Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity4 Product and Service Design
Activity4 Product and Service Design
A single product and specific service design holds various responsibility to the
consumers. They are expected to provide satisfaction to the needs of the customers.
Moreover, it includes many functional interactions to offer. These are to translate the
customer’s wants and needs into product and service requirements. Second is to refine
the existing products and services. They can also develop new product and services. As
well as to formulate quality goals and cost targets. Product and service deign are also in
charge to construct and test prototypes, document specifications, and then translate
product and service specifications into process specifications.
In most cases, designers must be cautious to examine a wide range of legal and
ethical aspects. Furthermore, if there is a risk of harming the environment, such
considerations become much more essential. The majority of businesses are regulated
by a variety of government authorities. The Food and Drug Administration, the
Occupational Health and Safety Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency,
and several state and municipal agencies are among the most well-known federal
agencies. Designers have been scrambling to come up with alternate designs that are
acceptable to both government regulators and customers because of phosphates and
asbestos.
The suits and potential suits have led to increased legal and insurance costs,
expensive settlements with injured parties, and costly recalls. Moreover, increasing
customer awareness of product safety can adversely affect product image and
subsequent demand for a product. Thus, it is extremely important to design products
that are reasonably free of hazards. When hazards do exist, it is necessary to install
safety guards or other devices for reducing accident potential, and to provide adequate
warning notices of risks. Consumer business firms, and various government agencies
often work together to develop industrywide standards that help avoid some of the
hazards.
Ethical issues often arise in the design of products and services; it is important
for managers to be aware of these issues and for designers to adhere to ethical
standards. Designers are often under pressure to speed up the design process and to
cut costs. These pressures often require them to make trade-off decisions, many of
which involve ethical considerations. One example of what can happen is “vaporware,”
when a software company doesn’t issue a release of software as scheduled as it
struggles with production problems or bugs in the software. The company faces the
dilemma of releasing the software right away or waiting until most of the bugs have
been removed—knowing that the longer it waits, the more time will be needed before it
receives revenues and the greater the risk of damage to its reputation. Organizations
generally want designers to adhere to guidelines such as the following:
• Produce designs that are consistent with the goals of the organization. For
instance, if the company has a goal of high quality, don’t cut corners to save cost, even
in areas where it won’t be apparent to the customer.
• Make health and safety a primary concern. At risk are employees who will
produce goods or deliver services, workers who will transport the products, customers
who will use the products or receive the services, and the general public, which might
be endangered by the products or services.
Product and service design is a focal point in the quest for sustainability. Key
aspects include cradle-to-grave assessment, end-of-life programs, reduction of costs
and materials used, reuse of parts of returned products, and recycling.
This is a method of product design that focuses on making the components that
will make up the final product as simple as possible. DFM is primarily focused with
lowering total part production costs and decreasing manufacturing operations
complexity. The process of developing or creating a product such that it is simple to
build at the lowest feasible cost is the goal of this process. The review of raw material
selection, secondary processes (finishing, plating), dimensional requirements, and even
final packing should all be part of the process.
Concurrent Engineering
Some CAD systems enable designers to run engineering and cost studies on
their ideas. For example, a computer can calculate a part's weight and volume, as well
as do stress analysis. When there are several possible designs, the computer can
swiftly sort through them and choose the best one based on the designer's
requirements. CAD with finite element analysis (FEA) capacity can significantly reduce
the time it takes for new goods to reach the market. It allows developers to run
simulations to help in the design process. New product development, analysis, and
commercialization FEA is used by designers in areas including aeronautics,
biomechanics, and automobiles.
Production Requirements
Component Commonality
It's essential to get feedback from customers to verify that they will like what we
are about to offer. Although getting client feedback may be done informally through
conversations with them, there is a formal technique to capture their desires. Quality
function deployment (QFD) is a method for incorporating the "voice of the customer"
into product and service development. It is a process of development in which the goal
is to make sure that the client’s needs are taken into account at every step of the
process. The primary aspect of QFD is listening to and comprehending the consumer.
Requirements are sometimes stated in broad terms, such as "It should be simple to
alter the cutting height of the lawn mower."
Once the criteria have been identified, they must be translated into technical
words that are applicable to the product or service. A remark regarding altering the
height of the lawn mower, for example, might refer to the mechanism, its location,
directions for operation, the tension of the spring that regulates the mechanism, or the
materials required. These must be connected to the materials, dimensions, and
processing equipment utilized for manufacturing purposes.
The Kano model is a product and service design theory developed by Dr. Noriaki
Kano, a Japanese professor, who proposed different categories of quality and posited
that understanding them would better position designers to assess and address quality
needs, rather than the traditional view of "more is better." His methodology elaborates
the characteristics that clients value the most. The approach uses three types of quality
definitions: threshold, performance, and excitement.
The first quality approach refers to consumer criteria that, if present, it will have a
minor impact on customer satisfaction but, if absent, lead to discontent is called as the
threshold attribute a.k.a. the basic quality. For example, installing a very short chord
on an electrical device would almost always cause consumer discontent, but adding
longer cord beyond the certain length will not boost customer satisfaction. Another
customer criteria that create satisfaction or discontent is dependent to their level of
functionality and attractiveness are referred to as performance quality a.k.a. the
satisfiers. Customer satisfaction may be improved by lengthening the tread life of a tire
or the duration of house paint. The third feature is the quality or attribute that is
unanticipated by the consumer and produces excitement, called as the "wow" factor,
such as a ticket for supper for two at the hotel restaurant after checking in, is an
example of excitement quality a.k.a. the delighters. Customers are dissatisfied when
fundamental quality attributes are missing or at low levels, but they are not satisfied
when they are there, even at high levels. Depending on the degree to which
performance elements are present, they might cause pleasure or discontent. Because
excitement aspects are unexpected, they do not create dissatisfaction when they are
missing or at low levels, but when they are there, they have the potential to cause
excessive amounts of satisfaction.
Features that excite people become performance features over time, and
performance features suddenly become standard quality features. The rate at which
various design aspects migrate is a crucial marketing input that will allow designers to
continue to satisfy and excite clients rather than wasting time and resources upgrading
what have become basic quality characteristics.
The Kano model simply teaches us that the design components that go into each
area of quality must be determined first. Additional efforts in such areas should not be
undertaken until fundamental necessities have been addressed. Cost–benefit analysis
applies to performance characteristics, and these elements should be included as long
as the benefit outweighs the cost. The use of excitement characteristics might be
difficult. Customers are unlikely to express enthusiasm in surveys since they are
unaware that they desire them. Small increases in such elements, on the other hand,
cause disproportional improvements in customer satisfaction and, in general, boost
brand loyalty, therefore it's critical for businesses to seek out and add these aspects
whenever they're economically possible.