Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management of Different Secondary Schools Basis For Schools DRRM Enhancement Program
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management of Different Secondary Schools Basis For Schools DRRM Enhancement Program
ISSN: 2456-9992
A. Disaster Risk Reduction and Management of Different Secondary Schools: Basis for Schools DRRM Enhancement
Program
Abstract: The study gathered feedback from different secondary schools heads in Bauan West District based on planning,
conveniences and equipment, implementation and integration and culture building; to ascertain the significant difference between the
level of disaster preparedness of male school heads and of those female school heads as well as the significant difference between the
level of preparedness of school heads who have served for one to five years as principals and of those who served for six to twenty-three
years and twenty-four years and above; to test the significant relationship among the profile variations and level of disaster preparedness
of the public school heads and lastly, to propose a program that will help in enhancing the present schools disaster risk reduction and
management implemented programs. The study was limited to schools heads of different secondary schools in Bauan West District. The
descriptive method of research used was used to gather information about the present condition and status of these employees in order to
test the hypothesis and to answer the questions concerning them.
The researchers used a standardized questionnaire developed by Fatma Ozmen from the Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty
of Technical Education at The University of Firat, Elazig, Turkey. This questionnaire was used by Ozmen on her study entitled “The
Level of Preparedness of the Schools for Disasters from the Aspect of the School Principals.” The researchers modified the instrument
to make it more in lined to the objectives of the current study as the main data gathering instrument.
The modified version is a four scale Likert’s type questionnaire of 20 items categorized into four namely Planning,
Conveniences and Equipment, Implementation and Integration and Culture Building. Four levels were determined to interpret the
responses on the given items such as ‘Always’ (4), ‘Occasionally’ (3), ‘Rarely’(2) and ‘Never’(1). Also, as part of the modification
processes, some of the items stated negatively were changed into a positive approach.
The hypothesis testing revealed that there is no significant difference between the level of disaster preparedness of male and female
principals. Also, there is no significant difference between the level of disaster preparedness of principals having diverse span of
experiences except for conveniences and equipment and culture building and there is also no significant relationship among the gender
and level of disaster preparedness. There is no significant relationship among the level of disaster preparedness and number of years,
except for integration and culture building.
The results of the study further revealed that A program for schools disaster risk reduction and management entitled
Oplan H.A.N.D.A. (Heads Alertness: Necessary during Adversity) is proposed to enhance the level of disaster preparedness of the school
heads.
Keywords: Disaster, Management, Risk Reduction, Secondary Schools
reduction to education. Additionally, DepEd participates disaster preparedness and thought of several ways on
well whenever drills are programmed to be conducted how to improve or change them. After this research was
inside academic institutions. Through the collaborative conducted, it could be a basis for the programs that they
effort of all concerned, learning institutes can play a would implement inside their designated grounds as
crucial role concerning training and building a disaster chairs and leaders in school disaster risk and
prevention culture, among various community groups management planning. Indeed, programs where everyone
(Assimina, 2013). With the fact that disasters became in the school would profit are expected to be employed
more frequent and spontaneous nowadays and safety in subsequent to the appraisal happened.
schools where children and youths spend most of their As the school heads and superiors in the district benefit
time shoud be maintained, the researchers had the motif from the study, the parents and students would be served
to conduct this quantitative research. It focused on the as well. They had ensured safety among well-prepared
school heads since they have a key role in any school school heads and scholastic grounds. There would be no
wide initiative through developing and reviewing worries on the stay of the children and youths at their
awareness policies, developing and revising emergency second home—their schools
response plans, holding emergency drills and trainings 2. Methods
to faculty memebers, staffs and students. With this, the
researcher tested the level of preparedness of different Research Design
public secondary schools at their district through the The participants in this study were the school heads of
readiness of plans, convenience amd equipment, disaster public secondary schools at Bauan West District. There
preparedness related programs and capacity to integrate was no required age limit, sex, experience, designation
present on the leaders of each scholarly grounds – the or position and other qualities to be a participant of this
school heads withrespect to their demographic profile. study as long as they handle a public secondary school
The study was beneficial, first to the researcher. As the which is located at Bauan West District. Using
study goes by, the researcher were able to learn on how purposive sampling, the researcher relied on his own
to apply different methods in data gathering, tabulation, judgment in choosing the participants of this study. The
calculation and interpretation. They also got new school heads of public secondary schools under Bauan
experiences that would surely help them to be better West District with a total of four (4) were used as the
researcher. Their five macro skills plus critical thinking participants of this study
ability would be developed as they used them for the
betterment of their research. They would become more In conducting the investigation, the researcher used a
innovative and critical in everything that they would be standardized questionnaire developed by Fatma Ozmen
doing. from the Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty
The significance of the study also reached Bauan of Technical Education at The University of Firat,
Technical High School and all its sub-communities since Elazig, Turkey. This questionnaire was used by Ozmen
one of the participants of the research is the school head on her study entitled “The Level of Preparedness of the
of the institution. Besides, in case that the other schools Schools for Disasters from the Aspect of the School
from the district have implemented programs that really Principals.” The researcher modified the instrument to
help in boosting the disaster preparedness, the make it more in lined to the objectives of the current
administration would adapt the project and apply it on study.
