanquhar, William Kelloch, aged 111 years. He served the
town as one of their common officers 96 years, and his son, now living, has served
in the same station 70 years. He was a very honest man, had his senses to the last,
and never made use of spectacles.’—E. E. C.
‘Notwithstanding the late execution of Margaret May 9.
Stewart for child-murder, yet we are told that two
more new-born children have since been found dead, with marks of violence on
them.’—E. E. C.
INDEX.