Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Paper
Project Paper
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of
Business Ethics
Abstract This article provides a review of what we imperialism, and the potential for joint-action CSR initia
know, what we do not know, and what we need to know tives in clusters of small and medium-sized enterprises to
about the relationship between industrial clusters and cor offer a new form of greenwashing. From this review, the
porate social responsibility (CSR) in developing countries. authors develop a theoretical model to explain why CSR
In addition to the drivers of and barriers to the adoption of has not become institutionalized in many developing
country clusters, which in turn suggests that the vast
CSR initiatives, this study highlights key lessons learned
from empirical studies of CSR initiatives that aimed to majority of industrial clusters in developing countries are
improve environmental management and work conditions likely to engage in socially irresponsible behavior.
and reduce poverty in local industrial districts. Academic
work in this area remains embryonic, lacking in empirical Keywords Corporate social responsibility • Developing
evidence about the effects of CSR interventions on the countries • Industrial clusters
profitability on local enterprises, workers, and the envi
ronment. Nor do theoretical frameworks offer clear
How do enterprises located in distinct geographical regions
explanations of the institutionalization and effects of CSR
in the developing world compete globally, without compro
in local industrial districts in the developing world. Other
mising the economic, social, and environmental interests of
key limitations in this research stream include an excessive
their stakeholders, including owners, employees, and local
focus on export-oriented industrial clusters, the risk that
communities? This question constitutes the heart of research
CSR becomes a form of economic and cultural
into corporate social responsibility (CSR) in industrial clus
ters located in developing countries (Accountability 2006).
Considering the preliminary state of this research stream, we
need to provide some definitions before we can start
answering the question; specifically, we adopt Blowfield and
P. Lund-Thomsen (El)
Center for Corporate Social Responsibility/Center for Business
Frynas's (2005, p. 503) definition of CSR:
and Development Studies, Copenhagen Business School,
an umbrella term for a variety of theories and prac
Porceltenshaven 18A, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
e-mail: plt.ikl@cbs.dk tices all of which recognize the following: (a) that
companies have a responsibility for their impact on
A. Lindgreen society and the natural environment, sometimes
Department of Marketing and Strategy, Cardiff Business School,
beyond legal compliance and the liability of indi
University of Cardiff, Aberconway Building, Colum Drive,
Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK viduals; (b) that companies have a responsibility for
e-mail: lindgreena@cardiff.ac.uk the behavior of others with whom they do business
(e.g., within supply chains); and (c) that business
J. Vanhamme
needs to manage its relationship with wider society,
Edhec Business School, 24 Avenue Gustave Delory, CS 50411,
59057 Roubaix Cedex, France whether for reasons of commercial viability or to add
e-mail: joelle.vanhamme@edhec.edu value to society.
£) Springer
Furthermore, we define
centrations of companies o
industries (Giuliani 2005)
local economies prosper i
ized global economy (Hum
Kaplinsky (2000) states,
local economies should eng
a question of how and on w
might lead to sustained
could prompt a social and
in industrial clusters. basis, we provide an assessment of what we know about the
In the 1990s, many articles and policy papers promoted impacts of CSR initiatives in cluster settings and
local economic growth through cluster development (Sch- oretical underpinnings of extant literature, which
mitz and Nadvi 1999), often by highlighting the benefits for some research limitations. In addition to developing
small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) located in analytical framework that we hope guides future i
industrial districts in developing countries (Nadvi 1999a; gâtions of CSR in developing country clusters,
Schmitz 2004). Joining a cluster seemingly could help elude by highlighting our main findings.
