Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Flyaway NAT
Flyaway NAT
Inhaltsverzeichnis
1. PREPARATION.......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Overview and maps ................................................................................................................. 1
1.2. Recommended Documents ..................................................................................................... 1
1.3. MNPS, CPDLC, RVSM, NAT OTS ............................................................................................... 1
2. AIRCRAFT REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................... 3
3. FLIGHT PLANNING .................................................................................................................... 5
3.1. OTS - Organized Track System ................................................................................................. 5
3.2. VHF Coverage Map at FL300 ................................................................................................... 6
3.3. TMI – Track Message Identification ........................................................................................ 7
3.4. MNPS – Separation Minima .................................................................................................... 7
3.5. Blue Spruce Routes for degraded Navigation Capability ........................................................ 7
4. OCA – OCEANIC CONTROL AREAS .............................................................................................. 9
4.1. Oceanic Clearance ................................................................................................................. 10
4.2. Datalink FIRs .......................................................................................................................... 12
5. SPECIAL PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................. 13
5.1. Inflight Contingency Procedures (Emergency Procedure) .................................................... 13
5.2. Weather Deviation Procedure............................................................................................... 14
5.3. Strategic Lateral Offset Procedure (SLOP)............................................................................. 15
6. GREENLAND CROSSING & MINIMUM USABLE FLIGHT LEVEL CALCULATION ..................................... 16
7. WEATHER:............................................................................................................................ 18
1. PREPARATION
1.1. Overview and maps
CBT:
There is an old CBT “Area Qualification North Atlantic” on your work pad which can be used
“for info only” as it is antiquated and not up to date.
MNPS
MINIMUM NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION
MNPS airspace has been established between FL285 and FL420. To ensure the safe application
of separation between aircraft in the airspace, only MNPS approved aircraft are permitted to
operate within the MNPS airspace. The current MNPS was established to ensure that the risk
of collision as a consequence of a loss of horizontal separation would be contained within an
agreed Target Level of Safety (TLS).
The lateral separation applied between MNPS approved aircraft is 60NM. For the most part,
aircraft tracks are separated using the earth’s coordinate system to define tracks and effect
separation laterally by 60 NM or 1 degree provided a portion of the route is within, above, or
below MNPS airspace.
The longitudinal separation minima applied in the airspace vary greatly depending on aircraft
class (jet, prop) among other criteria but for the target population, the values are 15 minutes for
crossing tracks and 10 minutes for aircraft that have reported a common point and follow the
same track or continuously diverging tracks.
CPDLC
Controller–pilot data link communications
RVSM airspace has been established within the confines of MNPS airspace and associated
transition areas. In RVSM airspace, 1000 ft. vertical separation is applied between approved
aircraft. Currently, RVSM is only applied between FL 290 and FL 410 inclusive. To ensure the
safe application of the separation minimum, only RVSM approved aircraft are allowed to
operate within RVSM airspace. Aircraft are monitored to ensure that the TLS is being met.
NAT OTS
NORTH ATLANTIC ORGANIZED TRACK SYSTEM (NAT OTS)
As is the norm in most of the NAT Region, the Reykjavik CTA is free of fixed routes, the only
constraints on routing being the use of anchor points at whole degrees of latitude at every whole
degrees of longitude for tracks trending West/East and at 5° intervals of latitude for North/South
oriented tracks. A significant portion of the NAT traffic operates on tracks, which vary from
day to day dependent on meteorological conditions. The variability of the wind patterns would
make a fixed track system unnecessarily penalizing in terms of flight time and consequent fuel
usage. Nevertheless, the volume of traffic along the core routes is such that a complete absence
of any designated tracks (i.e. a free flow system) would currently be unworkable given the need
to maintain procedural separation standards in airspace largely without radar surveillance. As
a result, an OTS is set up on a diurnal basis for each of the Westbound and Eastbound flows.
Each core OTS is comprised of a set, typically 4 to 7, of parallel or nearly parallel tracks,
positioned in the light of the prevailing winds to suit the traffic flying between Europe and
North America. The designation of an OTS facilitates a high throughput of traffic by ensuring
that aircraft on adjacent tracks are separated for the entire oceanic crossing - at the expense of
some restriction in the operator's choice of track. In effect, where the preferred track lies within
the geographical limits of the OTS, the operator is obliged to choose an OTS track or fly above
or below the system. Where the preferred track lies clear of the OTS, the operator is free to fly
it by nominating a random track. Trans-Atlantic tracks, therefore, fall into three categories:
OTS, Random or Fixed.
2. AIRCRAFT REQUIREMENTS
ETOPS Dispatch requirements 2 FMC
2 MCDU
2 IRS/ADIRU
MNPS Dispatch requirements
As a result of passenger demand, time zone differences and airport noise restrictions, much of
the North Atlantic (NAT) air traffic contributes to two major alternating flows a westbound
flow departing Europe in the morning, and an eastbound flow departing North America in the
evening. The effect of these flows is to concentrate most of the traffic unidirectional, with
peak westbound traffic crossing the 30W longitude between 1130 UTC and 1900 UTC and
peak eastbound traffic crossing the 30W longitude between 0100 UTC and 0800 UTC.
The exact location of the track changes daily according to weather and traffic demands. In
order to deal with the high traffic, the entire area has been designated as MNPS (Minimum
Navigation Performance Specifications) airspace, i.e. A/C must be equipped and maintained
so as to be continuously capable of a specific level of navigation accuracy.
