Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 45

The jazz war radio Nazism and the

struggle for the airwaves in World War


II First Edition Studdert
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-jazz-war-radio-nazism-and-the-struggle-for-the-air
waves-in-world-war-ii-first-edition-studdert/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

At war s summit the Red Army and the struggle for the
Caucasus Mountains in World War II First Published
Edition Niemcy. Heer

https://textbookfull.com/product/at-war-s-summit-the-red-army-
and-the-struggle-for-the-caucasus-mountains-in-world-war-ii-
first-published-edition-niemcy-heer/

The Fourth Reich: The Specter of Nazism from World War


II to the Present Gavriel D. Rosenfeld

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-fourth-reich-the-specter-of-
nazism-from-world-war-ii-to-the-present-gavriel-d-rosenfeld/

The future of the world: futurology, futurists, and the


struggle for the post-Cold War imagination First
Edition Andersson

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-future-of-the-world-
futurology-futurists-and-the-struggle-for-the-post-cold-war-
imagination-first-edition-andersson/

The War Before the War Fugitive Slaves and the Struggle
for America s Soul from the Revolution to the Civil War
Andrew Delbanco

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-war-before-the-war-fugitive-
slaves-and-the-struggle-for-america-s-soul-from-the-revolution-
to-the-civil-war-andrew-delbanco/
The Washington War FDR s Inner Circle and the Politics
of Power that Won World War II First Edition James
Lacey

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-washington-war-fdr-s-inner-
circle-and-the-politics-of-power-that-won-world-war-ii-first-
edition-james-lacey/

Unconditional: The Japanese Surrender in World War II


Marc Gallicchio

https://textbookfull.com/product/unconditional-the-japanese-
surrender-in-world-war-ii-marc-gallicchio/

Chronological Developments Of Wireless Radio Systems


Before World War II Vinayak Laxman Patil

https://textbookfull.com/product/chronological-developments-of-
wireless-radio-systems-before-world-war-ii-vinayak-laxman-patil/

A covert action Reagan the CIA and the Cold War


struggle in Poland First Edition Jones

https://textbookfull.com/product/a-covert-action-reagan-the-cia-
and-the-cold-war-struggle-in-poland-first-edition-jones/

Between Giants The Battle for the Baltics in World War


II General Military Buttar Prit

https://textbookfull.com/product/between-giants-the-battle-for-
the-baltics-in-world-war-ii-general-military-buttar-prit/
Will Studdert completed his PhD at the University of Kent, where
he specialised on the history of jazz and propaganda during World
War II.
‘This revelatory book throws fresh light on the manner in which the
widespread popularity of jazz was exploited by the Nazis for
propaganda purposes in World War II. One does not require a
knowledge of jazz history to recognise that Studdert’s critical
analysis of the “jazz war” represents an important contribution to the
historiography of World War II and its social and cultural impact is
clear. A wide-ranging, perceptive and authoritative study.’
David Welch, Professor Emeritus of Modern History and
Director of the Centre for the Study of War,
Propaganda and Society at the University of Kent
For Olya
CONTENTS

List of Figures
Glossary
List of Abbreviations
Acknowledgements

Introduction

1. The ‘Cultural Blackout’: September 1939 – July 1940


Britain
2. ‘Hot’ War: July 1940 – December 1941
Britain
Germany
3. Turning the Psychological Tide: December 1941 –
February 1943
Germany
USA
Britain
4. ‘Total Radio Warfare’: February 1943 – May 1945
Germany
USA
Britain
Postscript
Notes
Bibliography
Index
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Charles Chilton with guitar, late 1930s/early 1940s.