SMEs reduce the transaction costs associated with running
their business, by making it easier for them to access
specialized suppliers, local support agencies, training CSR in Industrial Clusters: Key Drivers
institutes, a skilled workforce, relevant consultants, and
logistics firms that could help their business grow (Hum- In academic literature pertaining to CSR in indu
phrey and Schmitz 2002). Their proximity with other clusters in developing countries, the enforcement o
SMEs, operating in the same or related industries, also emmental regulations related to the environment an
would facilitate knowledge exchanges, horizontally laws often serves as a prerequisite for cluster engage
(between SMEs) and vertically (between lead SMEs and in CSR (Kennedy 2006). However, we also fin
their supply chain networks) (Posthuma and Nathan 2010). spread skepticism about the potential of so-calle
Some authors argued further that local business associa- mand and control or compliance-based approach
tions and public-private partnerships could prompt initia- improving environmental and labor standards in
fives to upgrade the production, processes, and marketing (Blackman 2006). In India for example, Dasgupta
competences of local SMEs in clusters (Bazan and Navas- asserts that the enforcement of environmental law
Aleman 2004; Nadvi 1999a), which would be critical if been largely ineffective, because the enforcement p
cluster-based SMEs faced a common external challenge ignores the micro-level reality for many SMEs, whic
that no single SME could handle alone. For example, new to operate in informal or semi-formal settings. En
market requirements, government regulations, or buyer neurs often are unaware of environmental laws an
demands would fundamentally alter the competitive arena, lations; lack the technical, financial, and man
and local, cluster-based SMEs might address this challenge capacities required to implement legislation; and
more effectively than individual SMEs (Schmitz and Nadvi on a short-term basis that makes it difficult, if not im
1999). sible, for them to perceive the business benefits related to
Few studies have explored whether the development of environmental managem
local clusters actually proceeds in such an economically, environmental legislation
socially, and environmentally responsible fashion though driven hundreds of tho
(Battaglia et al. 2010; Hoivik and Shankar 2011; Testa preneurs out of their jobs,
et al. 2012). Across various perspectives, rare articles rely lihoods for themselve
on CSR discourse (Accountability 2006). Instead, they necessarily improving the
mainly consist of single case studies, highlighting the other cluster-based SME
potential role and limitations of cluster-based SMEs' Prior literature also
engagement in joint green initiatives, such as the investi- business associations, as
gâtions of how joint-cluster initiatives have sought to environmental initiatives b
combat environmental pollution in Central American and Blackman and Kildegaar
South Asian leather tannery, brick kiln, and textile clusters 2012). However, simp
through common effluent water treatment plans or cleaner does not guarantee the suc
technologies (Crow and Batz 2006; Lund-Thomsen 2009). ter-wide CSR initiatives. In
â Springer
and feature members with highly divergent interests. For campaigns or brib
the Jalandhar football cluster for example, entrepreneurs environment
eventually had to form a separate foundation, the Sports contexts, priva
Goods Foundation of India, to address the issue of child associations take
labor in football manufacturing, which threatened the measures and e
cluster's reputation among international buyers (Lund- effective than a r
Thomsen and Nadvi 2010a). Cricket manufacturers had not induce clust
been directly involved in any media reports of child labor behavior (Blac
in the broad sporting goods cluster though, so they had ing by trade unions
little incentive to help football producers in Jalandhar prove effective in cre
address this issue (Lund-Thomsen and Nadvi 2009). clusters, because
Moreover, clusters are not equal in their relative man- connected to local so
agerial capacity, financial clout, and entrepreneurial vision. pressure (i.e.,
Some cluster associations (e.g., the Kaur tanneries cluster affects their overal
in Pakistan) represent the interests of a few larger firms, nities in whic
largely ignoring the needs of many SMEs, and particularly 2006). In this sens
microenterprises, operating therein (Lund-Thomsen 2009). tom-up pressures
In such cases, it becomes difficult to secure sufficient buy- improved enviro
in for cluster-wide CSR initiatives across all firms in the Among the ke
cluster (Accountability 2006). For some smaller firms, it CSR initiatives,
may simply be financially unviable to contribute to joint developing country
efforts, especially if they engage only in seasonal produc- and environm
tion or operate with very low margins (Blackman 2006). nomic developm
The social networks that link particular production environmental co
clusters also may help explain the relative strength or cluster studies