the campus. On the other hand, this research is a good The modified version is a four scale Likert’s type
addition to the research library. With this, it would serve questionnaire of 20 items categorized into four namely
as one of the resources and basis for the future Planning, Conveniences and Equipment,
researchers who would prefer to have the parallel topic. Implementation and Integration and Culture Building.
It would help them a lot for the reason that they do not Four levels were determined to interpret the responses
need to go to other links and places anymore since the on the given items such as ‘Always’ (4), ‘Occasionally’
institution already have this research. (3), ‘Rarely’(2) and ‘Never’(1). Also, as part of the
Moreover, this study would benefit the municipality of modification processes, some of the items stated
Bauan, particularly the District Office of Bauan West. negatively were changed into a positive approach.
Through this quantitative research, the superiors would
easily assess the preparedness of the school heads under Sampling Design
the district in terms of disaster readiness. In addition, the Using purposive sampling, the researcher relied on their
office could also integrate the proposed ehnancement own judgment in choosing the participants of this study.
program of the researcher most especially in developing The school heads of public secondary schools under
the present schools’ DRRM programs. Bauan West District with a total of four (4) were used as
Similarly, it would also be vital to the participants of the the participants of this study.
study. Through assessment, school heads would be
refreshed of the things that they need to do and have in
order for them to be fully equipped in times of 3. Results and Discussions
unforeseen accidents. They would be familiarized with
the great responsibilities that would be placed on their Demographic Profile of the Respondents
shoulders in view of the fact that they must not only
prepare for themselves but for the whole community as Table 1
well. They have also personally evaluated themselves, Demographic Profile of the School Heads in terms
determined their strengths and weaknesses toward of Gender
Volume 1 Issue 1, July 2017 2
www.ijarp.org
International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications
ISSN: 2456-9992
Percentage with 3.5000 WM is the indicator where the school staffs, the
Gender Frequency members of the school community and the authorities of the
(%)
other related institutions are always working collaboratively
Male 2 50 in the development of school disaster risk reduction and
Female 2 50 management plans. With this, it is concluded that in terms of
TOTAL 4 100 planning, school heads under Bauan West District are always
ready with its composite mean of 3.7500.
disaster and that there will be blankets, battery-powered composite mean of 3.8750, it is concluded that the school
radios, tents and the like at school, with 3.2500 WM. Lastly, heads are always disaster ready in terms of programs and
keeping igniting and burning substances in close cupboards projects implementations.
and containers and putting alarming and early warning
systems at school are occasionally done by the heads, as Table 2.3
determined by their WM’s of 2.7500. Level of Disaster Preparedness of the School Heads
Based on Integration and Culture Building
Table 2.2 Verbal
Level of Disaster Preparedness of the School Heads Weighted
Indicators Interpret Rank
Based on Implementation Mean
ation
Weight Verbal 1. There is a conscious,
Indicators ed Interpretati Rank wide-awake school culture 3.7500 Always 2.5
Mean on for preventing disasters.
1. The drills 2. There is a mutual effort
related to the to enhance the level of the
action that Occasion
necessary skills and 3.2500 4.5
should be done ally
knowledge for everybody
during the at school.
