STUDENT’S NAME:

NAME OF INSTITUTION (THE UNIVERSITY OF

ARIZONA GLOBAL CAMPUS)
COURSE NAME AND NUMBER:
INSTRUCTOR’S NAME:
DUE DATE:
introduction
When evaluating the economic climate of various places, the Cost-of-Living Index and the

Grocery Index are essential metrics. We examine the association between these indices in seven

different American cities in our investigation. An understanding of the relative affordability and

economic dynamics of each city can be obtained by analyzing the correlation between the

Groceries Index and the Cost-of-Living Index. These indexes offer a lens through which we may

see which cities are the most and least expensive, illuminating the disparities in living standards

and economic environments that exist between various geographic areas. Knowing this

relationship not only helps people make well-informed decisions about where to move or spend

their money, but it also provides policymakers with important information about economic

inequities and potential areas for intervention. Our goal in doing this investigation is to clarify

the subtleties of cost differences between cities and how they affect citizens and policymakers in

equal measure.

Analyzing the correlation between the Cost of Living Index and the Grocery Index in the chosen

cities offers significant insights on the dynamics of costs and economic differences between

them. The Cost of Living Index includes a wider range of costs, such as housing, transportation,

healthcare, and other expenses, whereas the Groceries Index, which measures the relative cost of

groceries, acts as a stand-in for necessary living expenses. This is how the analysis unfolds:

1. Relationship Analysis: We see a clear trend when we plot each city's Grocery Index

against its Cost of Living Index. In general, we witness a comparable increase in the Cost

of Living Index, suggesting overall increased living expenses, as the Groceries Index
 rises, indicating higher grocery prices. The observed positive association implies that

groceries have a noteworthy impact on the overall cost of living in these locations.

table 1

The scatter plot effectively visualizes the

relationship between the Groceries Index and the
Cost of Living Index across the selected cities.
Each data point represents a city, with the x-axis
showing the Groceries Index (independent
variable) and the y-axis showing the Cost of Living
Index (dependent variable).

The plot illustrates a discernible trend,

indicating a positive correlation between the
two indices. As the Groceries Index increases,
suggesting higher grocery prices, there is a
corresponding increase in the Cost of Living
Index, reflecting higher overall living
expenses.
scatter plot diagram

2. Identifying Affordability: We are able to determine which cities are comparatively more

and less affordable thanks to the investigation. Due to their lower total living costs and

grocery prices, cities with lower cost of living and grocery indexes are thought to be more

inexpensive. On the other hand, cities with higher indices tend to be less cheap, which

means that living conditions generally and the cost of necessities will be greater.
 3. Best and Worst Cities Regarding Cost: Based on the analysis of the indices, we can

identify the best and worst cities regarding cost. For instance, cities with lower Groceries

and Cost of Living Indices, such as Seattle and Sacramento, emerge as relatively

affordable options. Conversely, cities like Hamilton, Bermuda, with notably higher

indices, signify higher living expenses and are thus categorized as less cost-effective

options.

4. elements Affecting Affordability: Although the Cost of Living and Grocery indices give

an overview of affordability, it's important to take into account the underlying elements

that influence these indices. The total cost of living in a place is heavily influenced by

variables like housing costs, income levels, tax laws, and local economic situations. For

example, despite relatively reduced grocery prices, communities with flourishing

economies and significant housing demand may have higher living expenses.

5. Implications for Citizens and Policymakers: It is imperative that citizens and

policymakers comprehend how these indices relate to one another. With this information,

residents may plan their budgets, relocate, and manage their living expenses. On the other

hand, policymakers can use these findings to carry out focused initiatives meant to

increase affordability, reduce economic imbalances, and improve inhabitants' quality of

life overall.

Individuals and policymakers can efficiently manage economic issues and promote a more

equitable and sustainable urban environment by finding the most and least expensive cities

from the above insights.

Cities with the lowest costs:

1. Seattle, Washington, USA: Seattle's Cost of Living Index (80.4) and Grocery Index (84.4) are
comparatively low when compared to the other cities in the list.

2. Sacramento, California, USA: Like Seattle, Sacramento is another economical option due to

its reduced living expenses, with an 80.1 Cost of Living Index and an 85.6 Grocery Index.

Cities with the lowest affordability:

1. Hamilton, Bermuda: With a Cost of Living Index of 130.8 and a Grocery Index of 145.6,

suggesting significantly higher living expenses, Hamilton stands out as one of the least cheap

cities in the survey despite its picturesque surroundings.

2. San Francisco, California, USA: San Francisco, which is well-known for having a high cost of

living, is among the most expensive cities in the list with a Cost of Living Index of 88.9 and a

Grocery Index of 100.8.

conclusion
To sum up, our examination of the correlation between the Cost of Living Index and the Grocery

Index in seven different locations provides important new understandings of the mechanics of

urban affordability. Seattle and Sacramento stand out as reasonably priced cities due to their

reduced cost of living and grocery prices. On the other hand, San Francisco, California, and

Hamilton, Bermuda, symbolize the difficulties brought on by increased living expenses.

But affordability goes beyond just goods; it also includes housing, income disparities, and local

economic circumstances. Therefore, broad actions are needed to address economic inequities.

These are very helpful insights, not only for people who are moving or managing their finances,

but also for legislators who are trying to create inclusive cities. Policymakers can improve

quality of life and affordability by implementing targeted reforms based on their understanding

of these affordability factors. In the end, our analysis emphasizes how critical well-informed

decision-making is to building just and sustainable urban communities.

References
1. Loveridge, S., & Paredes, D. (2018). Are rural costs of living lower? Evidence from a

Big Mac Index Approach. International Regional Science Review, 41(3), 364-382.

2. Osborne, M. (2018). Approximating the cost-of-living index for a storable

good. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10(2), 286-314.

3. Handbury, J. (2021). Are poor cities cheap for everyone? Non‐homotheticity and the cost

of living across US cities. Econometrica, 89(6), 2679-2715.

4. Handbury, J. (2019). Are poor cities cheap for everyone? non-homotheticity and the cost

of living across us cities (No. w26574). National Bureau of Economic Research.

5. Diamond, R., & Moretti, E. (2021). Where is standard of living the highest? Local prices

and the geography of consumption (No. w29533). National Bureau of Economic

Research.