weakness of business associations for engaging in joint- (Accountability
action CSR initiatives. In a study of the Palar Valley tan- entrepreneurs adop
nery clusters, Kennedy (1999) shows that leather tanneries enforcement
in some key clusters were owned by a tightly knit Muslim initiatives, often
community, operating in Hindu-majority areas. Despite Other studies
occasional tensions between the Muslim owners/managers contracting of
and Hindu workers, it proved an effective tool for moni- work conditio
toring member behavior and applying peer pressure to 2012). For exam
ensure member involvement in the financing and opera- Jalandhar (Ind
tions of common effluent water treatment plants by the that cluster-based
cluster (Kennedy 2006). to break local trade unions so that they can ensure the
These studies suggest an emerging consensus that the stability of production and thus their profit ma
combination of different drivers, rather than any single tactic, entrepreneurs would send some factory
factor alone, produces socially and environmentally work out of their homes, also rehiring som
responsible behavior within clusters (Blackman 2006; Lund- subcontractors, which reduced the form
Thomsen and Nadvi, 2010a; Tewari and Pillai 2005). In this duction process (Jamali et al., forthc
connection, Blackman (2006) points out that command and employees worked at their decentralized home
control policies are in themselves insufficient, unless they in factories, it became virtually impossible f
are buttressed by informal regulation and peer monitoring. unions to organize the workforce, leverage
Cluster-based SMEs are too numerous to be monitored collective bargaining, or achieve freedom
effectively by government regulatory authorities in devel- (Khan 2007a). Finally, participation in l
oping countries, which often lack the financial and human may reduce local producers' incentives t
resources needed to perform virtually any such monitoring environmental and labor records. In India fo
functions. The cluster-based entrepreneurs also are politi- vast majority of industrial clusters are locally
cally powerful and maintain close connections with existing no global value chain incentives exist to pro
regulatory authorities, through support for political improve their practices (Gulati 2012) (Tabl
£) Springer
Table
Table 1 Drivers behind and barriers to 1 Drivers
CSR adoption in developing behind and
country clusters that in environmental management literature in general, the
country clusters
Drivers
Drivers Barriers consensus appears to be that the introduction of cleaner
technologies is preferable (Blackman 2006; Mbohwa et al.
Enforcement of national Non-enforcement of national laws
laws
2010) but potentially not sufficient on its own. Instead,
Business associations
such efforts must be combined with end-of-pipe treatment,
Cluster firms threatening or
such as waste-water treatment plants or filters that can curb
Peer monitoring Bribing law enforcement officials
air pollution (Lund-Thomsen 2009).
Social networks Cluster firms' suppression of trade
unions A related debate for environmental management in
industrial clusters in developing countries involves whether
Informal regulation SMEs lacking CSR awareness/capacity
Participation in global
individual or common effluent treatment plants are more
Intra-cluster subcontracting processes
Value chains effective for reducing the pollution created by leather
Participation in local value chains
tanneries and textile factories (Kennedy 2006; Patel et al.
2013; Rathi 2013). One argument holds that only larger
firms can shoulder the costs of establishing individual
Main Features of the Cluster and CSR Debate treatment facilities, and the lack of physical space within
cluster, particularly in urban areas, makes the use of
Literature on industrial clusters and CSR in developing common effluent treatment plants the most viable optio
country clusters comprises three broad thematic categories: for treating waste water (Lund-Thomsen 2009). However,
(a) environmental management, (b) work conditions more common effluent treatment plants are not without cha
broadly, and (c) poverty reduction. lenges. Despite their strong potential for improving the
quality of waste water from tannery and textile clusters in
Studies of CSR and Environmental Management developing countries (Blackman 2006), some plants con
in Developing Country Industrial Clusters sistently underperform, because they lack the technical
capacity to treat water to such a level that it becomes safe
Studies of environmental management often investigate the for human or animal consumption. In addition, common
uses of clusters to address environmental pollution prob- effluent treatment plants may suffer free-rider problems
lems caused by SMEs in developing countries, in an effort (e.g., some members fail to pay dues) and conflicts, espe
to determine whether clustered SMEs enhance or harm the daily if large factories in the cluster dominate the decision
natural environment in these industrial districts. An making processes, at the expense of SMEs (Lund-Thomsen
emerging consensus indicates that the manufacturing 2009).
