Frequencies

Statistics
Umur Paritas Hipertensi Preklamsia
Valid 55 55 55 55
N
Missing 0 0 0 0
25 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00
Percentiles 50 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00
75 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00

Frequency Table

Umur
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
17-25 5 9.1 9.1 9.1
26-35 38 69.1 69.1 78.2
Valid
36-45 12 21.8 21.8 100.0
Total 55 100.0 100.0

Paritas
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Primipara 7 12.7 12.7 12.7
Multipara 40 72.7 72.7 85.5
Valid Grandemultipar 8 14.5 14.5 100.0
a
Total 55 100.0 100.0
 Hipertensi
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Hipertensi 49 89.1 89.1 89.1
Tidak 6 10.9 10.9 100.0
Valid
Hipertensi
Total 55 100.0 100.0

Preklamsia
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Tidak Preklamsia 6 10.9 10.9 10.9
Preklamsia 18 32.7 32.7 43.6
Valid Ringan
Preklamsia Berat 31 56.4 56.4 100.0
Total 55 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Hipertensi * 55 100.0% 0 0.0% 55 100.0%
Preklamsia
 Hipertensi * Preklamsia Crosstabulation
Preklamsia
Tidak Preklamsia
Preklamsia Ringan
Count 0 18
Expected Count 5.3 16.0
% within 0.0% 36.7%
Hipertensi Hipertensi
% within 0.0% 100.0%
Preklamsia
% of Total 0.0% 32.7%
Hipertensi
Count 6 0
Expected Count .7 2.0
% within 100.0% 0.0%
Tidak
Hipertensi
Hipertensi
% within 100.0% 0.0%
Preklamsia
% of Total 10.9% 0.0%
Count 6 18
Expected Count 6.0 18.0
% within 10.9% 32.7%
Total Hipertensi
% within 100.0% 100.0%
Preklamsia
% of Total 10.9% 32.7%

Hipertensi * Preklamsia Crosstabulation

Preklamsia Total
Preklamsia Berat
Count 31 49
Expected Count 27.6 49.0
Hipertensi % within Hipertensi 63.3% 100.0%
Hipertensi
% within Preklamsia 100.0% 89.1%
% of Total 56.4% 89.1%
Tidak Hipertensi Count 0 6
 Expected Count 3.4 6.0
% within Hipertensi 0.0% 100.0%
% within Preklamsia 0.0% 10.9%
% of Total 0.0% 10.9%
Count 31 55
Expected Count 31.0 55.0
Total % within Hipertensi 56.4% 100.0%
% within Preklamsia 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 56.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 55.000a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 37.907 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear 30.013 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The

minimum expected count is .65.

Directional Measures
Value
Nominal by Symmetric .400
Nominal Hipertensi 1.000
Lambda Dependent
Preklamsia .250
Dependent
Hipertensi 1.000
Goodman and Kruskal Dependent
tau Preklamsia .265
Dependent
Uncertainty Coefficient Symmetric .541
Hipertensi 1.000
Dependent
 Preklamsia .370
Dependent
Hipertensi 1.000
Nominal by Dependent
Eta
Interval Preklamsia .746
Dependent

Directional Measures
Asymp. Std.
Error
Symmetric .113
Lambda Hipertensi Dependent .000
Preklamsia Dependent .088
Hipertensi Dependent .000
Nominal by Nominal Goodman and Kruskal tau
Preklamsia Dependent .020
Symmetric .077
Uncertainty Coefficient Hipertensi Dependent .000
Preklamsia Dependent .072
Hipertensi Dependent
Nominal by Interval Eta
Preklamsia Dependent

Directional Measures
Approx. Approx.
T Sig.a
Symmetric 2.595 .009
Hipertensi 2.595 .009
Lambda Dependent
Preklamsia 2.595 .009
Dependent
Hipertensi .000
Nominal by Goodman and Kruskal Dependent
Nominal tau Preklamsia .000
Dependent
Symmetric 3.904 .000
Hipertensi 3.904 .000
Uncertainty Coefficient Dependent
Preklamsia 3.904 .000
Dependent
 Hipertensi
Nominal by Dependent
Eta
Interval Preklamsia
Dependent

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on chi-square approximation
d. Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx.
Sig.
Phi 1.000 .000
Nominal by Cramer's V 1.000 .000
Nominal Contingency .707 .000
Coefficient
N of Valid Cases 55