4.0000 Always 1.5
disasters are 3. The participation of the
taken place families in the disaster Occasion
periodically as a 3.2500 4.5
prevention activities can be ally
part of school achieved.
curriculum. 4. The support and aid of
2. The principal some specialists such as
ensures the doctor, engineer,
participation of 3.7500 Always 2.5
electrician, etc. are
the teachers in obtained to be prepared for
4.0000 Always 1.5
the programs the disasters.
towards the 5. Some activities such as
disaster workshops, seminars,
preparedness. conferences are being
3. School realized to raise the level of 4.0000 Always 1
personnel and awareness for disasters at
students are school and school
continuously environment.
3.7500 Always 3.5
trained on
protection, Composite Mean 3.6000 Always
evacuation, and Legend: 3.26-4.00=Always; 2.51-3.25=Occasionally; 1.76-
rescue issues. 2.50=Rarely; 1.00-1.75=Never
4. Necessary In Bauan West District, the school heads ensure that
efforts have workshops, conferences and seminars are being realized to
been devoted raise the level of awareness for disasters in school and its
for 3.7500 Always 3.5 environment. These workshops, as stated by Mamogale
strengthening of (2011), give education regarding disaster preparedness to
the school build the human capacities to understand the most likely
buildings. risks, likelihood of disasters and their potential
Composite consequences. In addition, these trainings involve the
3.8750 Always
Mean continuous work towards the inclusion and mainstreaming of
Legend: 3.26-4.00=Always; 2.51-3.25=Occasionally; 1.76- disaster risk reduction into school curricula and into pre-
2.50=Rarely; 1.00-1.75=Never service teacher education and the encouragement of
education departments to develop a concrete policy in
Table 2.2 manifests the level of disaster support of the efforts of the curriculum divisions to integrate
preparedness of the school heads based on projects and disaster risk reduction into school curricula and to enhance
programs implementations. As justified by their WM’s of teachers’ skills in delivering effectively the disaster risk
four (4), on the first rank are the facts that drills related to the reduction concepts.
action that should be done during disasters are always taking Similarly, schools under the district have conscious and
place regularly as a part of the school curriculum and the wide-awake school culture for preventing disasters. This
principals always ensure the participation of the teachers in culture, as elaborated by Mamogale (2011), is something that
the programs towards the disaster preparedness. In addition, forms over time. Cultural approaches and paradigms must be
the indicators which have 3.7500 WM’s added the fact that taught early in schools to have real success. In building a
school personnel and students are always trained disaster prevention culture, school heads of Bauan West
continuously on protection, evacuation and rescue issues and District are always assuring that the support and aid of some
that necessary efforts are always being devoted for specialists such as doctor, engineer, and electrician are
strengthening of the school buildings. As proven by its obtained to be prepared for the disasters.
Volume 1 Issue 1, July 2017 4
www.ijarp.org
International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications
ISSN: 2456-9992
Table 3.2
Table 2.4 Difference between the Level of Disaster Preparedness
Level of Disaster Preparedness of the School Heads Among
Weighted Verbal School Heads Demographic Profile (Years in Service)
Category Rank
Mean Interpretation Category F-value p-value Interpretation
Planning 3.7500 Always 2 Planning 7.0000 0.0741 Not Significant
Conveniences and Always Conveniences and
3.3200 4 22.7150 0.0154 Significant
Equipment Equipment
Implementation 3.8750 Always 1 Implementation 3.0000 0.1925 Not Significant
Integration and Always Integration and
3.6000 3 31.0000 0.0099 Significant
Culture Building Culture Building
Legend: Significant at p-value<0.05
Composite Mean 3.6360 Always
Legend: 3.26-4.00=Always; 2.51-3.25=Occasionally; 1.76- Table 3.2 presents the difference between the responses of
2.50=Rarely; 1.00-1.75=Never principals having diverse span of experiences as school
heads: 1-5 years, 6-23 years and 24 years and above. As
Table 2.4 summarizes the level of disaster marked by their p-values of 0.0154 and 0.0099
preparedness of the school heads depending on various correspondingly which both are less than 0.05, the given
dimensions. In all the categories, it is shown that the school confidence interval, there is significant difference between
heads of public secondary schools under Bauan West District the perceptions of the principals in terms of conveniences
are always disaster ready. With its composite mean of and equipment and integration and culture building.