operations of cluster-based SMEs have widespread, nega- Across these approaches, a key weakness is that envi
tive environmental consequences, especially in industries ronmental management in industrial clusters often gets
such as brick-making, textiles, and leather manufacturing portrayed as a problem in need of the "right" technical or
(Blackman 2006). policy-oriented solutions. The answer to complex pollution
Prior literature also makes a business case for environ- problems is thus better management pra
mental improvements in cluster-based SMEs, by attempt- environmental technologies (e.g
ing to demonstrate how cluster-based firms can improve 2008a). Yet such a view inapprop
their financial positions by participating voluntarily in ignores the role of power and politic
joint-action, cluster-based CSR interventions. In practice, management of clusters (Lund-T
this participation often follows the introduction of CSR suggest an opportunity to apply mo
initiatives that help SMEs reduce their operational costs For example, research on political e
(Gulati 2012). However, other studies find no business case countries highlights how unequal
for investing in environmental management improvements different actors (e.g., the state, multi
within clusters (Accountability 2006); smaller firms and international organizations, civil
micro-enterprises in particular have a hard time shoulder- mediate human-environment int
ing the costs of contributing financially to implement joint- disproportionate allocations of envir
action CSR initiatives. Many of them engage in job- burdens to poorer, low-income group
working, serve as subcontractors for larger firms, or work ciently organized, politically influent
only for certain months of the year, so their profit margins their interests and rights (Bailey an
are very small or non-existent (Lund-Thomsen 2009). political ecology perspective on envi
Another pertinent theme is the relative effectiveness of ment in industrial clusters thus
pre- versus end-of-pipe treatment of environmental explaining why particular joint-
■£) Springer
benefit or harm some firms, workers, and community value chains) thus hig
members in some clusters, some of the time (Newell to improve their own
(2005), such that we could move beyond technical, man- traditionally has bee
agement-oriented to more politically and economically form of trade union
based explanations of CSR in industrial clusters. (mostly in the formal sect
collective bargaining and freedom of associa
Studies of CSR and Work Conditions in Developing Hess 2013). A more
Country Industrial Clusters agency also includes the active choices that unorganized
workers make about their employment and broader liveli
Beyond environmental management, we find few studies hood (Carswell and De Neve 2013). For example, wor
that investigate whether CSR initiatives improve working opt in or out of work places according to their gender, ag
conditions in developing country clusters. Child labor is the life cycle, and personal preferences. Recent studies of t
primary concern raised in studies of export-oriented clus- labor agency of unorganized workers in the Tiruppur gar
ters or those that sell to markets dominated by large, brand- ment cluster in India and the Sialkot football-manufac
sensitive multinational companies (e.g., Nike, Adidas). In ing cluster in Pakistan implicate Western codes of con
their comparative analysis of joint-cluster CSR initiatives because they favor workers who can maintain a stable, 8-h
in the football-manufacturing clusters of Sialkot (Pakistan) work routine, earn fixed wages, feel comfortable laborin
and Jalandhar (India), Lund-Thomsen and Nadvi (2010a) in tightly monitored work environments, and adap
highlight how the differential integration of these clusters factory-based work environments. As De Neve (
into the world economy largely determined the kinds of cautions though, this emphasis ignores the need of o
CSR initiatives they developed. In Sialkot, some local workers who prefer flexible work hours, less rigorou
manufacturers joined high-end value chains, whose end monitoring, piece rates, or the ability to combine dom
buyers included famous, international sports brands such as duties (e.g., child rearing, household work) with earning
Nike; the firms in the Jalandhar football cluster instead living. For such workers, laboring in semi-formal w
tended to export footballs to smaller brands in Europe, shops or home-based locations might be preferable. L
North America, and the developing world. The pressure on Thomsen (2013) also notes that the nature of labor agency
local cluster firms to address child labor issues thus was in South Asian clusters (or clusters more broadly) ma
much tougher in Sialkot, and the development of a cluster- constrained by local gender norms, the spatial location o
wide monitoring mechanism in turn was stronger and more workers, their livelihood strategies, and the mode
independent in Sialkot than in Jalandhar. In contrast, the which they are recruited. This literature stream thus rev
Jalandhar producers had more space to develop their own, the importance of studying the specificities of local work
locally oriented solutions to child labor issues, whereas in and employment contexts, as well as the nature of g
Sialkot, large international development agencies (e.g., and local value chains, to be able to determine the a
ILO, UNICEF) essentially designed and drove the CSR (or lack of) possibilities that workers have for impro
interventions (Lund-Thomsen and Nadvi 2012). their working conditions.
