Grade 12 DRRR | Performance Task 3.

1
Hazard Profiling and Risk Assessment

Empowered like Mary to lead in Service

General Instructions

This Performance Task Worksheet is for sections who were able to perform the necessary
interviews in their Social Action communities.

Complete Section I with the basic information about your community.

Complete Section II with the data you were able to gather during your social action visit. You may add
more rows when necessary.

Complete Section III based on your experiences during the social action visit. Make sure Sections II
and III do not share a page.

Section I – Social Action Details

Social Action Community Date of Visit

Kaingin 1, Block 5, Aringit St. July 25, 2019

Section II – Hazard Profile of the Community

Hazard Frequency Duration Onset Forewarning Manageability

Event Speed
Earthquake 1-3 times a 10 seconds – Sudden none Ensuring that
year 1 minute onset objects are safe
speed and secured,
having go bags.

Thievery 2-3 times a 2 - 5 minutes Sudden none Getting proper

month onset locks for the doors
speed and windows.

Dengue 1-2 times a 3 months Sudden Sudden high Applying mosquito

year onset fever, severe repellent,
speed headaches and Removing of
muscle pains, stagnant water.
rashes

Water 2-3 times a 2 months Few days Barangay Storing enough

Shortage year after the announcement water in advance.
announce
ment is
made

Tokhang 1-2 times 4-5 hours Sudden none Staying inside the
every 2 weeks onset house at night.
speed
Section III – Risk Assessment of the Community

The community is resilient Rate the factors to the comments and observations
to disasters if it has: right according to their for each factor
presence in the
community:
(YES – 3, SOMETIMES –
2, NO - 1)

an organized population 2 The community's population is

relatively organized.

knowledgeable population 2 The population is familiar with the

about disasters basics on what to do during disasters,
but some are persistent in not
evacuating when disaster strikes.

mostly financially stable 1 The residents are mostly part of the

residents urban poor.

disaster-resilient houses 1 The houses are small and aren’t

made with the most sturdy materials.

accessible roads and 2 The roads are very small and

pathways damaged which make it difficult for
vehicles to pass through comfortably.
trained responders 3 The community has nearby
(firefighter, clinic, etc.) at responders who can help the
least one kilometer near them individuals in times of a disaster.

emergency plan, supplies, 2 People in the community have

and knowledge adequate knowledge on what to do
during disasters and how to prepare
for it.

warning systems available 1 The community is lacking in warning

systems for disasters.

supportive local government 2 The local government should

contribute more to the safety of the
community during disasters

linkages with other helpful 3 The community should have more

organizations organizations helping them

Resiliency Score 19/30

Based on the hazard profile of the community, our overall assessment for this community is that it is
not adequately prepared for disasters. The resiliency score of 19 out of 30 indicates that the disaster
preparedness of the community is not well developed, and it cannot guarantee the safety and recovery
of populace once a disaster strikes. The community lacks sturdy infrastructure, warning systems, and
resources. Another factor that contributes to the unpreparedness of the community is the
impoverishment of the residents which hinders them to acquire items that needed for emergencies. On
the other hand, the community members and residents have easy access to trained responders who will
provide assistance in times of disasters. Their partnership with other organizations helps families and
individuals prepare for probable hazard events. This community can still improve by establishing better
warning systems, and constructing sturdier buildings and infrastructures.