Courtesy: the Chilton family.
Figure 2.2 Lutz Templin in Berlin, 1942. Courtesy: Dr Rainer E. Lotz,
Bonn.
Figure 2.3 Members of the Lutz Templin Orchestra in Berlin, 1942.
Courtesy: Dr Rainer E. Lotz, Bonn.
Figure 2.4 The only known photograph of Charlie and his Orchestra,
practising in a Berlin mattress factory, 1942. Courtesy: Dr Rainer E.
Lotz, Bonn.
Figure 2.5 Klarinette & Mandolin issue of Charlie and his Orchestra’s
St Louis Blues. Courtesy: Dr Rainer E. Lotz, Bonn.
Figure 2.6 Members of the Lutz Templin Orchestra at the Berlin
Kurzwellensender (short-wave station), 1942–3. Courtesy: Dr Rainer
E. Lotz, Bonn.
Figure 2.7 Joseph Goebbels congratulates the composer Paul Lincke
on his 75th birthday in November 1941, with Hans Hinkel (centre)
looking on. Courtesy: Bundesarchiv photo no. 183-B05562
Figure 2.8 Members of the Lutz Templin Orchestra on
Truppenbetreuung duty. Charly Tabor is second from right, Fritz
Brocksieper third from right (back row). Courtesy: Jazzinstitut
Darmstadt.
Figure 2.9 An international gathering of jazz aficionados at a KdF
Kleinkunst (cabaret) facility in Magdeburg, 1943. Hans Blüthner is in
the back row, second from the right. Courtesy: Jazzinstitut
Darmstadt.
Figure 2.10 Jazz fans Lilo Blüthner (right), Siegfried Schröter and an
unidentified woman, early 1940s. Courtesy: Jazzinstitut Darmstadt.
Figure 2.11 The secret jam session at Berlin’s Delphi-Palast,
involving German musicians and members of Ernst van’t Hoff’s
orchestra, 3 April 1942. Courtesy: Jazzinstitut Darmstadt.
Figure 3.1 Dietrich Schulz-Köhn, a renowned postwar jazz
broadcaster and author, in Luftwaffe uniform with members of the
Hot Club of Paris, 1943. Courtesy: Jazzinstitut Darmstadt.
Figure 3.2 Fritz ‘Freddie’ Brocksieper, 1940s. Courtesy: Jazzinstitut
Darmstadt.
Figure 3.3 Elmer Davis, Director of the United States Office of War
Information. Courtesy: National Archives.
Figure 3.4 Sefton Delmer (centre) at the border transit camp Lager
Friedland in February 1958, interviewing German scientists returning
from Soviet captivity. Courtesy: Bundesarchiv photo no. F005103-
0008
Figure 4.1 Police check the draft cards of zoot suiters on Central
Avenue during the riots in Los Angeles, 1943. Courtesy: National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People/Library of
Congress, LC-USZ62-75611
Figure 4.2 Iva Toguri d’Aquino interviewed by American
correspondents, September 1945. Courtesy: National Archives photo
no. 80-G-490488
Figure 4.3 Members of the Lutz Templin Orchestra (including Fritz
Brocksieper, seated) in Stuttgart, 1944. Courtesy: Dr Rainer E. Lotz,
Bonn.
Figure 4.4 Charlie and his Orchestra clarinettist Benny de Weille in
the mid-/late 1940s with Werner Dies, Johnny Richardson and Lucky
Emery. Courtesy: Jazzinstitut Darmstadt.
GLOSSARY

Endsieg – final victory


Gauleitung – district leadership
Geheime Sonderdienststelle – secret special agency
Heimat – homeland
Kampfbund für deutsche Kultur – Combat League for German
Culture
Kurzwellensender – shortwave station
Machtergreifung – Nazi seizure of power
Obersten Reichsbehörden – top Reich authorities
Reichspropagandaleitung – Reich Propaganda Leadership
Soldatensender – armed-forces radio station
Sonderfahndungsliste G.B. – special wanted list Great Britain
Truppenbetreuung – troop entertainment
Völkisch – racial, ethnic
Volksempfänger – peoples’ receiver
Wunschkonzert – musical request programme
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ABC American Broadcasting Company