Such studies are important for highlighting the roles of
multinational companies, international donor agencies, and
cluster associations in creating or solving child labor con- Studies of CSR and Poverty Reduction in Developing
cerns in export-oriented production, yet child labor in Country Industrial Clusters
domestically oriented clusters is rarely the subject of any
detailed analysis. For example, in Pakistan, several studies Few authors have systematically investigated the ro
note the widespread use of bonded child labor in brick kiln CSR interventions in addressing poverty reducti
clusters, but these bricks mainly supply house construction developing country clusters (Lund-Thomsen and P
within the country, such that some of the "worst instances 2012). Perhaps, the only exception is Nadvi and Ba
of child labor" are not on the agenda of Western advocacy tos's (2004) effort to create a conceptual framewor
groups, consumer organizations, or trade unions to the studying such interconnections on the basis of their r
same extent—as they might be if the products were sold of empirical evidence pertaining to the interface of cluster
directly to Western consumers (Lund-Thomsen 2008). and poverty reduction. These authors argue that indus
In developing country clusters, the implementation of clusters and poverty reduction feature three conce
ethical guidelines or corporate codes of conduct in global links: cluster features, cluster processes, and clus
value chains dominated by international retailers and dynamics. First, Nadvi and Barrientos explain that clus
supermarkets directly affect workers (De Neve 2009). in rural areas, functioning in an informal economy, ma
Literature on labor agency in industrial clusters (and global by a majority of SMEs and microenterprises, or that fea
Ô Springer
women, migrants,
Table 2 Main topics in the cluster and CSRunskilled
literature
could have a particularly
Area of of
research po
Area research Main topics
Main topics
poverty in developing cou
Clusters
Clusters and and BusinessBusiness
case forcase for
environmental
environmental
cluster processes, "agglome
environmental
environmental improvements
improvements
and raise the capabilities of
management
management Cleaner technology
Cleaner versus
technology versus end-of-pipe
end-of-pipe
joint action takes such capa
treatment
capacity of local firms, a
Effectiveness of individual versus
external shocks" (Nadvi
common effluent treatment plants
and
the authors highlight that
Focus on technical fixes instead of c
such that they engage
political solutions to environmental in
processes, move into
problems higher
the Clusters
Clusters
experience andand
work
work Child
they laborlabor
Child (monitoring)
(monitoring) have
conditions
competitiveconditions Labor agency
advantages in clusters
Labor agency in clusters in
might downgrade,
Clustersand
Clusters andpoverty
poverty Cluster
Cluster by
features, processes,
features, lower
andand
processes, dynamics:
dynamics:
reduction
reduction their implications
their for poverty
implications for alleviation
poverty alleviation
and production processes or
functions in the value chain
relationship between clus
reduction, it appears th
produce winners and lose
firms and workers.
Regarding the question o
initiatives in industrial cl
find virtually no studies
(cf. Mezzadri 2010). Howev
potential connection of CS
corporate codes in global
impact on poor workers l
developing countries (Sou
Lund-Thomsen 2012). Att
non-factory realms in clu
tradictoryresults, reinfo
contractors in the cluster,
between pro-capital and
chain (Mezzadri 2014a). As
between the typical featu
developing countries-such a
cialization, job-working, a
meet varying national and
demands for stable, well
opportunities with full l
According to Khara and L
subcontracting arrangem
cluster, local firms face p
to protecting labor rights
national demand for footba
to use extensive networks o
workers in the informal e
The basic condition for e
cluster-level firms in thi
thus seems to be that wo
In other words, the devel
inextricably linked to irr
require workers to stay in
Springer
Springer
•£) Springer
Table 3 Limitations
to disempower workers through reliance on migratoryof the cluster and CSR literature
labor Table 3 Limitations
£) Springer
£) Springer
£) Springer
â Springer
£) Springer
We were able
tanning. to
Environmentalidentify
Economics and Policy Studies, 129(3),
115-132.
works (excluding those pres
Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Editorial: Setting new
seek to explain the drivers o
agendas—Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility
country clusters; even
in the developing world. here,
International Affairs, 81(3), 489-513.