3.6360, principals are always prepared in terms of planning, Meanwhile, with respect to planning and implementation,
conveniences and equipment settlement, projects and there is no significant difference between the insights of the
programs implementations and integration and disaster school heads with profile variations regarding the level of
prevention culture building. disaster preparedness. It is proven by their computed p-
values of 0.0741 and 0.1925 in that order.
Difference between the Level of Preparedness Depending on Relationship Among the Level of Disaster Preparedness and
Profile Variations the Profile Variations
Table 3.1 Table 4.1
Difference between the Level of Disaster Preparedness Relationship among the Level of Disaster Preparedness
Among and the School Heads Demographic Profile (Gender)
School Heads Demographic Profile (Gender) r- p- Interpretati Hypothes
Category
Category F-value p-value Interpretation value value on is
Planning 0.0000 1.0000 Not Significant 0.944 0.056 Not
Planning Rejected
Conveniences and 0 0 Significant
0.1712 0.9431 Not Significant
Equipment Conveniences
0.945 0.055 Not
Implementation 0.0000 1.0000 Not Significant and Rejected
0 0 Significant
Integration and Equipment
4.0000 0.4023 Not Significant
Culture Building Implementati 0.944 0.056 Not
Rejected
Legend: Significant at p-value<0.05 on 0 0 Significant
Integration
0.898 0.102 Not
Table 3.1 displays the difference between the perceptions and Culture Rejected
0 0 Significant
of male school heads and female school heads regarding Building
their level of disaster preparedness based on various Legend: Significant at p-value<0.05
categories. As shown above, there is no significant difference
between the level of disaster preparedness among male and Table 4.1 illustrates the relationship between the
female school heads. It can be seen that in all dimensions: level of disaster preparedness of the school heads and their
planning, conveniences and equipment, implementation and gender. As presented in the table, the hypothesis stating that
integration and culture building with p-values of 1.0000, there is a significant relationship between the gender and
0.9431, 1.0000 and 0.4023 respectively, the difference level of disaster preparedness of the public school heads at
between the responses of different genders are all not Bauan West District is rejected in all the four dimensions.
significant since the values of p are all greater than the given The computed p-values for planning, conveniences and
confidence interval, 0.05. equipment, implementation and integration and culture
building are 0.0560, 0.0550, 0.0560 and 0.1020
r- p- Interpreta Hypothes
Category correspondingly which are all less than the given confidence
value value tion is
interval of 0.05.
0.940 Not
Planning 0.0600 Rejected
0 Significant
Conveniences
0.934 Not
and 0.0660 Rejected
0 Significant
Equipment
Implementati 0.929 Not
0.0710 Rejected Table 4.2
on 0 Significant
Relationship among the Level of Disaster Preparedness
Integration
0.961
and Culture 0.0390 Significant Accepted
0
Building Volume 1 Issue 1, July 2017 5
www.ijarp.org
International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications
ISSN: 2456-9992
and the School Heads Demographic Profile (Years in dness of the checked and Superinten-
Service) the updated plans dent
Legend: Significant at p-value<0.05 schools must be facilitated
under a day after the
Table 4.2 exhibits the relationship between the level Bauan planning sessions
of disaster preparedness of the school heads and the number West to the students,
of years they have been in service as principals. The District parents, teachers
hypothesis is rejected as in planning with a p-value of in terms and all persons
0.0600, conveniences and equipment with 0.0660 and of involved.
implementation with 0.0710, there is no significant plannin
relationship between the appraisal of the disaster readiness of g 1.c. Rescue and
the principals and the span of years they are spending being evacuation plans
heads. On the other hand, in terms of integration and culture posted in each
building, the hypothesis is accepted since it has a p-value of classroom must be
0.0390 which is greater than the confidence interval of 0.05. enhanced to well-
It shows a significant relationship between the number of visualized
years being spent by the school heads as principals and the portraits that
aforementioned dimension of disaster preparedness. could easily be
Therefore, it is concluded that not in all aspects, there is a accessed by all the
significant or there is no significant relationship between the people.