The night-time OTS is produced by Gander OAC and the day-time OTS by Shanwick OAC
(Prestwick)
Consequently traffic concentration occurs unidirectional, with
NAT Track Structure Messages are identified by a 3-digit Track Message Identification
number (TMI) appearing at the end of the Track Message. This number relates to the day of
the year (no reference to month). Any subsequent NAT track amendment(s) on a given day
will carry a successive alpha number. e.g. TMI33B would reflect the 2nd amendment of the
TMI for the 33rd day of the year.
The following table indicates the separation required between A/C in NATS/MNPS airspace
KEF–EMBLA–63°N30°W–61°N40°W–OZN
OZN–59°N50°W–PRAWN–YDP
OZN–59°N50°W–PORGY–HO
4. OCA – OCEANIC CONTROL AREAS
Flights which are intent to cross the
North Atlantic Ocean are controlled by
an OCA. Currently there are 5 different
OCAs which control a part of the
Atlantic Ocean. The responsibility for
air traffic control services within the
North Atlantic (NAT) Region is
delegated by the International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO) to
seven states: The United Kingdom,
Iceland, Canada, Norway, USA,
Denmark and Portugal.
Gander OCA
The Gander Oceanic FIR (CZQX) and
Shanwick FIR (EGGX) cover the
airspace above the North Atlantic,
from 44° North to 61° North and partly
up to 64° North (only in Gander FIR).
The Gander Oceanic FIR covers the
airspace from 30° W to the coasts of
Newfoundland and Labrador. The
airspace is class A from FL55 to FL660
(except the area over southern
Greenland is a class A airspace from
FL195 to FL660). Traffic within the
Gander Oceanic FIR is managed by the
Gander Oceanic Control Centre, which
is a non-radar unit of the Gander ACC. Communication to pilots over the North Atlantic is
made via Gander Radio.
Shanwick OCA
The Shanwick FIR covers the airspace from the coasts of Europe to 30° W. The airspace is class
A from FL55 to FL660.Traffic within the Shanwick FIR is managed by the Shanwick Oceanic
Control Centre located in Prestwick, Scotland. The name of the FIR is actually a combination
of Shannon and Prestwick -> Shan-wick.
Communication to pilots over the North
Atlantic is made via Shanwick Radio
which is located in Shannon, Ireland.
Reykjavik OCA
The airspace managed by Reykjavik
ACC, is also known by the ICAO
identifiers as “BIRD CTA”. It is about 5.4
million sq. km. It ranges from the
Greenwich meridian in the east to west of
Greenland, from the North Pole to south
of the Faroe Islands, close to Scotland.
The Reykjavik Control Area (CTA)
comprises the Reykjavik Flight
Information Region (FIR) and the
Sondrestrom Flight Information Region.
The vertical limits of the control area are
from flight level 055 within Reykjavik
FIR and flight level 195 within
Sondrestrom FIR. The upper limit is unlimited.
Example:
“Shanwick, Condor 328, request oceanic clearance to KLAS, Track B, FL320, able FL340,
M.80, estimating Position ATSIX at time 15:28 UTC”
If an aircraft is unable to continue the flight in accordance with its ATC clearance, and/or an
aircraft is unable to maintain the navigation performance accuracy specified for the airspace, a
revised clearance shall be obtained, whenever possible, prior to initiating any action.
The radiotelephony distress signal (MAYDAY) or urgency signal (PAN PAN) preferably
spoken three times shall be used as appropriate. Subsequent ATC action with respect to that
aircraft shall be based on the intentions of the pilot and the overall air traffic situation.
If prior clearance cannot be obtained, until a revised clearance is received the following
contingency procedures should be employed and the pilot shall advise air traffic control as soon
as practicable, reminding them of the type of aircraft involved and the nature of the problem.
In general terms, the aircraft should be flown at a flight level and on an offset track where other
aircraft are least likely to be encountered.
COMMUNICATION PROCEDURE
VI. BROADCAST ON SUITABLE INTERVALLS ON 121.5 MHZ OR AIR-TO-AIR 123.45
MHZ AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION, FLIGHT LEVEL, POSITION, INTENTIONS
5.2. Weather Deviation Procedure
Route Centerline
Deviations greater 10 NM Level Change
Track
East Routing Left Descent 300 ft.
000° - 179° (magnetic) Right Climb 300 ft.
West Routing Left Climb 300 ft.
180° - 359° (magnetic) Right Descent 300 ft.
Rule of Thumb
Descent 300 towards North Pole, Climb 300 towards Equator
5.3. Strategic Lateral Offset Procedure (SLOP)
DUE TO HIGH GRID ALTITUDES OVER GREENLAND IT MAY BECOME ESSENTIAL TO CALCULATE ESCAPE ROUTES
ESPECIALLY DURING WEATHERS BELOW ISA TEMPERATURES AND PRESSURE.
Determination of possible Escape Routes
1. Draw the planned routing on the MGA crossing chart
2. Determine suitable airports (e.g. BGSF, BGTL, BIKF)
3. Determine possible escape routes as to comply with table 1,table 2
4. Determine decision points according to chosen escape routes
5. Plot decision points and possible escape routes
TABLE 2
SWAP (Severe Weather Avoidance Plan) "is in effect when flight through portions of
airspace is difficult or impossible ...". Expectable delay for start-up, taxi, enroute and arrival
on all routes (not only through severe weather areas).
In Canada and USA Visibility is given in SM and RVR is given in ft. QNH will be given in
in/Hg
Additionally non-convective windshears can be found sometimes in the TAF. The format is
"WShhh/ddfffKT" e.g. WS015/30045KT (Windshear, expect Wind 300/45kt in 1500 ft.
above the airport).
In TAF and METAR all winds are true winds (worldwide). Only ATIS and TWR winds are
magnetic. Due to high variation in some areas in Canada and northern USA pilots have to
careful check crosswind components.