This situation might
Campbell, be
J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in illus
socially
tions responsible ways:
associated with An institutional theory
CSRof corporate social in
responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3),
one hand, the 946-967.
literature ofte
driven global value
Carswell, chains
G., & De Neve, G. (2013). Labouring for global markets— to
Western-styleConceptualising
CSR labour agencypolicies
in global production networks. f
world. On theGeoforum,
other 44(1), 62-70. hand, t
Coe, N., & Hess, M. (2013). Global production networks, labour, and
ognizes how global
development. Geoforum, 44(1), 4-9.
buyer-d
mine labor and
Coe, N. M., &environment
Jordhus-Lier, D. C. (2011). Constrained agency—Re
pricing evaluating
policies the geographies of
and labour. Progressthre
the in Human
Geography, 35(2), 211-233.
low cost producers elsewh
Corpwatch. (2014). Definition of greenwash. Accessed March 28,
These global value chains
2014, from http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=242.
contradictory
Crow, M.,pressures tha
& Batz, M. B. (2006). Clean and competitive? Small-scale
nomically, bleachers and dyers in Tirupur, India.
socially, In A. Blackman (Ed.),en
and
Small firms and the environment in developing countries
SME's behavior can be in
Collective action and collective impacts (pp. 147-170). Wash
Finally, our review
ington, DC: RFF Press. highligh
initiatives inDasgupta,
developing cou
N. (2000). Environmental enforcement and small industries
exercise in economic and
in India: Reworking the problem in the poverty context. World
Development, 28(5), 945-967.
attempt by local SMEs to gre
De Neve, G. (2009). Power, inequality and corporate social respon
and social destructive activit
sibility: The politics of compliance in the South Indian garment
industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(22), 63-71.
De Neve, G. (2014). Fordism, flexible specialisation and CSR: How
Indian garment workers critique neoliberal labour regimes.
Ethnography, 75(4), 184-209.
References
Dolan, C., & Opondo, M. (2005). Seeking common ground:
Multistakeholder processes in Kenya's cut flower industry.
Accountability Journal (with the
of Corporate Citizenship, 18, 87-98. Unite
Organization). Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings
(2006). SME about case-study
clu
tiveness in research. Qualitative Enquiry, 12(2),countrie
developing 219-245.
Awasthi, D., Garvey, N.,
Pal, & Newell, P.&
S., (2005). Corporate
Yagnik, accountability to the J
conditions in auto poor? Assessing the effectiveness of community-based
parts and strate com
In A. Posthuma gies. Development
& D. in Practice, 75(4), 389^404.
Nathan (Ed
networks in Giuliani, E. (2005). Cluster
India (pp. absorptive 272-299)
capacity: Why do some
Press. clusters forge ahead and others lag behind. European Urban and
Bailey, S., & Regional Studies, 12(3), 269-288.
Bryant, R. (1997).
introduction. Gulati,
London:M. (2012). Business responsibility:
RoutledgGlobal value chains,
Bair, J., & industrial clusters, andG.
Gereffi, the future (2001).
of CSR in India. Paper L
causes and presented at "global value chains, industrial
consequences of clusters, and the
expo
jeans industry.future of CSR in the BRICS countries,"
World Copenhagen Business
Developm
Bair, J., & Palpacuer, School, 12-14 December, Copenhagen. F. (2012)
varieties of Hoivik, H. W., & Shankar, D. (2011). How canThe
activism: SMEs in a cluster an
comparative perspective. Socia
respond to global demands for corporate responsibility? Journal
Battaglia, M., ofBianchi, Business Ethics, 101(2), 175-195. L., Fr
innovative model Humphrey, J., & Schmitz,
to H. (2002). How does insertion in global
promote
industrial clusters: Evidence
value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional f
Social Responsibility Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027. and Envi
133-141. Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs. (2011). National voluntary
Bazan, L., & Navas-Aleman, L. (2004). The underground revolution guidelines on social, environmental, and economic responsibil
in the Sinos Valley—A comparison of upgrading in global and ities of business. New Delhi: IMCA.
