Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook The Uyghur Community Diaspora Identity and Geopolitics 1St Edition Guljanat Kurmangaliyeva Ercilasun Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook The Uyghur Community Diaspora Identity and Geopolitics 1St Edition Guljanat Kurmangaliyeva Ercilasun Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook The Uyghur Community Diaspora Identity and Geopolitics 1St Edition Guljanat Kurmangaliyeva Ercilasun Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-korean-diaspora-in-post-war-
japan-geopolitics-identity-and-nation-building-myung-ja-kim/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-emigrant-communities-of-
latvia-national-identity-transnational-belonging-and-diaspora-
politics-rita-kasa/
https://textbookfull.com/product/community-ecology-gary-g-
mittelbach/
Identity, Policy, and Prosperity: Border Nationality of
the Korean Diaspora and Regional Development in
Northeast China 1st Edition Jeongwon Bourdais Park
(Auth.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/identity-policy-and-prosperity-
border-nationality-of-the-korean-diaspora-and-regional-
development-in-northeast-china-1st-edition-jeongwon-bourdais-
park-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-eclipse-of-community-mental-
health-and-erich-lindemann-1st-edition-david-g-satin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-eclipse-of-community-mental-
health-and-erich-lindemann-1st-edition-david-g-satin-2/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-
organizational-identity-michael-g-pratt/
https://textbookfull.com/product/fashion-dress-and-identity-in-
south-asian-diaspora-narratives-from-the-eighteenth-century-to-
monica-ali-1st-edition-noemi-pereira-ares-auth/
THE UYGHUR
COMMUNITY
Diaspora, Identity
and Geopolitics
EDITED BY
GÜLJANAT KURMANGALIYEVA ERCILASUN
AND KONURALP ERCILASUN
POLITICS
AND HISTORY
IN CENTRAL ASIA
Politics and History in Central Asia
Series editor
Timur Dadabaev
University of Tsukuba
Tsukuba, Japan
In the past few decades, Central Asia has drawn the attention of academic
and business communities as well as policy professionals because of its
geostrategic importance (being located between Russia and China and in
close proximity to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, and India), its
international stability, and its rich energy resources. The region also faces
challenges, such as post-conflict peacebuilding, impacts of the Afghan
conflict, a number of recent inter-ethnic conflicts, and post-Socialist devel-
opment paradigms. Approaching the problems and issues related to this
region requires a multi-disciplinary perspective that takes into account
political science, international relations, political economy, anthropology,
geography, and security studies. The Politics and History in Central Asia
series serves as a platform for emerging scholarship on this understudied
region.
The Uyghur
Community
Diaspora, Identity and Geopolitics
Editors
Güljanat Kurmangaliyeva Ercilasun Konuralp Ercilasun
Gazi University Gazi University
Ankara, Turkey Ankara, Turkey
In recent years, studies on the Uyghurs of China have become more popu-
lar globally. Consequently, the Western world is becoming more familiar
with China’s remote western region. This popularization is related to vari-
ous factors. One of these factors is the rise of China as a global economic
power, which results in increased popular interest from the rest of the
world. Another factor is the potential for tensions in the region after the
Urumqi clashes of 2009. In fact, the Urumqi incident seemed to be an
important turning point in the region’s recent history. The Chinese state
tightened its rules after this incident, which in turn created a counter-
effect in the region. China has been facing more and more incidents in the
region since the “strike-hard” operations that were conducted after the
Urumqi incident. The third factor may be defined as the new, stricter
regulations of the government, such as restrictions on fasting and the pro-
hibition of entrance to mosques for some groups of the native population.
These restrictions attracted attention toward the region.
A boom in interest has also occurred in English-language scholarly
publications. Although there was already an increasing number of studies
on the region and its people since 1990, this trend accelerated tremen-
dously after the Urumqi incident.1 In fact, an early edited book by
S. Frederick Starr is a crucial academic work that underlined the impor-
tance of the topic and popularized it in the Western world. The 2009
incidents further popularized the field. It seems that this interest is going
to continue and more publications (both scholarly and fiction) are likely to
appear in the future.
v
vi FOREWORD
This book aims to analyze the Uyghur issue with its traditional, histori-
cal, geopolitical, and religious roots. The book starts with an introductory
chapter that summarizes the region’s geographical features and historical
discourse. By concentrating on identity and diaspora studies, the book
gives a comprehensive and updated view of the relations between the
Uyghur community and Chinese state. Furthermore, the book presents
research dealing with Chinese-Uyghur relations and their impacts on
geopolitics.
The second chapter which is written by Güljanat Kurmangaliyeva
Ercilasun focuses on the early stages of Eastern Turkestanese-Chinese rela-
tions according to the travelogue of a nineteenth-century scholar-official
and analyses the formation and development of identity in the region.