level of disaster preparedness and the number of years being
spent by the principals as school heads. 1.d. Transparency
The relationship attained between the demographic board showing the
profile based on the number of years and the level of disaster plans for disasters
preparedness among the school heads of Bauan West District might be posted
are due to various causes. Being disaster ready does not rely anywhere in the
on experience but on knowledge about the things that an campus, for the
individual should do in order to be safe and protected. community
Afedzie and McEntire (2010) point out that the state of members to be
knowledge regarding preparedness, response and recovery aware.
issues should be inculcated, and also view preparedness as
the activities of formulating, testing and exercising disaster 1.e. A
plans; and communicating with public and others about collaborative
disasters, and what to do to reduce them. planning session
In the end, after testing the relationships between wherein all the
the variables, the following upshots were drawn: the four schools will
hypothesis stating that there is a significant relationship cooperate and
between the gender and level of disaster preparedness of the articulate about
public school heads at Bauan West District is rejected in all their ways of
the four dimensions and also, the hypothesis stating that disaster
there is a significant relationship between the number of preparedness must
years and level of disaster preparedness of the public school be facilitated by
heads is rejected except for integration and culture building. the District
These results are presented by Table no. 4.1 and 4.2, Office.
respectively.
Schools DRRM Enhancement Program Convenie 2. To 2.a. Income- School and
nces and elevate generating Community
Equipme the level projects must be Representa-
nt of programmed for tives, School
Table 5 disaster the schools to Heads,
Proposed Schools DRRM Enhancement Program prepare collect funds to District
OPLAN HANDA (Heads Alertness: Necessary during dness of have mechanisms Superinten-
Adversity) the that will help in dent
Dimensi Persons schools times of
Progra
on of Enhancement Involved under emergencies.
m
Disaster Activities / Bauan
Objecti
Prepare Projects West 2.b. First-aid kits
ves
dness District distribution, to be
Planning 1. To 1.a. Checking and School and in terms lead by the
elevate updating of plans Community of District Office
the level must be processed Representa- conveni must be done.
of every month. tives, School ences
disaster Heads, and 2.c. A storage
prepare 1.b. Simulcast of District equipm room for disaster
preparedness namely planning, conveniences and equipment, already the knowledge which they gained from disaster and
implementation and integration and culture building. emergency response trainings.
8. Localization of disaster readiness tools, equipment and
4. Conclusions and Recommendations materials should be applied to minimize the amount of fund
With the results gained from the information gathered, the needed in buying such.
following conclusions were drawn: 9. Partnership between campuses, families, communities,
1. In Bauan West District, the number of male secondary offices, government and non-government organizations
school principals is equal to the number of the females. In should be achieved to strengthen the alliance in building a
number of years in service, most of them are in the range of disaster prevention culture over Bauan West District.
24 years and above. 10. An emergency team should be composed of well-trained
2. The school heads of public secondary schools under members that are not only from the schools’ faculty, but also
Bauan West District are always disaster ready in all the from the other members of the community.
dimensions of disaster preparedness. 11. Further inquiries about the same topic should be done.
3. There is no significant difference between the level of They must involve the school heads of elementary schools
disaster preparedness of male and female principals. Also, and even those who are under private institutions at the same
there is no significant difference between the level of disaster district to make a more district-wide relevant offshoot.
preparedness of principals having diverse span of 12. Program should be adopted, tested and evaluated
experiences except for conveniences and equipment and thereafter.
culture building.
4. There is no significant relationship among the gender and
level of disaster preparedness. There is no significant References
relationship among the level of disaster preparedness and Abas, F., Ahmadun, F., Mahmud, A. and Said, A. (2011).
number of years, except for integration and culture building. (Emerald Publishing Limited) Retrieved July 14,
5. A program for schools disaster risk reduction and 2017, from
management entitled Oplan H.A.N.D.A. (Heads Alertness: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/0965
Necessary during Adversity) is proposed to enhance the level 3561111141718
of disaster preparedness of the school heads.
Recommendations: Adyoso and Kanegae. (2013). Retrieved July 12, 2017,
Based on the conclusions drawn, the researchers suggest the from
following recommendations: https://www.fujipress.jp/jdr/dr/dsstr000800051009/).
