Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Causes of WWI
Causes of WWI
4/18/2023
E-Block
During the onset of the 20th century, Europe looked drastically different than it does today.
Emerging from the previous century wrought with upheaval and chaos, the fledging 20th century was
very much so defined by strong tension and struggle for power. Following the strife and conflict ensuing
during the 19th century, the power balance that had kept Europe stable for so long had deteriorated to on
the brink of collapse. As the age of the monarchy entered its twilight, surging nationalism across the
continent added more wood to an already burning fire, while the complicated and convoluted alliances
between nations posed a profound threat. At the end of the day, the fundamental causes that led to war
cannot be chalked up to a single culprit; in reality it was the tension, fragility, and convolution within
Europe all working simultaneously that heralded the onset of the Great War.
The state of affairs in Europe during the 1900s was incredibly chaotic, mired by tension and
agitation due to surging nationalism and ethnic disputes, both of which can be attributed to the tumultuous
19th century that preceded it. Such events during that era resulted in the destruction of the power balance,
which brought Europe to a virtual standoff between the great powers. The “power balance” referred to the
idea that no European power would be more dominant or stronger than the other, leading to a relatively
egalitarian distribution of authority amongst the great powers of the time, which ushered in a period of
relative peace, however the stark and abrupt changes proved a threat. Political events, such as the German
unification, upset the power balance, leading to a significant shift in power dynamics throughout Europe.
Rising nationalism in favor of ethnic unity and freedom rocked the already disturbed continent. Likewise,
in the Balkans, nationalist movements in favor of independence for Slavic ethnic groups against Austria-
Hungary began to gain momentum, evolving the peninsula into a powder keg of ethnic tensions that
would ultimately go on to play a major role in the onset of the war. This same nationalistic fervor that
spread through the Balkans was equally present across the rest of Europe as well. Pan-German
nationalism resulting in the emergence of a unified Germany posed a direct threat to the preexistent and
Nikky Nandipati
4/18/2023
E-Block
rigid power balance, and the Franco-Prussian War only served to exacerbate tensions between these
countries. The rise of Germany as a powerhouse was a slap in the face to other nations that had previously
been dominant on the world stage, such as France, Britain, and Russia, and the rapid growth of new
powerhouse only served to create further tension. This is shown to be true, as Germans, statesmen and
citizens alike, believed it was necessary for Germany to rise up the occasion, citing it as their necessity to
“keep [them]selves at the fore” with a “strong army and strong fleet”, in order to avoid be “tramped by
any other foreign powers” or “the slaves of humanity”, which encapsulated the mindset of inherent and
necessary competition between the great powers (Document D). Factors such as rising nationalism, the
failure of the power balance, and the struggle for power within Europe created a volatile political climate
In addition to nationalistic and ethnic conflicts, the complicated situation and strain on
Europe manifested itself into other precarious situations, as can be seen in the arms race and competitive
militaristic modernization amongst the great powers. Each nation seeking to expand their territories and
influence created an atmosphere of intense rivalry and mistrust, and the subsequent arms race was a
natural consequence of this growing competition. Countries felt that they needed to build up their military
forces to protect their interests and maintain their status as major powers. This led to a massive increase in
military spending and the development of new military technologies. During the time period from the late
19th century leading up to World War I, almost all the great powers within Europe were involved in this
arms race, their competition leading to a vicious spiral of escalation. From 1890, almost all nations
doubled, tripled, and in some cases, even quadrupled their military expenditures, showing not only the
dire state of affair in Europe at the time, but also the impending threat of war, which almost all countries
must have seen as inevitable considering their spending (Document C). The intense and adverse situation
in Europe made it difficult for nations to find peaceful solutions to conflicts, and they were often more
concerned with maintaining their honor and prestige through war than with finding a compromise that
would benefit both parties through diplomatic means, showing the likelihood of war. The arms race and
Nikky Nandipati
4/18/2023
E-Block
military buildup that occurred as a result of increasing nationalistic and political tensions set Europe down
a dark path. Such a desire to maintain military superiority created an atmosphere of intense competition
and mistrust, that set the stage for a looming and inevitable war to end all wars.
Working in unison, the tension and conflict together with the arms race in Europe snowballed
into an even greater force that spelled the beginning of World War I, but most directly, the conflict was a
complex web of alliances between major European powers that had been formed in the years leading up
to the war. These alliances were designed to maintain a balance of power and deter aggression, but they
ultimately proved to be a contributing factor to the outbreak of war. The alliances that emerged in the late
19th and early 20th centuries were a reflection of the geopolitical landscape of the time. The fledgling
German, rapidly industrializing and seeking to expand its territory and influence, alarmed the traditional
powers of Europe, particularly France and Russia, who formed the Triple Entente, while Germany allied
with its neighboring Austria-Hungary, and later the Ottoman Empire, to form the Central Powers
(Document A). In 1914, the assassination of the Austrian Archduke, Franz Ferdinand, by a Serbian
nationalist proved to be the last straw causing the tensions in Europe to boil over. Already at its most
fragile due to the loss of the balance of power, and comparable to a very late stage Jenga tower, all it took
was a minor spark to lead to all out catastrophe. Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia, which
was supported by Russia, and when Serbia refused to comply, Austria-Hungary declared war, and Russia
mobilized its troops to support Serbia. This, in turn, triggered Germany’s involvement in the war against
Russia, which drew in France against Germany and Austria, prompting Germany to make the first move
in invading neutral Belgium, pulling the British into the war. Neither side took responsibility for the onset
of the war and they failed to take the necessary steps to resolve the issue, and it thus began to spiral out of
control (Document B). Although the onset of the war can be most directly attributed to the assassination
of the Archduke and the tangled web of European alliances, at the end of the day, the war was a symbol of
much deeper tensions within Europe. The preexisting conflicts and struggle for power manifested
themselves on the battlefield as the Great War gradually shifted from a war over alliance technicalities
Nikky Nandipati
4/18/2023
E-Block
into a struggle for domination over the world, with each nation seeking to knock out the others to place
World War 1 was the result of something much deeper than surface level alliances or petty
squabbles, and it was very much so a representation for the struggle for power over the entirety of
Europe, and by extent the world. Kicked off by decades of growing dissent and tensions fueled by such
things like a ferociously competitive arms race and a complicated mess of alliances, Europe was a very
much so just a bomb waiting to explode, and the First World War was inevitable in every way.