Nabijan Tursun contributed a chapter that describes the internal and
external factors of Uyghur identity development, especially during the first
half of the twentieth century. Colin Mackerras e laborates on the religious
angle of the identity of the Uyghurs from the twentieth century through
the contemporary period.
The next chapters present diaspora studies. Işık Kuşçu Bonnenfant
deals with the theoretical foundation of diaspora politics. Suchandana
Chatterjee focuses on the formation of the Uyghur community in
Kazakhstan; her chapter constitutes an example of local history of the
Uyghur issue. Another chapter on this topic was written by Yitzhak
Shichor, who makes a profound analysis of the possibility of dialogue
between the Uyghur diaspora and the Chinese state.
The final chapters of the book focus on geopolitics. Erkin Emet pres-
ents a narrative report of the Urumqi incidents and the official and unof-
ficial reactions. Erkin Ekrem’s chapter focuses on the relations between
China and Turkey, which have experienced ups and downs during the last
few years.
Since the topic is very sensitive, it has reflected on the terms.
Therefore, authors’ terminology was maintained, and unity of the terms
was not obliged. Thus, different variations of the terms are all indicated
in the Index. By focusing on identity, diaspora, and geopolitics, we
believe that this volume will contribute greatly to Uyghur and Chinese
studies.
Foreword
vii
Notes
1. There have been a number of publications on Uyghurs and Xinjiang in the
beginning of the century through 2009. The most prominent ones include
the following: Michael Dillon, Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Far Northwest,
London, New York: Routledge, 2004; S. Frederick Starr (ed.), Xinjiang:
China’s Muslim Borderland, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2004; Arienne
M. Dwyer, The Xinjiang Conflict: Uyghur Identity, Language Policy, and
Political Discourse, Washington D.C.: East-West Center Washington, 2005;
James Millward, Eurasian Crossroads: A history of Xinjiang, New York:
Columbia University Press, 2007; Colin Mackerras and Michael Clarke
(eds.), China, Xinjiang and Central Asia: History, Transition and
Crossborder Interaction into the 21st Century, London: Routledge, 2009.
The boom can be traced after 2009 by the publications such as Gardner
Bovingdon, The Uyghurs: Strangers in Their Own Land, New York:
Columbia University Press, 2010; Michael Clarke, Xinjiang and China’s
Rise in Central Asia—A History, London: Routledge, 2011; Nick
Holdstock, The Tree That Bleeds: A Uighur Town on the Edge, Edinburgh:
Luath Press Ltd., 2011; Rian Thum, The Sacred Routes of Uyghur History,
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2014; Michael Dillon,
Xinjiang and the Expansion of Chinese Communist Power: Kashgar in the
Early Twentieth Century, London: Routledge, 2014; Yu-Wen Chen, The
Uyghur Lobby: Global Networks, Coalitions and Strategies of World Uyghur
Congress, New York: Routledge, 2014; Shaoying Zhang and Derek McGhee,
Social Policies and Ethnic Conflict in China: Lessons from Xinjiang, London:
Palgrave Macmillan, 2014; Nick Holdstock, China’s Forgotten People:
Xinjiang, Terror and the Chinese State, London, New York: I.B. Tauris,
2015; Joanne Smith Finley and Xiaowei Zhang (eds.), Language, Education
and Uyghur Identity in Urban Xinjiang, New York: Routledge, 2015;
Rongxing Guo, China’s Spatial (Dis)integration: Political Economy of the
Interethnic Unrest in Xinjiang, Boston: Elsevier, 2015; Ondrej Klime,
Struggle By the Pen: The Uyghur Discourse of Nation and National Interest c.
1900-1949, Leiden: Brill, 2015. It seems that this interest will continue to
increase in the future.
Contents
ix
x CONTENTS
Index 179
Notes on Contributors
xi
xii Notes on Contributors
Uyghur culture, language, and literature. He has also many publications on the
current situation of Uyghurs and the policies of the People’s Republic of China.
Konuralp Ercilasun is a Professor in the History Department at Gazi University,
in Ankara, Turkey. He holds a BA in History from Ankara University and an MA
from the National Cheng-chi University, Taipei. He earned his PhD from Ankara
University. Ercilasun has worked and lectured in Kyrgyzstan, Turkey and the
Republic of Korea. He published several articles on the steppe regions, Xiongnu,
Chinese historical documents, and the modern era of Mongols. Ercilasun co-
authored the Turkish annotated edition of the Xiongnu chapter in Han Shu. He
also wrote a book on Kashgar from the ancient times through the nineteenth
century.
Güljanat Kurmangaliyeva Ercilasun is an Associate Professor at the Department
of Modern Turkic Studies at Gazi University, Ankara. She holds a BA in History
and an MS in Political Science from the Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
She earned her PhD in History from the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University,
Kyrgyzstan. Kurmangaliyeva Ercilasun’s publications are mainly on various aspects
of the political and social history of the Kazakhs and Kyrgyzs, especially the Soviet
period, intelligentsia, collectivization, religion, women, and family institutions.