BA Bundesarchiv Berlin
BBC British Broadcasting Corporation
BBC WAC BBC Written Archives Collection, Caversham
CBS Columbia Broadcasting System
COI Office of the Coordinator of Information
CTASC Clara Thomas Archives and Special Collections,
York University, Toronto
DNB Deutsches Nachrichtenbüro (German News
Agency)
DRA Deutsches Runkfunkarchiv Frankfurt
DTU Deutsche Tanz- und Unterhaltungsorchester
(German Dance- and Entertainment Orchestra)
ENSA Enterntainments National Service Association
FCC Federal Communications Commission
JZD Jazzinstitut Darmstadt
KWS Kurzwellensender (Shortwave Station)
MBS Mutual Broadcasting System
MEW Ministry of Economic Warfare
MI5 Military Intelligence, Section 5
MoI Ministry of Information
NA National Archives, Kew
NAACP National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People
NARA National Archives and Records Administration,
College Park, Maryland
NFCL National Federation for Constitutional Liberties
NID Naval Intelligence Division
NJA National Jazz Archive, Loughton
NSDAP Nazionalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
(National Socialist German Workers’ Party)
OCD Office of Civilian Defense
OFF Office of Facts and Figures
OKW Oberkommando Wehrmacht (Armed Forces
High Command)
OWI Office of War Information
PID Political Intelligence Department
POW Prisoner of War
PWB Psychological Warfare Branch
PWD Psychological Warfare Division
PWE Political Warfare Executive
RBTO Radio Berlin Tanzorchester (Radio Berlin Dance
Orchestra)
RKK Reichskulturkammer (Reich Chamber of
Culture)
RMK Reichsmusikkammer (Reich Chamber of Music)
RMVP Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und
Propaganda (Reich Ministry of Public
Enlightment and Propaganda)
RRG Reichs-Rundfunk-Gesellschaft (Reich
Broadcasting Corporation)
RTK Reichstheaterkammer (Reich Chamber of
Theatre)
SD Sicherheitsdienst des Reichführers-SS (Security
Service of the Reichsführer-SS)
SHAEF Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary
Force
SOE Special Operations Executive
SS Schutzstaffel (Defence Corps)
SSD Special Services Division
UK-Stellung reserved occupation
(Unabkömm-
lichstellung)
VOA Voice of America
So it seems that Swing is mobilised and will play its part in the
coming struggle.
B. M. Lytton-Edwards, Melody Maker,
October 1939
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

In the years spent working on my doctoral thesis and this resulting


book, I have accumulated a number of personal and scholarly debts.
I am particularly grateful to my supervisors at the University of Kent,
Professor David Welch and Professor Ulf Schmidt, for sharing their
expertise with me. Their convivial encouragement and patience
during the research and writing of my PhD (and beyond) have been
much appreciated, and both this book and I have benefited greatly
from their insights, advice and criticism. The publication itself would
not have been possible without the support and enthusiasm of
Tomasz Hoskins, my editor at I.B.Tauris, and Florian Duijsens has
copyedited the final draft with his trademark diligence and creativity.
The PhD was generously funded by a three-year studentship
from the University of Kent’s School of History, and the School’s top-
up fund allowed me to undertake research trips to Darmstadt,
College Park and Toronto. It was at York University, Toronto, that I
was able to access the wealth of material collected by Professor
Michael H. Kater during the research for Different Drummers, his
seminal work on jazz in Nazi Germany, and which is now housed at
the Clara Thomas Archives and Special Collections. I thank Professor
Kater for his permission to use these remarkable resources, which
constitute the bulk of the German oral history cited in this book; in
the absence of surviving protagonists, the interviews and
correspondence with musicians and aficionados from the Third-Reich
jazz scene have been invaluable. Another influential figure in the
field, Dr Rainer E. Lotz, co-author of the groundbreaking Hitler’s
Airwaves: The Inside Story of Nazi Broadcasting and Propaganda
Swing, very kindly made rare photographs available to me.
Elsewhere, I have been most professionally assisted on my many
visits by the staff at the National Archives, Kew, the Bundesarchiv,
Berlin and the National Archives and Records Administration at
College Park, Maryland. I am grateful to Dr Wolfram Knauer and
Doris Schröder at the Jazzinsitut Darmstadt, Jeff Walden at the BBC
Written Archives Collection and Suzanne Dubeau at the Clara
Thomas Archives and Special Collections at York University, Toronto,
for their help in navigating the material at their institutions, and to
David Nathan for his cordial support at the excellent National Jazz
Archive at Loughton.
I was very fortunate to meet one of the key British protagonists
of this book in person. My wife Olya and I visited Charles and Penny
Chilton at their home in West Hampstead in June 2012, and the
interview was memorable not only for the extraordinary opportunity
to talk to Mr Chilton about his wartime experiences at the BBC, but
also for the warmth and humour of our hosts. Back at home in
Berlin, I have been able to call upon the help of the author and DJ
Stephan Wuthe, a leading authority on German jazz and a central
figure in the city’s vibrant swing revival culture. Stephan has
graciously taken the time to read the areas of the manuscript on
which he has unsurpassed expertise, setting me straight on
important points and providing information which I could not have
found elsewhere.
Professor Catherine Tackley, a preeminent historian of British jazz
with whom I shared a panel at the University of London (the former
headquarters of the Ministry of Information) in January 2013, was
kind enough to send me an as-yet-unpublished chapter of hers. She
also introduced me to British jazz aficionado Peter W. G. Powell,
whose detailed answers to my written questions have provided a
firsthand account of the experiences of a young jazz fan in wartime
London. In addition, Mr Powell generously sent me a pre-publication
manuscript relating to the landmark First English Public Jam Session
of 1941, which he attended, as well as numerous copies of articles,
photographs and concert programmes not available in any archive.
In spite of the assistance I have received from others during the
research and writing process, as well as the insightful comments and
expert suggestions of my anonymous peer reviewer, some errors of
fact or interpretation may well remain. I take full responsibility for
these.
Last but not least I thank my parents, Chris and Inge, who have
helped me over the years in ways too numerous to list, and more or
less cheerfully resigned themselves to my return to the household
during the periods when I was in the UK. And I dedicate this book to
Olya, who has been a continuous source of love, support and
kindred musical appreciation. Our nocturnal forays into the jazz
scenes of Berlin, London, New York and beyond have provided
frequent inspiration, serving as vivid reminders that this wonderful
music is alive and well in the twenty-first century.
INTRODUCTION

