Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Family of Socialist Law by Prabin
The Family of Socialist Law by Prabin
Society starts in condition where no legal system is needed because all property is owned in
common and it develops through the slave owning society, feudal society and then capitalism,
socialism and communism. In communism, there will be no need of law because all economic
contradictions are resolved and all exploitations of man by man will be ended. The state and
legal order will than die away, for they will have no functions left. Thus, law appears as
subsidiary to economic relations indeed derivative from them. It is conceived as lacking in
autonomy.
Role of Law
Marxists differ about the role played by law in the intermediate period, but they view that law is
an essential means of assuring, stabilizing and molding social conditions. The leaders of the
communist party alone have the necessary training and education to organize and develop the
process in accordance with the natural process of social development and to ordain the positive
law appropriate for the current state of social development. Practice of law is tied to this
principle of socialist legality. All these engaged in applying laws, must always act in harmony
with the objective legality of social development as interpreted by communist party. Law has two
functions; repression and education i.e. the double edge of law.
According to Marxist view, the capitalist system perpetuates class exploitation by means of
privately owned means of production. The owner is empowered to exploit other individual or
class. All state apparatus are managed in such a way that will disseminate the ideas of capitalist
system that will help to sustain it. These are the ideological state apparatus disseminating
capitalist ideology. In socialist society, the situation is just opposite, as class antagonism and
exploitation is avoided by socializing the means of production. There is the collective ownership
of the means of production.
Marxists' view that; the history of human-society is the history of class struggle. Its turning point
is marked by the victories of the exploited class. Then the means of production will be owned
collectively and they will be exploited for the common interest. Finally, classless society will be
created and the law will have no relevancy and wither away.
Socialist law, rooted in Marxian philosophy, serves as the legal framework in Communist states,
adapting the civil law system with Marxist-Leninist principles. Rejecting the traditional emphasis
on private property, Socialist Legality asserts that law should propel socialist development.
According to Marx, societal laws derive from the prevailing socio-economic structure, acting as
a superstructure atop the economic sub-structure. Marx's scientific interpretation of history posits
that all concepts, including law and the state, reflect material realities and serve the ruling class.
Economic shifts lead to revolutionary changes in the superstructure, with state and law seen as
interchangeable instruments upholding the ruling class's interests. In the Marxist progression of
society from communal ownership to communism, law's necessity diminishes as economic
contradictions are resolved, and exploitation ends. In communism, the state and law are expected
to wither away, having fulfilled their functions. Thus, law is viewed as subordinate and
derivative, lacking autonomy, and its existence is intricately tied to economic relations. The
foundation of socialist law lies in Marxist-Leninist ideology, underpinned by dialectical and
historical materialism.
In Marxist ideology, the role of law in the transitional period varies among theorists, but it is
universally seen as crucial for assuring, stabilizing, and shaping social conditions. Communist
party leaders, deemed the only ones with the requisite education, organize and develop societal
processes, prescribing positive laws aligned with current social development. The practice of law
is tethered to socialist legality, demanding alignment with the party's interpretation of objective
social development. Law, with its dual functions of repression and education, acts as a tool under
the guidance of the communist party.
In the post-revolutionary era, when the proletariat assumes control of state power through the
communist party, the functions of socialist law undergo a profound transformation. In the
socialist stage, law serves as a tool for constructing a communist, classless society—a departure
from its role under capitalism. Its primary purpose is to facilitate the transition from capitalism to
socialism under the guidance of the new ruling class, the communist party.
The first function of socialist law involves the establishment of collective ownership over the
means of production. This entails categorizing property into private, collective, and state
ownership. Private property includes personal belongings, while collective property encompasses
resources for communal use, such as agricultural enterprises and factories. State property
involves the nationalization of productive land, including larger industries and hospitals.
The second function of socialist law is educative, enlightening individuals about the role of the
state and their responsibilities within the socialist system. Through punitive measures for law
violations, it aims to educate the populace.
The third function is repressive, targeting reactionaries seeking to revive exploitative systems.
Unlike the capitalist legal system, which preserves the status quo, socialist law aims to safeguard
and repress activities harmful to socialist institutions.
In the transitional period marked by the dictatorship of the proletariat, law becomes an
instrument for transforming society towards the communist ideal. It guides this radical shift,
aiming for the eventual emergence of a classless, communist society where the need for state and
law will wither away. Socialist law has been implemented in various socialist countries,
including Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution and in China.