Her current research focuses on the Kazakh and Kyrgyz societies in the nineteenth
and twentieth centuries, as well as oral history and memory studies.
Işık Kuşçu Bonnenfant is an Associate Professor at the International Relations
Department of Middle East Technical University in Ankara, Turkey. She received
her PhD in December 2008 from the Department of Central Eurasian Studies at
Indiana University. She was a visiting scholar at the Davis Center, Harvard
University for the 2016–2017 academic year. She received the British Academy
Newton International Fellowship for 2016–2018. Her research interests cover the
former Soviet region (FSU), migration, diaspora politics, ethnic migration, and
peace and conflict studies. She has published in journals such as International
Migration, Central Asian Survey, and Nationalities Papers.
Colin Mackerras is Professor Emeritus at Griffith University, Australia, and a
Fellow of the Academy of Humanities of Australia. A Sinologist, he has visited and
worked in China numerous times, and researched many aspects of China’s past and
present. He has published widely, including on the Uyghurs and China’s other
ethnic minorities. His many authored books include China’s Ethnic Minorities and
Globalisation (RoutledgeCurzon, 2003). In addition, he has carried out primary
research on Uyghur history in The Uighur Empire According to the T’ang Dynastic
Histories, A Study in Sino-Uighur Relations 744–840 (Australian National
University Press, 1972).
Notes on Contributors
xiii
xv
Introduction: The Land, the People,
and the Politics in a Historical Context
Konuralp Ercilasun
K. Ercilasun (*)
History Department, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
or not, the region certainly played an important role in history, which sup-
ports Lattimore’s definition. The reason that Eastern Turkistan played an
important role was its geopolitical (or maybe more accurately, geo-eco-
nomical) location as a key point on the Silk Road. It was located between
the steppe zone and several agricultural regions. Agricultural people in dif-
ferent regions had unique styles of production. Steppe people had a surplus
of flocks and leather, which they could offer to the agricultural zones. More
importantly, steppe people had the ability to mobilize easily, which made
them perfect carriers of goods. Eastern Turkistan, as an intersection point,
benefitted very much from this location, but sometimes it suffered too.
An examination of the geographic condition of the region shows arduous
ranges, wide steppelands, springs of rivers, and oases scattered among vast
deserts. The Altai Mountains, Karakorum Mountains, and Kunlun Mountains
form the geographic borders of the region to the north and south. Another
mountain range, the Tian Shan (Tengri Taghliri), lies between these two
ranges, but closer to the northern part. Beginning from the eastern parts of
Xinjiang, the Tian Shan reaches high elevations in the south of Urumqi and
continues in a western direction until entering Kyrgyzstan.
The land that lies to the north of Tian Shan is called Zungharia and is
mostly dominated by steppeland. This region, which is suitable for animal
husbandry, hosts plenty of important rivers and lakes. The Irtish and Ili
rivers originate from the mountains of Zungharia. Lakes Sairam, Ebinuur,
Manas, Urungu and Barköl—all nourished by regional rivers—are scat-
tered around Zungharia.
The eastern part of Xinjiang contains the Turpan basin, one of the low-
est points on the earth. This location has been known for its fruit-growing
ability since ancient times, especially for grapes and melons. It is also
famous for its earliest annual maturation of fruits. Turpan and Kumul
(Hami) in the east are areas where the Chinese first imported some fruits,
such as melons and watermelons.
The greater part of Xinjiang—the Tarim Basin—lies to the south of the
Tian Shan Mountains. The Tarim Basin has had different names throughout
history, including Kashgaria, Altishahr, and Yitishahr. The Chinese court
also named this area Nanjiang (Southern Frontier) in modern times, an
expression that points to its location in reference to the Tian Shan Mountains.
The Tarim Basin is the land of the Tarim River and Taklamakan Desert.
The Karakorum Mountains and Kunlun Mountains mark the southern
end of this region, separating it from the Tibetan Plateau. The Tarim River
flows through the desert. In the past, it reached Lake Lobnor from time
INTRODUCTION: THE LAND, THE PEOPLE, AND THE POLITICS... 3
Written texts were not found in the steppe zone in general or in Eastern
Turkistan specifically until later times. Moreover, the record-loving cen-
ters of central China, Anatolia, Mesopotamia, and Iran are too far away to
provide any information about the region. More reliable and continuous
accounts of the region coincide with the rise of the Xiongnu in the steppe
in the third century BCE. Accounts dedicated to the Xiongnu and the
region can be found in early Chinese dynastic records. Modun, the famous
Chanyu of Xiongnu, wrote a letter to the Chinese emperor in 176 BCE
and stated that he had subjugated Loulan, Wusun, Hujie, and twenty-six
states.6 This was the first account of the region in terms of subjugation in
Chinese texts.