World War II was the first major conflict in which radio played a
central role. Broadcasting was far more than just a means of
conveying information and entertainment; it had the potential to
inform or deceive, to build or break morale, to amuse and to
intimidate, and, over the course of the war, the ‘battle of the ether’
came to constitute a front in its own right. Listeners in the armed
forces presented broadcasters and propagandists on both sides with
a wholly new kind of audience; young men desirous of upbeat
entertainment and accurate news, living closely together in an
environment where group listening habits and majority taste ruled.
Whatever differences there were in their personal, cultural and
political backgrounds, Allied and Axis forces audiences shared a
common taste for one type of music in particular: jazz.
The widespread international popularity of jazz made it a
potentially formidable weapon, and it is unsurprising that it came to
be exploited as a means of propaganda to such a degree during the
war. My introduction to the curious concept of ‘propaganda jazz’
came some years ago when I chanced upon the recordings of
Charlie and his Orchestra, Joseph Goebbels’ English-language jazz
band. Presumably in keeping with the songs’ original intended
impact on wartime British listeners, I was immediately struck by the
jarring contrast between the familiar American musical ‘evergreens’
and the Nazi worldview reflected in the lyrics, and began seeking out
the existing secondary literature on the subject, starting with Michael
H. Kater’s Different Drummers and Horst J. P. Bergmeier and Rainer
E. Lotz’s Hitler’s Airwaves. Yet the further I delved into books and
primary sources, it became clear that propaganda jazz was far from
being only a Nazi phenomenon; an array of organisations on both
sides of the conflict used popular music as a tool to influence or
attract audiences. The fact that Goebbels’ Reichsministerium für
Volksaufklärung und Propaganda (RMVP) appeared to have initiated
the ‘Charlie’ project as a response to BBC jazz broadcasts to
Germany also suggested that these propaganda strategies did not
emerge in a vacuum but directly influenced and affected one
another.
My comparative research into the uses of jazz music as
propaganda during World War II culminated in a PhD at the
University of Kent, of which this book is the result. Visiting archives
in Britain, Germany, the USA and Canada, I found that the ‘call and
response’ nature of the propaganda was indeed part of an
international discourse involving myriad personalities and
organisations, and encompassing a range of social, political and
cultural histories. Restricting the project’s focus to Britain, Germany
and the USA allowed me to explore the relations between these
individuals and government agencies in greater detail, concentrating
in particular on the work of the RMVP. in Germany, the Office of War
Information (OWI) in the USA, and Britain’s Political Warfare
Executive (PWE), a clandestine body established in August 1941 to
consolidate psychological warfare activities to enemy and neutral
countries. This book does not attempt to provide a comprehensive
overview of the uses of jazz music as a means of manipulation
during the war; the range of its impact and the truly international
nature of its popularity makes this impossible. Instead, it seeks to
reappraise and, in some cases, discuss for the first time several
diverse aspects of ‘the jazz war’ – from semi-legal nocturnal jam
sessions to subversive, clandestine radio stations, and from national
broadcasting policies to governmental debates – in order to facilitate
a clearer and more extensive understanding of jazz’s role in the
conflict.
The broad contemporary interpretations of the terms ‘jazz’ and
‘propaganda’, which I adhere to in this book, differ somewhat from
today’s usage. Although there already existed the belief among
connoisseurs that ‘jazz’ and ‘dance music’ were mutually exclusive
entities,1 in practice the boundaries between these genre distinctions
were fluid, and dance music is inseparable from the wartime jazz
discourse. Even the influential British jazz journal Melody Maker
devoted a great deal of coverage to dance bands, probably because,
since jazz was a minority taste, mainstream appeal was needed to
remain profitable through sales and advertising revenue.2
Meanwhile, many dance musicians, including the popular Geraldo,
jumped on the swing bandwagon during the British swing craze of
1942, and dance-band broadcasts over the BBC would usually offer
‘something for everyone’, from saccharine commercial tunes to ‘hot’
swing numbers.3 Indeed, the BBC had difficulties distinguishing
between jazz, dance music, and swing,4 and aficionados in the USA,
Britain, France, Germany and elsewhere often erroneously perceived
swing to be a slick commercial imitation by white musicians of
‘authentic’ African-American jazz.5 In Germany, the borders between
jazz and dance music were further blurred by the delayed
introduction of jazz to the Weimar Republic.6 A manual issued in
1928 provided instructions on how to convert a salon orchestra into
a jazz band,7 and this distinctly un-swinging model persisted in the
German musical imagination, remaining the dominant format of the
jazz band right up to the end of the Third Reich.
‘Propaganda’ is a similarly problematic concept. From the first
use of the term in Pope Gregory XV’s Congregatio de Propaganda
Fide in 1622 through to continental Marxist parties in the early
twentieth century, it was understood as a vehicle used to spread an
intellectual doctrine, which the Bolsheviks saw as a strictly separate
phenomenon to agitprop – the agitation of the masses. No such
distinction existed for the National Socialists, and propaganda
accordingly assumed a new significance under the direction of
Joseph Goebbels,8 who certainly did the most to ensure that the
word would acquire wholly negative connotations for subsequent
generations. To fully understand the nuances of wartime
