Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Synthesis of Aromatic Polyesters Bearing Pendant Carboxyl Groups by Phase Transfer Catalysis
Synthesis of Aromatic Polyesters Bearing Pendant Carboxyl Groups by Phase Transfer Catalysis
RKCL3797
Abstract
Aromatic polyester (PEA) and copolyesters having pendant carboxyl groups are
directly synthesized from isophthaloyl chloride, diphenolic acid and diols by
aqueous/organic two-phase interfacial polycondensation, using phase transfer
catalysts. The yield and molecular weight of the polyester were remarkably
affected by the structure of quaternary ammonium salts and crown ether catalysts.
The phase transfer reaction steps are suggested to explain this phenomena. The
properties of copolyesters were dependent on the original structure of diols.
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL
O CH3
O
Cl C C Cl + HO C OH
CH2
CH2COOH
IPC DPA
O O CH3
PTC
C C O C O
aq.NaOH/CH2Cl2
CH2
CH2COOH n
PEA
Fig. 1. Reaction mechanism of polyester synthesis from IPC and DPA using phase
'
transfer catalyst ( HOROH = DPA, ClR Cl= isophthaloyl chloride, QX =
quaternary ammonium salt PTC )
Bulky quaternary salts, having longer distances between cations and anions,
are generally known to exhibit higher catalytic activity in activating anions [10].
This explains why TOAC is more effective in the reaction of ClR'Cl and
QOROQ in organic phase than THAC and TBHC.
Quaternary ammonium salts with different halide anion (chloride, bromide
and iodide) were used to study the effect of the counter anion on the yield and
molecular weight of PEA. The experimental results in Table 1 show that the
molecular weight of PEA increases in the order Cl-<Br-<I-. The solvation of
anion is an important factor for liquid phase reactions. In a protic solvent like
CH2Cl2, stronger solvation may be expected with a hard anion like Cl- than with
DAE-WON PARK et al.: POLYESTERS 223
a soft anion like I-. Therefore, the order of nucleophilicity will increase in the
order Cl-<Br-<I-, which accords with the order of the reactivity of the quaternary
ammonium halides.
Table 1
Yield and molecular weight of polyester (PEA)a
a
Reaction was carried out with 0.01 mol of IPC in 40 mL of CH2Cl2 and 0.01 mol of DPA in
90 mL of aqueous 1N NaOH solution using 0.1g of PTC at 25oC for 1 h
b
TOAC = tetraoctyl ammonium chloride, THAC = tetrahexyl ammonium chloride,
TBAC = tetrabutyl ammonium chloride, TBAB = tetrabutyl ammonium bromide,
TBAI = tetrabutyl ammonium iodide, 15-C-5 = 15-crown-5,
18-C-6 = 18-crown-6, DCH-18-C-6 = dicyclohexano-18-crown-6,
DB-18-C-6 = dibenzo-18-crown-6
c
Weight average molecular weight measured by a GPC
Crown ethers are also known as phase transfer catalysts. They easily form
complexes with potassium or sodium metal cations in aqueous phase and then
move to the organic phase to participate in organic phase reactions. In order to
understand the effects of crown ether structure on the synthesis of polyester
(PEA), 15-crown-5, 18-crown-6, dibenzo-18-crown-6 and dicyclohexano-18-
crown-6 were used as PTCs. The role of crown ethers in the synthesis of
polyester is the transfer of O-RO- like Q+X- of eq. (2) in Fig.1. However crown
ethers form complexes with sodium cations, producing Na+O-RO-Na+, and
transfer it into the organic phase.
Table 1 also shows the yield and molecular weight of PEA with crown ether
catalysts. The catalytic activity of the crown ether catalysts are lower than those
of quaternary ammonium halide catalysts. As the carbon numbers of simple
crown ethers increase from 15-crown-5 to 18-crown-6, the yield and Mw of the
224 DAE-WON PARK et al.: POLYESTERS
polyester increases. The binding constant (Ks) of Na+ with crown ethers shown
in eq. (5) increases with the carbon number of crown ether as reported
previously [11].