The first written account of a Chinese encounter with Eastern Turkistan
came half a century later from the letter of Modun. The Chinese emperor
of the Han dynasty, seeking an alliance against Xiongnu, sent an envoy to
the region in 138 BCE. Zhang Qian, the Chinese envoy, returned to
China only in 126 BCE after a hazardous journey. He had twice been
captured by Xiongnu. Moreover, the Yuezhi, who had been pushed by the
Xiongnu, turned down the offer of an alliance with Han China. However,
Zhang Qian brought valuable information on the region, which had been
called the Western Regions by China. In his report, Zhang Qian gave
information about the countries in the region, including their location,
history, and military power.7 This report was a new discovery for the Han
Chinese court. From this report, the Chinese court understood that the
states in the Western Regions were fundamental for the economic power
of Xiongnu. Considering the information brought by Zhang Qian, China
developed a new policy that depended on separating the region from the
Xiongnu to undermine its economic base. Thus, the ancient version of a
Great Game began between Han China and Xiongnu.8
Han China attacked and defeated Fergana in 101 BCE. After this mili-
tary campaign, most states in Eastern Turkistan sent their envoys to the
Chinese army and offered tributes. However, this was a dual subjugation
for the city-states of Eastern Turkistan because they also continued to give
tributes to Xiongnu. In addition, they were still giving more importance
to Xiongnu envoys than the Han Chinese delegations.9 A Xiongnu garri-
son in the region was charge of collecting taxes from the city-states and
controlling them at the beginning of the first century BC.10
The Xiongnu control of the region collapsed in the second half of the
century. After the split, one portion of Xiongnu came under the control of
Han China and the other portion migrated to the environs of Issyk Köl.
INTRODUCTION: THE LAND, THE PEOPLE, AND THE POLITICS... 5
Han China defeated the western part and dominated the Western Regions.
During its rule in Eastern Turkistan, Han China founded a new bureau
named the Military Governorate of Western Regions. The Governorate
was modeled on the previous Xiongnu local garrison. It was in charge of
collecting tributaries and acted as a mediator between the city-states when
there was a dispute.11
The same pattern was repeated a century later. Xiongnu overthrew the
Han hegemony at the beginning of the first century and then controlled
Eastern Turkistan once more. There was a local rival for Xiongnu from one
of the cities of Western Regions. The Yarkent king declared himself as
“Chanyu” in 41 AD and competed with the Xiongnu for the supremacy of
the Western Regions.12
However, the Xiongnu power split a second time and southern Xiongnu
came under the rule of Han China in the middle of the century. The con-
trol of Eastern Turkistan frequently changed between Northern Xiongnu
and Han China in the second half of the century. Finally, Han China
established its power in the Western Regions during the second century.13
However, the Han Chinese control of the region was not continuous. In
fact, the southern part of the region seems to have been under the rule of
the Kushan Empire.14 Moreover, there were plenty of challenges from the
region itself against this rule. For example, Han China sent a troop of
more than 30,000 soldiers against Kashgar, a city-state that had been
expanded and dominated some other cities, in 170 AD. However, the
Chinese army could not take hold of a small city under the rule of the
Kashgar king, even in a siege of forty days.15
The fall of the Han dynasty in 220 AD ended Chinese rule over the
Western Regions. The city-states of the region either established their inde-
pendent rules or came under the rule of other empires, such as the Kushans
and Hepthalites, during this period. The cities in the Western Regions then
began to give tributes to the Wei dynasty,16 a sinified rule from the steppe,
between 435 and 440.17
A dramatic change in the steppes during the middle of the sixth century
affected the region deeply. Bumin, a leader of Ancient Turks, marched
against and defeated his superior Rouran Kaghanate in 552. This was the
beginning of a new rule in the steppe, which resulted in the domination of
Eastern Turkistan again by a steppe power. The cities were either sending
tributes or giving taxes to the Ancient Turks.18 This situation continued for
almost a century, until China became powerful under the Tang dynasty and
expanded its rule to Western Regions by 648.19 This time there was another
6 K. ERCILASUN
rival: Tibet, the southern neighbor of the region, became powerful and
occasionally enforced its dominance, especially in the southern part of the
Western Regions.20 A third rival emerged at the end of the seventh century
in the Issyk Köl area. This rival was named the Turgesh Kaghanate, which
was established in 690. The Turgesh Kaghanate also sometimes disturbed
the rule of Tang China in the Western Regions. Meanwhile, the kaghanate
of Ancient Turks was re-established and subjugated the Turgesh. Thus, the
Western Regions came under the rule of the Ancient Turks once again. In
the first half of the eighth century, the Turgesh kaghanate enjoyed more
independent activities in the region.21
The Islamic Arabs, a new power from the west, had appeared by the
decline of the Turgesh Kaghanate towards the middle of the eighth cen-
tury. At the same time, the ruler of the steppes had also changed and the
Uyghur Kaghanate dominated the land that is now known as Mongolia.