propaganda, it is necessary for us to overcome these pejorative
associations and recognise it instead as a variety of communications
processes with differing goals and relationships to the truth.
Indeed, Hans Fritzsche, that otherwise unreliable witness who led
the RMVP’s Press Division from January 1939 until March 1942 and
its Broadcasting Division from November 1942 until May 1945,9
provided a more realistic definition of his craft in his defence at
Nuremberg, describing propaganda as ‘the art of awakening
thoughts or feelings in other people which they would not have
thought or felt without this stimulus’.10 The one consistent element
in all propaganda is the attempt to exert some form of influence
over the recipient, and therefore attempts to bolster morale also
constitute propaganda. They were certainly perceived as such at the
time, with government agencies such as the RMVP, OWI and the
British Ministry of Information (MoI) attempting to psychologically
and emotionally manipulate their own forces and civilians for the
benefit of the war effort. In keeping with the word’s wartime usage,
I will treat both malevolent and benevolent attempts to influence an
audience as propaganda.
Much like the terminology of the era, the wide variety of primary
sources cited in this book is the product of specific contemporary
political and cultural environments. In terms of the jazz discourse,
for example, this is evident in the BBC’s self-perception as the
guardian of British cultural values, a role which was often
incompatible with the arguably more pressing task of making
concessions to popular taste in the name of wartime morale.
Reading between the lines of the empty clichés and bureaucratic set
phrases used by the Nazi cultural apparatus is also vital to any
analysis of Goebbels’ attempted creation of a ‘New German
Entertainment Music’ to replace jazz. I have endeavoured to
contextualise such sources, and the international scope of the book
has in many cases made it possible to cross-reference British,
German and US archive material to provide a range of diverse
perspectives, including an extraordinary German commentary on
BBC dance music policy, revealing some remarkable similarities in
the challenges facing Allied and Axis broadcasters alike in the realm
of musical entertainment.
Melody Maker remains the single most valuable source on jazz
culture in wartime Britain, and was considered significant – or
troublesome – enough by the BBC for the Corporation to keep its
own file on the journal, reopened for the first time for this research.
Its output cannot be properly interpreted without an understanding
of the dramatically varying agendas and credibility of its journalists,
and these are discussed at length in Chapter One. I have also
utilised wartime diaries kept by members of the public for the social
research organisation Mass Observation, which offer fascinating
accounts of everyday life in Britain during the war but cannot be
taken at face value; as Mass Observation’s biographer Nick Hubble
has noted, the diaries have their own ‘internal logic’ rooted in the
organisation’s culture, and the diarists were fully aware that they
were writing for an audience, playing ‘the unique role [. . .] both as
researcher and researched, archivist and archived’.11 Nonetheless,
the various diaries, as well as a series of special reports and
analyses created for and by Mass Observation, provide valuable
personal and street-level perspectives on issues ranging from anti-
Semitism to air raids, morale and popular music, at a time when the
public mood was of paramount importance to the government and
the war effort.
Oral history interviews, too, present their own methodological
problems. The recollections of protagonists, often recorded long
after the events described, are inevitably susceptible to a range of
factors, from manipulation or guidance through the interviewer’s line
of questioning to lapses of memory or attempted self-justification on
the part of the subject. Indeed, the question of vindication is an
obvious challenge when critically assessing evidence such as the
recordings and transcripts of Michael H. Kater’s interviews with
German musicians who collaborated with the Nazis, and may have
had reason to obscure the extent of their complicity. This material
must be approached with appropriate caution, and, wherever
possible, I have corroborated it against other sources. It would,
however, be a mistake to omit such testimony, which, as in the case
of the surviving jazz musicians’ unanimously positive views of Nazi
ministerial official Hans Hinkel, can also open up new and potentially
significant lines of historical enquiry. The experiences of musicians,
broadcasters and listeners on both sides, whether written at the time
or related in retrospect, remain an essential and inextricable part of
the history of popular music in wartime.
This book is chronologically divided into four broadly defined
‘psychological phases’ of the war, each of which is discussed in a
separate chapter. Chapter One will look at the period from the start
of the ‘Phoney War’, the early months of relative military inactivity on
the Western Front, in September 1939 until the beginning of the
Battle of Britain in July 1940. During this time, the so-called ‘cultural
blackout’ intensified the atmosphere of boredom and anxiety on the
British home front, presenting the Nazis with an excellent
opportunity to gain an audience in Britain. Chapter Two covers the
real commencement of Anglo-German hostilities, from July 1940
until the eve of the USA’s entry to the war in December 1941, and
Chapter Three will explore the post-Pearl Harbor ‘turning of the
psychological tide’ through to the catastrophic German defeat at
Stalingrad in February 1943. The final period of the conflict, which
saw Allied ‘total radio warfare’ answering Goebbels’ calls for ‘total
war’, will be discussed in Chapter Four.
CHAPTER 1
THE ‘CULTURAL BLACKOUT’: SEPTEMBER
1939 — JULY 1940

