Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
The aim of corporate governance is to ensure that companies are run well in the interests of
their shareholders, employees, and other key stakeholders such as the wider community.
The aim is to try and prevent company directors from abusing their power which may
adversely affect these stakeholder groups. For example, the directors may pay themselves
large salaries and bonuses whilst claiming they have no money to pay a dividend to
shareholders. Similarly, they may be making large numbers of staff redundant but awarding
themselves a pay rise.
• Greater transparency
• Greater accountability
• Efficiency of operations
• Better able to respond to risks
• Less likely to be mismanaged.
In the US the Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002) introduced a set of rigorous corporate governance
laws. The UK Corporate Governance Code introduced a set of best practice corporate
governance initiatives into the UK.
1. Leadership
2. Effectiveness
3. Accountability
4. Remuneration
5. Relations with shareholders
Leadership
• Each company should have an effective board who take collective responsibility for
the long-term success of the company. The board should comprise of a balance
between executive directors and non-executive directors.
• There should be clear division of responsibilities between running the board and
the running of the company’s business. No one should have unfettered powers of
decision.
Effectiveness
• The board should have the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence
and knowledge of the company to enable them to discharge their respective duties
and responsibility effectively.
• All directors should receive induction on joining the board and should regularly
update and refresh their skills and knowledge.
• The board should undertake formal and rigorous evaluation of its performance and
that of its committees and individual directors.
Accountability
• The board is responsible for determining the nature and extent of the significant
risks it is willing to take in achieving its strategic objectives.
• The board should maintain sound risk management and internal control systems.
• The board should establish formal and transparent arrangements for maintaining
an appropriate relationship with the company's auditor.
Remuneration
• Levels of remuneration should be sufficient to attract, retain and motivate
directors of the quality required but should not pay more than necessary.
• The board should establish formal and transparent procedures for developing the
policy for executive directors' remuneration.
• The board should use annual general meetings to communicate with investors
and encourage their participation.
The Code is particularly important for publicly traded companies because large
amounts of money are invested in them, either by ‘small’ shareholders, or from
pension schemes and other financial institutions. The wealth of these companies
significantly affects the health of the economies where their shares are traded.
Non-executive
directors
Having a balanced board will mean that board decisions are not influenced by
one group of directors.
The roles of the chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) should be held by
two separate people to avoid concentration of power.
Non-executive directors
The non-executive directors monitor the executive directors and contribute to the
overall strategy and direction of the organisation. Non-executive directors (NEDs) are
usually employed on a part-time basis and do not take part in the routine executive
management of the company.
NEDs will
At least half the board, excluding the chairman, must be independent non-executive
directors. The board should determine whether directors are independent in character
and judgment and whether there are relationships or circumstances which are likely
to affect, or could appear to affect, the director’s judgment.
1. Remuneration committee
The role of the remuneration committee is to set the remuneration packages for
the executive directors. This is to ensure that they are not paid excessive amounts but
are paid fairly for their role. The committee will comprise nonexecutive directors.
Advantages:
• Decisions are based on agreement of several people, reducing the risk of
bribes from directors in return for a higher package.
• No director is involved in setting his own pay.
• Performance related elements will be included to avoid the risk that
directors are rewarded for poor performance.
2. Nomination committee
The role of the nomination committee is to decide on appointments of executive
directors. This is to ensure the best person for the job is recruited. The majority
of this committee should be non-executive directors.
Advantages:
• Reduces the risk of 'jobs for the boys'. Executive directors might appoint
other directors who they are friends with or used to work with but wouldn't
necessarily have the skills required.
• Reduces the risk of improperly affecting board decisions. Executives might
appoint people to the board they know will vote in favor of the same
decisions as them and can therefore influence board decisions which may
not be in the best interests of the company.
3. Risk committee
The risk committee will be responsible for advising the board on the company’s
risk appetite, reviewing and approving the risk management strategy and
advising the audit committee and board on risk exposures.
4. Audit committee
The audit committee will take responsibility for financial reporting and internal
control matters. Audit committees are covered in more detail in the next section.
Internal audit has an important role to play in assisting the board fulfil their
corporate governance responsibilities.
Internal audit will work closely with the audit committee. They will:
• Ensure that the internal auditor has direct access to the board chairman
and to the audit committee and is accountable to the audit committee.
• Meet with the head of internal audit at least once a year without the
presence of management.
• Monitor and assess the effectiveness of internal audit in the overall context
of the company’s risk management system.
The roles and functions of internal audit are covered in the chapter ‘Internal audit’.
• Increased public confidence in the audit opinion as the audit committee will monitor
the independence of the external auditors.
• The internal audit function will report to the audit committee increasing their
independence and adding weight to their recommendations.
• The skills, knowledge and experience (and independence) of the audit committee
members can be an invaluable resource for a business.
Problems
• Difficulties recruiting the right non-executive directors who have relevant skills,
experience and sufficient time to become effective members of the committee.
•staff fear that audit committee are purely looking for errors and as a result they fear
losing their job.
•non-executive directors are not full time and not employed by the business may be
overburdened with the information from different people within the company.
• The cost. Non-executive directors are normally remunerated, and their fees can be
quite expensive.
1. A statement given by the directors that they consider the annual report and
accounts taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the
information necessary for shareholders to assess the entity’s performance, business
model and strategy, that is inconsistent with the knowledge acquired by the auditor in
the course of performing the audit.
2. A section describing the work of the audit committee that does not appropriately
address matters communicated by the auditor to the audit committee.
3. An explanation, as to why the annual report does not include such a statement or
section, that is materially inconsistent with the knowledge acquired by the auditor in
the course of performing the audit.
Other countries may have different reporting requirements in accordance with local
legislation and regulations.
risks are defined as those events that may occur resulting in an undesirable outcome.
Companies face many risks, for example:
The risk that products may become technologically obsolete.
• The risk of losing key staff.
• The risk of a catastrophic failure of IT systems.
• The risk of changes in government policy.
• The risk of fire or natural disaster.
Management of risk
Companies should have a risk management in place that allows them to: -
1. Identify risk
2. Assess risk
3. Put measures in place to manage the risk communicate risks to others in the
business
4. Monitor risk
Companies need mechanisms in place to identify and then assess those risks. In so
doing, companies can rank risks in terms of their relative importance by scoring them
with regard to their likelihood and potential impact. This could take the form of a ‘risk
map’. A risk map enables the company to assess the likelihood or probability of a risk
occurring and the likely impact to the company if it does happen.
• Accepting the risk and bearing the cost and consequence if the risk
happens. This may be likely for risks which are deemed low in terms
of probability or impact on the company.
A risk that ranked as highly likely to occur and high potential impact on
the business would be prioritized as requiring immediate action. A risk
that was considered both low likelihood and low impact might be ignored
or insured against.
Auditors are not responsible for the design and implementation of their clients'
control systems. Auditors have to assess the effectiveness of controls for reducing
the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements. They incorporate this
into their overall audit risk assessment, which allows them to design their further
audit procedures.
In addition to this, auditors are required, in accordance with ISA 265, to report
significant deficiencies in client controls and any significant risks identified during the
audit to those charged with governance.