Table 1

Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile

N = 33

Profile Category f %
Age 22 – 23 years old 31 93.9
24 – 25 years old 2 6.1

Sex Male 1 3.0

Female 32 97.0

Mother Tongue used Filipino 20 60.6

at Home Iloko 10 30.3
Pangasinense 3 9.1

Mother Tongue used Filipino 28 84.8

at School Iloko 1 3.0
Pangasinense 4 12.1
 Table 2
Teaching Strategies employed by the Respondents
in terms of Content

Indicators WM DE
1. introduced the content with audio or video 4.42 HU
2. introduce the content with pictures, HU
illustrations and artifacts. 4.12
3. model my objectives and expectations in a HU
particular content 4.06
4. I implement a by pair reading. 3.91 HU
5. I implement a small group to re-teach an idea HU
or skill for struggling learners, or to extend the 3.94
thinking or skills of advanced learners.
6. provide materials that reflect a variety of HU
cultures and home settings. 4.06
7. provide an interest centers that encourage HU
students to explore subsets of the class topic of 3.88
particular interest to them.
8. provide multiple visual and concrete examples HU
of information. 4.18
9. put text materials on cartolina and manila HU
paper. 3.94
10. used spelling or vocabulary lists at readiness HU
levels of students. 4.33
Average Weighted Mean 4.09 HU
Legend: Mean Scale Descriptive Equivalent
4.50 – 5.00 Very Highly Utilized (VHU)
3.50 – 4.49 Highly Utilized (HU)
2.50 – 3.49 Utilized (U)
1.50 – 2.49 Fairly Utilized (FU)
1.00 – 1.49 Not Utilized (NU)

Table 3
Teaching Strategies employed by the Respondents
in terms of Pedagogy

Indicators WM DE
1. used instructional models based on explicit HU
teaching and learning goals. 4.27
2. used real-world scenarios and problem- HU
solving activities 4.33
3. used project-based learning strategy 4.36 HU
4. used collaborative learning strategy 4.42 HU
5. used team-based learning strategy 4.18 HU
6. used constructivist approach 4.33 HU
 7. used reflective approach 4.18 HU
8. used constructivist approach 4.18 HU
9. used reading and writing learning style 4.24 HU
10. used direct instruction 4.33 HU
Average Weighted Mean 4.28 HU
Legend: Mean Scale Descriptive Equivalent
4.50 – 5.00 Very Highly Utilized (VHU)
3.50 – 4.49 Highly Utilized (HU)
2.50 – 3.49 Utilized (U)
1.50 – 2.49 Fairly Utilized (FU)
1.00 – 1.49 Not Utilized (NU)

Table 4
Teaching Strategies employed by the Respondents
in terms of Assessment

Indicators WM DE
1. given an activity after the discussion 4.42 HU
2. give a short quiz at the end of the class to HU
check for comprehension. 4.21
3. used a think-pair-share to think about the HU
question or prompt 4.33
4. ask a single focused question with a specific HU
goal that can be answered within a minute or 4.21
two
5. used formative pencil-paper assessment 4.09 HU
6. check for understanding at least three times HU
or more 4.30
7. used performance-based tasks 4.33 HU
8. identify the weakness of the learner 4.21 HU
9. recognize the learning needs of an individual HU
learner 4.24
10. used an open-ended questions that gets HU
them writing and talking 4.45
Average Weighted Mean 4.28 HU
Legend: Mean Scale Descriptive Equivalent
4.50 – 5.00 Very Highly Utilized (VHU)
3.50 – 4.49 Highly Utilized (HU)
2.50 – 3.49 Utilized (U)
1.50 – 2.49 Fairly Utilized (FU)
1.00 – 1.49 Not Utilized (NU)
 Table 5
Relationship between the Teaching Strategies employed
by the Respondents and their Profile Variables

CONTENT PEDAGOGY ASSESSMENT

Age Pearson Correlation -.079 .093 .077
Sig. (2-tailed) .662 .606 .670
SEX Pearson Correlation -.005 -.005 -.038
Sig. (2-tailed) .980 .980 .835
* *
MT home Pearson Correlation -.359 -.348 -.208
Sig. (2-tailed) .040 .047 .245
**
MT school Pearson Correlation -.455 -.330 -.352*
Sig. (2-tailed) .008 .061 .045