1. The District Office of Bauan West, under the supervision
of higher offices, must continue in building equally skilled Akbarisari,A., Ardalan, A., Jabbari, H., Najafi, M.,
school heads regardless of their genders and span of Noorbala, A. . (2015, December 11). Retrieved July
experiences for they serve as the leaders of the institutions 20, 2017, from
designated to them. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697
2. Regular assessments from higher authorities can play a 750/
crucial role on retaining the high level of disaster
preparedness of the school heads. Aids from various offices Alba, D., Gable, R. (2011). Retrieved Spetember 22, 2017,
and organizations in different aspects such as moral and from
financial should help in maintaining the mentioned level of http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi
readiness of the principals. ?article=1006&context=nera_2011
3. District-wide meetings and trainings for school heads of
any gender and span of experience regarding disaster Alexander, D. (2015) Retrieved from
preparedness should be obtained. A collaboration of insights https://targetstudy.com/articles/importance-of-
relating to disaster readiness from opposite sexes and diverse disaster-management.html
expertise would be a great help in pursuing an unbiased
disaster plan. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2017). Retrieved July
4. Gender-related issues connected to disaster preparedness 13, 2017, from
must be ceased. Distribution of works to school heads toward http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/122/4/89
a disaster prevention culture must be just and not delimited 5
due to profile variations.
5. The proposed enhancement program should be applied to Arbon, P., Bahnisch, L., Cusack, L., Hammad, K., Kako,
the institutions under Bauan West District in order to M. & Woodman, R. (2011, September). Retrieved
develop the present schools disaster risk reduction and July 20, 2017, from
management programs. http://www.flinders.edu.au/fms/disaster-
6. The Department of Education must have a study about resilience/documents/WillingnessReport.pdf
incorporating a subject regarding disaster preparedness to the
curriculum, not only for Senior High School students but Asian Bank Development. (2014). Gender Inclusive
even for elementary pupils. Disaster Management.
7. The school heads should initiate in making each of their
institution a home for students to learn awareness and Assimina, K. (2013). Retrieved from
information of how to respond in times of disasters. Boy http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013EGUGA..15.5979
Scout and Girl Scout members in every school are great K
helps in educating their fellow students since they have
Bainbridge A., Eaton, J., Feroz, S., Kohn S. (2013, April Hilvano, N. F., Nelson, G. L. M., Coladilla, J. O., &
08). doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.47 Rebancos, C. M. (2016). Household Disaster
Resiliency on Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda): The Case
CDRC. (2012). Retrieved from Citizens' Disaster of Manicani Island, Guiuan, Eastern Samar,
Response Center: http://www.cdrc-phil.com/wp- Philippines. Coastal Engineering Journal, 58(01),
content/uploads/2009/08/PDR-2012.pdf 1640007.
Corporation, I. F. (2010). Disaster and Emergency International Finance Corporation. (2010). Retrieved
Preparedness: Guidelines for Schools. 2121 September 22, 2017, from
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20433 https://www.google.com.ph/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc
USA: Health and Education Department. =s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahU
KEwjV2p2Pj7nWAhVCKpQKHfMeDhsQFgg1MA
Dewey, J. Democracy and Education. New York: New M&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ifc.org%2Fwps%2F
York: The Free Press. wcm%2Fconnect%2F8b796b004970c0199a7ada336b
93d75f%2FDisERHandbook.pdf%3FMOD%3DAJPE
Dobalian, A., Heslin, K.,Nyugen, T., Ruzek, J., Smith, R., RES&usg=A
Stein, J. & Zagelbaum, N. (2014, July 19). Retrieved
July 20, 2017, from Jibiki, Y., Kure, S., Kuri, M., & Ono, Y. (2016). Analysis
https://bmcemergmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10. of early warning systems: the case of super-typhoon
1186/1471-227X-14-16 Haiyan. International Journal of Disaster Risk
Reduction, 15, 24-28. Retrieved from:
Dube & Orodho. (2016). Retrieved July 13, 2017, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol- 2420916307300
6%20Issue-2/Version-1/B06210611.pdf)
Kikuvi, E. (2011). Retrieved September 22, 2017, from
Ebrahim N. A., (2015). Preparedness Of Primary Health http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/4221
Care Nurses For Disaster Management In Bahrain.