national value chains. In H. Schmitz (Ed.), Local enterprises in Jamali, D., Lund-Thomsen, P., & Khara, N. (forthcoming). CSR
the global economy-issues of governance and upgrading (pp. institutionalized myths in developing countries: An imminent
110-139). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. threat of selective decoupling. Business & Society.
Jenkins, H. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME
Blackman, A. (2006). Small firms and the environment in developing
countries—Collective action and collective impacts. Washing perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37-57.
ton, DC: RFF Press. Kaplinsky, R. (2000). Globalisation and unequalisation—What can be
Blackman, A., & Kildegaard, A. (2010). Clean technological change learned from value chain analysis? Journal of Development
in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather Studies, 37(2), 117-146.
â Springe
Mezzadri, A. and
Kaplinsky, R. (2005). Globalization, poverty, (2010). inequality—
Assessing the effectiveness of corporate social
Between a rock and a hard place. Cambridge: Polity
responsibility as a Press.
tool for poverty reduction through productive
activities:
Kennedy, L. (1999). Co-operating for survival: Tannery The casepollution
of the Delhi garment
and cluster. Growth, exports
joint action in the Palar Valley. World and technological change27(9),
Development, in developing countries (pp. 148-165).
1673-1691. Vienna: UNIDO.
Kennedy, L. (2006). Improving environmental performance of small Mezzadri, A. (2014a). Backshoring, local sweatshop regimes and
firms through joint action: Indian tannery clusters. In A. CSR in India. Competition and Change, 18(A), 327-344.
Blackman (Ed.), Small firms and the environment in developing Mezzadri, A. (2014b). Indian garment clusters and CSR norms:
countries—Collective action and collective impacts (pp. Incompatible agendas at the bottom of the garment commodity
112-128). Washington, DC: RFF Press. chain. Oxford Development Studies, 42(2), 217-237.
Khan, A. (2007a). Power, policy and the discourse on child labour in Nadvi, K. (1999a). Collective efficiency and collective failure: The
the football manufacturing industry of Sialkot. Karachi: Oxford response of the Sialkot surgical instrument cluster to global
University Press. quality pressures. World Development, 27(9), 1605-1626.
Khan, F. (2007b). Representational approaches matter. Journal ofNadvi, K. (1999b). Shifting ties: Social networks in the surgical
Business Ethics, 73(1), 77-89. instruments cluster of Sialkot. Pakistan, Development &
Khan, F., & Lund-Thomsen, P. (2011). CSR as imperialism— Change, 30(1), 141-175.
Towards a phenomenological approach to CSR in the developing Nadvi, K., & Barrientos, S. (2004). Industrial clusters and poverty
world. Journal of Change Management, 11(1), 73-90. alleviation: Mapping links and developing a methodology for
Khara, N„ & Lund-Thomsen, P. (2012). Value chain restructuring, poverty and social impact assessment of cluster development
work organization, and labour outcomes in football manufac initiatives. Working Paper. United Nations Industrial Develop
turing in India. Competition and Change, 16(A), 261-280. ment Organization, Vienna.
Lund-Thomsen, P. (2004). Towards a critical framework on corporateNeilson, J., & Pritchard, B. (2009). Value chain struggles—Institu
social and environmental responsibility in the south: The case of tions and governance in the plantations of South India. London:
Pakistan. Development, 47(3), 106-113. Wiley-Blackwell.
Lund-Thomsen, P. (2008). The global sourcing and codes of conduct Newell, P. (2005). Citizenship, accountability, and community: The
debate: Five myths and five recommendations. Development and limits of the CSR agenda. International Affairs, 81(3), 541-557.