Those who listen to the wireless will tell you that at present
we can pick up in England from eight to ten German stations
daily. If our own broadcasts are not attractive, if the news is
dry, if the entertainment is mediocre, and if the music is of a
low standard, which is what people complain of, the listener
just turns the button and he gets a foreign broadcast. He may
very well tune in to a German programme for its
entertainment value, but he also gets a full measure of
German propaganda, skilfully delivered and in excellent
English. Do not let us undervalue the possible effects of this.
Sir Samuel Hoare, House of Commons, 11 October 19391

On 2 September 1939, Melody Maker ran a front-page article


explaining how war – should the crisis in Poland ‘break the wrong
way’ – would affect the jazz world and its protagonists.2 That same
day, a 17-year-old Romford schoolgirl observed in a diary kept for
Mass Observation that, on a cinema visit, newsreel footage of
Chamberlain was wildly applauded, whilst Mussolini’s appearances
were greeted with hissing. ‘What an anticlimax it would be,’ she
noted, ‘if there were no war!’3 At 11 o’clock the next morning,
however, the British ultimatum to Hitler expired, and war was
declared, with France joining Britain as its own ultimatum expired at
5 pm.4 The American CBS network’s Berlin correspondent William L.
Shirer opened his evening broadcast with the words, ‘Hello. The war
is on,’ and reported that German radio was ‘playing a stirring piece
from the Fourth Symphony of Beethoven. Sometimes the music
stops and the proclamations which the German Führer issued at
noon today are re-read [. . .] Then the music goes on and people
huddle close to their sets for the next piece of news.’5
The German population met the declaration of war with ‘reluctant
loyalty’6 rather than widespread popular enthusiasm,7 and Shirer
found ‘no excitement [. . .], no hurrahs, no throwing of flowers – no
war fever, no war hysteria’ on the streets of Berlin.8 Nonetheless, the
quick succession of military victories in the early months of the war,
skilfully exploited by Goebbels in popular newsreels, ensured a
growing degree of national consensus.9 The initial British
propaganda strategy was largely disingenuous, with the BBC’s
European Service concentrating its efforts on attacking Hitler and
insisting that a Nazi victory was impossible10 – an unconvincing
message in the months of the Blitzkrieg. In the first year of the war,
the Nazis were conducting their propaganda campaign from a
position of strength, supported as it was by mounting victories, and
the BBC’s morality lectures to the German people – described by the
contemporary American sociologist Kenneth Burke, apparently
without irony, as ‘a liberal university of the air’11 – could only hope
to appeal to ‘the infinitesimal few’ who hoped that Hitler would
fail.12