Retrieved from: Kimathi, J. (2011, December). Retrieved September 23,
http://www.worldresearchlibrary.org/up_proc/pdf/52- 2017, from http://ir-
144022209631-34.pdf library.ku.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/5325/Ki
mathi%20Janice.pdf;sequence=3
Echo. ( August 2010) .School Safety Towards Building
Disaster Resilient Schools in Bangladesh. Retrieved Laiviera, N. (2010, October 20). Retrieved September 22,
from 2017, from Maltatoday:
http://www.adpc.net/v2007/IKM/ONLINE%20DOC http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/national/5663/sa
UMENTS/downloads/2010/DIPECHO_Bangladesh_ fety-culture-necessary-in-disaster-prevention-carm-
Aug2010.pdf mifsud-bonnici#.WcUqj8gjHIU
Enguito, M., Galindo, R.& Villanueva, G. (2014, August). Louw, E., Wyk, S.v. (2011, August). Retrieved September
Retrieved July 13, 2017, from 22, 2017, from http://www.idc-
http://multidisciplinaryjournal.com/pdf/Organizationa online.com/technical_references/pdfs/civil_engineerin
l.pdf g/Disaster_Risk_Management.pdf
Fakhruddin, S.H.M., Kawasaki, A., & Babel, M.S. (2015). Magnaye, B., Munoz, M.S., Munoz, M.A., Munoz, R. &
Community responses to flood early warning system: Muro, J. (2011). Retrieved July 20, 2017, from
Case study in Kaijuri Union, Bangladesh. http://www.eisrjc.com/documents/The_Role,_Prepare
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, dness_And_Management_Of_Nurses_During_Disaste
323-331 Retrieved from: rs_1325648617.pdf
Mamogale, H. M. (2011). Assessing disaster preparedness Turner, G., Said, F., Afzal, U., & Campbell, K. (2014).
of learners and educators in Soshanguve North The effect of early flood warnings on mitigation and
schools. recovery during the 2010 Pakistan floods. In
Reducing Disaster: Early Warning Systems For
Manille, (November 28, 2012) Teaching disaster Climate Change (pp. 249-264). Springer Netherlands.
preparedness in schools. Retrieved from Retrieved from:
http://www.irinnews.org/report/96909/philippines- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221
teaching-disaster-preparedness-schools 2420916307300
Ministry of Education Sri Lanka. (2013). Retrieved July UNESCO. (2014) Retrieved from
13, 2017, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002289/22896
http://www.moe.gov.lk/english/images/publications/G 3e.pdf
uidelines_for_sch_level_planning/Planning_Guidelin
es_E.pdf UNISD. (2015). Retrieved from United Nations Office for
Disaster Risk Reduction:
Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2012). Effects of anxiety, disaster http://www.unisdr.org/files/47804_2015disastertrends
education, and resources on disaster preparedness infographic.pdf
behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
42(5): 1069-1087. doi:10.1111/j.1559- Links
1816.2011.00853.x Retrieved from: www.undp.org/gender
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221 www.gdnonline.org
2420916307300 www.humanitarianinfo.org/iasc/
www.unisdr.org/eng/risk-reduction/gender/rd-gender-
Muttarak, R., and W. Pothisiri. (2013). (Resilience eng.htm
Alliance) Retrieved July 20, 2017, from www.who.int/gender/other_health/disasters/en/
http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06101-180451 www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbyncsa-en
isdr-gender@un.org
NDRRMC. (2011). Retrieved from National Disaster Risk www.cgdsmona.edu.jm
and Reduction Management Council: www.ifrc.org
http://www.ndrrmc.gov.ph/attachments/article/41/ND www.oxfam.org.uk/policyandpractice
RRM_Plan_2011-2028.pdf www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221
Nduku. (2013). Retrieved July 12, 2017, from 2420916307300
http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/ http://soeagra.com/iaast/iaastmarch2014/3.pdf
56293/Kimei_Effects%20of%20flood%20disaster%2 http://www.worldresearchlibrary.org/up_proc/pdf/52-
0preparedness%20on%20learning%20in%20public% 144022209631-34.pdf
20secondary%20schools.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed www.iosrjournals.org
=y