Professional Documents
Culture Documents
smll202300673 Sup 0001 Suppmat
smll202300673 Sup 0001 Suppmat
Water-Stable Fluorous Metal–Organic Frameworks with Open Metal Sites and Amine
Groups for Efficient Urea Electrocatalytic Oxidation
Jinhu Wang, Reza Abazari*, Soheila Sanati, Aleksander Ejsmont, Joanna Goscianska, Yingtang
Zhou* and Deepak P. Dubal*
Supporting Information
1
1
These authors contributed equally to this work.
(Aldrich, 99%), 3,5-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)phenyl)boronic acid (Alfa, 97%), palladium acetate (Merck, 47%
Pd), H2O2 (Merck, 30%), hydrobromic acid (HBr; Alfa, 48%), ethanol (EtOH; Merck, 99.9%), and N,N-
dimethylformamide (DMF; Merck, 99.8%) were of analytical grade and used without further
purification.
General methods. The FE-SEM images were obtained on a Hitachi S-1460 instrument with a 15 kV
accelerating voltage. Prior to the FE-SEM examination, the samples were diluted with ethanol, dried
on a silica wafer, and sputter-coated with gold. X-ray powder diffraction (PXRD) measurements were
2020 analyzer. The specific surface area was calculated by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method.
The FT-IR spectra were obtained over the 400−4000 cm–1 wavenumber range on a Shimadzu FT-IR
spectrometer (model Prestige 21) using the KBr disks. Ultrasonication was carried out in a SONICA-
2200 EP ultrasonic bath with a 40 kHz frequency. Using a thermo-balance model of TG209 F1 Iris, the
thermo-gravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed. Through the nitrogen gas flow of 30 mL min –1, at
Synthesis of H4L linker. According to Scheme S1, after steps (I) and (II), the mixture containing
tetraester (150 mg, 0.25 mmol) and sodium hydroxide (5 N, 10 mL) was prepared in 20 mL ethanol
and refluxed for 3 days to ester hydrolysis. The solution was then filtered and placed in an ice bath for
1 h. The pH of the solution was set to 5 using HCl. A yellowish product was then precipitated which
2
was centrifuged several times and washed with water followed by 12 h of drying in a vacuum oven at
100 C . A clear yellow product was then obtained (130 mg; 91%).
B(OH)2
(I) (II) (III)
CF3 CF3 CF3 CF3
Aq. HBr, i) 5N NaOH, EtOH
H2O2 EtOOC COOEt ii) HCL
Figure S1. Cu-FMOF-NH2 3D structure in different axes: (010) and (001), with a marked cell unit.
3
Figure S2. PXRD patterns of Cu-FMOF-NH2 before and after urea electrocatalytic oxidation.