Feature

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Feature GFAAS ICP-MS

Atomic absorption Mass spectrometry


 Technique spectrometry
Electrothermal (graphite Inductively coupled plasma
 Atomization method furnace)
Measures light absorbed by Measures the mass-to-charge ratio of
 Detection principle atoms at specific ions
wavelengths
GFAAS provides higher Very high, can detect elements at
sensitivity for certain trace and ultra-trace levels
elements, as evidenced by its
superior detection limits for
chromium in solid samples (2
 Sensitivity ng g−1 for GFAAS vs 30 ng
g−1 for SS-ETV-ICPMS) [ref.
23-0].
But Lower for most elements
compared to ICP-MS
Typically in the low µg/L ICP-MS generally offers lower
range detection limits and better precision
High complexity increases compared to GFAAS. For example, ICP-
detection limits due to MS has a detection limit of 0.19
interferences. microg/l for selenium, while GFAAS
 Detection limits Proper digestion and matrix has a limit of 3.4 microg/l [ref. 8-0].
modification (if needed) can Can be in the pg/L or fg/L range
improve detection limits
Careful optimization can lead
to lower detection limits.
Small sample volumes Can handle wider range of sample
 Sample size required (typically < 100 µL) sizes
More susceptible to chemical ICP-MS is less affected by matrix
interferences from matrix interferences compared to GFAAS
requires careful management Less susceptible to interferences, but
 Interferences of matrix modifiers and some spectral overlap possible
conditions to achieve
accurate results [ref. 6-0].
Generally less expensive More expensive instrumentation
 Cost instrumentation
Requires careful Less complex operation, but requires
 Operational complexity optimization of furnace knowledge of mass spectrometry
program for each element principles
Can be used for rhenium Excellent technique for rhenium analysis
determination, but requires due to high sensitivity and minimal
 Suitability for rhenium analysis proper matrix modification spectral overlap
techniques to minimize
interferences
Narrower linear range for Wider linear range, allowing analysis of a
 Linear range rhenium compared to ICP-MS broader concentration range without
dilution
Slower; each element requires a Faster; multi-element analysis possible in
 Speed of analysis separate furnace program and a single run
analysis cycle
Not possible for most isotopes Can be used to determine the abundance
due to limited resolution of different rhenium isotopes, potentially
 Isotope analysis providing information on origin or
environmental processes
Requires frequent calibration Less frequent calibration needed due to
 Calibration requirements due to potential for matrix lower susceptibility to interferences
effects and instrument drift
Simpler software for instrument More sophisticated software for complex
control and data analysis data acquisition, spectral deconvolution
 Software capabilities (GFAAS), and isotope ratio analysis (ICP-
MS)
More portable instruments Typically larger and less portable
 Portability available, potentially useful for instruments
field applications
Requires proper handling of Generally safer operation, but proper
toxic or volatile samples due to handling of solvents and potential
 Safety consideration high temperatures in the aerosols is still important
furnace
Deuterium lamp background Various background correction methods
correction can be used to available (e.g., peak hopping, dynamic
 Background correction minimize non-specific reaction cell) for improved accuracy
absorption
More susceptible to memory Less prone to memory effects, but
 Memory effects effects from previous analyses, residual contamination can still occur
especially for volatile elements
Requires careful injection Nebulization process can be affected by
 Sample injection technique to avoid splattering sample viscosity and salt content,
and analyte loss impacting sensitivity
Limited source options (typically Various plasma source configurations
argon) available (e.g., collision/reaction cell) for
 Plasma source specific interferences and element
detection
Single element detection Multi-element detection possible,
 Detection mode allowing simultaneous analysis of multiple
elements in the sample

You might also like