Rubric For Research Presentation

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
REGION IV A - CALABARZON
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF RIZAL
SAN MATEO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________

PAPER PRESENTATTION RUBRIC FOR PRESENTATION FOR ACTION RESEARCH AND BASIC RESEARCH

Name of Panelist: _____________________________________________ Date: __________________________ Signature: ___________________


MAIN CRITERIA Points
Earned
TITLE (2 POINTS) (5 POINTS)
Not all key elements/variables of the • All key elements/ variables of the research questions or focus of inquiry are
research questions or focus of inquiry reflected in the title.
are reflected • All key elements/ variables of the research questions or
BACKGROUND OF (0 POINT) (5 POINTS) (8 POINTS) (10 POINTS)
THE STUDY Not It presents a general • The educational relevance and • The nature, extent and salience of the
described description of the topic timeliness of the topic are shown. identified problem or issue are
or focus of inquiry • It explains the need to conduct to comprehensively discussed.
advance or validate knowledge, • Different aspects of the research
improve a situation, address an setting are elaborated showing in-
issue/problem depth and critical analysis of the
situation.
USE OF (0 POINT) (5 POINTS) (8 POINTS) (10 POINTS)
LITERATURE AND Not • It cites related theories • Viewpoints and issues underlying • Viewpoints and issues underlying the
CITATION provided and/or previous the topic are discussed and topic are discussed and synthesized.
studies. synthesized. • The study identifies the gap/s in
• Sources are properly • The study does not identify the current knowledge that it intends to
acknowledged. gap/s in current knowledge that it address.
intends to address. • Constructs are defined and presented.
• Constructs are defined and Citation consistent.
presented. Citation consistent.
RESEARCH (0 POINT) (5 POINTS) (10 POINTS) (15 POINTS)
QUESTIONS Not Aim, objective or general Research questions specify Research questions logically
provided research questions the variables or the focus of proceed from the context of the study
stated inquiry and clearly show the extent or scope of
inquiry
PARTICIPANTS/ (0 POINT) (5 POINTS) (10 POINTS)
SOURCE OF Not It states the study’s • Details are provided about the target participants (ex. number,
DATA OR described target participants characteristics, sampling procedure, if any) and/or other sources of data and
INFORMATION and/or other sources of information.
data and information. • Clear rationale for their inclusion in the study is given.
DATA GATHERING (0 POINT) (5 POINTS) (8 POINTS) (10 POINTS)
METHODS Not It presents a general • Details of data gathering methods • It explains why the data gathering
described description of the are provided: the specific kinds of methods are suited to the nature and
methods to be employed data, how and when collected. purpose of the study, and how it is
for gathering data • It describes the research aligned with the research questions.
instrument, if any (ex. test, scale, • Details about research instruments are
survey questionnaire, checklist, presented such as sources or how
interview guide) to be developed or these were developed and by whom,
adopted and their appropriateness for obtaining
the desired kind of data/information
DATA ANALYSIS (0 POINT) (5 POINTS) (10 POINTS) (15 POINTS)
Not stated It presents a general • Details of the methods of data • The selected methods of data analysis
description of how the analysis are given. are shown to be appropriate to the
data gathered are • Techniques (ex. nature of the data/information
analyzed quantitative/statistical, gathered and for addressing the
qualitative, or both methods), as research questions.
well as tools (ex. software)
employed are specified.
DISCUSSION OF (0 POINT) (5 POINTS) (10 POINTS) (15 POINTS)
RESULTS Not Results are presented in • Results are extensively discussed. • Results are extensively discussed.
provided general terms and Interrelatedness of the variables Interrelatedness of the variables are
recommendations are are explained. Implications of the explained. Implications of the results
broad results are provided. are provided.
• Each recommendation is clearly • Related studies were used to compare
stated, feasible and related to the and contrast the results of the study.
information/topic. • Each recommendation is clearly
stated, feasible and related to the
information/topic.
OVER-ALL (5 POINTS) (10 POINTS)
PRESNETATION • Some parts of the presentation are • Presentation is clear and easy to understand.
not clear. • Dressed appropriately/ professionally.
• Did not consistently provide • Presents the paper in logical and coherent manner. Shows confidence and
adequate answers to the questions. mastery of the topic.
• Shows lack of self-confidence. • Speaks clearly and provides adequate answers to the questions.
TOTAL POINTS (100%)

You might also like