Change, 39(6), 1005-1018. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic
Lund-Thomsen, P. (2009). Assessing the impact of public-private performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
partnerships in the global south: The case of the Kasur tanneries O'Rourke, D. (2004). Community-driven regulation: Balancing
pollution control project. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(Suppl. development and the environment in Vietnam. Cambridge,
1), 57-78. MA: MIT Press.
Lund-Thomsen, P. (2013). Labor agency in the football manufactur Patel, S., Rajor, A., Jain, B., & Patel, P. (2013). Performance
ing industry of Sialkot, Pakistan. Geoforum, 44(1), 71-81. evaluation of effluent treatment plant of textile wet processing
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2009). Global value chains, local industry: A case study of Narol textile cluster, Ahmedabad,
clusters, and corporate social responsibility: A comparative Gujarat, India. International Journal of Engineering Science and
assessment of the sports goods clusters in Sialkot, Pakistan and Innovative Technology, 2(4), 290-296.
Jalandhar, India. Technical Paper 17. Industrial Policy and Posthuma, A., & Nathan, D. (2010). Labor in global production
Private Sector Development Branch, United Nations Industrial networks in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Development Organisation, Vienna. Prieto-Carron, M., Lund-Thomsen, P., Chan, A., Muro, A., &
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2010a). Clusters, chains, and Bhushan, C. (2006). Critical perspectives on CSR and develop
compliance: Corporate social responsibility and governance in ment: What we know, what we don't and what we need to know.
football manufacturing in South Asia. Journal of Business International Affairs, 82(5), 977-987.
Ethics, 93(Suppl 1), 201-222. Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2008a). Upgrading clusters and small
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2010b). Global value chains, local enterprises in developing countries—Environment, labor, inno
collective action, and corporate social responsibility: A review of vation, and social issues. Aldershot: Ashgate.
evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(1), 1-13. Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2008b). Social upgrading among small
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2012). Applying the Atlanta enterprises and clusters in developing countries—New chal
Agreement on child labour in South Asia. In A. Reed, D. Reed, lenges for governance. Proceedings of the International Asso
& P. Utting (Eds.), Business, non-state regulation and develop ciation for Business and Society, 19, 125-136.
ment. London: Routledge. Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., & Jabbour, C. (2011). Climate change,
Lund-Thomsen, P., Nadvi, K„ Chan, A., Khara, A., & Xue, H. (2012). small enterprises and clusters: Conceptualizing the impacts of
Labor in global value chains: Work conditions in football different governance approaches. Paper presented at SMEs,
manufacturing in China, India, and Pakistan. Development and CSR, and competitiveness, Copenhagen Business School, 12-14
Change, 43(6), 1211-1237. December, Copenhagen.
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Pillay, R. G. (2012). CSR in industrial clusters: Pyke, F. (2010). Towards a new paradigm for developing economic
An overview of the literature. Corporate Governance, 12(A), clusters: Integrating regulatory frameworks, local governance,
568-578. and the community. Geneva: Job Creation and Enterprise
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). "Implicit" and "explicit" CSR: A Department, ILO.
conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of Rathi, A. K. A. (2013). Common environmental infrastructure: Case
corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, study on the management of common effluent treatment plants.
33(2), 404-424. International Journal of Environmental Engineering, 5(1),
Mbohwa, C., Rwakatiwana, P., & Fore, S. (2010). The impact of 93-109.
Sachdeva, A., & Panfil, O. (2008). CSR perceptions and activities of
industrial clusters in greening manufacturing industry practices
in small and medium scale enterprises: The case of the Old small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in seven geographical
Ardbennie Industrial Cluster in Harare, Zimbabwe. International clusters—Survey report. Vienna: United Nations Industrial
Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 2(1), 91-108. Development Organization.
Ê Springe
Schmitz, H, experiences.
(2004). Local In
ente
governance 55(1-2),
and 152-1
upgrading.
Schmitz, H., & Nadvi,
Tewari, K. &
M., (19P
Introduction. compliance
World Develop
in
Scott, J. C. Studies,
(1987). 55(2),
Weapons of
resistance. New Haven,
Vives, A. CT:
(2006
Testa, G., Battaglia,
and M.,
medium & Bi
en
initiatives in Citizenship,
industrial clu
21
•£) Springer