BASIC FACTORS OF SUBS-STANDARD FACILITIES

Figure 1 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 1. Among 150

respondents, 63% answered Strongly Agree, 31% answered Agree, 2% answered Disagree, and
4% of the respondents answered Undecided.

Lack of skilled manpower

Undecided
Disagree 7%
7%

Strongly Agree
28%

Agree
58%

Figure 2 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 2. Among 150

respondents, 28% answered Strongly Agree, 58% answered Agree, 7% answered Disagree, and
7% of the respondents answered Undecided.

Inadequate Funding
4%
29%
3%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
64%
Undecided
Figure 3 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 3. Among 150 respondents,
29% answered Strongly Agree, 64% answered Agree, 3% answered Disagree, and 4% of the
respondents answered Undecided.

Poor Planning
4%
1%

46%
Strongly Agree
49% Agree
Disagree
Undecided

Figure 4 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 4. Among 150

respondents, 46% answered Strongly Agree, 49% answered Agree, 1% answered Disagree, and
4% of the respondents answered Undecided.

Land quality and enough area

9% 29%
3%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
59%
Undecided

Figure 5 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 5. Among 150 respondents,
29% answered Strongly Agree, 59% answered Agree, 3% answered Disagree, and 9% of the
respondents answered Undecided.
 Corruption
4%

34%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
62%
Undecided

Figure 6 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 6. Among 150 respondents,
34% answered Strongly Agree, 62% answered Agree, 0% answered Disagree, and 4% of the
respondents answered Undecided.

Equipment failure to perform preven-

tive maintenance

13% 23%

Strongly Agree
9%
Agree
Disagree
55% Undecided
Figure 7 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 7. Among 150 respondents,
23% answered Strongly Agree, 55% answered Agree, 9% answered Disagree, and 13% of the
respondents answered Undecided.

Improper Operation
4%
28%
1%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
66%
Undecided

Figure 8 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 8. Among 150 respondents,
28% answered Strongly Agree, 66% answered Agree, 2% answered Disagree, and 4% of the
respondents answered Undecided.

Failure to continuously monitor

equipment
11%
38%
5%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
45%
Undecided

Figure 9 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 9. Among 150 respondents,
38% answered Strongly Agree, 46% answered Agree, 5% answered Disagree, and 11% of the
respondents answered Undecided.
 Delay in the procurement purchase of
materials
4% 23%

15%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
58%
Undecided

Figure 10 indicates the respondent’s rating in percentage in statement 10. Among 150
respondents, 23% answered Strongly Agree, 58% answered Agree, 15% answered Disagree, and
4% of the respondents answered Undecided.

POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF HAVING SUBSTANDARD FACILITIES

FIGURE 1
 Having enough classroom size and shape

27%
8% 3%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
62%
Undecided

Figure 11 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 1 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
Among 150 respondents, 27% answered Strongly Agree, 62% answered Agree, 8% answered
Disagree, and 3% of the respondents answered Undecided.

FIGURE 2

Good quality of Education

7% 27%

3%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
63%
Undecided

Figure 12 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 2 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
Among 150 respondents, 28% answered Strongly Agree, 64% answered Agree, 3% answered
Disagree, and 5% of the respondents answered Undecided

FIGURE 3
 Excessive noises given by the workers stresses
out the teachers and mostly the students

2% 26%
16%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
56%
Undecided

Figure 13 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 3 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
Among 150 respondents, 26% answered Strongly Agree, 56% answered Agree, 16% answered
Disagree, and 2% of the respondents answered Undecided

Good aura and ambiance

4% 27%
15%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
54%
Undecided

Figure 14 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 4 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
Among 150 respondents, 27% answered Strongly Agree, 54% answered Agree, 15% answered
Disagree, and 4% of the respondents answered Undecided
 Pleasant surrounding to be seen

7% 22%

13%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
57%
Undecided

Figure 15 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 5 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
Among 150 respondents, 22% answered Strongly Agree, 58% answered Agree, 13% answered
Disagree, and 7% of the respondents answered Undecided

Time consuming when shifting from a room to

another eventually when there is not enough
vacant rooms
3% 25%
15%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
57%
Undecided
 Figure 16 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 6 on the
Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
Among 150 respondents, 25% answered Strongly Agree, 57% answered Agree, 15% answered
Disagree, and 3% of the respondents answered Undecided

Capacity to hold enough number of students

for a room

1% 29%
13%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
57%
Undecided

Figure 17 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 7 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
Among 150 respondents, 29% answered Strongly Agree, 58% answered Agree, 13% answered
Disagree, and 0% of the respondents answered Undecided
 Air quality

2.6%
12.6 34.6%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
50%
Undecided

Figure 18 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 1 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of SAFETY AND SECURITY..
Among 150 respondents, 34.6% answered Strongly Agree, 50% answered Agree, 12.6%
answered Disagree, and 2.6% of the respondents answered Undecided

Having enough clean comfort rooms

3.3%

24% 41.3%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
31.3%
Undecided
 Figure 19 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 2 on the
Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of SAFETY AND SECURITY.
Among 150 respondents, 41.3% answered Strongly Agree, 31.3% answered Agree, 24%
answered Disagree, and 3.3% of the respondents answered Undecided.

Students getting injured from falling objects,

etc.

4%
23% Strongly Agree
Agree
32%
Disagree
Undecided

37%

Figure 20 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 3 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of SAFETY AND SECURITY.
Among 150 respondents, 23% answered Strongly Agree, 37% answered Agree, 32% answered
Disagree, and 4% of the respondents answered Undecided.
 Temperature

19%
10%

14% Strongly Agree

Agree
Disagree
57%
Undecided

Figure 21 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 4 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of SAFETY AND SECURITY.
Among 150 respondents, 19% answered Strongly Agree, 57% answered Agree, 14% answered
Disagree, and 10% of the respondents answered Undecided.

Having adequate water supply

6% 29%

18%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
47%
Undecided
 Figure 22 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 5 on the
Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of SAFETY AND SECURITY.
Among 150 respondents, 29% answered Strongly Agree, 47% answered Agree, 18% answered
Disagree, and 6% of the respondents answered Undecided.

Emergency necessities

5% 31%
16%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
48%
Undecided

Figure 23 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 6 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of SAFETY AND SECURITY.
Among 150 respondents, 31% answered Strongly Agree, 48% answered Agree, 16% answered
Disagree, and 5% of the respondents answered Undecided.
 High quality electrical systems

3% 30%
14%

Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
54%
Undecided

Figure 24 indicates the respondents rating in percentage in statement 7 on the

Possible Effect of having Sub-Standard Facilities in terms of SAFETY AND SECURITY.
Among 150 respondents, 30% answered Strongly Agree, 54% answered Agree, 13% answered
Disagree, and 3% of the respondents answered Undecided.

Sub-standard materials

4%

2%
31%
Strongly Agree
Agree
63%
Disagree
Undecided