Britain
Melody Maker and the BBC
While German radio was co-opting Beethoven to inspire a martial
mentality amongst the populace, the 9 September 1939 edition of
Melody Maker found the British jazz journal in a similarly warlike
spirit. The front page was divided into two parts: ‘Our Job Now’
highlighted the new responsibilities acquired by the musical press,
and ‘Your Job Now’ reminded British musicians of their role in
maintaining morale. Even the heroes of the comic strip Billy Plonkit
and His Band, a weekly feature following the exploits of a hapless
jazz group, were mobilised for the cause. Their wartime debut
showed Plonkit’s group marching in khaki uniforms, complete with
rifles and kit bags, and the bandleader staring determinedly into the
unknown future. The nonchalant caption states: ‘Cheerho, Fellers.
We’ve got a gig in Poland!’13
This militarisation of the Plonkit strip was symbolic of the general
mobilisation of the British jazz scene that was already underway,14
although the gravity of the situation was tempered with a tongue-in-
cheek approach to international developments which, to paraphrase
the historian Martin Doherty, arguably represented ‘bravado
disguised as humour disguising fear’.15 Melody Maker quipped that
the feuding dance musicians Bert Ambrose and Jack Harris were
rumoured to be about to sign a non-aggression pact,16 and the
South-West London Rhythm Club announced the assembly of a
‘Supreme War Council’, which had reached the unanimous decision
that they should ‘continue to grind out jazz propaganda each Sunday
between 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. at their headquarters’, and invited
members of newly defunct rhythm clubs to join for no extra cost.17
Indeed, one week earlier, Melody Maker had already insisted that
jazz would be an active protagonist in the coming conflict:

It is argued that jazz, in particular, being a virtual prerogative


of youth, will be practically stilled by the mobilisation of the
young men who now create it. That is a fallacy. Come what
may, there will not even be a lull in jazz. [. . .] Music, indeed,
comes right into its own in times of national menace: much
more so than in times of prosperity, because it is the main
prop of any country’s morale, and nothing can be so
important to a State as that its people should be inspirited to
endure danger and stress with buoyant cheerfulness.18
But if much of the journal’s humour upon the outbreak of war
revolved around the juxtaposition of the macro-significance of
international politics with the micro-significance of musical politics, it
nonetheless also earnestly and adamantly acknowledged the
potentially crucial role that musicians could play in the war. The
technical editor, Dan S. Ingman, emphasised this on 9 September,
albeit via a series of crude analogies with the practices of ‘jungle
savages’ that resembled the language used in Nazi attacks on jazz
music and belied the Melody Maker’s generally progressive stance
regarding racism:19

Music has been used as an incentive to fighting men from


time immemorial. If we are to believe that the savages of the
jungle are merely a reflection of our earlier selves, then we
can say with confidence that from the earliest dawn of time
mankind has used music to stir himself up.
The throbbing of jungle tom-toms has a stimulating effect
on the warriors who dance to it. Savage tribes the world over
prepare themselves for battle with music of some kind.20

Although clumsily made, Ingman’s case for the importance of music


during wartime was valid. During the first weeks of the war,
however, a ‘cultural blackout’ was imposed as part of restrictive air-
raid precautions, ceasing all television and commercial radio
broadcasts,21 and closing football grounds, theatres, public
museums and cinemas,22 as well as many places of nocturnal
entertainment.23 The BBC Home Service was the Corporation’s sole
radio channel, and even this was reduced to a skeleton staff, with
most employees being sent home. Melody Maker’s criticism of the
new limited service was vehement; now publishing monthly in order
to save paper, in its October edition the journal attacked the BBC’s
‘Great Wartime Flop’ and bemoaned ‘the deplorable drop in the
standard of broadcast entertainment since the war’.24
In the same edition, B. M. Lytton-Edwards, the pseudonymous
writing team Mary Lytton and Bettie Edwards, observed
pessimistically that ‘it looks extremely probable to me that the
gramophone alone will keep us amused during the war.’25
Gramophone sales in Britain doubled during September and October
1939,26 and the BBC’s shortcomings were raised in Parliament by
Labour MP Arthur Greenwood:

In these rather dull and dreary days there is something to be


said for increasing brightness. [. . .] I hear everywhere
complaints about the ‘weeping Willy’ programmes that we
have been given. We have to remember that in the
conditions of war, with the limitations there are in public
entertainment outside the homes, the B.B.C. becomes the
main avenue of public entertainment for millions of our
people. In these days of train restrictions, lighting
restrictions, restrictions here, there and everywhere, and the
determination on the part of the Government to make the life
of everybody as miserable as possible, it would be well if we
could have some brighter entertainment from the B.B.C.27

The BBC’s output was centred on the Canadian organist Sandy


MacPherson, whose popularity could not prevent growing frustration
at the lack of variety on the airwaves.28 Its Variety Department,
which had been evacuated to an ostensibly secret location code-
named ‘Exbury’ (Bristol),29 also employed one new band every two
weeks, beginning with the renowned dance band of Jack Hylton,30
whose first broadcast was praised by Edgar Jackson in Melody Maker
as sounding ‘just like a first-rate American outfit, the brass being
really superb’. Jackson was less enthused by the ‘Swing Ramblers’, a
new group that performed on two consecutive nights in September,
complaining that ‘as far as I can ascertain this combination was
recruited from the BBC Variety Orchestra. If that’s wrong I have
sincerely to apologise, for more laughably amateurish attempts at
swing I have never heard.’31
Yet Melody Maker’s October attacks on the BBC’s early wartime
output also gave indications of the more constructively critical role
that the journal could play. In a section entitled ‘The “M. M.” Asks
The B.B.C.’, the magazine launched a slew of bluntly-worded
questions at the national broadcaster:

Is it beyond the wit of all the men at the B.B.C. to devise and
provide a continuous daily entertainment radio service of 24
hours as a means of keeping up the spirits of the populace in
general and civil defence workers in particular?
Cannot [BBC Director-General] Mr. Ogilvie realise that,
after the conclusion of the B.B.C.’s midnight news, there is
nothing for these listeners to do but tune into the violent anti-
British propaganda emanating from a treacherous renegade
[Lord Haw-Haw] in Germany, whose ‘music hall act,’ though
unconsciously funnier than Arthur Askey still makes any
decent stomach revolt?
[. . .] What’s wrong with giving listeners instead plenty of
dance music by plenty of bands?
Why has British radio got to be the world’s worst bore?32

The potential for such criticism to have an impact on BBC policy was
evident from a memorandum written by Godfrey Adams, the Director
of Programme Planning, dated 1 August 1939, which anticipated ‘a
reaction from the public that our purge of dance music has been too
severe. We ought perhaps, therefore, be prepared for some
concession if pressure is considerable.’33 On 20 September, the
Corporation’s West of England Press Officer A. J. P. Hytch reported
‘considerable interest in the dance band situation from specialist
papers such as Melody Maker’ and requested ‘a line on future plans’
with which to feed the media,34 indicating that the BBC was paying
at least some attention to the journal and taking account of its
readers’ views from the outset of the war.

Melody Maker Journalists: Propaganda and ‘Jacksonese’


Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EDINBURGH
SKETCHES & MEMORIES ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions


will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.


copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright
in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and without
paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General
Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and
distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if
you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the
trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the
Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such
as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and
printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in
the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright
law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE


THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the


free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this
work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase
“Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of
the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or
online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and


Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand,
agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to
abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using
and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for
obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms
of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only


be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by
people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
There are a few things that you can do with most Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There
are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™
electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and
help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright
law in the United States and you are located in the United
States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying,
distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project
Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will
support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project
Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms
of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with
its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project


Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other


immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project
Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United


States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United
States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is


derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to
anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges.
If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of
paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use
of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth
in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is


posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder.
Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™
License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright
holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project


Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files
containing a part of this work or any other work associated with
Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,


performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or


providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who


notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of


any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project


Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend


considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -


Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If


you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set


forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied


warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the


Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of


Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the


assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project


Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500


West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to


the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws


regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states


where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot


make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current


donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project


Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several


printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,


including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.

You might also like