Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shared Service Cost Model
Shared Service Cost Model
Finance
Insights
Expert Guidance
Tools
Become a Client
Shared services organizations can choose from several pricing models. Some incentivize customer
behavior or cost efficiency more than others.
“How should I charge internal customers for the services offered?” There is no single answer to that
question, so it’s important for shared services leaders to select a pricing model based on the balance
between efficiency (how costs are charged out) and its effectiveness in influencing customer behavior
(i.e., accuracy).
Recent research from the Gartner Finance research team offers guidance to shared services leaders on
weighing the pros and cons of shared services pricing models.
This article recaps their key points, edited for clarity and length.
Some shared services organizations (SSOs) don’t charge, while some use a simple allocation
methodology. Others use elaborate activity-based costing to determine variable-based models. One of
the main reasons to charge customers is to encourage them to “do the right thing” for the enterprise
and fund process improvement.
Certain pricing mechanisms can ensure that customers are vested in forecasting or managing their
demand for services and supplying the quality inputs required for shared services to do its job. They
prevent customers from overutilizing or underutilizing services.
Some pricing models provide a basis for accurately reflecting the cost of services and enable
comparisons to external pricing. However, other models can also trigger resistance and lead to “I’ll do it
myself” behavior by customers, leading to reduced customer commitment to working with shared
services.
This is the most basic model, generally used when shared services is a centralized support group without
separate budget. As a result, the cost is typically borne by the broader organization and not allocated to
business-unit customers directly.
Pros Cons
Good option for starting up or for Doesn’t influence customer behavior, which can lead
the short term until processes to deviations from best practice
are stable
Portrays shared services as a corporate entity
This is usually one of the simplest models to implement. Business units are charged a flat rate or a
percentage of costs depending on a predetermined metric (for example, the number of full-time
employees using the shared service). Price is calculated irrespective of the volume or type of service.
Pros Cons
Provides a simple basis for Provides limited information on the true cost of the
allocating costs to different services provided
business-unit customers
Does not provide business units an incentive to
Easily updated as a part of the review their demand for services or partner with
budgeting process shared services to optimize processes and reduce
costs
Helps send business-unit
customers a message that they The complexity of the services rendered is not
are, in fact, paying for the service accounted for, possibly penalizing some customers
and subsidizing others
Pros Cons
In this model, price is decided or influenced by external competitive market rates for a similar service.
Pros Cons
Business-unit customers feel Can be difficult to source the market price and
comfortable that they are charged determine which best suits shared services,
appropriately for the services they making this model time-consuming to implement
receive and maintain
Transparent and easy to understand Shared services can get trapped into unfair
comparisons
Encourages shared services to be
competitive Costs that aren’t billed to internal customers must
be absorbed by a corporate overhead department
This model is similar to the previous market model, but adds a profit margin. The shared service
organization therefore acts as a profit center, aiming to reinvest revenue to improve
service, technology or infrastructure.
Pros Cons
The profit margin enables shared services to focus There may be no incentive for
on improving their services and the customer shared services to be cost-efficient
experience
Business unit customers typically
As business-unit customers are required to pay don’t appreciate paying a profit
over and above the cost, they have a vested margin for shared services’ internal
interest in how the profits are being utilized to agenda
improve shared services
This article has been updated from the November 2019 original to reflect new events, conditions or
research.
Be a part of most important gathering for CFOs to explore potential finance tech providers and get
actionable insights to prioritize technology innovation.
View Conference
*Note that some documents may not be available to all Gartner clients.
Discover how to prepare your finance function to achieve your goals by understanding the top CFO
trends and finance executive priorities for 2024.
Read Now
Work Email
Continue
By clicking the "Continue" button, you are agreeing to the Gartner Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Explore deep-dive content to help you stay informed and up to date
Watch Webinar
Watch Webinar
Ask the Expert: The Art of the 1-Page Strategy - 4 Simple Steps to Success
Watch Webinar
Impactful Storytelling: Craft a Business Value and Human Value Story to Increase Influence
Watch Webinar
Watch Webinar
Government Finance Leaders, Manage Change Fatigue to Set Your Team Up for Success
Watch Webinar
Become a Client
About Gartner
Who We Are
o About Us
o Corporate Responsibility
o Investor Relations
o Newsroom
What We Do
o Conferences
o Consulting
o Digital Markets
Get in Touch
Contact
o Contact Us
o Become a Client
o Office Locations
o Technical Support
Careers
o Why Gartner
o Search Careers
o Our Culture
o Careers Blog
Latest Insights
Resources
o Featured Insights
o Webinars
o Glossary
o Client Stories
We use cookies to deliver the best possible experience on our website. To learn more, visit our Privacy
Policy. By continuing to use this site, or closing this box, you consent to our use of cookies. Cookie
Notice.
Accept