However, the rivalry was between the Arabs and China at that time; these
two rivals waged war in the Talas region in 751. This war had great
implications for Tang China, which was the defeated party. Many warlords
emerged and strived for power, endangering the sovereignty of the Tang
dynasty. Interestingly, the Arabs, the winning party, also removed their
forces from the region because of the power struggle in their center.22 This
power vacuum resulted in the expansion of Uyghur Kaghanate’s domina-
tion of the region in the 750s.23
Uyghur’s dominance was sometimes disturbed not only by Tibet, but
also by the Karluks. The Karluks were internal rivals of the Kaghanate clan
and migrated into the region after being defeated in the power struggle
for the steppe supremacy. Nevertheless, the Uyghur supremacy continued
until the fall of the Kaghanate in 840.24
The year 840 was an important turning point for the region. In this year,
many clans poured into the region because of a decline in the steppe’s
power.25 The region became very populated during this time, which may
have caused the emergence of the native powers of the region. One of them
was the Karakhanids, who were established in the ninth century and ruled
the southern parts of the region at the beginning of their sovereignty. The
other power was the Turpan Uyghur Kingdom, which was the northeast-
ern neighbor of the Karakhanids.
The period between the fall of the Uyghur Kaghanate and the rise of
Chinggis Khan was the era of booming cities in the region. The cities of the
Tarim and Turpan basins flourished culturally and became important cen-
ters. Cities of the Tarim basin became representatives of Islamic culture after
INTRODUCTION: THE LAND, THE PEOPLE, AND THE POLITICS... 7
The Manchus were the victorious side of this strife: they took complete
control of the Zunghar basin in 1757 and the Tarim Basin in 1759.46
Another important outcome of this struggle was the elimination of the
Zunghar population as a result of bloody warfare.
The Manchus studied the structure of the region carefully before they
established their administration, an organization of three different admin-
istrative systems in Eastern Turkistan. In the Zunghar basin, they expanded
their banner system of Mongolia. In the northern cities of Urumqi, Turpan,
and Hami, they established the province system, which was useful for gov-
erning the sedentary population. In the Tarim basin, the Manchus inte-
grated the previous administrative structure with their imperial Qing rule
by excluding the Khojas from the region.47 As a result, the Khojas found
shelters in the western states such as Bukhara, Khokand, and Afghanistan.
Although there were a plenty of Qing garrisons in the region, the new
Qing rule was very careful to separate this outside military power from the
local population, especially in the Tarim basin. The military regime was not
so recognizable for a common city dweller of the Tarim basin.48 Thus, only
one large uprising was seen during the first fifty years of Qing control.
From the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Khokand Khanate,
which was a neighbor of the Tarim basin, had been gaining influence in
the region. Many Khojas had fled to the land of this khanate after the Qing
occupation. The Khans of Khokand supported these Khojas to establish
their power in the Tarim basin. Consequently, a chain of uprisings began
in the region. The first uprising was in 1815 and another one erupted in
1824. Unable to suppress the continuous rebellions, the Manchus were
obliged to give some privileges to Khokand in the Tarim basin in 1833.49
However, this concession did not put an end to the problems of the
Manchu rule. The region continued to disobey the Manchu court and
finally broke away totally in the 1860s. At that time, Yakup Bek, originally
a commander of the Khokand Khanate, had founded his own khanate in
Eastern Turkistan and established diplomatic relations with Russia and
Britain. By enjoying independency, his rule continued until his death in
May 1877.50 Then the Qing court, which was already sinicisized, main-
tained the help of Russia and defeated the remnants of the Khanate in one
year.51 The new Qing rule was totally different than the previous one. The
two-century-long rule in China resulted in a gradual sinicization of the
Manchus; this process was completed in the second half of the nineteenth
century. The court now had more of the characteristics of a Chinese reign
than before. Thus, the Qing court gave up the old style of indirect
10 K. ERCILASUN
been still influencing the region and the Eastern Turkistan Republican
Government. Soviet Russia compromised with China because of the estab-
lishment of the Communist Chinese government in 1949. The leaders of the
Eastern Turkistan Republic boarded a plane for Beijing under the influence
of Soviet Russia, after which it was announced that the plane had crashed and
the passengers were dead. In fact, they were imprisoned in Beijing. Thus, the
Chinese army leader in Xinjiang declared subordination to the Peoples’
Republic of China. However, local resistance continued until 1951.58
The new Chinese government established the Xinjiang Uygur
Autonomous Region in 1955, although its position was not so secure in
the region. There were plenty of uprisings against the new Chinese admin-
istration, including three large uprisings during the 1950s and three more
during the 1960s.59 Tensions continued in the second half of the 1980s.
The most well-known clashes were the 1990 Barın and the 1997 Ili (Gulja)
clashes. Finally, the tensions peaked after the 2009 Urumqi clashes.