The hole size of 15-crown-5 and 18-crown-6 is reported as 1.7-2.2 and 2.6-
3.2 Å, respectively [12]. The solubility of 18-crown-6 in CH2Cl2 is also known
to be higher than that of 15-crown-5 [10]. All these facts support the better
catalytic activity of 18-crown-6 as compared with 15-crown-5.
When three different kinds of 18-C-6 are compared, the order of catalytic
activity of crown ethers increases as: dibenzo-18-crown-6<dicyclohexano-
crown-6<18-crown-6. This order is the same order as for binding constants,
however, the partition constant, KC = [crown ether]org/ [crown ether]aq, is the
highest for dibenzo-18-crown-6 and the lowest for 18-crown-6 [13]. The
changes in catalyst efficiency of crown ethers can be explained in terms of the
metal-ligand complex stability (binding constant) and partition constant [10].
The effect of complex stability is considered to be more dominant in this work.
The same conclusion was previously reported by Stott et al. [13].
When different types of solvents are used for the synthesis of the polyester
(PEA), dichloromethane and chloroform show higher yield and molecular
weight than with non-polar solvents like toluene and cyclohexane. Cyclohexane
showed the lowest yield and less than 3000 of Mw value since the reactant IPC
was poorly soluble in cyclohexane.
Synthesis of copolyesters
The copolyesters from diols of aliphatic chains showed lower Tg values because
of their relatively higher mobility than those of aromatic chains. One can also
see that PE-BPA has higher Tg than PE-PCD since the latter has soft carboxyl
groups. Thermogravimetric analysis showed the same order of thermal stability
of these copolyesters.
O O CH3
Cl C C Cl + HO C OH + HO R1 OH
CH2
CH2COOH
IPC DPA DIOL
O O CH3 O O
PTC
C C O C O C C O R1 O
aq.NaOH/CH2Cl2
CH2
CH2COOH n
PE-DIOL
CH3
R 1: C Bisphenol A (BPA)
CH3
CH3
C Propylchlorohydrin diphenolate (PCD)
CH2
H
H2COOCH2C C CH2
OH Cl
Table 2
Effect of various monomers on the yield, molecular weight and glass transition
temperature of copolyesters
Molecular weight
Polymera Diol Yield(%) Tg(C)
(Mw)
a
Reaction was carried out with 0.01 mol of IPC in 40 mL of CH2Cl2 and 0.01 mol of DPA in
90 mL of aqueous 1N NaOH solution using 0.1 g of TBAC at 25oC for 1 h
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
1. P.W. Morgan: Condensation Polymers by Interfacial and Solution Methods. Interscience,
New York 1965.
2. Y. Imai, S. Abe, M. Ueda: J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed., 19, 3285 (1981).
DAE-WON PARK et al.: POLYESTERS 227
3. B. Zhang, R.A. Weiss: J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed., 30, 83 (1992).
4. H. Schnell: Angew. Chem., 68, 633 (1956).
5. A.J. Conix: Ind. Eng. Chem., 51, 147 (1959)
6. N. Ohtani, Y. Inoue, A. Nomoto, S. Ohta: Reactive Polymers, 24, 73 (1994).
7. N. Ohtani, Y. Inoue, A. Kobayashi, T. Sugawara: Biotechnol. Bioeng., 48, 42 (1995).
8. C. Wang, S. Nakamura: J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Poly. Chem., 33, 2157 (1995).
9. S. Nakamura, C. Wang: Phase Transfer Catalysis: Mechanisms and Syntheses, ACS
Symp. Series 659 (1997).
10. C.M. Starks, C.L. Liotla, M. Halpern: Phase Transfer Catalysis. Chapman & Hall, New
York 1994.
11. D.M. Dishong, G.W. Gokel: J. Org. Chem., 47, 148 (1982).
12. H.K. Frensdorff: J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 600 (1971).
13. P.E. Stott, J.S. Bradshaw, W.F. Parish: J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 4810 (1980).