Soviet Law, or Socialist law, emerged in the Soviet Union post the October Revolution of 1917,
influencing many Communist states after World War II. While rooted in the civil law tradition, it
departed significantly from conventional civil law systems. Soviet law upheld state ownership of
means of production, embracing national economic planning over private property.
Distinguishing features included the absence of a civil-criminal law divide, limited civil rights,
and a lack of recourse against the government.
The core purpose of Soviet Law was to aid societal restructuring and advance towards
communism under Communist Party oversight. After the 1917 Revolution, the Soviet authorities
nullified all Tsarist legislation, seeking to establish a socialist system progressing towards
communism. Socialist law, a construct necessitated by the dearth of Marxist legal theory, aimed
to eliminate bourgeois political power, serve as a tool of the state and the people, establish rules
for public order aiding the transition to socialism, and educate citizens in building a communist
social system.
The Soviet legal system, devoid of an adversarial approach, featured judges, procurators, defense
attorneys, and people's assessors. Court proceedings were consistent for civil and criminal cases,
emphasizing truth-seeking over legal rights protection. Equality before the law was theoretically
affirmed, allowing appeals for both defendants and procurators based on perceived harshness or
leniency in sentencing.
Soviet Law guaranteed legal representation, trial in one's native language, and public hearings,
with private sessions at the discretion of the Soviet Government. Amendments aligned legal
provisions with Marxist philosophy during the establishment of the Soviet state, coinciding with
economic collectivization. Soviet law served national security, economic development, and the
eradication of anti-social behavior.
Derived from Roman law and continental European legal systems, Soviet Law prioritized
codification. Primary sources included the collectivization of means of production and the
establishment of proletarian dictatorship. Secondary sources comprised legislation, judicial
decisions, customs, and doctrinal works. Employing an inquisitorial procedure, Soviet law
eschewed the review of legislative actions and rejected the dichotomy between private and
public law. Ownership concepts differed significantly, either limited or absent in private forms,
with collective or state ownership prevailing over the means of production. Ultimately, Soviet
Law represented a unique legal system tailored to the ideological and socio-economic context of
the Soviet Union.
In the People's Republic of China, legal systems have undergone significant modifications due to
market-oriented economic changes, deviating from strict adherence to Marxism. While some
Marxist influences persist, notable deviations are evident. Chinese real estate law, for instance,
features state ownership of land, with a complex system of use rights for structures. Contrary to
the misconception of Deng Xiaoping's reforms privatizing agricultural land, individual farmers
use the land, creating a distinctive tenure system. Despite originating from the Romano-
Germanic legal tradition, socialist law in China exhibits revolutionary characteristics, contrasting
with the static nature of its Western counterparts.
The influence of the socialist legal system is prominently evident in Nepal's legal framework,
aligning with the objective of establishing an egalitarian society. Socialist law, as a tool for
realizing socialism, emphasizes collective ownership of the means of production and the creation
of public enterprises to ensure the right to work and social security. The Constitution of Nepal,
formulated in 2019 B.S., incorporates directive principles of state policies geared towards
establishing an exploitation-free society.
Key legislative measures, such as the Land Reform Act of 2021, demonstrate a socialist
influence by imposing ceilings on land holdings, protecting tenant rights, and preventing land
fragmentation. The Cooperatives Act of 2049 further reflects socialist principles by promoting
the formation of cooperative associations for economic and social development, particularly
benefiting farmers, artisans, individuals with low capital, low-income groups, laborers, landless
and unemployed individuals, and social workers.
The constitutional commitment to socialism is explicit, with Article 4 defining the state as
socialism-oriented. Various articles within the constitution, such as Article 50(3), outline the
objective of developing a socialism-oriented independent and prosperous economy, aiming to
eliminate economic inequality through equitable distribution.
Nepal's legal system, therefore, is distinctly socialism-oriented, with the constitution enshrining
rights and principles that foster equality and social security. Measures such as the right to
equality, protection against exploitation, rights related to education, culture, language,
employment, labor, health, food, and housing underscore the commitment to creating a socially
just society.
In the public service sector, laws like the Civil Service Law, Police Law, and Army Law are
grounded in inclusive principles, reflecting positive discrimination to promote inclusion in the
public sphere. This reflects the enduring impact of socialist legal principles on the development
and implementation of laws in Nepal.