The controlling powers of Eastern Turkistan from ancient times can be
summarized as follows. With regard to the Chinese government, some
pure Chinese dynasties of Han and Tang governed the region. There were
also many sinified steppe rulers of China, such as Liao, and Qing, who also
governed the region. The sinicization of the last empire was absolute.
Therefore, when the Qing Empire governed the region in the second half
of the nineteenth century, it was a sole Chinese rule. The Republic of
China nominally ruled the region because the main power was in the hands
of the Chinese governors of the region, who can also be counted as war-
lords. The last governing power was the People’s Republic of China.
When other governing powers are considered, different types of rules
are apparent. One type of domination can be regarded as local domina-
tion, in which the capital of the state is in the region. The self-governing
city-states of the earliest times fall into this category. In some cases, a city-
state became more powerful than the others and governed the neighbor-
ing cities, such as the Yarkent Kingdom of the first century and the Kashgar
Kingdom of the second century. Other powers that fall into this category
include the Karakhanids, the Turpan Uyghur Kingdom, the Yarkent
Khanate, the Zunghars, the Yakup Bek Khanate, and the Republics of
Eastern Turkistan. In fact, most of the rulers on this second list originated
from the steppe because the region had been integrated into steppe poli-
tics for many centuries. The steppe powers also governed the region as the
periphery of their realm. These powers include the rule of the Xiongnu,
Xianbei, Rouran, Ancient Turks, Orkhon Uyghur, Kara Khitay, Chinggisid,
12 K. ERCILASUN
Chagataid, and Timurid Khanates. The capital was either in the Orkhon
valley in Mongolia or at Mawarannahr. Kushans and Hephtalites, who
were both of steppe origin but had their core center in Afghanistan and
India, also principally ruled the southern part of the region.
Notes
1. The naming of the region is an important debate between Uygur, Chinese,
and sometimes Western scholars. China stresses the official name of the
region, whereas Uygur scholars indicate that Eastern Turkistan is the origi-
nal name. They further point out that Xinjiang is an artificial name and this
term has a short history. Sometimes, Western scholars also get involved in
this dispute. The ancient Chinese name for the region is Western Regions.
In this introductory chapter, I generally (although not strictly) use the
terms Eastern Turkistan and Western Regions when describing the histori-
cal discourse and the term Xinjiang when describing recent events.
2. Owen Lattimore, Pivot of Asia: Sinkiang and the Inner Asian Frontiers of
China and Russia, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1950.
3. A. P. Derevyanko and Lü-Zun E, “Upper Palaeolithic cultures”, History of
Civilizations of Central Asia, Vol. 1, edited by A. H. Dani & V. M. Masson,
Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 1992, p. 107.
4. Elizabeth Wayland Barber, The Mummies of Ürümchi, New York & London:
W. W. Norton & Company, 1999, plates 1 and 9. For a good and detailed
discussion of popularization of the mummies and of some misunderstand-
ings please refer to James A. Millward, Eurasian Crossroads: A History of
Xinjiang, New York: Columbia University Press, 2007, pp. 15–17.
5. Another Stop on a Long, Improbable Journey (NYT—Feb 20, 2011 http://
www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/arts/design/21silk.html?_r=0); After
Mummy Mix-Up, Philly Unwraps Museum Exhibit (Foxnews—Feb 21,
2011 http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2011/02/21/mummy-mix-philly-
unwraps-museum-exhibit.html).
6. Shiji p. 2896; Han Shu p. 3757.
7. Shiji pp. 3157–3180.
8. Konuralp Ercilasun, “Silk Road as a Sub-Global Region: A Sphere Emerging
from the Interaction of Cultural and Economic Fields”, in International
Seminar on Reviving the Silk Route: New Initiatives and Engagements for
the 21st Century, The Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA), International
Center, Goa, India, 9–10 February 2007. https://www.google.com.tr/url
?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ah
UKEwiKnYr35q3JAhXBCywKHWc9Cf8QFggfMAE&url=http%3A%2F%
2Fwww.centralasia-southcaucasus.com%2Fdocs%2FSilk%2520Route%2FPa
INTRODUCTION: THE LAND, THE PEOPLE, AND THE POLITICS... 13
per_Konulrap_Ercilasun.doc&usg=AFQjCNHrabBklqNHPZMdxyjpyOL
k7pQ6_w
9. Yü Ying-shih, Trade and Expansion in Han China: A Study in the Structure
of Sino-Barbarian Economic Relations, Berkeley and LA: University of
California Press, 1967, pp. 139–140.
10. Han Shu p. 3872.
11. Yü Ying-shih, Trade and Expansion in Han China: A Study in the Structure
of Sino-Barbarian Economic Relations, p. 142.
12. William Montgomery McGovern. The Early Empires of Central Asia, Chapel
Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1939, pp. 226–230. Bahaeddin
̇
Ögel, Büyük Hun Imparatorluğ u Tarihi II (History of the Great Xiongnu
Empire II), Ankara: Ministry of Culture Publications, 1981, pp. 245–247,
260–262.
