Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copy of Your Work Space 2
Copy of Your Work Space 2
SUBMITTED BY:
Wilbert Managuelod
Shey Padrones
Department of Education
SCHOOL
Mallig, Isabela
GFBGG
CHAPTER I
panic and
GFBGG
Beilock 2016).
lived
GFBGG
educational settings.
student population.
in term of
a. Age,
b. Sex,
c. Section,
Grade 10 Curriculum?
as follow:
outcomes.
mathematical difficulty.
Conceptual Framework
FEEDBACK MECHANISM
Figure 1:
and gender.
School.
GFBGG
10 Students
difficulty.
School.
Definition of Terms
mathematics.
GFBGG
difficulty.
CHAPTER II
study.
(GA). The results showed that girls had higher MA than boys at
path analysis and refining the model, the final path model was
through guided.
GFBGG
classrooms.
GFBGG
idea
GFBGG
methodology, and
GFBGG
abilities
GFBGG
and teaching.
results. The study included 620 educators and 4645 pupils from
that
GFBGG
unusual.
career
GFBGG
freshmen students at
GFBGG
educators.
students’ impressions
GFBGG
math course grades were obtained from school records for the
turn predicted
GFBGG
the number of high school math courses taken and career goals
The subset of pupils with the lowest math difficulty and the
differentiated instruction.
(male 743 51%, female 721 49%, age 15.82 ± 0.28) via PISA 2012
data for our study. First, we used latent profile analysis and
students’ abilities
GFBGG
skills in mathematics.
determine the
GFBGG
students.
The first was the length of the additions, which included either
to the number tokens that configured the sums, but in the high
performance.
GFBGG
CHAPTER III
Research Design
Archimedes 38 37 25.87
Newton 34 33 23.08
Aristotle 38 37 25.87
useful.
level.
GFBGG