13. Konuralp Ercilasun, Tarihin Derinliklerinden 19. Yüzyıla Kâşgar (Kashgar
till the 19th Century), Ankara: TTK Publications, p. 19.
14. L. Ligeti, Bilinmeyen İç Asya (Unknown Inner Asia), tr. Sadrettin Karatay,
Ankara: TDK Publications, 1986, p. 240.
15. Hou Han Shu pp. 2926–2927.
16. Unlike the Han dynasty, the Wei dynasty was not founded by ethnic
Chinese. The rulers were from the origin of Tabgach, which migrated from
the steppes. They ruled the steppe area and China up to the shores of
Yangtse River for almost two centuries. Because most of their population
were Chinese, they were gradually sinified, especially during the second
half of the fifth century. İbrahim Kafesoğlu, Türk Milli Kültürü (Turkic
National Culture), İstanbul: Ötüken Publications, 1997, pp. 90–93.
17. Bei Shi pp. 3205–3206.
18. Wei Shu p. 2268, Sui Shu p. 1852.
19. Howard J. Wechsler, “T’ai-tsung (reign 626–49) the consolidator”, The
Cambridge History of China, Vol. 3, ed. Denis Twittchet, Taipei: Caves
Books Limited, 1989, p. 227.
20. Denis Twittchet, Howard J. Wechsler, “Kao-tsung (reign 649–83) and the
empress Wu: the inheritor and the usurper”, The Cambridge History of
China, Vol. 3, pp. 285–286.
21. Hüseyin Salman, Türgişler (The Turgesh), Ankara: Ministry of Culture
Publications, 1998, pp. 17–24, 42–46.
22. Konuralp Ercilasun, Tarihin Derinliklerinden 19. Yüzyıla Kâşgar (Kashgar
till the 19th Century), p. 24.
23. Hüseyin Salman, Türgişler (The Turgesh), pp. 81–82.
24. S. G. Klyashtornıy—T. İ. Sultanov, Kazakistan Türkün Üç Bin Yılı
(Kazakhstan: A History of Three Thousand Years), tr. D. Ahsen Batur,
İstanbul: Selenge Publications, 2003, pp. 117–118.
14 K. ERCILASUN
25. For Uyghur migrations Özkan I ̇zgi, Çin Elçisi Wang Yen-te’nin Uygur
Seyahatnamesi (The Travel of Wang Yen-te: A Chinese Envoy to Uyghurs),
Ankara: TTK Publications, 1989, pp. 25–26.
26. Peter B. Golden, “The Karakhanids and Early Islam”, The Cambridge
History of Early Inner Asia, edited by Denis Sinor, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1990, p. 360. Reşat Genç, Karahanlı Devlet Teşkilatı (The
State Structure of Karakhanids), Ankara: Ministry of Culture Publications,
1981, pp. 44–45. Reşat Genç, “Karahanlılar” (The Karakhanids), Türkler
(Turks), vol. 4, Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Publications, pp. 449–450.
27. I ̇brahim Kafesoğlu, Türk Milli Kültürü (Turkic National Culture),
pp. 90–93.
28. Peter B. Golden, “The Karakhanids and Early Islam”, p. 367.
29. Herbert Franke, “The Forest Peoples of Manchuria: Kitans and Jurchens”,
The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, edited by Denis Sinor, p. 410.
30. V. V. Barthold, Moğol I ̇stilasına Kadar Türkistan (Türkistan Down to the
Mongol Invasion), Ankara: TTK Publications, 1990, p. 390.
31. Özkan I ̇zgi, Çin Elçisi Wang Yen-te’nin Uygur Seyahatnamesi (The Travel
of Wang Yen-te: A Chinese Envoy to Uyghurs), p. 30.
32. V. V. Barthold, Moğol I ̇stilasına Kadar Türkistan (Türkistan Down to the
Mongol Invasion), p. 390.
33. Özkan I ̇zgi, Çin Elçisi Wang Yen-te’nin Uygur Seyahatnamesi (The Travel
of Wang Yen-te: A Chinese Envoy to Uyghurs), p. 30.
̇
34. Rene Grousset, Bozkır Imparatorluğ u (Empire of the Steppes), tr. M. Reşat
Uzmen, I ̇stanbul: Ötüken Publications, 1980, pp. 319–327. Mustafa
Kafalı, Çağatay Hanlığı 1227–1345 (Chagatai Khanate 1227–1345),
Ankara: Berikan Publications, 2005, p. 115.
35. Jean-Paul Roux, Orta Asya: Tarih ve Uygarlık (Central Asia: History and
Civilization), tr. Lale Arslan, I ̇stanbul: Kabalcı Publications, 2001,
pp. 332–333.
36. Rene Grousset, Bozkır I ̇mparatorluğu (Empire of the Steppes), pp. 396–
400. Zeki Velidi Togan, Bugünkü Türkili Türkistan ve Yakın Tarihi
(Contemporary Turkistan and Its Modern History), I ̇stanbul: Enderun
Publications, 1981, pp. 102–105.
̇
37. Rene Grousset, Bozkır I mparatorluğu (Empire of the Steppes), p. 452.
W. Barthold, “Duglat”, I slaṁ Ansiklopedisi (Encyclopedia of Islam—Turkish
Version), Vol. 3, Ankara: Ministry of Education Publications, 1963, p. 652.
̇
38. See for ex. Rene Grousset, Bozkır Imparatorluğ u (Empire of the Steppes),
p. 396 and Jean-Paul Roux, Orta Asya: Tarih ve Uygarlık (Central Asia:
History and Civilization), p. 353.
̇
39. Jean-Paul Roux, Moğol Imparatorluğ u Tarihi (History of the Mongol Empire),
̇
tr. Aykut Kazancıgil and Ayşe Bereket, I stanbul: Kabalcı Publications, 2001,
pp. 443–445.
INTRODUCTION: THE LAND, THE PEOPLE, AND THE POLITICS... 15
40. D. Pokotilov, History of the Eastern Mongols during the Ming Dynasty from
1368 to 1631, Arlington, Virginia: University Publications of America,
pp. 48–51. Ming Shi, pp. 8500–8501.
41. Henry H. Howorth, History of the Mongols, Vol. 2, Taipei: Cheng-wen
Publishing Company, 1970, pp. 688–689. Konuralp Ercilasun, “Batı
Moğollarını I ̇fade eden Terimler Üzerine” (On the Terms related to the
Western Mongols), Türk Tarihçiliğine Katkılar: Mustafa Kafalı Armağanı
(Contributions to the Turkic History - Dedicated to Mustafa Kafalı), edited
by Üçler Bulduk & Abdullah Üstün, Ankara: TKAE Publishing, 2013,
p. 106.
̇
42. Rene Grousset, Bozkır Imparatorluğ u (Empire of the Steppes), p. 460.
Muhammed Bilal Çelik, Yarkent Hanlığı’nın Siyasi Tarihi (Political
History of Yarkent Khanate), I ̇stanbul: IQ Publications, 2013, p. 226.
43. Jean-Paul Roux, Orta Asya: Tarih ve Uygarlık (Central Asia: History and
Civilization), p. 385. Konuralp Ercilasun, Tarihin Derinliklerinden 19.
Yüzyıla Kâşgar (Kashgar till the 19th Century), p. 34.
̇
44. I senbike Togan, “Islam in a Changing Society: The Khojas of Eastern
Turkistan”, Muslims in Central Asia: Expressions of Identity and Change,
edited by Jo-Ann Gross, Durkham, London: Duke University Press, 1992,
̇
pp. 137–138. I senbike Togan, “Chinese Turkistan Under the Khojas
(1678–1759)”, Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. 5, California: Mazda Publishers,
1991, p. 475.
45. Henry H. Howorth, History of the Mongols, Vol. 2, p. 623.
̇
46. Rene Grousset, Bozkır Imparatorluğ u (Empire of the Steppes), pp. 493–496.
47. Lin An-hsien, Qingchao zai Xinjiangde Han Hui Geli Zhengtse (The
Segregation Policy of the Qing Dynasty in Xinjiang), Taipei: Taiwan Shangwu
Publishing, 1988, p. 57. L. J. Newby, “The Begs of Xinjiang: Between Two
Worlds”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 61
(1998), No. 2, pp. 286–287.
48. Konuralp Ercilasun, Tarihin Derinliklerinden 19. Yüzyıla Kâşgar (Kashgar
till the 19th Century), p. 128.
49. Joseph Fletcher. “The heyday of the Ch’ing order in Mongolia, Sinkiang
and Tibet”, in The Cambridge History of China: Late Ch’ing 1800–1911
(Part 1), vol. 10, ed. John K. Fairbank. Cambridge, London, New York &
Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 377–378.
50. Demetrius Charles Boulger. The Life of Yakoob Beg, Athalik Ghazi and
Badaulet, Ameer of Kashgar. London, 1878, p. 253. There is a detailed study
on this period: Ahmet Rıza Bekin, Yakup Bey Devrinde Çin Türkistanında
Siyasal ve Kültürel Durum (Social and Cultural History of Chinese Turkistan
in the Yakup Bek Era), PhD. Thesis, Ankara University, 1968.
51. Mehmet Emin Buğra. Doğu Türkistan—Tarihî, Coğrafî ve Şimdiki Durumu
(Eastern Turkistan: History, Geography and Current Situation). Istanbul.
1952, pp. 27–28.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Pee-wee Harris
in camp
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
Language: English
ILLUSTRATED BY
H. S. BARBOUR